This protocol provides a practical and reproducible workflow for synchronizing cultured cells, performing staggered time-course sampling over 24–72 h without overnight collection, and analyzing circadian clock gene expression.
A subscription to JoVE is required to view this content. Sign in or start your free trial.
Method Article
This protocol provides a practical and reproducible workflow for synchronizing cultured cells, performing staggered time-course sampling over 24–72 h without overnight collection, and analyzing circadian clock gene expression.
Circadian rhythms are endogenous oscillations of approximately 24 h that regulate a wide range of cellular and physiological processes, including gene expression, metabolism, and behavior. These rhythms arise from interconnected transcriptional–translational feedback loops that respond to temporal and environmental cues. Because circadian regulation is highly dynamic, even minor experimental variations can influence phase, amplitude, and rhythmicity, making standardized experimental workflows essential for generating reliable and reproducible results. The goal of the present protocol is to provide a practical and reproducible workflow for synchronizing cultured cells, performing time-course sampling, and analyzing circadian clock gene expression under standard laboratory conditions. The protocol describes serum shock-based synchronization, staggered sample collection over 24–72 h to avoid overnight sampling, ribonucleic acid extraction, complementary deoxyribonucleic acid synthesis, quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction, and circadian rhythm analysis using appropriate statistical approaches. The workflow also highlights critical experimental considerations, including synchronization conditions, sample quality assessment, reference gene selection, and data analysis, to improve reproducibility across experiments. This method provides an accessible approach for investigating molecular circadian mechanisms and evaluating rhythmic gene expression in cultured cells, facilitating studies of circadian regulation in physiological and disease-related experimental models.
Circadian rhythms are endogenous cycles with a period of approximately 24 h that regulate a wide range of physiological, metabolic, and cellular processes1. In mammalian systems, these rhythms are coordinated by a central clock located in the suprachiasmatic nucleus (SCN) of the hypothalamus and by self-sustained molecular clocks at the cellular level. These clocks consist of interlocked transcriptional–translational feedback loops involving core clock genes, including circadian locomotor output cycles protein kaput (Clock), basic helix-loop-helix aryl hydrocarbon receptor nuclear translocase-like 1 (Bmal1), period (Per), and cryptochrome (Cry)2. Given the central role of the circadian clock in diverse biological processes, in vitro cell models have become important tools for investigating the molecular mechanisms of temporal regulation under controlled experimental conditions.
The goal of the present protocol is to provide a reliable, practical, and reproducible workflow for synchronizing cultured cells using a serum shock protocol, performing staggered time-course sampling, and analyzing circadian clock gene expression while avoiding overnight sample collection. By improving the feasibility of circadian sampling without compromising data quality, this workflow is intended to facilitate studies of rhythmic biological processes using standard laboratory techniques.
Circadian studies have been performed in a wide range of in vitro models, including human cancer cell lines3, rat-1 fibroblasts4, SCN explants5, and organoids6. Although most mammalian cells possess functional circadian clocks, the absence of synchronizing cues, such as light, rapidly leads to desynchronization in culture, limiting the study of circadian rhythms in vitro7. Therefore, synchronization techniques are essential for investigating molecular clock mechanisms and their implications in health and disease.
Several synchronization strategies have been developed for cultured mammalian cells. Glucocorticoid-based synchronization using dexamethasone is among the most widely used approaches because it robustly resets circadian rhythms in many cell types while reducing some of the variability associated with serum stimulation8. Similarly, forskolin-mediated activation of cyclic adenosine monophosphate signaling has been successfully used to synchronize peripheral clocks in selected cellular models9. Other approaches include treatment with blood-borne signals4, different chemical compounds8,10, medium exchange3, temperature shock11, oxygen cycles12, and mechanical stimulation13. Collectively, these methods have substantially advanced circadian research; however, they may require specialized equipment, specific experimental conditions, or additional optimization, making it important to validate the selected synchronization strategy for each biological model and experimental application14.
