Research Article

Soft Hip Exoskeleton Reduces Physiological Cost and Perceived Exertion In Older Adults During Uphill Walking

DOI:

10.3791/71062

June 9th, 2026

In This Article

Summary

Loading...
$$\rightleftharpoonup{xx}$$ $$\longleftharp{xx}$$, $$\longrightharp{xx}$$,

This protocol evaluates the efficacy of a lightweight soft hip exoskeleton in reducing physiological stress during uphill walking in older adults. Using a randomized crossover design, the method demonstrates that the device significantly reduces physiological cost and subjective fatigue in the elderly.

Abstract

Loading...
$$\rightleftharpoonup{xx}$$ $$\longleftharp{xx}$$, $$\longrightharp{xx}$$,

Mountain hiking and mountaineering are common activities for active older adults to maintain cardiovascular fitness; however, the high physiological demands of these activities often accelerate the onset of neuromuscular fatigue. This fatigue is a critical risk factor for sports-related injuries, such as falls and musculoskeletal strains. This study aims to investigate whether a lightweight soft hip exoskeleton can mitigate these risks and support safe physical activity for older adults during simulated mountaineering tasks. Twenty healthy older adults (63.45 ± 3.70 years) participated in a randomized crossover trial on a treadmill set to a 15% incline at 3.5 km/h. Participants walked for 15 min under three conditions: No Exoskeleton (NO_EXO), Exoskeleton Active (EXO_ON), and Exoskeleton Passive (EXO_OFF). Outcomes included Physiological Cost Index (PCI), Peak Heart Rate (HR_Peak), and Rating of Perceived Exertion (Borg RPE). Active assistance (EXO_ON) significantly reduced the Physiological Cost Index to 13.80 ± 1.51, compared to NO_EXO (14.68 ± 2.11) and EXO_OFF (15.35 ± 1.83; p = 0.033). Similarly, RPE was significantly lower with active assistance (12.95 ± 1.15) than with unassisted (13.50 ± 1.19) or passive (14.00 ± 1.17) conditions (p = 0.023). Although Peak Heart Rate was lowest in EXO_ON (133.65 ± 7.74 bpm), differences across conditions were not statistically significant (p = 0.267). The device effectively offsets the physiological burden of its own mass, resulting in a net reduction in cardiovascular effort, as evidenced by lower PCI and RPE. These findings suggest that soft hip exoskeletons may improve walking efficiency and reduce perceived exertion during uphill walking in older adults.

Introduction

Loading...
$$\rightleftharpoonup{xx}$$ $$\longleftharp{xx}$$, $$\longrightharp{xx}$$,

As the global population ages, maintaining functional mobility in older adults has become a significant public health challenge1. Regular aerobic exercise plays a clear protective role in preventing cardiovascular disease, musculoskeletal degeneration, and cognitive decline2. Among various physical activities, outdoor hiking and mountaineering are widely adopted leisure activities for older adults due to their combination of social engagement and aerobic conditioning benefits2. However, compared to level walking, uphill walking imposes a substantial biomechanical load, requiring lower limb joints to generate greater net positive work to elevate the body’s center of mass3.

For older individuals, this increased biomechanical demand is often accompanied by specific compensatory strategies. Research by Franz and Kram indicates that with advancing age, power output during uphill walking exhibits a significant "distal-to-proximal shift"4. Specifically, the propulsive capacity of the ankle plantar flexors diminishes in older adults, who consequently rely more heavily on the hip extensors (gluteus maximus and hamstrings) for work production; the proportion of work performed by the hip is significantly higher than in younger controls4,5. This compensatory mechanism, superimposed on age-related sarcopenia and reduced cardiopulmonary reserve, results in a higher physiological cost during uphill locomotion in older adults, making them highly susceptible to neuromuscular fatigue6.

The accumulation of fatigue not only limits exercise tolerance but is also closely linked to an increased risk of falling7. Previous studies have shown that lower limb muscle fatigue disrupts gait stability and reduces minimum toe clearance, thereby significantly increasing the probability of tripping and falling7,8. Therefore, the development of assistive technologies capable of delaying fatigue onset is of great significance for ensuring the safety of older adults during outdoor activities.

Wearable exoskeleton robotics offer a potential pathway to address this issue9. While rigid exoskeletons excel at providing high torque output, their substantial mass often restricts the body's natural kinematic degrees of freedom. This can result in a "physiological penalty" where the physiological cost added by wearing the device offsets or even exceeds the benefits derived from the assistance10,11. Research by Browning et al. confirmed that adding 1 kg to the distal lower extremities significantly increases physiological cost, a non-negligible burden for older adults with limited physical capacity10. To overcome this limitation, "soft exosuits" based on flexible textiles and Bowden cable transmission have emerged, designed to minimize interference with natural gait by improving human-machine compliance12.

