$$\rightleftharpoonup{xx}$$
$$\longleftharp{xx}$$,
$$\longrightharp{xx}$$,
Takayasu arteritis (TAK) is a chronic granulomatous large-vessel vasculitis that primarily affects the aorta and its major branches. Although TAK is the most common large-vessel vasculitis in the pediatric population, its incidence in children is extremely low, estimated at approximately 0.4 per million person-years1. Compared with adult-onset disease, childhood-onset TAK is associated with more severe organ involvement, a higher relapse rate, and worse long-term outcomes2,3,4. The clinical presentation in children is often insidious and nonspecific, with unexplained fever, malaise, weight loss, and elevated acute-phase reactants being common early manifestations, frequently leading to diagnostic delays5,6.
The coexistence of TAK with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD), particularly ulcerative colitis (UC), has been increasingly recognized in the literature7,8,9. Epidemiological data suggest that UC occurs in approximately 6.4% of patients with TAK, and both conditions share genetic susceptibility loci, including HLA-B*52:01 and IL12B10. The two diseases may also share common immunopathological pathways, including B-cell dysregulation and the presence of anti-endothelial protein C receptor autoantibodies11. However, the co-occurrence of TAK with a history suggestive of UC in children is exceedingly rare, and diagnostic challenges arise when the intestinal pathology does not meet the classic histopathological criteria for UC.
Behçet's disease (BD) is a systemic vasculitis that can involve both large and small vessels and may present with gastrointestinal ulcers and vascular inflammation, creating diagnostic overlap with TAK and UC12. However, BD is defined by recurrent oral ulcers as a mandatory criterion, together with at least two of the following: genital ulcers, eye lesions, skin lesions, or a positive pathergy test13. When a child presents with both intestinal inflammation and large-vessel vasculitis, BD often enters the differential diagnosis. Strict adherence to validated classification criteria is therefore essential to avoid overdiagnosis and unnecessary treatment.
Herein, we report a 14-year-old female patient with a previous diagnosis of ulcerative colitis who presented with intermittent fever and was ultimately diagnosed with definite Takayasu arteritis and chronic active proctitis of unspecified etiology. BD was considered in the differential diagnosis but was rigorously excluded because of the absence of its core clinical features. This case highlights the diagnostic challenges in differentiating Takayasu arteritis from BD and ulcerative colitis in children and emphasizes the importance of applying validated classification criteria.
Case Presentation:
The patient was a 14-year-old girl who was admitted to the hospital on 15 January 2025 with a 20-day history of intermittent fever. The maximum recorded temperature was 38.1 °C, with an irregular fever pattern. During febrile episodes, she reported dizziness, nausea, and neck pain. Approximately one year before admission, she had been diagnosed with ulcerative colitis at the Seventh Medical Center of the Chinese PLA General Hospital because of hematochezia. She received a 10-day course of inpatient treatment and had been taking oral mesalazine granules (0.5 g twice daily) regularly for one year after discharge. During follow-up, stool examinations and liver and kidney function tests remained within the normal ranges.
On admission, her vital signs were as follows: temperature, 37.1 °C; heart rate, 112 beats/min; and respiratory rate, 24 breaths/min. Blood pressure was measured in the supine position using a standard mercury sphygmomanometer with an appropriately sized cuff, sequentially in all four limbs. On 18 January 2025, the measurements were 105/64 mmHg in the left upper limb, 106/64 mmHg in the right upper limb, 104/73 mmHg in the left lower limb, and 102/67 mmHg in the right lower limb. No persistent interlimb blood pressure difference exceeding 20 mmHg was observed. Peripheral pulses were palpable without deficits, and no vascular bruits were detected. Physical examination revealed no oral ulcers, genital ulcers, skin lesions (including erythema nodosum or folliculitis), or ocular abnormalities. A tender right cervical lymph node measuring approximately 1.5 × 1.0 cm with good mobility was palpated. Cardiopulmonary, abdominal, musculoskeletal, and neurological examinations were otherwise unremarkable. Serum amyloid A (SAA) was measured once at an outside hospital before admission, with a result of 307.71 mg/L (reference <10 mg/L); this test was not repeated during follow-up.
