A subscription to JoVE is required to view this content. Sign in or start your free trial.

Method Article

DNA-FISH Metaphase Spreads to Distinguish Extrachromosomal DNA from Homogeneously Staining Regions in Human Cancer Cell Lines

369 views

⸱

DOI:

10.3791/71970

⸱

August 4th, 2026

 ,  , 

In This Article

Summary

We report a DNA-FISH metaphase spread protocol that visually detects locus copy number and location within the genome. This approach enables single-cell resolution of amplification states, specifically in cancer cell lines containing extrachromosomal DNA and homogeneously staining regions.

Abstract

Whole-genome sequencing identifies focal DNA amplifications with base-pair resolution but cannot determine whether amplified sequences reside on extrachromosomal DNA (ecDNA, also known as double minutes) or within chromosomally integrated homogeneously staining regions (HSRs). DNA fluorescence in situ hybridization (DNA-FISH) metaphase spreads remain the gold standard for distinguishing these amplification states at single-cell resolution. Here, we present a detailed protocol for DNA-FISH metaphase spreads using human cancer cell lines, encompassing cell culture, metaphase arrest, hypotonic treatment, fixation, chromosome spreading, fluorescent probe hybridization, and fluorescence imaging. The protocol incorporates intermediate quality-control steps to verify successful chromosome dispersion and optimize metaphase spread quality, making the workflow accessible to laboratories without specialized cytogenetics expertise. Results demonstrate clear visualization of ecDNA and HSR amplification states using locus-specific probes and illustrate common technical artifacts that can affect interpretation. This protocol provides a robust and reproducible approach for studying the structural organization of oncogene amplification in cancer cells.

Introduction

The human genome is organized not only by its sequence, but also by its structure, and changes in either sequence or structure can lead to cancer1,2,3,4. Oncogene amplification is present in approximately 40% of all tumors, where it contributes to tumor initiation, growth, metastasis, and drug resistance5. In some cases, amplified oncogenes are carried on extrachromosomal DNAs (ecDNAs, also called double minutes), which are circular, self-replicating, double-stranded DNA elements that reside outside of the linear chro....

Access restricted. Please log in or start a trial to view this content.

Protocol

All human cell culture procedures were performed in compliance with institutional guidelines.

1. Arrest cells in metaphase using Colcemid (N-methyl-N-deacetyl-colchicine)

  1. Begin with approximately 2.0 × 106–2.0 × 107 cancer cells or other cultured cells. Too few cells will yield fewer metaphase spreads, whereas too many cells may result in insufficient fixation.
  2. Determine the appropriate Colcemid incubation time for the experimental system. Incubation time affects the number of metaphase spreads obtained and chromosome length, and optimal conditions vary among cell ....

Access restricted. Please log in or start a trial to view this content.

Results

This protocol (Figure 1B) yields clean, well-dispersed, intact metaphase chromosomes suitable for cytogenetic analysis, with chromosomes and DNA-FISH signals clearly visible by fluorescence microscopy. Using a brightfield/phase-contrast microscope at low magnification (10× or 20×) is an important quality-control step to verify that nuclei have burst and chromosomes have dispersed (Figure 2). Successful fixation and tabletop dropping should yield well-dispersed m.......

Access restricted. Please log in or start a trial to view this content.

Discussion

Despite their well-established advantages, DNA-FISH metaphase spreads are underused in the era of WGS. The physical organization of amplified DNA is functionally significant, as it can influence downstream biological behavior and therapeutic response61,62,63,64. Focally amplified oncogenes can exist on ecDNA or within HSRs, and these two amplification states are not functionally equivalent

Access restricted. Please log in or start a trial to view this content.

Disclosures

The authors declare no competing interests.

