$$\rightleftharpoonup{xx}$$
$$\longleftharp{xx}$$,
$$\longrightharp{xx}$$,
Dissection and collection of the adult female mouse urethra
In the first part of this study, the authors provide a detailed protocol for the dissection of the female mouse urethra. Given its attachment to the ventral vaginal wall and location underneath the pubic symphysis, the method provided here allows for the clean dissection of the full-length female urethra (Figure 1).
Isolation of urethral epithelial tissue and flow cytometry analysis for single-cell isolates
Trypsin digestion results in easy separation of the epithelial lining of the urethra from the surrounding stroma. Epithelial sheets with higher transparency than the stromal tissue can be observed after separation (Figure 2). The separated epithelial sheets yielded single-cell suspensions upon enzymatic digestion. Single cells isolated from the urethral epithelium show consistently high viability (>80%) by trypan blue exclusion on a hemocytometer (Figure 2L) and flow cytometry using viability dyes to gate live cells (Figure 3, Supplementary File 1).
The authors performed flow cytometry to assess epithelial cell enrichment from single-cell suspensions of urethral epithelium. To check cell viability, the cell suspension was stained with a live/dead marker, the amine-reactive ghost dye V450. Authors consistently observed a cell viability of >80% by the live/dead marker. The live/dead marker enabled the gating out of debris and dead cells during flow analysis. They stained samples with an epithelial cell marker (CD326/EPCAM), a macrophage marker (F4/80), and an immune cell marker (CD45) to record the composition of cells isolated through this method. The results of flow cytometry showed that the authors isolated an enriched epithelial cell population from the female mouse urethral epithelium. For both independent experiments performed, the group achieved 80–90 % of EPCAM-positive epithelial cells after gating on live cells. The authors also observed ~1.30 % of CD45+ immune cells in the epithelial preparation. Macrophages associated with the epithelial lining accounted for ~1.18 % of the live cells from the epithelial compartment. Flow cytometry analysis of single-cell suspensions from epithelial sheets shows minimal stromal contamination (5–6%), which is mostly attributed to vascular endothelium according to their previous study5. Supplementary File 1 shows flow cytometry results for single-cell preparations from the epithelial and stromal compartments. Compared to the 80–90% enrichment of epithelial cells isolated from the epithelial compartment, the stromal compartment also showed 40–50% of epithelial cells, which are from the short ducts and glandular epithelium extending from the urethral lumen into the surrounding stroma (Figure 3, Supplementary File 1).
Urethral epithelial organoids culture, histology, and immunostaining
The authors also demonstrate how single epithelial cells isolated from the urethra are viable and can form organoids in a 3D matrix, and observed organoid growth from single urethral epithelial cells up to Day 6 in culture (Figure 4B–G). They performed hematoxylin-eosin staining (H&E) to observe the histology of organoids (Figure 4H–J). The authors observed two distinct morphologies of urethral epithelial organoids, one being large and hollow, while the other type was smaller and solid. In both cases, the organoids were stratified and recapitulated markers expressed in the epithelial lining of the female urethra, including KRT5 and P63 marking the basal layer and KRT4 and KRT13 labeling suprabasal/intermediate cell layers (Figure 4K–N), Supplementary Figure 1). The differences in organoid formation capacity between the proximal and distal urethra were examined. Organoids generated from the proximal urethra had a higher proportion of hollow organoids, while organoids from the distal urethra formed solid spheres (Figure 4O–P). Additionally, they observed differences in organoid-forming efficiency in epithelial cells isolated from the proximal and distal parts of the urethra. Distal urethral epithelium formed organoids with higher efficiency than proximal urethral epithelium with the same initial seeding density (5000 cells/droplet) (Figure 4Q–S).
Whole-mount immunostaining of isolated urethral epithelial sheets
The researchers also present an optimized method for whole-mount staining of the female mouse urethral epithelial sheets. Here, they stained epithelial sheets with two markers: F4/80 for macrophages and E-cadherin/CDH1 to mark epithelial cell-cell junctions (Figure 5). Tissues were imaged using a Zeiss Axio Observer 7 microscope with Apotome 3 optical sectioning. Epithelial sheets show strong labeling with the CDH1 antibody. Whole-mount preparations of urethral epithelium labeled with antibodies to F4/80 showed macrophages forming an arbor of dendrites in the epithelial lining. Macrophages could be observed sending dendritic processes between epithelial cells of the urethra. Overall, the results demonstrate the utility of the protocols described here for the study of the epithelial lining of the female mouse urethra.

