A subscription to JoVE is required to view this content. Sign in or start your free trial.

Method Article

Evaluations of Oxygenation and Vascular Perfusion in Pre-Clinical Models of Cancer and Wound Healing Using OS-DCE OAI

276 views

DOI:

10.3791/70689

April 7th, 2026

In This Article

Summary

Here, we present a protocol for performing Oxygen Sensitive – Dynamic Contrast Enhanced Optoacoustic Imaging (OS-DCE OAI) for evaluating pre-clinical models of cancer and wound healing. OS OAI can image oxy‑ and deoxyhemoglobin, mapping tissue oxygenation. DCE-OAI can image the pharmacokinetics of an exogenous contrast agent, thereby mapping vascular perfusion.

Abstract

Oxygen-sensitive optoacoustic imaging (OS OAI) and dynamic contrast–enhanced optoacoustic imaging (DCE OAI) provide complementary, noninvasive readouts of tissue physiology. OS OAI leverages multispectral detection of endogenous oxyhemoglobin and deoxyhemoglobin to generate maps of blood oxygen saturation (%sO₂), while DCE OAI tracks the in vivo pharmacokinetics of a near-infrared absorber to quantify vascular perfusion and permeability. The goal of this protocol is to present a unified OS-DCE OAI workflow that enables simultaneous assessment of oxygenation and perfusion in two widely used pre-clinical settings: orthotopic breast cancer tumors and full-thickness cutaneous wounds.

In this protocol, we demonstrated OAI of mouse models of breast cancer or a laceration wound. For OS OAI, multi-slice multispectral scans are acquired at 700–875 nm to allow spectral unmixing and estimation of %sO₂. For DCE OAI, repeated acquisitions at ≤5-s temporal resolution are performed before and after intravenous bolus injection of indocyanine green (ICG), using either multispectral sampling at 700-875 nm or single-wavelength sampling at 800 nm to generate time versus OA signal amplitude curves. The development of animal models, preparation for OA imaging, OS OAI and DCE OAI acquisitions, and analyses to measure characteristics of oxygenation and vascular perfusion are detailed, along with key troubleshooting guidance for motion artifacts, superficial absorbers, and failed injections.

Together, this OS-DCE OAI protocol yields an integrated functional portrait of hypoxia and vascular transport that can detect physiological changes in tumors and wounds earlier than gross anatomical measures. OS-DCE OAI is readily adaptable to other disease models.

Introduction

Optoacoustic imaging (OAI), also referred to as photoacoustic imaging or multispectral optoacoustic tomography, is a relatively new modality that couples optical excitation with ultrasound (US) detection to enable deep tissue imaging1,2. In OAI, brief nanosecond laser pulses excite endogenous chromophores such as oxy- and deoxyhemoglobin, producing localized thermoelastic expansion and wideband acoustic waves that are detected by US transducers. These signals enable OAI to yield images with optical contrast at ultrasound-like spatial resolution while achieving centimeter-scale depth of view in vivo. When data are acquired at multiple wavelengths and analyzed with spectral unmixing, Oxygen Sensitive (OS) OAI can estimate relative concentrations of oxy- and deoxyhemoglobin and thereby infer tissue oxygen saturation (%sO₂)2. Blood oxygen saturation provides a functional evaluation of microvascular physiology that is difficult to access noninvasively with other methods.

Vascular perfusion is also useful for evaluations of microvascular physiology. Vascular perfusion represents a combination of vascular flow, permeability, and vessel surface area3. To quantify perfusion, OAI can be used with an exogenous contrast agent to perform Dynamic Contrast Enhanced OAI (DCE OAI). In this approach, temporal imaging before, during, and after contrast agent injection monitors the pharmacokinetics (PK) of the agent. These results can be modeled to measure the wash-in rate (NKtrans) from the blood plasma compartment to the tumor extracellular extravascular compartment, and washout rate (kep) from the tumor extracellular extravascular compartment to the plasma compartment. We have developed a PK modeling method that avoids the notorious problem of light fluence (i.e., scattering and absorbance in tissues that cause variable radiant energy through the tissue)4. Our method normalizes the change in dynamic OAI signal from 0% (pre-injection) to 100% (maximum enhancement) and then uses differential equations to estimate NKtrans wash-in rate and the kep. Other DCE OAI studies have used standard PK modeling methods that suffer from the major assumption that light fluence is uniform throughout the tissue5,6.

DCE OAI results can also be used to assess wash-in rates by making empirical measurements of Maximum Signal Enhancement (MSE), Time-to-Peak (TTP) to reach MSE, slope (typically for injection to TTP), and Initial Area Under the Curve (IAUC; again typically for injection to TTP post-injection)7. It should be noted that if the TTP occurs later in the PK curve, the slope or IAUC can be taken during the linear portion of the curve or from the time of injection to 1 min post-injection. We have shown that empirical measurements can also be useful when evaluating treatments administered to tumor models or when evaluating wound healing8,9. Other studies have also shown value in using empirical measurements to evaluate tumor vascular permeability and liver fibrosis10,11. The shape of the PK curve can also be used to qualitatively categorize tumor vascular perfusion as high or low12,13,14.