Diagnosis, Assessment, and Plan:
Laboratory evaluation was performed on samples collected on different dates. On 15 January 2025, a complete blood count demonstrated mild anemia (hemoglobin, 108 g/L; reference, 114–154 g/L) and thrombocytosis (platelet count, 463 × 109/L; reference, 150–407 × 109/L). The C-reactive protein (CRP) level was 93.19 mg/L (reference, <10 mg/L), and the erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR) was 90 mm/h (reference, 0–20 mm/h). On the same day, autoantibody testing was positive for perinuclear antineutrophil cytoplasmic antibody (pANCA), whereas antinuclear antibody (ANA), rheumatoid factor, and anti-cyclic citrullinated peptide antibody were negative. Complement C3 (2.060 g/L; reference, 0.850–1.930 g/L) and C4 (0.494 g/L; reference, 0.120–0.360 g/L) levels were elevated. Serum immunoglobulin levels (IgG, IgA, IgM, and IgE) were within the normal ranges. Infection screening was negative, and liver and kidney function tests were normal.
Computed tomography angiography (CTA) demonstrated diffuse wall thickening of the aortic arch and brachiocephalic trunk, and of the bilateral common carotid, subclavian, and axillary arteries, with luminal stenosis most severe in the subclavian arteries. No aneurysms were identified (Figure 1). Initial color Doppler ultrasonography performed on 18 January 2025 confirmed thickening of the bilateral common carotid arteries (left, 2.6 mm; right, 2.0 mm) and the left subclavian artery (1.3 mm). Colonoscopy performed on 6 February 2025 revealed rectal mucosal elevations with erosions. Histopathological examination of the rectal biopsy demonstrated severe chronic active proctitis, characterized by focal mucosal erosion/ulceration, glandular architectural irregularity, prominent lymphoplasmacytic and neutrophilic infiltration, and occasional cryptitis; no crypt abscesses or granulomas were identified. Biopsies from the terminal ileum, cecum, and sigmoid colon showed only mild chronic inflammatory changes without cryptitis or crypt abscesses. Whole-exome sequencing identified no pathogenic variants associated with monogenic autoinflammatory or autoimmune diseases.
The patient fulfilled the 2010 EULAR/PReS/PRINTO classification criteria for childhood-onset Takayasu arteritis, based on angiographic abnormalities of the aorta and its major branches, together with elevated acute-phase reactants2,14. Therefore, the diagnosis of Takayasu arteritis was established.
Behçet's disease (BD) was considered in the differential diagnosis because of the coexistence of intestinal inflammation (a previous diagnosis of ulcerative colitis and biopsy-confirmed proctitis) and large-vessel vasculitis. However, the patient did not fulfill the International Study Group (ISG) criteria for Behçet's disease15.
The previous diagnosis of ulcerative colitis was subsequently re-evaluated. Histopathological examination showed glandular architectural irregularity and active inflammation in the rectum, including occasional cryptitis, but no crypt abscesses or granulomas. Although mild chronic inflammatory changes were also present in the terminal ileum, cecum, and sigmoid colon, the overall distribution and histopathological pattern were insufficiently specific to confirm classic ulcerative colitis.
Histopathologically, the rectal lesion was diagnosed as severe chronic active proctitis. Because the overall clinical, endoscopic, and histopathological findings were insufficient to establish a specific etiology, the condition was ultimately classified as chronic active proctitis of unspecified etiology. This finding may represent a limited form of inflammatory bowel disease, nonspecific inflammation, or an intestinal manifestation of systemic inflammation.
Based on the integration of the clinical presentation, imaging findings, laboratory results, and histopathological examination, the final diagnoses were (1) definite Takayasu arteritis and (2) chronic active proctitis of unspecified etiology.