$$\rightleftharpoonup{xx}$$
$$\longleftharp{xx}$$,
$$\longrightharp{xx}$$,
Expression of NEAT1 and diagnostic value
Compared with the healthy control (HC) group, NEAT1 expression levels in IBS-D patients were markedly higher (P < 0.0001; Figure 1A). The area under the curve (AUC) of NEAT1, as shown by the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve, was 0.867 (95% CI: 0.821–0.913). Its specificity was 75.9%, while its sensitivity was 84.5% (Figure 1B). This suggests that abnormal NEAT1 expression in the serum of patients with IBS-D could serve as a novel diagnostic biomarker for the condition.
Additionally, the clinical data of patients in the healthy and IBS-D groups were compared. The results showed no significant differences between the two groups in age, sex, or other characteristics (P > 0.05). However, there were significant differences in HADS, bowel movements, and stool forms. (P < 0.0001, Table 2). Regarding abdominal pain frequency, 69 patients experienced symptoms for ≥ 5 days, accounting for 59.48% of cases. Regarding the severity of abdominal pain, 72 patients had a score ≥ 5, accounting for 62.07% (Table 2). This means that patients with IBS-D are clearly distinguishable from the control group by their symptoms. Given the clinical association between elevated NEAT1 and IBS-D symptoms, we next investigated the functional impact of NEAT1 on intestinal barrier integrity using an LPS-treated Caco-2 cell model.
Effects of low levels of NEAT1 on intestinal barrier damage and inflammatory responses in LPS-treated Caco-2 cells
To model the intestinal barrier dysfunction and low-grade inflammation seen in IBS-D, we treated Caco-2 cells with LPS. When LPS was added to the cells, NEAT1 levels were upregulated compared to the control group. After transfection with si-NEAT1, the NEAT1 level was markedly decreased compared to the LPS + si-NC group (P < 0.0001, Figure 2A). LPS treatment reduced cell viability and increased apoptosis relative to the control group. After knocking down NEAT1, cell viability increased, and the apoptosis rate decreased compared with the LPS + si-NC group (P < 0.001; Figure 2B,C). After knocking down NEAT1, the LPS-reduced TEER was significantly restored (P < 0.0001, Figure 2D). LPS decreased the mRNA expression of ZO-1 and occludin and increased claudin-2 expression relative to controls, whereas NEAT1 knockdown reversed these changes (P < 0.001, Figure 2E-G). Treatment with LPS can trigger an inflammatory response in cells. The levels of the pro-inflammatory factors TNF-α, IL-6, IL-8, and IL-1β in the cells were higher than in the control group. After knockdown of NEAT1, the contents of pro-inflammatory factors in the cells were significantly decreased compared to the si-NC group (P < 0.0001, Figure 3A-D). This suggests that low NEAT1 levels reduce LPS-induced intestinal barrier dysfunction and inflammatory responses, and that NEAT1 may contribute to the progression of IBS-D.
Direct binding of NEAT1 and effects on miR-29b-3p in Caco-2 cells
In Caco-2 cells, NEAT1 is primarily found in the cytoplasm (Figure 4A). The binding sites of NEAT1 and miR-29b-3p were predicted by the ENCORI database. Based on this, we designed the WT-NEAT1 and MUT-NEAT1 sequences (Figure 4B). The DLR experimental results indicated that miR-29b-3p mimics reduced WT-NEAT1 enzymatic activity relative to the mimic NC, whereas its inhibitors increased it relative to the inhibitor NC. Conversely, neither treatment had any influence on MUT-NEAT1 (P < 0.0001, Figure 4C). The RIP assay revealed that NEAT1 and miR-29b-3p were markedly abundant in the anti-Ago2 fraction compared to the anti-IgG group, indicating a specific interaction between the two (P < 0.0001, Figure 4D). These results indicate that NEAT1 specifically binds to miR-29b-3p. Meanwhile, the miR-29b-3p level was notably decreased in IBS-D patients compared to the HC group (P < 0.0001, Figure 4E). The AUC of its ROC curve was 0.856 (95% CI: 0.808–0.905), with a sensitivity of 89.7% and a specificity of 71.6% (Figure 4F). Pearson's correlation analysis revealed an inverse correlation between NEAT1 levels and the miR-29b-3p expression (r = -0.744, P < 0.0001, Figure 4G).
