RESEARCH
Peer reviewed scientific video journal
Video encyclopedia of advanced research methods
Visualizing science through experiment videos
EDUCATION
Video textbooks for undergraduate courses
Visual demonstrations of key scientific experiments
BUSINESS
Video textbooks for business education
OTHERS
Interactive video based quizzes for formative assessments
Products
RESEARCH
JoVE Journal
Peer reviewed scientific video journal
JoVE Encyclopedia of Experiments
Video encyclopedia of advanced research methods
EDUCATION
JoVE Core
Video textbooks for undergraduates
JoVE Science Education
Visual demonstrations of key scientific experiments
JoVE Lab Manual
Videos of experiments for undergraduate lab courses
BUSINESS
JoVE Business
Video textbooks for business education
Solutions
Language
English
Menu
Menu
Menu
Menu
Research Article
Erratum Notice
Important: There has been an erratum issued for this article. View Erratum Notice
Retraction Notice
The article Assisted Selection of Biomarkers by Linear Discriminant Analysis Effect Size (LEfSe) in Microbiome Data (10.3791/61715) has been retracted by the journal upon the authors' request due to a conflict regarding the data and methodology. View Retraction Notice
Reliable and accurate forms of field-deployable DNA analysis are crucial for many industries. This paper offers two methods for environmental microbial analysis in the field: 1) the isolation of microbial DNA from environmental samples using a biological extraction field kit, and 2) the analysis of DNA via the field qPCR unit.
As quantitative PCR (qPCR) is adopted more widely across industries, the capacity to extract and analyze DNA in remote settings without logistical hurdles is becoming essential. One clear example is the need for straightforward tools to quantify contaminant-degrading bacteria at remote sites affected by train derailments or petroleum releases, enabling timely assessment of risk and environmental impact. To reliably achieve this, the processes must be portable and lightweight, user-friendly for non-scientists, resistant to contamination, and capable of delivering rapid results while still maintaining rigorous quality control. Although options for both nucleic acid extraction and qPCR analysis outside of the laboratory have existed for years, only recently have advances in technology enabled the development of field-deployable systems capable of reliable and accurate performance. In this study, we demonstrate the use of a field DNA extraction kit coupled with portable qPCR instruments under realistic environmental conditions. Field trials conducted at ambient outdoor temperatures of approximately 30 °C demonstrated DNA yields and amplification efficiencies comparable to those obtained in controlled laboratory settings. Importantly, results obtained in the field demonstrated equivalent sensitivity and reproducibility, confirming that portable workflows can provide high-quality data without the need for conventional laboratory infrastructure. These findings highlight the potential for decentralized molecular analyses that expand the reach of qPCR into remote and resource-limited settings while maintaining the accuracy and reliability required for decision-making.
When considering molecular biological analyses, like qPCR, there are several limitations for sample management. A clear example is the demand for simple, reliable tools to quantify contaminant-degrading bacteria at remote sites impacted by train derailments or petroleum releases, supporting timely evaluation of environmental risk and impact1,2,3,4,5. The primary limitation is that no matter how cold you keep the sample, microbial communities can (and will) shift over time6,7. To ensure data accurately reflects the original environment from which the samples were collected, it is recommended that the DNA be extracted from those samples within 24 h8. For an engineer collecting microbial samples on an offshore oil platform, or a scientist deep in the interior of a rain forest, this timeline is not feasible. Getting a water or soil sample from one of these remote locations to a shipping company within the same day and then overnighting to a laboratory (all while maintaining refrigeration), where the DNA can then be extracted prior to analysis, is simply impossible.
Once the DNA is extracted, the clock stops, and the sample's entire genetic information is preserved indefinitely with proper storage techniques9. This makes extracted DNA incredibly unique compared to the vast majority of chemical, metallurgical, and biological samples - most of which have a limited shelf life. Archived DNA can be retrieved years or decades later and analyzed for new targets on new platforms. For this reason, it is crucial that the extracted DNA truly represents the original microbial community, and not the altered one from delayed transit.
Additionally, the requirement of a laboratory to extract and analyze the samples greatly limits both flexibility and consistency in sampling programs. The cost of logistics alone can be prohibitory for certain projects10. The ability to analyze samples, accurately quantifying genetic targets of interest within hours or even minutes of sampling, opens many doors for environmental projects around the globe.
NOTE: The following protocol was performed using a Bio-Extract Kit (biological extraction field kit) and the FieldQuant qPCR (Field-based qPCR).
1. Biomass sampling from groundwater and a DNA isolation protocol using an encapsulated filter and a biological extraction field kit
2. Field-based qPCR analysis protocol using a field qPCR unit
NOTE: The field-based qPCR instrument and the phone that controls the instrument rely on rechargeable batteries. Ensure that both are fully charged before traveling to the field.
DNA extraction from representative environmental samples was performed using both the biological extraction field kit and a highly validated laboratory-based method previously described4. As shown in Figure 4, successful completion of DNA isolation using the field kit was confirmed when comparing qPCR results to a highly validated laboratory-based extraction method. This consistency confirms that the method preserved the DNA integrity of environmental samples in the field.
The components of the field qPCR kit are shown in Figure 5. Analysis of a standard culture dilution of Dehalococcoides (DHC) using the field qPCR unit was performed at both indoor (21 °C) and outdoor (30 °C) temperatures to illustrate the robustness of the instrument under real-world field conditions. The results, seen in Figure 6, highlight the low deviation for 10 different repetitions of each. For full context, DHC is an organism capable of degrading chlorinated solvents and is commonly quantified via qPCR within the environmental remediation industry4.
To validate the precision of the instruments, DHC was analyzed at three different concentrations using ten field qPCR instruments performed in duplicates (Figure 7). Even at low abundances, the relative standard deviation remained low (below 5%) across all runs. Note that, compared to standard deviation, relative standard deviation is important for logarithmic data as it normalizes the results through the following equation:

Where RSD is Relative Standard Deviation, σ is the standard deviation of the dataset, and µ is the mean of the dataset.
Together, both methods within this paper provide reproducible results across replicate field extractions and qPCR assays. The agreement between field and laboratory extractions and qPCR analysis demonstrates that reliable, high-quality data can be obtained without reliance on laboratory infrastructure, enabling microbial analyses to be carried out in remote or resource-limited environments.

Figure 1: Encapsulated filter kit components. The encapsulated filter is used to filter biomass out of the water sample. By connecting to a peristaltic pump via tubing, water is pushed through the filter. After notating the total volume of water, the water is discarded and the biomass collected on the filter is ready for DNA extraction. Components: a. sterile tube that holds the filter and components before and after use, b. inlet cap, c. hose clamp, d. luer-locking tubing connection adapter, e. encapsulated filter, f. rubber outlet cap. Image used with permission from Microbial Insights, Inc.12. Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.

Figure 2: Filter and tubing connection. The tubing is pushed over the luer-locking tubing connection adapter and is held in place using the hose clamp. The other end of the tubing is connected to a peristaltic pump (this connection and the pump operation are outside the scope of this protocol). Image used with permission from Microbial Insights, Inc.12. Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.

Figure 3: DNA isolation field kit components. All components are sterile prior to use. The components include: (1) encapsulated filter kit (see Figure 1 for more details), (2) 3 mL syringe, (3) 1 mL syringe pre-loaded with Solution A, capped, (4) 1 mL syringe pre-loaded with Solution B, capped, (5) 3 mL syringe, (6) silicone bead tube, (7) 1 mL syringe fitted with isolation column, (8) 1 mL disposable transfer pipette, (9) DNA isolation sample prep cartridge, (10) 1.5 mL microcentrifuge tube. Not pictured: parafilm squares for sealing during shaking, and alcohol prep wipes used to clean the surface used for extraction. Image used with permission from Microbial Insights, Inc.12. Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.

Figure 4: Field extraction comparison using real-world samples. Comparative qPCR results of DNA isolated from two representative samples using a laboratory method (red bars) versus the biological extraction field kit (blue bars). These were not analyzed in replicate, as would be expected in a standard qPCR analysis. Gene targets (x-axis) show abundance (y-axis) within an order of magnitude for both methods. Information on each specific gene target is not included as it is outside of the scope of this paper. Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.

Figure 5: Field-based qPCR instrument and components. The components include: A. The Field-based qPCR instrument, B. sample prep tray, C. assay strip containing lyophilized reagents, D. phone pre-loaded with application used to run the instrument. Image used with permission from Microbial Insights, Inc.12. Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.

Figure 6: Demonstration of field qPCR robustness. Dehalococcoides (DHC) standard analyzed in ten replicates under outdoor (30 °C, red bars) and indoor (21 °C, blue bars) temperature conditions, highlighting the reliability of the instrument for the field. Replicate run number is listed along the x-axis and the calculated DHC abundance is listed along the y-axis. The Inside (20 °C) mean was calculated to be 4.92 × 10² cell/mL, SD = 1.14 × 10² cells/mL (n = 10), and the Outside (30 °C) mean was calculated to be 5.89 × 10² cells/mL, SD = 1.80 × 10² cell/mL (n = 10). Measurements obtained at 20 °C and 30 °C did not differ significantly (Welch's t-test, p = 0.17). Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.