Although studies involving young healthy cohorts have confirmed that hip assistance can reduce the physiological cost of level walking13, research targeting older adults in the high-physiological-demand scenario of inclined walking remains relatively scarce. Given the increased reliance on hip work during uphill walking in older adults4,14, this study hypothesizes that a lightweight soft hip exoskeleton, by providing precise hip flexion assistive torque, can effectively overcome the physiological penalty of its own mass, thereby significantly reducing the Physiological Cost Index (PCI) and subjective fatigue (RPE) of older adults during a 15% incline walking task. To test this hypothesis, this study follows a within-subject randomized crossover design. The initial subject preparation and device fitting are performed by unblinded staff, while the formal walking assessment is supervised by a blinded assessor.

Access restricted. Please log in or start a trial to view this content.

Protocol

Loading...
$$\rightleftharpoonup{xx}$$ $$\longleftharp{xx}$$, $$\longrightharp{xx}$$,

The study protocol was approved by the Clinical Research Ethics Committee of the First Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine (Approval No. 2024-Research-022). All experimental procedures were performed in accordance with the principles of the Declaration of Helsinki.

Subject recruitment and screening
For this study, 20 healthy older adults (aged 60–75) were recruited from The First Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine15. Subjects were screened according to the following inclusion criteria: age 60–75 years; capability for independent walking without assistive devices; ability to walk continuously on a treadmill for ≥15 min; and MMSE score ≥24. Subjects with uncontrolled hypertension (resting BP ≥160/100 mmHg); unstable angina, severe arrhythmia, or myocardial infarction within 6 months; stroke, Parkinson’s disease, severe vertigo, or peripheral neuropathy; lower limb fracture or orthopedic surgery within 12 months; severe osteoarthritis or rheumatoid arthritis; open wounds, ulcers, dermatitis, severe varicose veins, or strap allergies at exoskeleton contact areas; BMI >30 kg/m2; or body dimensions outside the device range were excluded. Written informed consent was obtained, and baseline anthropometric metrics, including height, weight, and resting heart rate, were recorded.

Experimental setup
The treadmill was set to 3.5 km/h and 15% incline. A magnetic safety lanyard was attached from the participant’s belt to the treadmill auto-stop switch, and a supervising researcher maintained continuous access to the manual emergency stop. The exoskeleton device was prepared before testing. Battery charge level was verified to be >90%. The drive units were inspected manually to confirm the absence of cable entanglement, mechanical binding, or excessive friction in the transmission mechanisms. The exoskeleton provided terrain-adaptive assistance modes (Climbing, Downhill, Flat) with 5 intensity levels (up to 18 Nm). Climbing Mode incorporated a gait-learning algorithm and an angle-triggered mechanism (0–90° range) to synchronize hip flexion torque with the wearer’s gait phase. Assistance magnitude, predominantly at levels 3 or 4, was personalized based on subjective tolerance during adaptation. Subjects were fitted with a heart rate monitor for continuous data recording. The Borg RPE scale (6–20) and VAS pain scale (0–10) were printed on A4 paper and positioned within the participant’s clear line of sight to ensure immediate accessibility during testing.

Device donning and fitting (Unblinded phase)
An appropriate device size was selected based on participant height (Size L for height >165 cm; Size M for height ≤165 cm). Subjects were assisted in donning the shoulder straps, and the back module height was adjusted to coaxially align the lateral hip motor units with the greater trochanter. The magnetic waist buckle was fastened, and the lateral adjustment straps were tightened above the iliac crest to anchor the device securely to the pelvis and prevent slippage during actuation. Leg connections were secured. Thigh struts were aligned approximately 5–10 cm above the patella. Hooks were secured, and the Boa dial was rotated clockwise to tighten the thigh straps. Strap tension was verified by maintaining approximately 1.0–1.5 cm clearance between the strap and the skin when pulled perpendicular to the skin. Subjects performed squats and high leg lifts to verify the absence of mechanical interference or excessive cable tension (Figure 1). A 15-min adaptation session16 was conducted. Subjects walked without the device on the treadmill at 3.5 km/h and 15% incline for 5 min. Subjects walked with the unpowered exoskeleton (EXO_OFF) for 5 min. Subjects walked with the powered exoskeleton (EXO_ON) for 5 min while assistance intensity was gradually increased from level 1 to the subject’s comfort level (levels 3 or 4). Subjects then rested in a seated position for 20 min before the formal trials. The 20-min rest period ensured that heart rate and perceived exertion returned to baseline levels17.

Intervention and blinding
The order of the three experimental conditions was randomized using a computer-generated sequence to minimize learning and fatigue effects. In the NO_EXO condition, subjects walked in standard sportswear without the exoskeleton. In the EXO_ON condition, the device was activated in Climbing Mode with assist intensity set to level 3 or 4. The exact assistance level was determined by verifying a stable gait rhythm without visible postural instability, compensatory movements, or reported resistance to the device torque. All LED indicators (power and mode lights) were covered with black electrical tape in both EXO_ON and EXO_OFF conditions to maintain visual blinding. A 40-min seated rest period was provided between trials to allow heart rate and fatigue levels to return to baseline.

