Striated muscle is the motor that generates skeletal movement in humans and other animals. Understanding its unique hierarchical composition is complicated by cross-scale factors influencing the generation of force and production of work1,2. Perhaps because of these complexities, muscle function can be an underprioritized component in anatomy and physiology curricula, because educators lack the tools needed to properly showcase the fundamental and most fascinating aspects of muscle function3,4,5,6.
Muscle function has historically been described through several enduring paradigms, none more widely recognized than the force–velocity trade-off first characterized nearly a century ago by Archibald Vivian Hill1,2,3,4,5,6. This fundamental physiological relationship describes the trade-off between muscle contraction velocity and force, whereby isometric or very slow shortening contractions are generally the strongest, producing peak muscle force (Fmax), whereas the fastest isotonic contractions approaching peak muscle velocity (Vmax) are typically the weakest1. When Hill described the force–velocity–power (FVP) relationship in 1938, he introduced a function that still bears his name. The Hill equation (Equation 1) relates the peak force generated during an isometric contraction (with fixed muscle ends) to the peak velocity achieved in the absence of an external load.
Equation 1: (v + b) (F + a) = b (Fmax + a)
where v is shortening velocity, F is muscle force, Fmax is maximum isometric force, and a and b are constants that describe the force–velocity relationship and the energetic properties of muscle shortening1.
Embedded within this fundamental relationship are several key concepts of muscle function represented by five quantitative parameters that define the FVP relationship. The product of instantaneous muscle force and velocity is power, which typically reaches a maximum value (Pmax) at approximately one-third of Vmax7. The velocity at which Pmax occurs is referred to as the optimal velocity (Vopt), and its location within the range of shortening velocities (from V0 to Vmax) is an important characteristic of the force–velocity and power–velocity relationships. For example, a greater Vopt results in peak power being delivered at a higher shortening velocity. Within the force–velocity relationship itself, peak force (Fmax) and peak velocity (Vmax) are connected by intermediate force–velocity relationships in a curvilinear manner (Figure 5A). Representative force–velocity and power–velocity relationships obtained using the present methodology are shown in Figure 1. The slope of this curve is referred to as the force–velocity curvature, which describes the rate of force decline with increasing velocity. Curvature is defined as a/Fmax8, where a is the thermodynamic constants in the Hill equation that quantifies frictional heat generation by an unloaded shortening muscle1. Curvature influences the position of Vopt on the force–velocity curve and determines how much force a muscle can generate at a given shortening velocity. Curvature has also been described using the muscular power ratio (Equation 2)9.
Equation 2: 
where Pmax is the maximum muscle power output, and Vmax and Fmax are the maximum shortening velocity and maximum isometric force, respectively.
The intuitive nature of the force-velocity and power-velocity relationships provides effective entry points when teaching muscle function in the life sciences classroom. The importance of providing students with hands-on opportunities to build a more complete understanding of the FVP relationships is underscored by the fact that hands-on learning has been shown to improve knowledge-retention10. Moreover, experimental learning is known to strengthen the foundation for assessing muscle function, both in a fundamental scientific context and as preparation for occupations in healthcare, including injury prevention, rehabilitation, and physical training.
Traditional instruments for testing muscle physiological properties, such as dual-mode servomotor lever systems, are highly precise and accurate but incur prohibitive costs and therefore pose substantial barriers to implementation in most classroom environments7. To address these limitations and expand opportunities for hands-on learning, a low-cost alternative was developed. The apparatus is built around a 3D-printed pulley incorporating a ratchet-and-pawl gear and uses off-the-shelf slotted aluminum railings, stiff wire, and a caddy-mounted smartphone running a free data acquisition application (Figure 2). A smartphone was selected instead of dedicated acceleration-measurement devices because smartphones are widely available and are typically equipped with accurate and robust accelerometers11. The utility of smartphones as scientific measurement devices has been demonstrated previously, including the incorporation of a commercially available smartphone accelerometer into the inertial measurement unit of the Ingenuity Mars Helicopter12.
While there are a few existing low-cost tools for teaching muscle physiology, they target different concepts: Judge et al.6 developed affordable SpikerBox-based activities for recording muscle electrical activity, and Medeiros et al.10 created a low-cost 2-D sarcomere model to demonstrate titin-related mechanics. However, no existing low-cost tool allows students to directly measure the FVP relationships of a contracting human muscle and generate quantitative, research-comparable data. The present apparatus is intended to fill this gap by delivering gold-standard-validated FVP measurements for under $300.
The present study reports on the construction of a low-cost FVP apparatus with a cross-validation against the industry gold standard. The validation analyses rely on pairwise comparisons of the five recognized FVP summary variables, measured in the same subjects on both apparatuses. The analyses test the hypothesis that both apparatuses generate equivalent force-velocity and power-velocity curves. With successful cross-validation, the low-cost apparatus can democratize classroom studies of muscle physiology and musculoskeletal biomechanics by lowering the financial barrier to apparatus acquisition, whilst maintaining experimental accuracy and thus scientific rigor. It is anticipated that the low-cost apparatus can inspire and enable students and educators in physiology and biomechanics classrooms worldwide who already study and teach muscle anatomy to practically explore one of the most foundational relationships of muscle. By including a hands-on activity for generating physiological measurements, classrooms can achieve multimodal understanding and improved knowledge-retention.