Serum shock is one of the most widely established synchronization approaches and consists of exposing cultured cells to a short-term, high-serum stimulus4. Because the stimulus is transient, prolonged perturbation of cellular signaling pathways is minimized4, reducing potential confounding effects on downstream analyses. Consequently, serum shock is particularly suitable for studies of circadian gene expression and molecular clock function. In addition, the procedure is straightforward to implement and does not require specialized equipment, making it accessible and readily reproducible across laboratories. A practical limitation of serum shock experiments, however, is the intensive sampling schedule required to characterize circadian rhythmicity accurately. Reliable rhythm analysis typically requires sample collection at regular intervals, usually every 2–6 h over one or more circadian cycles (24–72 h)14, often necessitating overnight collections.
The workflow described here addresses this logistical challenge by staggering the initiation of synchronization across multiple culture plates, thereby enabling complete circadian sampling during standard working hours while avoiding overnight sample collection. Rather than introducing a new synchronization strategy, this protocol provides a detailed and reproducible implementation of an established serum shock method combined with a practical sampling schedule and downstream gene expression analysis. This workflow is particularly appropriate for studies of circadian gene expression in cultured cells using widely available laboratory techniques. When adapting the protocol to additional cellular models, experimental parameters, including cell density, synchronization conditions, sampling intervals, and reference gene selection, should be optimized and validated for the specific cell type before implementation.
Access restricted. Please log in or start a trial to view this content.
The following protocol describes a validated synchronization method for the mHypoE-42 embryonic mouse hypothalamic cell line. Validate and optimize the synchronization protocol independently before applying it to other cultured cell types. See Figure 1 for an overview of the workflow and Supplementary Figure 1 for the weekly sampling schedule. Refer to the Table of Materials for all reagents, equipment, and instruments used in this protocol. Perform all cell culture procedures in a certified biosafety cabinet using sterile reagents and equipment.

Figure 1. Schematic overview of the staggered serum shock synchronization protocol. Schematic illustrating the workflow used to synchronize mHypoE-42 cells by serum shock in two staggered experimental sets. The staggered design enables circadian sample collection during standard working hours while avoiding overnight sampling. Samples are subsequently processed for RNA extraction, quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction (qRT-PCR), and circadian rhythm analysis. Created with Biorender.com. Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.
1. Cell culture
2. Synchronization of mHypoE-42 Cell Line
3. Sample Processing: RNA Extraction
NOTE: Protocols may vary depending on the experimental context and application. The following workflow describes an example of an effective procedure for RNA extraction, complementary DNA (cDNA) synthesis, and quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction (qRT-PCR). Extract total RNA using a combined phenol-based lysis and phase separation method followed by purification with silica spin columns.
4. Sample Processing: cDNA Synthesis
NOTE: Synthesize cDNA from 1 μg of total RNA using a first-strand cDNA synthesis kit. Adjust reaction volumes and incubation conditions according to the manufacturer’s instructions.
5. Sample Processing: Real-Time Quantitative Polymerase Chain Reaction (qRT-PCR)
NOTE: Measure the expression of circadian clock genes using qRT-PCR. Refer to Supplementary Table 2 for validated primer sequences, annealing temperatures, and primer concentrations.
6. Data Analysis
Access restricted. Please log in or start a trial to view this content.
Successful synchronization is indicated by statistically significant circadian rhythmicity of the analyzed clock genes under the control condition (p < 0.05). In this study, three independent biological experiments were performed, with 0.1% dimethyl sulfoxide serving as the negative control. Bmal1 and Per2 were selected as representative circadian markers because they are core components of the molecular circadian clock and exhibit a well-characterized antiphasic expression pattern. Represen...
Access restricted. Please log in or start a trial to view this content.
Circadian rhythms are endogenous cycles of approximately 24 h that regulate a wide range of physiological, metabolic, and cellular processes through conserved molecular clock mechanisms1,2. In vitro synchronization models provide a controlled experimental environment for investigating these mechanisms and have become valuable tools for studying circadian regulation under normal and pathological conditions, including exposure to environmental contaminants...