Simulated uphill walking task (Blinded assessment)
Subjects walked on the treadmill for 15 min and were encouraged to maintain natural walking without holding the handrails unless necessary for safety. Heart rate (HR) was continuously recorded. The 180 heart rate data points collected from min 12:00–15:00 at a sampling rate of 1 Hz were averaged to calculate the steady-state heart rate. The absolute highest heart rate recorded during the task was defined as HR_Peak. At min 14, subjects reported their level of exertion using the Borg RPE scale. Immediately after task completion (within 1 min), the VAS scale was used to assess skin integrity and joint pain. Skin contact areas were visually inspected for erythema, blisters, or pressure marks. Joint pain was recorded using a 0–10 cm VAS scale, where 0 indicated no pain, and 10 indicated the worst imaginable pain. Scores ≥4 were considered clinically significant discomfort requiring further evaluation. The Physiological Cost Index (PCI) was calculated using the formula adapted from MacGregor18: PCI = (Walking Heart Rate − Resting Heart Rate) / Walking Speed, expressed in beats per minute per kilometer per hour (beats/min/km/h).

Statistical analysis

Outcome variables were compared across conditions using ANOVA, with effect sizes reported as partial eta-squared (η2p). Post hoc pairwise comparisons used Bonferroni-corrected paired t-tests, and Cohen's dz with 95% CIs were calculated (Supplementary Table 1). Condition order was counterbalanced, with rest periods between trials to minimize carryover effects. Significance was set at p < 0.05.

Access restricted. Please log in or start a trial to view this content.

Results

Loading...
$$\rightleftharpoonup{xx}$$ $$\longleftharp{xx}$$, $$\longrightharp{xx}$$,

Subject characteristics

A total of 20 healthy older adults (10 male, 10 female) completed the study. The subjects had a mean age of 63.45 ± 3.70 years, a height of 1.65 ± 0.07 m, a weight of 60.51 ± 6.59 kg, and a Body Mass Index (BMI) of 22.13 ± 1.58 kg/m2 (Table 1). All subjects successfully completed the three walking conditions (NO_EXO, EXO_ON, EXO_OFF) with no reported adverse events.

Physiological cost index...

Access restricted. Please log in or start a trial to view this content.

Discussion

Loading...
$$\rightleftharpoonup{xx}$$ $$\longleftharp{xx}$$, $$\longrightharp{xx}$$,

This study evaluated the impact of a lightweight, soft hip exoskeleton on physiological and psychological metrics in older adults during simulated uphill walking, using a randomized, crossover design. The results show that, compared with the baseline condition (NO_EXO) and the passive wear condition (EXO_OFF), the active assistance mode (EXO_ON) significantly reduced PCI and subjective fatigue rating (RPE). This finding supports our hypothesis that targeted hip joint assistance can effectively reduce physiological stress...

Access restricted. Please log in or start a trial to view this content.

Disclosures

Loading...
$$\rightleftharpoonup{xx}$$ $$\longleftharp{xx}$$, $$\longrightharp{xx}$$,

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Acknowledgements

Loading...
$$\rightleftharpoonup{xx}$$ $$\longleftharp{xx}$$, $$\longrightharp{xx}$$,

We thank the volunteers for their participation.

Access restricted. Please log in or start a trial to view this content.

Materials

List of materials used in this article
NameCompanyCatalog NumberComments
Borg RPE ScaleN/A6-20 ScaleStandardized scale for assessing Rating of Perceived Exertion.
GraphPad PrismGraphPad SoftwareVersion 9.0Used for data visualization and generating boxplots.
Medical Weight/Height ScaleMeilenM-C-MSG100Used for baseline physical characteristic measurements (BMI).
Soft Hip Exoskeleton
(GOGO-H)
Hangzhou RoboCT Technology Development Co., Ltd
100189510835
Lightweight soft robotic suit (2.3 kg) providing hip flexion assistance.
SPSS Statistics SoftwareIBMVersion 26.0Used for statistical analysis.
Standard Motorized TreadmillYPOOM5maxUsed for simulated uphill walking at a 15% incline and 3.5 km/h.
Visual Analog Scale (VAS)N/A10 cm lineUsed for subjective assessment of lower limb pain and discomfort.
Wearable smart bandXiaomi Communications Co., Ltd.6932554419790Wearable smart band used for real-time heart rate and blood oxygen monitoring.

Reprints and Permissions

Request permission to reuse the text or figures of this JoVE article

Request Permission

Tags

Cardiovascular FitnessNeuromuscular FatigueRandomized Crossover TrialWalking EfficiencyPeak Heart Rate

Related Articles