Figure 1: Mouse dissection for female urethra collection. (A) Place the mouse in a supine position and spray the abdomen with 70% EtOH. (B–C) Open the abdomen by lifting up the skin and making a vertical incision. (D) Trim fat and connective tissue to expose the butterfly-shaped pubic bones connected at the (Arrow in black) pubic symphysis. (E) Cut the pubic symphysis. (F) Once the pubic bones are removed, the urethra can be seen running downward (Outlined with a dotted line in black) from the bladder. (G) Gently pull up the bladder with forceps. The urethra is clearly visible as a thin red tube. (H–I) Pull the bladder upwards from the body cavity. Use tension on the bladder to separate the urethra from the ventral vaginal wall. Run the scissors between the urethra and the vaginal wall to separate the urinary and reproductive tracts. (J–K) Detach the distal end of the urethra attached to the skin. (L) Image of a dissected female mouse lower urinary tract (FLUT), showing bladder and urethra. Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.

Figure 2: Isolation of urethral epithelium and preparation of a single-cell suspension. (A) Schematic depicting enzymatic digestion and mechanical separation of the epithelial and stromal compartments of the urethra followed by single-cell digestion. (B) Clear the extra fat from the female lower urinary tract. (C–F) Cut the urethra from the bladder neck region to separate urethra from bladder. Then cut urethra in two halves using fine scissors. (G) Wash urethral pieces with 1x HBSS solution by passing over a 100-micron filter. (H) Transfer urethral tissue fragments into 1% trypsin solution. Incubate on a sample rotator in the cold room. Add MgCl₂ and DNase I to the same tube. Incubate at 37 °C in a hybridization oven on a sample rotator. (I–J) Isolate the epithelium by gently squeezing with fine forceps along the length of the urethral fragment. (K) Tissues are minced into small fragments using fine scissors. Transfer the minced epithelial tissue into Accutase digestion solution and incubate at 37 °C in a hybridization oven on a sample rotator. (L) Count epithelial cells and assess viability using trypan blue with a hemocytometer. Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.

Figure 3: Flow cytometry to assess single-cell suspensions from urethral epithelium and stroma compartments. Flow cytometry was performed on single-cell preparations of pooled mouse urethra (A) epithelial and (B) stromal compartments. Live cells were gated to exclude dead cells stained with Ghost Dye V450. Live cells were assessed for CD45 (pan-immune marker), CD326/EPCAM (pan-epithelial marker) and F4/80 (murine macrophage marker) expression. Data is representative of 2 independent experiments conducted on a pool of 5–6 mice per experiment to generate epithelial and stromal samples. Abbreviations; SSC-A = side scatter-peak area; FITC = fluorescein isothiocyanate; APC = allophycocyanin; PE = phycoerythrin. Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.