In addition, the OAI signal at a single post-injection time point can be used as an empirical evaluation of perfusion, known as non-dynamic Contrast Enhanced OAI (CE OAI)15. A CE OA image that shows a bright tumor or wound is simplistic and highly visual and yet is often only used for a qualitative assessment of high vs. low perfusion. In general, the dynamic change in OAI signals after TTP is not analyzed to empirically evaluate vascular perfusion in tumors. However, as shown below, the wash-in rates in wounds are extremely fast, so that NKtrans, TTP, slope, and IAUC are challenging to measure. Therefore, we have used the linear or exponential slope of the washout phase as an empirical measure of vascular perfusion in wounds9.

Most OAI agents absorb in the near-infrared (NIR) wavelength range, which can penetrate deeper into tissues16,17. However, water absorption at wavelengths greater than 900 nm limits the usable in vivo OAI wavelength range to 700–900 nm for most applications2. Indocyanine green (ICG) is a prototypical DCE OAI agent because it offers strong NIR absorption at 780–800 nm, produces a moderately strong OAI signal, and has favorable biocompatibility with FDA approval for clinical use. These features enable intravascular contrast and interpretable PK curves.

We have developed a combined OS-DCE OAI protocol to evaluate oxygenation and vascular perfusion in pre-clinical models of solid tumors and wounds8,9. The OS portion of this protocol can evaluate oxygenation in multiple imaging slices that can cover entire tumor and wound volumes in mouse models. The DCE portion of our protocol has an option to image a single slice of the tumor or wound using multiple laser wavelengths (improving the accuracy of contrast agent detection), or to image as many as 5 slices with a single laser wavelength (improving spatial coverage). We have used OS-DCE OAI to monitor the change in oxygenation and vascular perfusion after treating a tumor model with radiotherapy or with combretastatin A4 phosphate, a vascular disrupting agent4,8. We have also used OS-DCE OAI to monitor wound healing9. DCE OAI gives OAI the ability to monitor progression via vascular perfusion that can be applied to a variety of diseases.

Access restricted. Please log in or start a trial to view this content.

Protocol

Conduct all procedures under the approval of the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee (IACUC) of your institution. All procedures in the protocol below were approved by the IACUC of our institution.

1. Anesthesia (for subsequent procedures)

  1. Induce anesthesia. Initially induce and maintain anesthesia with 5% isoflurane in 100% oxygen carrier gas until the mouse is no longer awake.
  2. Maintain anesthesia. Continue to anesthetize the mouse with 1.5–2% isoflurane in 100% oxygen carrier gas. Verify the absence of pedal reflex.
  3. Maintain normothermia. Make sure to maintain animals on a warm surface and monitor temperature throughout the anesthetized period.
    NOTE: (Pause point) Proceed to tumor implantation or wound formation once an animal is fully anesthetized.

2. Preparing the model 

NOTE: All cell work should be performed in a biosafety cabinet to avoid exposure and potential contamination.

  1. Establish a 4T1 orthotopic tumor model (Figure 1).
    1. Prepare cells on ice: Resuspend 4T1 cells in ice-cold PBS at a concentration of 2 × 107 cells/mL.
    2. Mix cells with matrix: Combine the cell suspension 1:1 (v/v) with ice-cold biological hydrogel that has a rich extracellular matrix. The combination should yield a solution of cells at 1 × 107 cells/mL.
    3. Load the syringe: Load the cell mixture into a sterile laboratory syringe with a volume no larger than 1.0 mL. Limit the volume to 100 µL per injection (1 × 106 cells). As an option, gently warm the syringe to 30 °C, which makes the biological hydrogel slightly viscous and more focally retained at the injection site.
      CAUTION: Be mindful that syringes are sharp and avoid recapping.
    4. Anesthetize the mouse as described in section 1.
    5. Remove fur if present: Depilate the breast pad area. Omit this step if using athymic nude mice.
    6. Position the needle and inject: Sterilize the 4th inguinal mammary fat pad. Insert the needle bevel-up and inject 100 µL slowly into the fat pad to avoid reflux.
    7. Recover the animal from anesthesia: Return the mouse to a warmed cage and monitor the mouse until ambulatory.
    8. Allow the tumor to grow: Allow 8-10 days for 4T1 tumors to reach a minimum diameter of 0.3 cm before imaging.
      NOTE: Tumors with a larger diameter can also be imaged. The diameter of the tumor can be measured with a calibrated vernier caliper. Tumors that exceed the maximum diameter approved by the IACUC (or an equivalent institutional committee) should be euthanized. Follow orthotopic injection and adapt cell number/volume to the desired engraftment protocol.
  2. Generation of an excisional wound in a mouse (Figure 2)
    1. Prepare the surgical field: Sterilize the work area and instruments.
    2. Anesthetize the mouse as described in section 1.
    3. Remove fur if present: Depilate the dorsal region. Omit this step if using athymic nude mice.
    4. Administer analgesia: Secure the mouse on a sterile surgical surface. Inject buprenorphine 0.05–0.1 mg/kg subcutaneously (SC) in the dorsal region.
    5. Disinfect the wound area: Disinfect the dorsal skin with povidone-iodine followed by 70% ethanol.
    6. Create an excisional wound: Use a 6-mm biopsy punch to outline the site. Excise the skin and panniculus carnosus to form a full-thickness defect.
    7. Seat the silicone splint:
      1. Center a donut-shaped silicone splint around the wound. Ensure that the inner diameter of the split is 2–4 mm larger than the diameter of the wound, and the width of the splint is ~5 mm.
      2. Cut a donut-shaped silicone splint from a sheet of silicone material. Use a clear suture material to sew the splint in place. If needed, use a thin adhesive film to seat the ring.
        NOTE: Pigmented suture materials may absorb NIR light and, therefore, should not be used.
    8. Suture the splint: Place eight evenly spaced interrupted sutures to secure the splint to the surrounding skin without strangulation.
    9. Apply an occlusive dressing: Cover the wound and splint with an occlusive dressing to protect the bed and standardize the wound environment.
    10. Recover the animal from anesthesia: Return the mouse to a warmed cage and monitor the mouse until ambulatory.
    11. Allow the animal to heal: 6 hours following initial wound formation, administer 1 dose of buprenorphine. The following day, administer 2 more doses of buprenorphine 6 hours apart. Continue daily care and assessments per study design or until the wound is completely healed.
    12. Replace the dressing each day: Replace occlusive dressing daily after imaging or photography to limit contamination and maintain sterility.
      NOTE: (Critical step) Splint the wound to suppress contraction and promote re-epithelialization, improving translational relevance to human healing. (Pause point) After applying the dressing, pause until the next scheduled assessment or imaging session.

