In this B-cell ELISpot assay, antibody-secreting cells (ASCs) were detected using CH505 SOSIP, a soluble HIV-1 envelope glycoprotein (Env) trimer, as the coating antigen in a vaccine study aimed at eliciting broadly neutralizing antibodies (bnAbs) against HIV-1. Figure 1 illustrates the ELISpot plate layout used to quantify total and antigen-specific ASCs on separate plates. The layout identifies individual animals and the well positions assigned for IgG, IgM, and IgA analyses. Plate labels also include the study number, sampling time point, and date. In addition, the layout specifies the coating concentrations, cell suspension volumes, and serial dilution scheme used for the assay.
Figure 2 presents representative antigen-specific ASC responses in bone marrow, showing spots of varying size and intensity corresponding to individual ASCs secreting different amounts of antibody. IgG-producing ASCs generated the greatest number of spots, followed by IgM, whereas IgA responses were comparatively low. Automated spot enumeration was based on a predefined spot diameter and tended to overestimate the number of spots when large spots were present. Consequently, manual spot counting was performed to accurately enumerate ASCs, as demonstrated in the magnified representative wells from a single animal.
Table 2 lists the dilution factors (15×, 45×, and 135× for total immunoglobulin assays; 3×, 9×, and 27× for antigen-specific assays) used for the calculation of the total immunoglobulin plate and antigen-specific plate. Table 3 summarizes the manually counted antigen-specific (CH505) ASC spots for IgG, IgM, and IgA obtained from individual wells for four rhesus macaques (RH1–RH4). Wells containing excessive spot numbers at the highest cell concentration were excluded from analysis when individual spots could not be reliably distinguished.
Table 4 presents the mean ASC counts calculated from duplicate wells shown in Table 3. When the highest cell concentration produced an uncountable number of spots, the average was calculated using the remaining countable dilutions. Table 5 shows the calculated ASC frequencies per million input cells. These values were obtained by multiplying the average spot counts by the appropriate dilution factors (15×, 45×, and 135× for total immunoglobulin assays; 3×, 9×, and 27× for antigen-specific assays). Table 6 summarizes the calculated ASC frequencies per million cells for each individual animal together with the mean responses for the immunized animal group.
Figure 3 compares baseline and post-booster (5 days after immunization) plasmablast responses in PBMCs. Total ASC responses (Figure 3A) and antigen-specific CH505 ASC responses (Figure 3B) increased markedly following booster immunization for IgG, IgM, and IgA compared with baseline. These findings are consistent with the transient expansion of circulating plasmablasts released from draining lymph nodes following booster immunization. Figure 3C shows the ratio of antigen-specific to total ASCs at baseline and after boosting. The increased ratio observed after booster immunization reflects an enhanced antigen-specific response and provides a useful measure for comparing the immunogenicity of different vaccine formulations and adjuvants. The total number of plasmablasts observed after booster immunizations is consistently higher than at baseline, likely reflecting adjuvant-mediated immune activation. This, combined with higher background antigen-specific plasmablast values, may result in inflated ratios for individual animals, though the mean ratios across the four animals clearly increased post-immunization.
Similarly, Figure 4 shows an increased frequency of antigen-specific (CH505) ASCs in bone marrow following booster immunization, consistent with the establishment of long-lived plasma cells (LLPCs). The ratio of antigen-specific to total bone marrow ASCs also increased after boosting compared with baseline (Figure 4C), indicating successful accumulation of antigen-specific plasma cells within the bone marrow compartment.

Figure 1: ELISpot plate layout for the quantification of total and antigen-specific antibody-secreting cells. Plate layouts showing the detection of (A) total immunoglobulin (Ig) plasmablasts, (B) antigen-specific plasmablasts, (C) total Ig plasma cells, and (D) antigen-specific plasma cells. Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.

Figure 2: ELISpot detection of antigen-specific IgG, IgM, and IgA antibody-secreting cells in a bone marrow sample. (A) Representative IgG, IgM, and IgA ASC responses to CH505 antigen from a single rhesus macaque (RH1) bone marrow sample. Each dark spot represents an individual ASC secreting antigen-specific antibody. Three cell dilutions (0.33, 0.11, and 0.037 million cells per well) were analyzed in duplicate. (B) Magnified images compare automated spot counts (black) with manually corrected counts (red), illustrating the need for manual enumeration when spot size varies substantially. Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.

Figure 3: Total and antigen-specific IgG, IgM, and IgA antibody-secreting cells in peripheral blood mononuclear cells. (A) Total plasmablast responses and (B) CH505-specific plasmablast responses for IgG, IgM, and IgA were measured at baseline and 5 days after booster immunization. Values represent the mean spot counts from duplicate wells normalized using the appropriate serial dilution factors (15×, 45×, and 135× for total ASCs; 3×, 9×, and 27× for antigen-specific ASCs). (C) Ratio of antigen-specific to total ASC responses at baseline and after booster immunization. Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.

