An attractive smile constitutes a fundamental component in the development and enhancement of interpersonal relationships, holding significant importance for both adults and children. Therefore, esthetics has become a central focus in contemporary dentistry1. Tooth discoloration is one of the major factors that adversely affect dental esthetics, and its occurrence is closely associated with dietary patterns and oral hygiene habits. Frequent consumption of soft drinks, especially among children, contributes to tooth discoloration due to the presence of aromatic additives such as chocolate, grape, and strawberry flavorings2. Tunç et al.3 reported that the staining potential of children's beverages varies according to their composition, pH, and other characteristics, with grape juice and cola causing greater tooth discoloration compared to distilled water.
In recent years, fruit juices have increasingly been perceived as a healthier alternative to carbonated beverages and are frequently preferred by parents for children's daily consumption. However, despite their nutritional value, these beverages contain chromogenic compounds, natural pigments, and acidic components that may contribute to extrinsic tooth discoloration and enamel surface alterations. Their frequent intake during early childhood may therefore represent an underrecognized risk factor for esthetic changes in the primary dentition4,5,6.
Colorants present in children's fruit juices can either deposit on tooth surfaces or penetrate the organic phase during adsorption and absorption, and those adhering to the surface may be partially or totally removed through toothbrushing7. Sarembe et al.8 demonstrated that while brushing with toothpaste enhances stain removal effectiveness, it does not alter the relative staining potential of the tested dietary substances. Toothbrushing has been reported to have a positive influence on reducing discoloration caused by beverages on restorative materials commonly used in pediatric dentistry1,7,8. However, no study has investigated the effect of fluoridated and non-fluoridated toothpastes on discoloration caused by fruit juices commonly consumed by children.
Fluoride-containing toothpastes have been shown to promote remineralization and enhance enamel resistance to acid challenges, potentially modifying surface roughness and porosity. Changes in enamel surface characteristics may, in turn, influence the adhesion and retention of staining agents. In contrast, non-fluoridated formulations may provide mechanical plaque and stain removal without altering enamel mineral dynamics9,10. Evaluating their comparative effectiveness may therefore provide insight into the preventive role of fluoride in controlling extrinsic discoloration in primary teeth.
Color perception is a complex phenomenon that depends on individual physiological and psychological factors, leading to variations among observers. Because the limits of perceivable and acceptable color differences are not identical, the use of objective assessment techniques is preferred1. Several approaches can be applied to determine the color of teeth or restorative materials, including visual shade comparison, spectrophotometric measurement, colorimetry, spectroradiometry, and digital image-based analyses11. Among these options, the spectrophotometer is commonly employed, as it enables accurate and reproducible color evaluation by quantifying the reflection or absorption of light at different wavelengths by the tested surface7.
Although previous studies have examined beverage-induced discoloration in restorative materials and permanent teeth1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12, the impact of fluoridated and non-fluoridated toothpastes on fruit juice–induced discoloration in primary teeth has not yet been evaluated. It is important to distinguish the mechanisms of discoloration between restorative materials and natural enamel. While restorative materials primarily undergo discoloration due to water sorption and matrix degradation, enamel discoloration is largely driven by the adsorption of chromogens onto the acquired pellicle and diffusion into the hydroxyapatite structure13. Furthermore, primary enamel differs significantly from permanent enamel in terms of structure and composition, which influences its interaction with extrinsic stains. Primary enamel is less mineralized, more porous, and has a lower microhardness compared to permanent enamel. The hydroxyapatite crystals in primary enamel are smaller and less tightly packed, creating a surface that may be more susceptible to rapid pigment diffusion and retention compared to permanent teeth2,9.
Therefore, this protocol may be particularly useful for researchers aiming to investigate extrinsic discoloration processes in primary teeth and to evaluate the effectiveness of preventive oral hygiene interventions. This study aims to quantitatively assess the extent of discoloration caused by fruit juices that are commonly and safely consumed by children—orange, black mulberry, and pomegranate—on primary teeth, and to evaluate the comparative effect of brushing with fluoridated versus non-fluoridated toothpastes in reducing these color changes.