3. OS-DCE OAI acquisition protocols

  1. Prepare a mouse and the contrast agent for the OAI scan.
    1. Prepare the contrast agent.
      1. Prepare a solution of 1.62 mM of the ICG contrast agent in sterile water. Filter the solution with a 0.3 µm syringe filter. Fill a sterile laboratory syringe with 100 μμL of this solution.
        NOTE: This dose is 162 nmol or 125.5 μμg based on a 775 g/mol molecular weight of ICG. The dose is 6.28 mg/kg of mouse body weight, considering that a mouse weighs approximately 20 g. An animal equivalent dose is 12.3 times greater than a human equivalent dose18. Therefore, the human equivalent dose is 0.51 mg/kg of human body weight. The maximum tolerated dose for humans is 2 mg/kg19. Therefore, the dose used in this pre-clinical study is approximately ¼ of the maximum tolerated dose in humans.
    2. Prepare the OAI scanner.
      1. Fill the imaging tank with deionized, distilled water. Set the temperature of the tank to 36 °C for a mouse with <25 g body weight.
        NOTE: This tank temperature will maintain core body temperature near 37 °C because the mouse is wrapped in a plastic bag in the cradle. The temperature of the tank should be set to 35 °C for a larger mouse with >25 g body weight to avoid overheating the mouse, because a larger mouse has more subcutaneous adipose tissue that acts as an insulating layer.
    3. Anesthetize the mouse as described in section 1. For the remainder of the acquisition protocol, ensure the mouse remains anesthetized with 1.5–2% isoflurane in 100% oxygen carrier gas.
    4. If performing DCE OAI, place venous access.
      1. Flush a 27 G tail-vein catheter with heparinized saline. Insert the catheter into a lateral tail vein and secure the catheter to prevent it from uninserting from the tail vein (Figure 3A). Ensure there are no air bubbles present.
        NOTE: (Critical step) Use heparinized saline to maintain catheter patency.
      2. In addition, prepare a sterile laboratory syringe with a volume no greater than 500 µL that can connect to the catheter. Ensure the syringe contains 100 µL of 2.14 mM ICG (~322 nmol; ~16 µmol/kg for a 20 g mouse).
    5. Cover the mouse and cradle with ultrasound gel (Figure 3B).
      1. Apply a thin layer of clear ultrasound gel to the tumor or wound area (Figure 3C). Also, apply ultrasound gel to the cradle to make a seal between the cradle and the tumor or wound area.
        NOTE: Eliminate air bubbles. As an option, the ultrasound gel may be centrifuged to remove air prior to using the gel. Also, use a minimum amount of ultrasound gel to avoid bubbles that can form in thick gel layers.
    6. Place the mouse in the cradle (Figure 3D): Refer to the manufacturer instructions for the instrument. Place the mouse in a holder with the nose of the mouse firmly inside the nosecone. Use cuffs to hold the hands and feet of the mouse. Use the tooth loop to stabilize the head.
      1. (OPTIONAL) Use the cradle with a rat nose cone when imaging a mouse. The rat nose cone lifts the mouse head from the bottom of the cradle, which can avoid accidental drowning if a small amount of water leaks into the cradle.
    7. Place the mouse and cradle in the OAI instrument. Refer to the manufacturer's instructions for the instrument.
      1. Observe for any leaks in the mouse cradle. If leaks are present, remove the mouse and cradle from the instrument and re-seal the mouse in the cradle to avoid accidental drownings.
      2. If DCE OAI is desired, connect the catheter to the syringe with the contrast agent.
    8. Equilibrate the mouse prior to imaging: Allow 10 min for stabilization of the mouse physiology in the warm water tank (35-36 °C, depending on animal size, see section 3.1.2) prior to image acquisition (Figure 3E).
    9. Position the mouse relative to the OAI transducer:
      1. Move the mouse or the OAI transducer according to the manufacturer's instructions so that the tumor or wound is located in the multi-slice image set.
      2. Optimize the speed of sound for the image set. Complete this step while the mouse is being equilibrated prior to imaging (step 3.1.7).
      3. (Critical step) Maintain consistent animal orientation/slice position for all mice and at all time points to ensure rigorous results
  2. Set the OS OAI parameters.
    1. Select the image slice parameters so that multiple slices are imaged to cover the entire tumor or wound area with 1 mm slice thickness.