Effects of low NEAT1 on intestinal barrier damage in LPS-treated Caco-2 cells and miR-29b-3p levels
In LPS-treated Caco-2 cells, miR-29b-3p expression was notably downregulated compared to the control group. Transfection with si-NEAT1 increased miR-29b-3p levels, whereas transfection with the miR-29b-3p inhibitor decreased miR-29b-3p levels again (P < 0.0001, Figure 5A). Knockdown of NEAT1 increased cell viability and decreased apoptosis, and these effects were abolished by the miR-29b-3p inhibitor (P < 0.01, Figure 5B,C). The LPS-induced reduction in TEER was restored by NEAT1 knockdown, and this restoration was again prevented by the miR-29b-3p inhibitor (P < 0.0001, Figure 5D). LPS treatment led to decreased expression of ZO-1 and occludin mRNA and increased expression of claudin-2 mRNA compared with the control group. After NEAT1 knockdown, miR-29b-3p levels increased, ZO-1 and occludin mRNA levels rose, and claudin-2 mRNA levels decreased compared with the LPS + si-NC group. After miR-29b-3p inhibition, ZO-1 and occludin mRNA levels decreased, and claudin-2 mRNA levels increased compared with the LPS + si-NEAT1 + inhibitor NC group (P < 0.001, Figure 5E-G). NEAT1 (primarily the cytoplasmic subtype NEAT1_1) acts as a sponge for miR-29b-3p. Knockdown of NEAT1 releases miR-29b-3p, thereby indirectly upregulating ZO-1 and occludin and downregulating claudin-2, which alleviates LPS-induced barrier disruption. These results suggest that, in this model, miR-29b-3p positively regulates ZO-1 and occludin expression and negatively regulates claudin-2, and that the effects of NEAT1 knockdown are mediated, at least in part, by miR-29b-3p.
We further examined the expression levels of tight junction proteins using western blot analysis. As shown in Figure 5H, NEAT1 knockdown increased the LPS-reduced expression of ZO-1 and occludin and suppressed the expression of claudin-2 compared with the LPS + si-NC group. However, co-transfection with a miR-29b-3p inhibitor weakened the protective effect of NEAT1 knockdown compared with the LPS + si-NEAT1 + inhibitor NC group. These results support the conclusion that NEAT1 knockdown restores tight junction protein expression, at least in part by upregulating miR-29b-3p, thereby improving intestinal barrier function.
Effects of low NEAT1 levels on intestinal inflammation in LPS-treated Caco-2 cells and miR-29b-3p expression
In LPS-treated Caco-2 cells, LPS triggered an inflammatory response. The levels of the pro-inflammatory factors TNF-α, IL-6, IL-8, and IL-1β were significantly higher than in the control group. After NEAT1 knockdown, miR-29b-3p levels increased, while the levels of pro-inflammatory factors decreased significantly compared to si-NC. After miR-29b-3p inhibition, the levels of inflammatory factors increased again (P < 0.0001, Figure 6A-D). Therefore, NEAT1 knockdown suppresses the release of inflammatory cytokines, at least in part, by upregulating miR-29b-3p.
These results indicate that NEAT1 levels are abnormally elevated in the serum of patients with IBS-D and that NEAT1 has a high AUC for distinguishing patients with IBS-D from healthy controls. Mechanistically, NEAT1 directly binds to and sequesters miR-29b-3p in the cytoplasm. In cellular models and functional rescue experiments, NEAT1 knockdown increased miR-29b-3p expression, improved cell survival and TEER, reduced apoptosis, and attenuated the release of pro-inflammatory cytokines. These findings support the hypothesis that NEAT1 negatively regulates intestinal barrier integrity by inhibiting miR-29b-3p and suggest that targeting NEAT1 may provide a potential diagnostic and therapeutic strategy for IBS-D.
Data availability:
The raw data underlying the figures and tables are provided as Supplemental File 1 (raw data spreadsheet) and Supplemental File 2 (unedited western blot images).

Figure 1. Expression and diagnostic value of NEAT1 in patients with IBS-D. (A) NEAT1 expression levels in serum from healthy controls (HC, n = 116) and IBS-D patients (n = 116) detected by RT-qPCR; (B) ROC curve analysis of NEAT1 for discriminating IBS-D patients from healthy controls. Data are presented as mean ± SD (n = 116 per group). **** P < 0.0001. Abbreviations: IBS-D = irritable bowel syndrome with diarrhea; ROC = receiver operating characteristic. Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.

