A subscription to JoVE is required to view this content. Sign in or start your free trial.

Method Article

Enhancing an Avian Sound Recognition Model's Detection Precision via Logistic Regression of Large Acoustic Datasets: A Case Study of the European Robin (Erithacus rubecula)

473 views

⸱

DOI:

10.3791/70479

⸱

April 11th, 2026

In This Article

Summary

The goal of this protocol is to determine species- and site-specific confidence score thresholds using logistic regression to improve detection precision in large acoustic datasets processed with automated acoustic recognition software.

Abstract

Passive acoustic monitoring (PAM) has become an invaluable tool for biodiversity research, enabling the non-invasive collection of vast datasets. However, a significant challenge remains in efficiently and reliably processing this large volume of data to extract species-specific information across varying locations. This paper presents a detailed, step-by-step protocol to address this challenge using a machine learning detector module within a bioacoustics analysis software. The methodology is designed to accurately and confidently identify and validate bird vocalisations from raw acoustic recordings.

Our protocol details the process from initial data collection using autonomous recording units (ARUs) to the final generation of a high-quality annotated dataset. Key steps include configuring the machine learning detector module to generate initial detections, a manual validation procedure to calculate precision tables, and a logistic regression analysis to determine a species-specific and, where appropriate, a location-specific confidence score threshold. This statistically derived threshold is then used to refine the detector’s output, tested on two overlap configurations (0 s and 2 s). We show that applying the derived optimal confidence score thresholds substantially improves the machine learning-based avian sound recognition models detection precision across sites. For the three sites used to illustrate the process (Liverpool Park, Cairngorms, and Glasgow Suburban) precision increased by 26.1%, 17.7%, and 17% for an overlap of 0 s, and by 28.77%, 16.87%, and 15% for an overlap of 2 s. We suggest the resulting methodology is superior to manual counting methods in both speed and reliability. In summary, this paper provides a reproducible framework that facilitates the accessible and effective use of machine learning approaches in bioacoustics, enabling researchers to confidently leverage large acoustic datasets for ecological studies and parameter analysis.

Introduction

Animal vocalisations offer valuable insights into the natural world and act as powerful biological tools allowing researchers to investigate various aspects of animals lives1. The field of bioacoustics has become increasingly important in biodiversity monitoring and conservation, aiding in species identification and in assessing population trends and ecosystem health2,3,4. This field of research also contributes to our understanding of animal behaviour, for example, in communication and habitat use5,....

Access restricted. Please log in or start a trial to view this content.

Protocol

Ethics statement
This protocol follows the ethical guidelines of Liverpool John Moores University. Methodology involved passive acoustic monitoring only, and did not include the handling, disturbance, or experimental manipulation of animals. No hazardous procedures were required to deploy the ARUs. ARUs were deployed in accordance with institutional research and fieldwork guidelines, and appropriate signage was installed at recording sites to inform the public of acoustic monitoring. However, it is highly advised to check weather forecasts before conducting field activity, and to conduct a risk assessment for each field site.

Access restricted. Please log in or start a trial to view this content.

Results

To illustrate the effectiveness of the described protocol, we present representative results from the analysis of acoustic data for the European Robin (Erithacus rubecula) collected at three sites of varying environments and avian species assemblages, including a park in Liverpool (ARU 1), a naturally regenerating woodland site within The Cairngorms National Park (ARU 2), and a suburban site in Glasgow (ARU 3). These examples demonstrate how applying statistically derived confidence score thresholds can improve .......

Access restricted. Please log in or start a trial to view this content.

Discussion

The use of the protocol outlined in this paper provides a reliable, streamlined method for generating species-specific and accurately classified datasets of bird vocalisations, which has proven useful when handling large audio datasets. We chose to test the protocol on the European Robin due to its well-known structural and frequency variability within its song repertoires43. Meaning initially, detections were found to have high mislabelling (false positive) rates (Table 1). We al.......

Access restricted. Please log in or start a trial to view this content.

Disclosures

Authors have no competing financial interest.

Acknowledgements

We thank Liverpool John Moore’s University for guidance and resources. We also thank the Wild Animal Initiative (WAI) for funding support, this research was funded by WAI grants (S-2023–00038).

....

Access restricted. Please log in or start a trial to view this content.

Materials

List of materials used in this article
NameCompanyCatalog NumberComments
Autonomous Recording Units v1.2.0Open Acoustic DevicesN/AAutonomous recording unit (ARU)
Bioacoustics Analysis Software v1.6.5Cornell Lab of OrnithologyRRID:SCR_016190Sound analysis software
Data Transfer CableVarious ManufacturersN/AUsed to transfer data from devices
Device Configuration ApplicationsOpen Acoustic DevicesN/AApps for configuring AudioMoths
Machine Learning Detector Module v2.4Cornell Lab of OrnithologyN/AMachine learning detector 
Rechargeable Alkaline BatteriesVarious ManufacturersN/APower supply for recording units
Removable Memory CardsVarious ManufacturersN/AData storage for recordings
Statistical Computing SoftwareR Core TeamRRID:SCR_001905Statistical computing software

References

  1. Briefer, E. F. Vocal expression of emotions in mammals: Mechanisms of production and evidence. J Zool. 288 (1), 1-20 (2012).
  2. Changapur, M. W., Seema, S., Sowmya, B. J. Bioacoustics monitoring to improve conservation efforts for endangered species. 2023 7th International Conference on Computation System and Information Technology for Sustainable Solutions (CSITSS), , IEEE. (2023).
  3. Sebastián-González, E., Pang-Ching, J., Barbosa, J. M., Hart....

Access restricted. Please log in or start a trial to view this content.

Reprints and Permissions

Tags

European Robin DetectionPassive Acoustic MonitoringMachine Learning DetectorBioacoustics AnalysisAutonomous Recording UnitsConfidence Score Threshold