    2. Select the absorption wavelengths. For OS OAI, select 700, 730, 760, 800, 850, and 875 nm absorption wavelengths.
    3. Employ signal averaging: Select parameters to acquire 10 averages per wavelength before acquiring the next wavelength, and before moving to the next imaging slice. The 10 averages per wavelength increase the signal-to-noise of each image slice.
    4. Set the number of repetitions:
      1. Set the number of repetitions as shown in Table 1 to maintain a total acquisition time of approximately 2 min. For users of an instrument that has a 10 Hz repetition rate, the total acquisition time is 6.0 s per image slice.
      2. Moving the mouse to the next imaging slice and then returning to the first slice position requires an average of 0.2 s, so that each slice requires 6.2 s.
      3. Perform a minimum of 3 repetitions to ensure measurement stability. A total acquisition time longer than 2 min is acceptable if more repetitions are desired.
  3. Acquire the OS OA images.
  4. Set the DCE OAI parameters.
    1. Set DCE OAI acquisition parameters for a single-slice imaging protocol with multiple wavelengths.
      1. Position the imaging slices. Select ≤5 imaging slices that are centered on the tumor or wound area with 1 mm slice thickness.
      2. Select the optimal absorption wavelength for the contrast agent. For indocyanine green within an in vivo environment, set the wavelength to 800 nm.
      3. Set the number of averages and repetitions as shown in Table 2. These recommendations will maintain a temporal resolution ≤ 5 s and a total acquisition time of 11.0–11.2 min for users of the OAI instrument, which has a 10 Hz imaging repetition rate.
        NOTE: Users of other instruments with a different imaging repetition rate should adjust the number of averages to maintain a temporal resolution of ≤ 5 seconds for each image set.
    2. As an alternative to step 3.4.1, set the DCE OAI acquisition parameters for a multi-slice imaging protocol with a single wavelength.
      1. Position the imaging slices. Select ≤ 5 imaging slices that are centered on the tumor or wound area with 1 mm slice thickness.
      2. Select the optimal absorption wavelength for the contrast agent. For indocyanine green within an in vivo environment, set the wavelength to 800 nm.
      3. Set the number of averages and repetitions as shown in Table 2. These recommendations will maintain a temporal resolution ≤ 5 s and a total acquisition time of 11.0–11.2 min for users of the OAI instrument, which has a 10 Hz imaging repetition rate.
        NOTE: Users of other instruments with a different imaging repetition rate should adjust the number of averages to maintain a temporal resolution of ≤ 5 s for each image set.
  5. Acquire the DCE OA images.
    1. Record baseline images: Start the acquisition and collect 12 image sets (~1 min).
    2. Inject the contrast agent: Administer 100 µL via the catheter while continuing acquisition.
      NOTE: The bolus injection should be consistent for approximately 10–15 s to avoid a buildup of pressure in the catheter in the fragile tail vein. This consistency can be controlled with consistent pressure on the syringe plunger during manual injection, or by using an automated injector. Importantly, injection rates of 10–15 s smooth the initial delivery of agent to the tumor, rather than creating first-pass kinetics spikes in the PK curve that are caused by faster injection timings, which improves the PK modeling and analyses of empirical measurements.
      1. (Critical step) Avoid leakage of contrast agents from the blood vessel to surrounding tissues at the site of injection to preserve accurate bolus timing.
    3. Continue imaging: Acquire the remaining 128 image sets for 10.2 min post-injection to capture wash-in/washout kinetics.
    4. Monitor the imaging process to ensure that the images are acquired: Monitor the mouse breathing rate to ensure that the mouse physiology is stable during the scans.
    5. Remove the mouse and cradle from the instrument: Remove the mouse from the cradle. Allow the mouse to recover from anesthesia. Return the mouse to a warmed cage and monitor the mouse until ambulatory.
      NOTE: Use appropriate software and refer to the manufacturer's instructions for the OAI instrument. The steps below describe reconstruction and analysis steps for an OAI instrument that uses viewMSOT v4.0 software, and Matlab R2019b or a newer version of Matlab software.