Figure 2. Effect of NEAT1 on LPS-induced intestinal barrier damage in Caco-2 cells. (A) Transfection of si-NEAT1 reduces LPS-induced NEAT1 levels; (B) Cell viability measured by CCK-8 assay at 0, 24, 48, and 72 h. Knockdown of NEAT1 enhances cell viability; (C) Apoptosis rate determined by flow cytometry with Annexin V-FITC/PI staining. Silencing NEAT1 reduces apoptosis rates; (D) Transepithelial electrical resistance (TEER) measured in Caco-2 monolayers. Inhibiting NEAT1 increases cellular TEER; (E-G) mRNA expression levels of (E) ZO-1, (F) occludin, and (G) claudin-2 measured by RT-qPCR. Silencing NEAT1 elevates ZO-1 and occludin mRNA expression, decreases claudin-2 mRNA levels. Data are presented as mean ± SD from six independent experiments (n = 6 per group). *** P < 0.001; **** P < 0.0001, LPS compared to control, LPS + si-NEAT1 compared to LPS + si-NC. Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.

Figure 3. Effect of NEAT1 knockdown on LPS-induced pro-inflammatory cytokine release in Caco-2 cells. (A-D) Concentrations of (A) TNF-α, (B) IL-6, (C) IL-8, and (D) IL-1β in cell culture supernatants measured by ELISA. NEAT1 knockdown reduces LPS-induced TNF-α, IL-6, IL-8, and IL-1β levels. Data are presented as mean ± SD from six independent experiments (n = 6 per group). **** P < 0.0001, LPS vs. control, LPS + si-NEAT1 vs. LPS + si-NC. Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.

Figure 4. Direct binding of NEAT1 and association with miR-29b-3p. (A) Subcellular localization of NEAT1 in Caco-2 cells determined by nuclear-cytoplasmic fractionation (U6: nuclear control, GAPDH: cytoplasmic control). NEAT1 is mainly located in the cytoplasm; (B) Predicted WT and MUT binding sequences of NEAT1 for miR-29b-3p from ENCORI database; (C) The DLR assay verified the binding relationship between NEAT1 and miR-29b-3p; (D) RIP verified the binding relationship between NEAT1 and miR-29b-3p. Data in A, C, and D are mean ± SD from six independent experiments (n = 6 per group). (E) Serum miR-29b-3p expression levels in healthy controls (HC, n = 116) and IBS-D patients (n = 116); (F) ROC curve of miR-29b-3p for discriminating IBS-D patients from healthy controls; (G) Pearson correlation analysis between NEAT1 and miR-29b-3p levels in IBS-D patients. NEAT1 was negatively correlated with the expression of miR-29b-3p (r = -0.744, P < 0.0001). Data in E are mean ± SD (n = 116 per group). **** P < 0.0001. Abbreviations: WT = wild type; MUT = mutant; DLR = dual-luciferase reporter; RIP = RNA immunoprecipitation. Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.

Figure 5. Effects of NEAT1 knockdown on intestinal barrier function in LPS-treated Caco-2 cells and miR-29b-3p. (A) Knockdown of NEAT1 increases miR-29b-3p levels, whereas transfection with miR-29b-3p inhibitors reduces miR-29b-3p expression. (B) Cell viability measured by CCK-8 assay. Low levels of NEAT1 enhance cell viability by increasing miR-29b-3p; (C) Apoptosis rate determined by flow cytometry. Low levels of NEAT1 reduce the apoptosis rate by increasing miR-29b-3p; (D) Low levels of NEAT1 increase the TEER of cells by raising the level of miR-29b-3p; (E-G) mRNA expression of (E) ZO-1, (F) occludin, and (G) claudin-2. Low levels of NEAT1 increase the expression of ZO-1 and occludin and reduce the expression of claudin-2 mRNA by enhancing miR-29b-3p. (H) Representative western blot images showing ZO-1, occludin, claudin-2, and GAPDH protein expression under the indicated treatment conditions. Data are presented as mean ± SD from six independent experiments (n = 6 per group). ** P < 0.01; *** P < 0.001; **** P < 0.0001, LPS vs. control, LPS + si-NEAT1 vs. LPS + si-NC, LPS + si-NEAT1 + miR-inhibitor vs. LPS + si-NEAT1 + inhibitor NC. Abbreviation: miR-inhibitor = miR-29b-3p inhibitor; TEER = transepithelial electrical resistance. Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.

