This research constitutes a concept analysis derived solely from existing literature and publicly accessible sources (including PubMed, CINAHL, Medline, Embase, Web of Science, and Scopus). The study did not include the collection or analysis of individual patient data, medical records, CT scan data, or any identifiable human information. Consequently, ethical approval (IRB approval) and informed patient consent were not necessary for this study. No ethics committee review was sought, in accordance with institutional and national research guidelines (Table of Materials).
Study design
This investigation applies Rodgers' evolutionary conceptual analysis methodology9. Emphasizing the evolution of concepts across time and contexts, this approach deepens comprehension and highlights the progression of HBPC strategies for patients with HF. Key steps include contextualizing the primary concept, identifying related concepts, structuring them into a model, and assessing the model's validity within theoretical frameworks9,29.
Data sources and search strategy
Data were drawn from professional literature spanning 1990 to 2025, including qualitative and quantitative studies, reviews, and book chapters. A comprehensive literature search was conducted across relevant databases, including PubMed, CINAHL, Medline, Embase, Web of Science, and Scopus, to identify research addressing the concept of HBPC-HF. Search terms, developed and refined with the support of a professional librarian, included "home-based palliative care" and "heart failure," along with related terms such as "cardiac insufficiency/congestive heart failure" and "home palliative care/home palliative treatment/family hospice care." The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines were adhered to and implemented where applicable 30. A total of 101 abstracts were screened for relevance, from which 30 articles were identified and obtained for full-text assessment. Following the exclusion of 3 conference proceedings, 5 case reports, and 4 articles with unavailable full texts, 18 publications focusing on HBPC-HF and 4 articles from reference lists were retained for inclusion (Figure 1). The final search was executed on 15 March 2025, with the exact search string: ("home-based palliative care" OR "home palliative care" OR "home palliative treatment" OR "family hospice care") AND ("heart failure" OR "cardiac insufficiency" OR "congestive heart failure"). Search limits were applied to include only peer-reviewed, English-language literature focused on adult (≥18 years) patient populations.
Study selection
All retrieved records underwent a two-stage screening process. The initial step involved reviewing titles and abstracts for their relevance to home-based palliative care in heart failure. Subsequently, full-text articles were evaluated for eligibility. Conference abstracts, case reports, and articles lacking an accessible full text were excluded from the study. Research involving adult patients with heart failure who are receiving palliative care in home environments was deemed eligible for inclusion. Disputes concerning eligibility were addressed through dialogue and consensus. To mitigate potential bias from single-reviewer screening, a 10% random sample of abstracts was independently dual-screened by a second reviewer, with 100% inter-rater agreement; uncertain full-text eligibility was adjudicated via team consensus.
Data extraction
Data were systematically extracted from the included studies using a standardized extraction form created in Microsoft Excel. The extracted information encompassed the publication year, study design, definitions of home-based palliative care, identified attributes, antecedents, consequences, contextual factors, and implications for nursing practice. This systematic method guaranteed uniformity and thoroughness in data collection throughout the studies.
Quality appraisal
The methodological quality of the studies included was evaluated utilizing the Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI) critical appraisal tools, which were chosen based on the study design. Each study underwent assessment for methodological rigor, clarity of reporting, and relevance to the research objective. Only studies evaluated as moderate to high quality were included for synthesis to ensure the robustness of the conceptual analysis. A second independent reviewer verified quality ratings for 30% of included studies, with no discrepancies in final quality categorization, to minimize single-reviewer appraisal bias. Pre-specified quality thresholds were applied: studies were categorized as high quality if they met ≥80% of applicable JBI checklist criteria, moderate quality if they met 50–79% of criteria, and low quality if they met <50% of criteria.
Data synthesis and analysis
Data synthesis was performed using iterative comparison and thematic analysis, following Rodgers' evolutionary method. Attributes, antecedents, and consequences were systematically compared across studies to discern patterns, similarities, and differences. The elements were integrated to develop a revised conceptual model of home-based palliative care for heart failure. The framework was refined through iterative review to ensure logical coherence and theoretical consistency.