4. OS-DCE OAI result analysis

  1. Reconstruct the OA images.
    1. Select image reconstruction parameters: Set up image reconstruction to use a filtered back-projection method with a 50 kHz–6.5 MHz band-pass filter and enable automatic pulse-to-pulse energy correction.
    2. Reconstruct all images: Obtain images at all laser wavelengths, all image slice positions, and all time points. This volume of data may require substantial time for image reconstruction.
  2. Analyze OS OA images.
    1. Unmix chromophores: Perform spectral unmixing to generate parametric maps of oxyhemoglobin (HbO2), deoxyhemoglobin (Hb), total hemoglobin (where HbT = HbO2 + Hb), and %sO2 (where %sO2 = HbO2/HbT).
    2. Define ROIs:
      1. Manually draw an ROI that represents the tumor or wound in each image slice. Draw a conservative ROI that errs on the side of excluding pixels of the tumor periphery or wound periphery rather than including pixels for normal tissue at the periphery.
      2. As an alternative, manually draw one ROI that represents the tumor rim and a second ROI that represents the tumor core. The tumor rim can have greater vascularization than the tumor core, providing for a potentially useful sub-region analysis.
        NOTE: Although additional ROIs of tumor or wound sub-regions may be drawn, or the pixelwise values of HbO2, Hb, HbT, or %sO2 may be evaluated (requiring no ROI), these smaller regions have lower signal-to-noise, which leads to imprecise measurements.
      3. Maintain the ROI positions consistent across all images at each wavelength and time point.
    3. Calculate average parameters for the entire tumor.
      1. Calculate the average value of HbO2, Hb, HbT, and %sO2 in the tumor ROI or wound ROI for each imaging slice and each time point.
      2. For multi-slice OS OAI, calculate the average value of HbO2, Hb, HbT, and %sO2 from all imaging slices to obtain a single average value for each parameter for the entire tumor or wound.
    4. Evaluate parameter stability. Plot the value of %sO2 for each repetition (see step 3.2.4). Evaluate whether the %sO2 value changed by more than 10% during the scans, which indicates a temporally unstable measurement.
  3. Analyze DCE OA images.
    1. Unmix chromophores in multiwavelength DCE OA images: Perform spectral unmixing to generate parametric maps of HbO2, Hb, and the contrast agent. This step is not needed for single-wavelength DCE OAI.
    2. Define ROIs.
      1. Manually draw an ROI that represents the tumor or wound in each image slice. Draw a conservative ROI that errs on the side of excluding pixels of the tumor periphery or wound periphery rather than including pixels for normal tissue at the periphery.
      2. As an alternative, manually draw one ROI that represents the tumor rim and a second ROI that represents the tumor core. The tumor rim can have greater vascularization than the tumor core, providing for a potentially useful sub-region analysis.
        NOTE: Although additional ROIs of tumor sub-regions may be drawn, or the pixelwise values of contrast agent may be evaluated (requiring no ROI), these smaller regions have lower signal-to-noise, which leads to imprecise measurements.
      3. Maintain the ROI positions consistent across all images at each wavelength and time point.
    3. Extract PK curves from DCE OA images.
      1. For the ROI in each image slice, export the time points versus the average ICG signal (from multiwavelength DCE OAI) or the OAI signal at the single selected wavelength (for single-wavelength DCE OAI).
      2. Calculate the average signal for all image slices. A plot of the average signal throughout the tumor or wound vs. time is known as the PK curve.
      3. Transfer the average signal for all image slices at each time point to a computer program that can evaluate the empirical parameters listed below. For example, Microsoft Excel and Graphpad Prism can perform simple analyses of graphs.
    4. Compute empirical parameters as described in steps 4.3.5–4.3.11.
    5. Normalize the PK curve: Determine the average value of the pre-injection time points, known as the baseline signal. Subtract the baseline signal value from all post-injection signal values.
    6. Determine the Maximum Signal Enhancement (MSE): Identify the highest post-injection signal value in the PK curve.
    7. Determine the Time-to-Peak (TTP): Identify the time point value of the MSE.
    8. Calculate the initial slope of the PK curve.
      1. Obtain this initial slope from the time of initial injection to TTP. Alternatively, calculate the slope at 1 min post-injection if the shape of the curve is too steep or if the TTP is too late.
      2. In this scenario, acquire the pre-injection images for 1 min, and calculate this slope from Minute 1.0 to Minute 2.0 on the PK curve.
    9. Calculate the Initial Area Under the Curve (IAUC): Calculate the average value of the signal values from the time of initial injection to TTP on the PK curve.
    10. Calculate an empirical rate of the washout phase.
      1. For the portion of the PK curve from 1 min after TTP to the last time point, fit this portion of the curve with a straight line or a monoexponentially decaying function with a constant offset term.
      2. Use the slope of the straight line or the exponential decay constant as an empirical measure of the PK rate of the washout phase.
    11. Calculate contrast-enhanced OAI.
      1. Select a time point longer than TTP. Determine the signal value at this time point as a measure of contrast enhancement.
        NOTE: The time point at 10 min post-injection is often selected, but other time points may be selected as needed.
      2. As an alternative, calculate the average signal from TTP to the selected time point, the average signal from TTP to the last time point, or another range of time points as needed.