Figure 6. Effects of NEAT1 knockdown on inflammation in LPS-treated Caco-2 cells and miR-29b-3p. (A-D) Concentrations of (A) TNF-α, (B) IL-6, (C) IL-8, and (D) IL-1β in cell culture supernatants measured by ELISA. Low levels of NEAT1 reduce the content of TNF-α, IL-6, IL-8, and IL-1β in the cell supernatant by increasing miR-29b-3p. Data are presented as mean ± SD from six independent experiments (n = 6 per group). **** P < 0.0001, LPS vs. control, LPS + si-NEAT1 vs. LPS + si-NC, LPS + si-NEAT1 + miR-inhibitor vs. LPS + si-NEAT1 + inhibitor NC. Abbreviation: miR-inhibitor = miR-29b-3p inhibitor. Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.
| Gene | Primer sequence |
| NEAT1 forward | 5’-GTGGCTGTTGGAGTCGGTAT-3’ |
| NEAT1 reverse | 5’-TAACAAACCACGGTCCATGA-3’ |
| ZO-1 forward | 5’-GCCGCTAAGAGCACAGCAA-3′ |
| ZO-1 reverse | 5’-TCCCCACTCTGAAAATGAGGA-3’ |
| Occludin forward | 5’-ATGGCAAAGTGAATGACAAGCGG-3’ |
| Occludin reverse | 5’-CTGTAACGAGGCTGCCTGAAGT-3’ |
| Claudin-2 forward | 5’-GTGACAGCAGTTGGCTTCTCCA-3’ |
| Claudin-2 reverse | 5’-GGAGATTGCACTGGATGTCACC-3’ |
| miR-29b-3p forward | 5’-GCTCTAGATCAGTTACAGAAAGACCACGA-3’ |
| miR-29b-3p reverse | 5’-GCTCTAGATAGTGTCCATGCACGGACC-3’ |
| GAPDH forward | 5’-CCAGGTGGTCTCCTCTGA-3’ |
| GAPDH reverse | 5’-GCTGTAGCCAAATCGTTGT-3’ |
| U6 forward | 5’-CTCGCTTCGGCAGCACA-3’ |
| U6 reverse | 5’-AACGCTTCACGAATTTGCGT-3’ |
Table 1: Primer sequences.
| Indicator | Control group (N=116) | IBS-D group (N=116) | P |
| Age, years | | | |
| < 40 | 63 | 54 | 0.293 |
| ≥ 40 | 53 | 62 | |
| Sex | | | |
| Male | 64 | 66 | 0.895 |
| Female | 52 | 50 | |
| Smoking | | | |
| NO | 58 | 53 | 0.599 |
| YES | 58 | 63 | |
| Drinking | | | |
| NO | 63 | 58 | 0.599 |
| YES | 53 | 58 | |
| HADS, score | | | |
| < 8 | 96 | 26 | < 0.0001 |
| ≥ 8 | 20 | 90 | |
| Bowel movements, number/day | | | |
| < 4 | 103 | 51 | < 0.0001 |
| ≥ 4 | 13 | 65 | |
| Stool form, Bristol score | | | |
| < 5 | 87 | 25 | < 0.0001 |
| ≥ 5 | 29 | 91 | |
| Abdominal pain frequency, number of days | | | |
| < 5 | / | 47 | / |
| ≥ 5 | / | 69 | |
| Severity of abdominal pain, score | | | |
| < 5 | / | 44 | / |
| ≥ 5 | / | 72 | |
Table 2: Comparison of demographic and clinical characteristics between healthy controls and IBS-D patients. Values are reported as participant counts for each group (n = 116/group). Between-group differences were evaluated using the chi-square test. Abbreviation: HADS = Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale; IBS-D = irritable bowel syndrome with diarrhea.
Supplemental File 1: Raw data underlying the figures and tables. This file contains the raw numerical data used to generate the quantitative results shown in Figure 1, Figure 2, Figure 3, Figure 4, Figure 5, and Figure 6, and the demographic/clinical data summarized in Table 2.Please click here to download this file.
Supplemental File 2: Unedited western blot images. This file contains the unedited western blot images for ZO-1, occludin, claudin-2, and GAPDH corresponding to the representative western blot panel shown in Figure 5H.Please click here to download this file.