Figure 4: Histology and immunostaining of urethral epithelial organoids. (A) Schematic showing workflow for the generation of urethral epithelial organoids. (B–G) Representative bright-field micrographs of urethral epithelial organoids (UEOs) generated from single cells at different days of in vitro expansion. Representative bright-field images of (H) hollow and (I) solid urethral epithelial organoids (UEOs) stained with hematoxylin and eosin (H&E). (J) Quantification of organoid types generated across three independent experiments. The error bar represents the standard error of the mean. Representative images of (K) hollow and (L) solid urethral epithelial organoids (UEOs) immunostained with epithelial markers KRT13 (suprabasal epithelial marker), KRT5 (basal epithelial marker) and P63 (basal epithelial marker). Images depicting single fluorescent channels are depicted in K’,K’’,K’’’,L’,L’’ and L’’’. Representative images of (M) hollow and (N) solid urethral epithelial organoids (UEOs) immunostained with epithelial markers KRT4 (suprabasal epithelial marker) and KRT5 (basal epithelial marker). Images depicting single fluorescent channels are depicted in M’,M’’,N’ and N”. (O) Schematic of dissection of proximal and distal urethra. (P) Quantification of organoid types generated from the proximal and distal urethra across two independent experiments. Representative bright-field micrographs of Day 6 urethral epithelial organoids (UEOs) generated from epithelium isolated from the (Q) proximal and (R) distal urethra. Data of organoids generated from the complete urethra is representative of 3 independent experiments conducted with a pool of 3–5 mice per experiment. (S) Data of organoids generated from the proximal and distal urethra are representative of 2 independent experiments conducted with a pool of 3–4 mice per experiment. Nuclei labeled with DAPI (blue). (Scale bars, 100 µM). Schematics prepared with BioRender and Adobe Illustrator. Created in BioRender. Binoy joseph, D. (2026) https://BioRender.com/jvf17v7 Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.

Figure 5: Whole-mount immunostaining of urethral epithelial sheets. (A) 10-micron frozen section of the adult female mouse urethra in optimal cutting media, showing immunostaining for the murine macrophage marker F4/80 (in red) and the epithelial protein E-cadherin/CDH1 (in green). (A’) represents zoomed in view of inset in (A). (B) Schematic diagram showing steps for whole-mount staining of isolated urethral epithelial sheets. Wholemount immunostaining of isolated female mouse urethral epithelial lining was performed with antibodies against the murine macrophage marker F4/80 (in red) and the epithelial protein E-cadherin/CDH1 (in green). (C) Representative image of merged view. (D) Orthogonal maximal intensity projection of the red channel showing macrophage organization. (E–F) Zoomed in view of epithelium and associated macrophages. White scale bar, 50 µM. Grey scale bar, 500 µM. Data is representative of 2 independent experiments conducted on a pool of 4–5 mice. Schematics prepared in BioRender and Adobe Illustrator. Created in BioRender. Binoy joseph, D. (2026) https://BioRender.com/tjh9opk Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.
Supplementary Table 1: Preparation of 1x HBSS (no Ca, Mg).Please click here to download this file.
Supplementary Table 2: Preparation of 1x sHBSSa and 1 % Trypsin solution.Please click here to download this file.
Supplementary Table 3: Preparation of cell/flow staining buffer.Please click here to download this file.
Supplementary Table 4: Preparation of organoid expansion media for urethral epithelial organoids.Please click here to download this file.
Supplementary Table 5: Preparation of Horse Blocking Buffer.Please click here to download this file.
Supplementary File 1: Cell counts for flow cytometry experiment performed on single cells from the urethral epithelial and stromal compartments from two independent experiments.Please click here to download this file.
Supplementary Figure 1: Comparison of adult female mouse urethral epithelium to urethral epithelial organoids. Representative images of (A) adult female mouse urethral epithelium, (B) hollow urethral epithelial organoids, and (C) solid urethral epithelial organoids (UEOs) immunostained with epithelial markers KRT13 (suprabasal epithelial marker), KRT5 (basal epithelial marker), and P63 (basal epithelial marker). Images depicting single fluorescent channels are depicted in A’,A’’,A’’’,B’,B’’,B’’’,C’,C’’ and C’’’. Representative images of (D) adult female mouse urethral epithelium, (E) hollow urethral epithelial organoids and (F) solid urethral epithelial organoids (UEOs) immunostained with epithelial markers KRT4 (suprabasal epithelial marker) and KRT5 (basal epithelial marker). Images depicting single fluorescent channels are depicted in D’,D’’,E’,E’’,F’ and F”. Data representative of 3 independent experiments conducted with a pool of 3–4 mice per experiment. Nuclei labeled with DAPI (blue). (Scale bars, 100 µM).Please click here to download this file.