      3. Note that the average signal is equivalent to the area under the PK curve for these two time points, which is technically known as a measure of signal intensity rather than a measure of signal amplitude.
    12. Perform PK modeling as described in steps 4.3.13–4.3.20.
      NOTE: The following steps analyze DCE OA images acquired with an inVision OAI instrument. Other OAI instruments may produce images in a different data format. The steps below can still be followed to analyze DCE OA images using other OAI instruments if the data format from the other instruments can be transferred into MatLab and the data format is adjusted to match the example data files provided with the software package.
    13. Download the software.
      1. For multiwavelength DCE OAI, download OE-DCE_MSOT_Matlab from the CAMEL-MartyPagel repository on Github, or https://github.com/CAMEL-MartyPagel/OE-DCE_MSOT_Matlab.
      2. For single-wavelength DCE OAI, download DCE-MSOT_SingleWavelength_Matlab from the CAMEL-MartyPagel repository on Github, or https://github.com/CAMEL-MartyPagel/DCE_MSOT_SingleWavelength_Matlab.
      3. Unzip the compressed file. Open the SOP file in the doc folder and follow the standard operating procedure for installing and using the software.
    14. Organize the software components into different folders. Store the following software files in a single folder:
      Main code: run_MSOT_nonneg.m
      Sub-codes: run_DCE_MSOT_MSP.m ; run_OE_MSOT_AK_nonneg.m
      Other codes: Negative_pixel_count.m ; Voxel_count.m ; ROI_modification.m
      Folder titled: com.itheramedical.msotlib_beta_rev723_20221128_M2022b
      Data exported from ViewMSOT after reconstruction and spectral unmixing.
    15. Launch the program in MatLab.
      1. Double-click on run_MSOT_nonneg.m to start the program in Matlab. Click the "Run" button at the top of the Matlab window. The code may report an error that run_OE_MSOT_AK_nonneg is not found in the current folder or on the MATLAB path.
      2. To fix this error, type addpath then put the file location in quotes (e.g. addpath 'C:\Users\yourname\Documents\Non negative analysis') before running the code.
    16. Select the type of analysis: Enter N for the OE analysis, and Y for the DCE analysis.
      NOTE: The program is capable of analyzing Oxygen Enhanced (OE) OA images, which consist of a combination of %sO2 maps acquired with 21% O2 breathing gas (medical grade air) or 100% O2 breathing gas, which is not used for OS-DCE OAI studies described in this protocol.
    17. Select the data:
      1. Select the folder containing the DCE OAI files. Select the main scan folder and not the MSP subfolder.
      2. Then verify the name of the scan. Finally, select the folder to save the analyzed data.
    18. Enter 3 for the number of chromophores. The chromophores are Hb, HbO2, and the contrast agent.
      NOTE: The program is designed to accommodate the DCE OAI analysis of multiple chromophores that are co-injected into the mouse model, if needed. However, the DCE OAI protocol in this protocol only uses one chromophore.
    19. Draw the ROIs as described in steps 4.3.19.1–4.3.19.4.
      1. Draw the ROI of the blood vessel that will serve as the Arterial Input Function for the analysis: A grayscale image of the scan will appear. Manually trace the ROI that represents the blood vessel.
        NOTE: Zoom in by clicking on the magnifying glass with the plus sign just above the upper right-hand corner of the image. Click on the magnifying glass again to go back to the mode to draw the ROI. The inferior vena cava near the spine can often be identified and used as the AIF.
      2. Draw the ROI of the tumor: A grayscale image of the scan will appear. Trace the ROI that represents the entire tumor, the tumor rim, or the tumor core. To analyze more than one ROI, repeat this entire PK modeling procedure (Step 4.3.12) for an additional ROI.
      3. Draw the ROI of a muscle region: Do not use this ROI in the DCE OAI calculation. Use the ROI of the muscle for DCE OAI analysis using the Linear Reference Region Model, which is not used in this report. This step must still be performed for the program to continue.
      4. Verify that the correct ROI is drawn. The modeling of the PK curve will commence.
    20. Visualize the analyzed DCE OAI results.
      1. To load analyzed DCE data, go to the browser bar and select DCE_MSOT_MSP.
      2. In the command window, enter clear all.
        NOTE: The current folder tab is now populated with analyzed DCE OAI data, which includes:
        Average_signal_Wavelength_ICG.mat: Double click on this to view the tabulated values of NKtrans and kep for the tumor ROI. The kinetic parameters are tabulated in 3 ways:
        NKtrans_avg: Average of NKtrans calculated for each pixel.
        NKtrans _avg_signal: Single NKtrans value calculated after averaging the signals for the entire tumor
        NKtrans _nz: NKtrans_avg calculated with only non-zero pixel values.
        Similarly, kep values can be displayed.
        NKtrans.fig: Displays the NKtrans _avg map superimposed on a grayscale image.
        kep.fig: Displays the kep_avg map superimposed on a grayscale image.
        Maps_Wavelength_ICG.mat: This needs to be loaded to visualize other NKtrans or kep maps. After loading this matrix, use the "overlap code" (included separately) to display the desired parameter.
        Muscle_Average_signal_Wavelength_ICG.mat and Muscle_Maps_Wavelength_ICG.mat : Display parameters for muscle ROIs.
        Normalized signal for ICG.fig: Denotes the average signal of ICG over time in the three ROIs, normalized to the maximum signal.
        Signal for ICG.fig: Denotes the average signal of ICG over time in the three ROIs.