Figure 7: Demonstration of field qPCR precision. Precision performance between 10 different instruments, run in duplicate at three different standard concentrations. The true value and replicate number (n = 2 for 10 instruments at each standard concentration) is listed along the x-axis, with colored bars specific to the field unit. The y-axis shows the calculated abundance for each run. Percent relative standard deviation for each standard concentration is shown in the dotted lines above the bars. Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.
A critical feature of this protocol is that it enables microbial DNA extraction and qPCR analysis under field conditions without the need for laboratory infrastructure or electricity12. The method has been optimized to balance portability with reliability, providing reproducible results that are consistent with laboratory-based workflows even when performed outdoors under a range of ambient temperatures12. The suggested range of use is 4 °C to 95 °C (39 °F to 104 °F), and side-by-side comparison at standard outdoor temperatures (30 °C, 86 °F) for a field crew show reliable consistency (Figure 6). This consistency is essential to ensure that field results are interpretable alongside laboratory datasets.
Several steps are crucial for protocol success. During the extraction process, complete removal of liquid from filters and thorough mixing of reagents are important to ensure efficient lysis and DNA recovery. Likewise, careful transfer of lysate into the sample prep cartridge while minimizing bead carryover is key to preventing clogging or column failure. Troubleshooting strategies include slowing plunger depression to reduce back-pressure and repeating syringe pumping if viscous lysates impede fluid movement. For qPCR, avoiding bubbles in assay wells and ensuring complete pellet resuspension are critical to accurate amplification.
Despite its advantages, the method has limitations. DNA yields may be lower than those achieved with benchtop centrifugation-based kits, and highly turbid or organic-rich samples can challenge column performance. Although the isolation kits are simple and easy for anyone to use - including users with no previous laboratory experience - there is additional risk of error when comparing an inexperienced person in the field. Additionally, while the field qPCR unit provides rapid results, it is restricted to a limited number of simultaneous reactions (currently limited to 9 gene targets per run) compared to standard thermocyclers. These limitations are offset, however, by the speed of analysis and the ability to capture microbial community profiles in the field. There is no inherent limitation on what qPCR targets can be analyzed besides the catalog of the laboratory that offers the unit.
The significance of this method lies in its capacity to mobilize molecular analyses, enabling real-time monitoring of microbial populations in environments such as oilfields, agricultural sites, or remote ecosystems. By preserving DNA integrity at the point of sampling and generating results on-site, this approach reduces logistical barriers, enhances data quality, and allows rapid decision-making. Future applications may include pathogen surveillance in public health, monitoring of bioremediation progress, or microbial risk assessment in water systems. With minor modifications, the platform can be continually adapted for additional molecular targets and emerging qPCR assays.
Authors are employed by Microbial Insights, which owns the intellectual property for both FieldQuant and Bio-Extract.
Funding and support for this work were provided by Microbial Insights, Inc.
| 5/16" silicon tubing | Amazon (www.amazon.com) | 796753613221 | Alternate models may be acceptable |
| Coolers | Staples (www.staples.com) | 24299978 | Alternate models may be acceptable |
| DNA Isolation Field Kit | Microbial Insights, Inc. | https://microbe.com/bio-extract/ | Proprietary |
| Field qPCR Unit with Accessories | Microbial Insights, Inc. | https://microbe.com/fieldquant/ | Proprietary |
| Gloves | Amazon (www.amazon.com) | Depends on size | Alternate models may be acceptable |
| Groundwater filters | Microbial Insights, Inc. | https://microbe.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/08/MI-Sampling-US-01.02-bio-flo_dna_mi.pdf | |
| Ice | Local convenience store | NA | |
| Kamoer DIP1500 peristaltic Pump 24 V 1500 mL/min hig | Amazon (www.amazon.com) | 701705886813 | Alternate models may be acceptable |
| Needlenose Pliers | Amazon (www.amazon.com) | 762983170575 | Alternate models may be acceptable |
| Paper towels | Staples (www.staples.com) | 2126874 | Alternate models may be acceptable |
| Safety glasses | Amazon (www.amazon.com) | B0BNHKWR6W | Alternate models may be acceptable |
| Sharpie Fine Tip Marker | Amazon (www.amazon.com) | 71641300033 | Alternate models may be acceptable |