Figure 4: Total and antigen-specific IgG, IgM, and IgA antibody-secreting cell responses in bone marrow. (A) Total and (B) antigen-specific antibody-secreting cell (ASC) responses in bone marrow were measured at baseline and 1 month after booster immunization. Values represent the mean spot counts from duplicate wells normalized using the appropriate serial dilution factors (15×, 45×, and 135× for total ASCs; 3×, 9×, and 27× for antigen-specific ASCs). (C) Ratio of antigen-specific to total ASC responses for each immunoglobulin isotype at baseline and after booster immunization. Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.
| Method | Wash |
| Plate Type | 96-well |
| Number of Cycles | 4 |
| Predispense Before Washing | No |
| Bottom wash before First Cycle | No |
| Wash Format | Plate |
| Soak/Shake After Dispense | No |
| Predispense between the cycle | No |
| Shake before Soak | No |
| Prime | No (The washer was primed before use) |
| Dispense Parameter |
| Volume | 200µl/well |
| Flow Rate | 3 |
| Advance Options | Z: Dispense height: 200(25.41mm above carrier |
| X: Offset: 0 (Center of the well) |
| Y: Offset: 0 (Center of the well) |
| Delay Start of Vacuum During Dispense | 0 µl/well |
| Aspiration Parameter |
| Flow Rate | 2 |
| Delay | 0 msec |
| Advanced Options | Z: Aspiration height: 40(5.08 mm above carrier) |
| X: Offset: 0 (Center of the well) |
| Y: Offset: 0 (Center of the well) |
| Perform Secondary aspirate | NO |
| Final Aspiration | Yes |
Table 1: Automated ELISpot plate washer settings used for assay processing.
| For Total Immunoglobulin plates starting with 1 million cells/ml |
| 3- fold dilution | Cells/well | Volume | Factor/Million |
| A | 0.066 million | 133 µL | 15 X |
| B | 0.022 million | 133 µL | 45 X |
| C | 0.007 million | 133 µL | 135 X |
| For Antigen Specific plates starting with 5 million cells/ml |
| 3- fold dilution | Cells/well | Volume | Factor/Million |
| A | 0.33 million | 133 µL | 3 X |
| B | 0.11 million | 133 µL | 9 X |
| C | 0.037 million | 133 µL | 27 X |
Table 2: Calculation worksheet for determining antibody-secreting cells per million input cells from ELISpot spot counts.
| Plate-2: Gp1, CH505-specific IgG, IgM and IgA |
| 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 |
| Monkey# | #RH1 | #RH2 |
| Ab-isotype | IgG | IgG | IgM | IgM | IgA | IgA | IgG | IgG | IgM | IgM | IgA | IgA |
| A | 28 | 28 | 29 | 23 | 2 | 0 | 40 | 25 | 23 | 16 | 0 | 5 |
| B | 16 | 15 | 7 | 14 | 0 | 1 | 15 | 17 | 8 | 15 | 0 | 1 |
| C | 8 | 6 | 3 | 12 | 3 | 0 | 8 | 2 | 3 | 5 | 0 | 0 |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Monkey# | #RH3 | #RH4 |
| Ab-isotype | IgG | IgG | IgM | IgM | IgA | IgA | IgG | IgG | IgM | IgM | IgA | IgA |
| E | 54 | 32 | 28 | 35 | 7 | 7 | NC | NC | 30 | 30 | 0 | 6 |
| F | 25 | 19 | 13 | 23 | 0 | 0 | 21 | 24 | 18 | 13 | 2 | 0 |
| G | 13 | 9 | 7 | 9 | 1 | 3 | 18 | 19 | 10 | 11 | 0 | 0 |
Table 3: Manual spot counts of CH505-specific IgG, IgM, and IgA antibody-secreting cells from individual ELISpot wells.
| CH505-specific (Average) |
| #RH1 | #RH2 |
| IgG | IgM | IgA | IgG | IgM | IgA |
| A | 28 | 26 | 1 | 33 | 20 | 3 |
| B | 16 | 11 | 1 | 16 | 12 | 1 |
| C | 7 | 8 | 2 | 5 | 4 | 0 |
| | | | | | |
| #RH3 | #RH4 |
| IgG | IgM | IgA | IgG | IgM | IgA |
| E | 43 | 32 | 7 | NC | 30 | 3 |
| F | 22 | 18 | 0 | 23 | 16 | 1 |
| G | 11 | 8 | 2 | 19 | 11 | 0 |
Table 4: Mean antibody-secreting cell counts calculated from duplicate ELISpot wells.
| | | CH505-specific responses per million BM | | | | |
| #RH1 | | | #RH2 | | | |
| IgG | IgM | IgA | IgG | IgM | IgA | Dilution factor |
| A | 84 | 78 | 3 | 98 | 59 | 8 | ×3 |
| B | 140 | 95 | 5 | 144 | 104 | 5 | ×9 |
| C | 189 | 203 | 41 | 135 | 108 | 0 | ×27 |
| Average | 138 | 125 | 16 | 126 | 90 | 4 | Responses |
| | | | | | | |
| #RH3 | | | #RH4 | | | |
| IgG | IgM | IgA | IgG | IgM | IgA | |
| E | 129 | 95 | 21 | NC | 90 | 9 | ×3 |
| F | 198 | 162 | 0 | 203 | 140 | 9 | ×9 |
| G | 297 | 216 | 54 | 500 | 284 | 0 | ×27 |
| Average | 208 | 158 | 25 | 351 | 171 | 6 | Responses |
Table 5: Calculated frequencies of total and antigen-specific antibody-secreting cells per million input cells after application of dilution factors.
| BM ELISpot: CH505-specific responses |
| CH505-spec IgG | CH505 IgM | CH505 IgA |
| #RH1 | 138 | #RH1 | 125 | #RH1 | 16 |
| #RH2 | 126 | #RH2 | 90 | #RH2 | 4 |
| #RH3 | 208 | #RH3 | 158 | #RH3 | 25 |
| #RH4 | 351 | #RH4 | 171 | #RH4 | 6 |
| | | | | |
| Average | 206 | Average | 136 | Average | 13 |
| SEM | 46 | SEM | 16 | SEM | 4 |
| Let 0=1, in the graph with Log |
Table 6: Summary of antibody-secreting cell frequencies per million cells for individual rhesus macaques and group mean responses.