Access restricted. Please log in or start a trial to view this content.

Results

OAI signal can generate maps of oxygen saturation in tumors and wounds
Following acquisition and reconstruction of multispectral OAI datasets, regions of interest (ROIs) can be defined within tumors or wound beds to quantify signal intensity at different wavelengths. Spectral unmixing algorithms are then applied to separate the contributions of oxyhemoglobin (HbO2) and deoxyhemoglobin (Hb) from the composite optoacoustic signal. This processing enables the generation of quantitative maps o...

Access restricted. Please log in or start a trial to view this content.

Discussion

DCE OAI PK curves may be affected by a variety of artifacts that reduce the reliability of PK analysis. One common pitfall is the presence of superficial wounds, scabs, or dried blood within the imaging field, which can introduce strong, non-specific absorption at the skin surface and obscure deeper signals (Figure 8). When drawing ROIs within the tumor, care should be taken to avoid including these superficial structures to ensure that the extracted curves reflect intratumoral contrast dyna...

Access restricted. Please log in or start a trial to view this content.

Disclosures

The authors have no conflicts of interest with regard to this work.

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to thank Dr. Neal Burton at iThera Medical, GmbH, for consultation. This work was funded by UW-Madison Radiology NRSA grant (2T32CA009206-46), ITPT Radiological Sciences Trainee Pilot Grant, Clinical and Translational Science Award (CTSA) program, the National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences (NCATS), grant UL1TR002373 and TL1TR002375, NIH R43 CA265603, NIH R01 EB034261, NIH R21 EB037731, and a Falk Catalyst Award from the Falk Medical Research Trust.

Access restricted. Please log in or start a trial to view this content.

Materials

List of materials used in this article
NameCompanyCatalog NumberComments
20 G NeedleExel INT26417Hypodermic needle; 20G x 1", used for preparing heparin solutions
4T1 cellsATCCCRL-2539Triple negative breast cancer cell line
Anti-Anti (100x)Gibco15240-062Antibiotic cocktail
Biopsy punchIntegra 33-366 mm disposable biopsy punch 
Cell Culture Grade WaterCorning25-055-CV500 mL; tested to USP sterile sater for inection specifications 
Collagen Matrix SolutionCorning354262Collagen matrix for tumor fomation and injection
EthanolDeacon Laboratory2701General purpose antiseptic
Eye Lube Optixcare 50-218-844220 g/.70 oz; for animal use only 
Gauze Fisherbrand22-415-468Cotton gauze pad; 3" x 3" (7.6 x 7.6 cm); 12-Ply
GlovesVWR76457-130Nitrile examination gloves
HeparinMeithealNDC71288-402-1010,000 USP units per 10 mL, 1000 USP units per mL; 10 mL Multi-Dose Vial
Indocyanine greenTCII0535Optoacoustic Contrast Agent
IsofluraneIsospire17033-091-25A nonflammable, nonexplosive inhalation anesthetic for use in horses and dogs; 250 mL 
Laboratory FilmParafilm PM-9922" x 250'; 1" diameter core
Nair body bream Hair remover NairLL4038Depiliatory Cream; rich cocoa butter & vitamin E
Needle TerumoNN2732R27G x 1 1/4" (6.40 mm x 32 mm); R.W. Reg. Bevel 
Optoacoustic Imaging MachineiTheraMedical MSOT inVision 512Optoacoustic scanner
PBS, 1xCorning 21-040-CV500 mL; Phosphate-buffered saline without calcium and magnesium 
RPMICorning 10-040-CVCell culture media
SalineHospiraNDC0409-4888-0210 mL single dose; 0.9% sodium chloride injection, USP
StopwatchiTheraMedical 4135333Used to record minutes and seconds 
SyringesCardinal Health11881280121 mL Insulin Syringe; U-100 Insulin only; 27G x 1/2" (0.35 x 12.7 mm)
Transparent Wound DressingTegaderm1624Wtransparent film dressing frame style; 2 3/8" x 2 3/4" (6 cm x 7 cm)
TweezersTermo Electron 7626Used to pull skin back when injecting cells into mice
Ultrasound gelEcoVue28332 g packet, prpylene glycol free, water soluble, paraben and dye free
Undyed SuturesEthiconVR49318" cutting; P-3 3/8 13 mm; undyed and braided, synthetic absorbable suture, non-USP
Warming padRepti Therm UTH120VAC 60Hz 8W Used to warm animals while under anesthetic; 
Would SplintsGrace Bio-Labs476684Clear Silicone, 14 mm OD x 10 mm ID 0.5 thickness with suture sites 
Wound clipsReflex 7203-1000Reflex skin closure system, 7 mm, stainless stee

