This retrospective study was conducted in accordance with institutional requirements and the Declaration of Helsinki and was approved by the Ethics Committee of Nanjing Tongren Hospital Affiliated to Southeast University Medical School (approval no. 2024-03-039-K001). The requirement for individual informed consent was waived due to the retrospective design and the use of anonymized data.
Clinical data
A total of 172 children with MPP treated between April 2018 and April 2021 were included as the case group, together with 40 healthy children as controls. The case group comprised 103 boys and 69 girls, with a mean age of 7.15 ± 2.97 years; the control group comprised 24 boys and 16 girls, with a mean age of 7.02 ± 2.31 years. Baseline age and sex did not differ significantly between the groups (P > 0.05). According to the criteria described10, MPP was classified as severe when at least two of the following were present: evident dyspnea, heart rate >120 beats/min, fever lasting >10 days, multilobar involvement, or large-area pulmonary infiltration. The remaining cases were classified as mild-to-moderate MPP.
Inclusion criteria
All children with MPP met the clinical diagnostic criteria for MPP11. Diagnosis was supported by an MP antibody titer >1:160, a positive MP DNA test, or a fourfold or greater increase in serum MP-specific IgG between the acute and recovery phases. Clinical manifestations included cough, shortness of breath, tachycardia, cyanosis, or dyspnea, and chest imaging showed unilateral or bilateral pulmonary lesions. Eligible participants were 8 months to 10 years of age.
Children were excluded if they had confirmed viral, bacterial, or fungal pneumonia; severe dysfunction of major organs, including the heart, brain, liver, or kidneys; another pulmonary disease; a malignant tumor; congenital immune dysfunction; or insufficient clinical information for the required analyses.
Children in the control group were 8 months to 10 years of age, were in good health, and had normal findings on physical examination. The control group was used only for biomarker comparisons and did not contribute to the prognostic or regression analyses.
Data collection
The hospital information system was reviewed for age, sex, fever duration, lesion type and location, immune function status, CRP level, extrapulmonary complications, treatment information, and follow-up outcomes. Immune dysfunction was determined from the contemporaneous medical record prior to outcome assessment, based on immunoglobulin values that fell below the hospital laboratory's age-specific reference intervals. Data were initially extracted by Boling Han and cross-checked against the original medical records by Rui Wang. Any discrepancies were resolved through discussion between the two investigators. Data completeness was verified before analysis. The complete variable definitions, coding rules, and de-identified cohort dataset are provided in Supplementary File 1.
Measurement of immune function indicators and inflammatory markers
Within 24 hours after enrollment, 4 mL of fasting venous blood was collected from each participant. Samples were centrifuged at 1,500 × g for 10 min at 4°C, and the resulting serum was stored in accordance with the institutional laboratory protocol until analysis. Serum IgA, IgG, and IgM concentrations were measured by immunoturbidimetry, and CRP was measured by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay. Specifically, serum samples were stored at –80 °C for no longer than 3 months before analysis, and repeated freeze-thaw cycles were avoided.
Treatment protocol
Treatment was individualized according to clinical severity and the applicable institutional practice. Conventional management included anti-infective therapy and supportive care, including oxygen therapy, nebulized inhalation, fluid administration and maintenance of water and electrolyte balance, antipyretic treatment, and other symptomatic measures as clinically indicated. Children with severe MPP were treated with azithromycin, and methylprednisolone was used as adjunctive anti-inflammatory treatment when clinically indicated. Although all patients were managed according to the same institutional principles, the specific supportive measures were individualized rather than strictly standardized. Because of the retrospective design, exact treatment timing and regimen details were not uniformly available for all participants.
Prognosis follow-up
Children with severe MPP were followed monthly through outpatient visits and telephone contact until April 2022. Prognosis was classified as good when body temperature normalized, respiratory symptoms improved, and pulmonary lesions were absorbed or resolved. Poor prognosis was defined as a composite outcome comprising persistent fever, worsening cough or dyspnea, absent radiographic improvement or radiographic deterioration, transfer to another hospital, or death12. The components could overlap and were not analyzed as mutually exclusive outcomes. All 114 children with severe MPP completed follow-up, and no participants were lost to follow-up.
Statistical analysis
Analyses were performed using IBM SPSS Statistics version 22.0. Continuous variables were summarized as mean ± standard deviation. Two-group comparisons used the independent-samples t test, and comparisons among more than two groups used one-way analysis of variance. Categorical variables were summarized as n (%) and compared using the chi-square test. ROC curves were used to evaluate IgA, IgG, IgM, and CRP individually, with AUCs, 95% confidence intervals, cutoff values, sensitivity, and specificity reported. The four biomarkers were not combined into a multivariable prediction model. Variables associated with prognosis in univariable analyses were entered into an exploratory stepwise binary logistic regression. Regression results were reported as beta coefficients, standard errors, Wald statistics, odds ratios (ORs), 95% confidence intervals, and P values. Because of the limited number of poor-prognosis events, the regression was interpreted as an exploratory association analysis rather than a validated prediction model. A two-sided P < 0.05 was considered statistically significant. The normality of continuous variables was assessed using the Shapiro-Wilk test, and homogeneity of variance was evaluated using Levene's test. There were no missing values in the variables included in the analyses; therefore, no imputation was performed, and complete-case analyses were used.