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by NIH R00HG011467 and CPRIT RR23004 to G.S.E. Imaging for this project was supported by the Integrated Microscopy Core at Baylor College of Medicine with funding from the NIH (P30 DK056338, P30 CA125123, S10OD030414). The authors thank Dr. Pawel Stankiewicz for his advice early on. The authors also thank Dr. Paul Mischel (Stanford University) for providing the GBM39ec and GBM39hsr cell lines.

....

Access restricted. Please log in or start a trial to view this content.

Materials

List of materials used in this article
NameCompanyCatalog NumberComments
15-mL conical centrifugeany sourceNACentrifugation. 
15-mL conical tubesany sourceNACell collection.
200 proof ethanolany sourceNAWash steps. 
Acetic Acid, glacial, 99.7%Millipore Sigma695092Carnoys fixative and slide wash steps.
Antifade Mounting MediumFisherScientificNC9265087Slide mounting after completed slide preparation
Biological safety cabinet with vaccum outletany sourceNAChemical storage.
Colcemid (N-methyl-N-deacetyl-colchicine)Millipore Sigma10295892001Binds tubulin, arrests cells in metaphase.
Coplin jarsany sourceNAWash steps. 
DAPI (4′,6-diamidino-2-phenylindole)Milipore SigmaD8417-1MGFluorescent DNA stain.
EGFR/CON7 FISH probe Empire GenomicsEGFR-CHR07Locus-specific fluorescent probe. 
Elmer's rubber cementany sourceNAKeep coverslide in place during overnight probe hybridization.
Ethanol resistant permanent markerany sourceNASlide labeling.
Fluorescent microscopeany sourceNASlide imaging. 
Glass Cover Slip, 22 x 22mmThermoFisher50-143-780Probe hybridization on slide.
Glass Slide, precleanedVWR48311-703To drop metaphase spreads and perform DNA-FISH.
Humidified CO2 Incubatorany sourceNALive-cell incubation.
Hybridization BufferEmpire GenomicsHyb-BufferBuffer used with probe. 
Ice bucketany sourceNAKeep Carnoy's fixative cold. 
KCl (2M)ThermoFisherAM9640GSwell cells prior to fixation. 
Methanol, 99.9%, HPLC gradeMillipore Sigma1060351000For Carnoys fixative. 
Microcentrifugeany sourceNACentrifugation. 
Microcentrifuge tubesany sourceNAFor cells during fixation, and for probe preparation. 
MYC / SE 8 ProbeLeicaKI-10106Locus-specific fluorescent probe. 
PBS, pH 7.4Gibco10010-023Wash steps. 
Phase contrast microscopeany sourceNAImaging of metaphase spreads immediately after dropping
Pipette tipsany sourceNAPipetting.
Sodium chlorideMillipore SigmaS9888For SSC buffer.
Sodium citrateMillipore Sigma567446For SSC buffer.
Sterile ultrapure waterany sourceNAWash steps. 
ThermoBrite programmable slide incubatorany sourceNASlide incubation.
Tongsany sourceNAFor slide wash steps. 
Water bathany sourceNAFor KCl incubation. 

References

  1. Albertson DG. Gene amplification in cancer. Trends Genet. 2006;22:447-455.
  2. Bagci O, Kurtgöz S. Amplification of cellular oncogenes in solid tumors. N Am J Med Sci. 2015;7:341-346.
  3. Schimke RT, et al. Gene amplification and drug resistance in cultured animal cells. Cancer Treat Rev. 1984;11:9-17.
  4. Baker TM, Waise S, Tarabichi M, Van Loo P. Aneuploidy and complex genomic rearrangements in cancer evolution. Nat Cancer. 2024;5:228-239.
  5. Ohshima K, et al. Integrated analysis of gene expression and copy number identified potential cancer driver genes with amplification-dependent overexpression in 1,454 solid tumors. Sci Rep. 2017;7:641.

Access restricted. Please log in or start a trial to view this content.

Reprints and Permissions

Explore More Articles

Human Cancer CellsChromosome SpreadingFluorescence ImagingLocus-Specific ProbesOncogene AmplificationHypotonic Treatment