References

  1. Wang, L. V., Hu, S. Photoacoustic tomography: In vivo imaging from organelles to organs. Science. 335 (6075), 1458-1462 (2012).
  2. Ntziachristos, V., Razansky, D. Molecular imaging by means of multispectral optoacoustic tomography (MSOT). Chem Rev. 110 (5), 2783-2794 (2010).
  3. Sourbron, S. P., Buckley, D. L. Classic models for dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI. NMR Biomed. 26 (8), 1004-1027 (2013).
  4. Hupple, C. W., et al. A light-fluence-independent method for the quantitative analysis of dynamic contrast-enhanced multispectral optoacoustic tomography (DCE MSOT). Photoacoustics. 10, 54-64 (2018).
  5. Xiao, T. G., et al. Applying dynamic contrast-enhanced MSOT imaging to intratumoral pharmacokinetic modeling. Photoacoustics. 11, 28-35 (2018).
  6. Han, Z., et al. Dynamic 2-deoxy-D-glucose-enhanced multispectral optoacoustic tomography for assessing metabolism and vascular hemodynamics of breast cancer. Photoacoustics. 32, 100531(2023).
  7. Pickles, M. D., Manton, D. J., Lowry, M., Turnbull, L. W. Prognostic value of pre-treatment DCE-MRI parameters in predicting disease-free and overall survival for breast cancer patients undergoing neoadjuvant therapy. Eur J Radiol. 71 (3), 498-505 (2009).
  8. Goel, S., et al. Evaluations of radiotherapy in small animal models of pancreatic cancer with oxygen-enhanced–dynamic contrast-enhanced multispectral optoacoustic tomography (OE-DCE MSOT). Photons Plus Ultrasound: Imaging and Sensing 2023, 12379, (2023).
  9. Yang, E., et al. Evaluations of a cutaneous wound healing model using oxygen-enhanced dynamic contrast-enhanced photoacoustic imaging (OE-DCE PAI). Mol Imaging Biol. 26 (6), 995-1004 (2024).
  10. Longo, D. L., et al. Water-soluble melanin derivatives for dynamic contrast-enhanced photoacoustic imaging of tumor vasculature and response to antiangiogenic therapy. Adv Healthcare Mater. 6 (1), 1600550(2017).
  11. Ermolayev, V., Dean-Ben, X. L., Mandal, S., Ntziachristos, V., Razansky, D. Simultaneous visualization of tumour oxygenation, neovascularization and contrast agent perfusion by real-time three-dimensional optoacoustic tomography. Molec Imaging. 26, 1843-1851 (2016).
  12. Chen, Z., et al. Concurrent fluorescence and volumetric optoacoustic tomography of nanoagent perfusion and bio-distribution in solid tumors. Biomed Opt Express. 10 (10), 5093-5102 (2019).
  13. Taruttis, A., Morscher, S., Burton, N. C., Razansky, D., Ntziachristos, V. Fast multispectral optoacoustic tomography (MSOT) for dynamic imaging of pharmacokinetics and biodistribution in multiple organs. PLoS One. 7 (1), e30491(2012).
  14. Tomaszewski, M. R., Gehrung, M., Joseph, J., Quiros-Gonzalez, I., Disselhorst, J. A., et al. Oxygen-enhanced and dynamic contrast-enhanced optoacoustic tomography provide surrogate biomarkers of tumor vascular function, hypoxia, and necrosis. Cancer Res. 78 (20), 5980-5991 (2018).
  15. Choi, W., Park, B., Choi, S., Oh, D., Kim, J., et al. Recent advances in contrast-enhanced photoacoustic imaging: and practical challenges. Chem Rev. 123 (11), 7379-7419 (2023).
  16. Weber, J., Beard, P. C., Bohndiek, S. E. Contrast agents for molecular photoacoustic imaging. Nat Methods. 13 (8), 639-650 (2016).
  17. Fu, Q. R., Zhu, R., Song, J. B., Yang, H. H., Chen, X. Y. Photoacoustic imaging: Contrast agents and their biomedical applications. Adv Materials. 31 (6), 1805875(2019).
  18. Nair, A. B., Jacob, S. A simple practice guide for dose conversion between animals and human. J Basic Clin Pharm. 7 (2), 27-31 (2016).
  19. Alander, J. T., et al. A review of indocyanine green fluorescent imaging in surgery. Int J Biomed Imaging. 2012, 940585(2012).
  20. Xia, J., Chen, W. Y., Maslov, K., Anastasio, M. A., Wang, L. H. V. Retrospective respiration-gated whole-body photoacoustic computed tomography of mice. J Biomed Opt. 19 (1), 016003(2014).
  21. Liu, S., Wang, T., Zheng, X., Zhu, Y., Tian, C. On the imaging depth limit of photoacoustic tomography in the visible and first near-infrared windows. Optics Express. 32 (1), 5460-5480 (2024).
  22. Oraevsky, A., Clingman, B., Zalev, J., Stavros, A., Yang, W., et al. Clinical optoacoustic imaging combined with ultrasound for coregistered functional and anatomical mapping of breast tumors. Photoacoustics. 12, 30-45 (2018).
  23. Cox, B., Laufer, J. G., Arridge, S. R., Beard, P. C. Quantitative spectroscopic photoacoustic imaging: a review. J Biomed Opt. 17 (6), 061202(2012).
  24. Khodaverdi, A., et al. Two photoacoustic spectral coloring compensation techniques adapted to the context of human in-vivo oxygenation measurements. Biomed Optics Express. 16 (6), 2217-2231 (2025).
  25. Reinhart, M. B., Huntington, C. R., Blair, L. J., Heniford, B. T., Augenstein, V. A. Indocyanine green: Historical context, current applications, and future considerations. Surg Innov. 23 (2), 166-175 (2016).

Access restricted. Please log in or start a trial to view this content.

Reprints and Permissions

Tags

Optoacoustic ImagingOxygenation AssessmentDynamic Contrast ImagingBreast Cancer ModelsBlood Oxygen SaturationIndocyanine GreenMultispectral Imaging