Access restricted. Please log in or start a trial to view this content.
The authors declare no conflicts of interest.
This work was co-funded by the European Union (EU) Recovery and Resilience Facility and Portuguese national funds through FCT – Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia under projects LA/P/0058/2020 (DOI: 10.54499/LA/P/0058/2020), UID/04539/2025, UID/PRR/04539/2025 (DOI: 10.54499/UID/PRR/04539/2025), and UID/PRR2/04539/2025 (DOI: 10.54499/UID/PRR2/04539/2025); by the European Regional Development Fund (ERDF) through the Centro 2030 Regional Operational Programme under project CENTRO2030-FEDER-02360200; and by Portuguese national funds through FCT under grants 2023.17896.ICDT (DOI: 10.54499/2023.17896.ICDT), 2023.12355.PEX (DOI: 10.54499/2023.12355.PEX), 2021.02220.CEECIND/CP1656/CT0008 (DOI: 10.54499/2021.02220.CEECIND/CP1656/CT0008), 2020.04850.BD (DOI: 10.54499/2020.04850.BD), and 2021.05334.BD (DOI: 10.54499/2021.05334.BD).
Access restricted. Please log in or start a trial to view this content.
| Name | Company | Catalog Number | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|
| 6-well cell culture plate | Nest Biotechnology | 15140122 | Cell culture plate |
| Agarose | NZYtech | MB02702 | RNA quality assessment |
| Antibiotic mixture (penicillin/streptomycin) | Gibco, Thermo Fisher Scientific | D5648 | Cell culture supplement |
| cDNA synthesis kit (first-strand) | NZYtech | MB12502 | Reverse transcription |
| Chloroform | Sigma-Aldrich | A5256701 | Phase separation reagent |
| DMEM, high glucose (4500 mg/L glucose, L-glutamine) | Sigma-Aldrich | 26050088 | Cell culture medium |
| Eppendorf microcentrifuge tubes | Eppendorf | 30120086 | Sample storage |
| Ethanol (96%) | Fisher Bioreagents | 15552393 | RNA purification |
| Fetal bovine serum, heat-inactivated | Gibco, Thermo Fisher Scientific | J62692.K7 | Cell culture supplement |
| Hard-shell 96-well PCR plate | Bio-Rad Laboratories | HSP9601 | qRT-PCR plate |
| Horse serum, heat-inactivated | Gibco, Thermo Fisher Scientific | 15400054 | Serum shock synchronization |
| mHypoE-42 cell line (CVCL_D443) | CELLutions Biosystems Inc. | MB13402 | Embryonic mouse hypothalamic cell line |
| Oligonucleotide primers | NZYtech | MB12501 | qRT-PCR primers |
| Phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) | Thermo Fisher Scientific | MB18502 | Cell washing |
| qPCR Green Master Mix (2×) | NZYtech | MB22403 | qRT-PCR reagent |
| Real-time PCR detection system | Bio-Rad Laboratories | EP0030108116 | qRT-PCR instrument |
| RNA isolation kit | NZYtech | 288306 | Silica spin-column purification |
| RNA lysis reagent | NZYtech | MB18502 | Phenol-based RNA extraction reagent |
| Sodium bicarbonate | Sigma-Aldrich | MB22401 | Cell culture medium supplement |
| Sterile 35-mm culture dish | Thermo Fisher Scientific | 121V | Cell culture dish |
| T100 thermal cycler | Bio-Rad Laboratories | 1861096 | cDNA synthesis |
| T75 tissue culture flask | Corning | 430641U | Cell culture vessel |
| Trypan blue solution (0.4%) | Gibco, Thermo Fisher Scientific | 15250061 | Cell counting |
| Trypsin-EDTA (0.5%) | Gibco, Thermo Fisher Scientific | 15400054 | Cell dissociation |
Access restricted. Please log in or start a trial to view this content.
This article has been published
Video Coming Soon