Human pluripotent stem cell (hPSC) technology is an easily scalable and renewable source of human cells that can be differentiated into any cell type in the body, allowing researchers to investigate cell and tissue types that are hard to obtain or inaccessible in patients. Further, induced pluripotent stem cells (iPSCs) can be derived directly from patient somatic cells1. This allows for the differentiation of patient-specific cell types of interest, an invaluable tool for disease modeling and drug discovery. Thus, rigorous, reproducible and successful methods to reprogram somatic cells into iPSCs are critical.
Fibroblasts, urine cells, and blood cells2,3, each with their own limitations, are some of the most frequently used somatic cell sources for iPSC derivation. Fibroblasts, historically the most popular choice for reprogramming3, are not very easily obtained, requiring a somewhat invasive skin biopsy. Reprogrammable cells can be derived from urine samples, which are easy to obtain and non-invasive, but the reprogramming process must begin with fresh samples up to 48 h after collection4. Blood offers a great source for reprogrammable cells, as it is minimally invasive to obtain and readily available. There are many available reprogramming protocols from peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs), blood cells with a single nucleus including lymphocytes, monocytes and natural killer cells5. Because PBMCs are less dense than other blood cells, they can be isolated/purified from freshly isolated whole blood samples through density gradient centrifugation5. Alternatively, upon centrifugation, whole blood separates into three distinct layers: plasma, buffy coat, and red blood cells6. Buffy coats contain PBMCs as well as platelets and some erythrocytes. However, PBMCs are less readily available in most biobanks, whereas whole blood or buffy coats are abundant and accessible7. Despite the availability of buffy coats in biobanks and the presence of reprogrammable PBMCs in these samples, very few protocols detail reprogramming from frozen buffy coats8, leaving this an untapped resource.
Currently, there are many published protocols1,8,9 and commercially available kits10 to streamline reprogramming; however, they do not deeply troubleshoot how to maximize success for patient donor cells that are hard to reprogram. It is commonly accepted that some cells just won’t reprogram, and when this happens, many researchers may try with a different donor cell type or a different patient. However, this may not be a viable option for many researchers or patient populations. Unlike previously published protocols8,9, this protocol includes a guide with check points and criteria, based on which to predict reprogramming success and takes a unique approach by purifying frozen buffy coats with density gradient centrifugation upon thawing.
The process begins with drawing blood from chosen individuals and isolating either PBMCs or buffy coats. For new experiments, this is likely to include recruiting new donors who will undergo fresh blood draws under IRB approval and with a proper consent form. The next step is somatic cell expansion, in which frozen blood cells are thawed and cultured under conditions that promote the proliferation of hematopoietic stem cells and erythroid progenitors, the blood cells that are the best candidates for reprogramming11. After 10–14 days, cells should be ready for reprogramming, as evidenced by a distinct morphology which is not discussed in previous protocols, and are then transduced by inoculation with a Sendai virus carrying the Yamanaka factors Oct4, Sox2, c-Myc, and Klf41. Following transduction, cells will begin expressing the Yamanaka transcription factors and will return to a pluripotent state, again denoted by a distinct morphological change and proliferation into stem cell colonies. Emerging colonies are then individually picked, expanded, and cryopreserved. After ten passages, characterization by confirmation of expression of stemness markers and differentiation potential into the three germ layers validates a successfully reprogrammed iPSC line.
This protocol works best for cryopreserved buffy coats, which have been stored for < 1 month, or cryopreserved PBMCs stored for up to 2 years with at least 1 million viable cells upon thawing. However, the described checkpoints may help guide troubleshooting reprogramming from any quality blood sample. Additionally, details about adapting reprogrammed iPSCs to feeder-free conditions can be applicable to any iPSC reprogramming workflow, regardless of starting somatic cell type.
This protocol, established through hands-on troubleshooting, details reprogramming iPSCs from frozen buffy coats and identifies morphological indicators of reprogramming success, providing a workable guide to reprogramming difficult samples. Ultimately, implementing these strategies results in conservation of time, money, reagents, and samples.