Ethics statement
This study used only publicly available, de-identified, secondary human datasets (FAERS, CTD, GEO GSE16191, GTEx v8, and FinnGen Release 9). The investigators had no access to direct identifiers and did not contact participants. Accordingly, the study did not constitute human-subject research requiring institutional review board approval or additional informed consent under the applicable institutional policies. The original data-contributing studies obtained their own ethics approvals and participant consent where required, as documented by the respective data providers. All data were used in accordance with the terms of access and data-use requirements of the source databases.
Study design and analytical workflow
The current study utilized a multi-level analytical framework encompassing pharmacovigilance signal detection, toxicogenomic target mining, disease transcriptome integration, and genetics-informed candidate-gene prioritization. The FAERS component first established an overall cohort of 7,232 deduplicated VPA primary-suspect reports restricted to male patients aged ≤18 years. All baseline summaries, System Organ Class (SOC)- and preferred term (PT)-level signal analyses, and year-specific analyses of the VPA cohort used this same sex and age restriction. The nested cryptorchidism screening set comprised 108 reports within this cohort and was evaluated using exposure-route assessment and calendar-year signal-stability analysis. Subsequently, valproic acid-associated genes were obtained from CTD and intersected with cryptorchidism DEGs. Two-sample MR was then used as an additional prioritization layer for the shared genes. No step was considered experimental, mechanistic validation, or proof of a VPA-gene-cryptorchidism causal chain.
Data source and case selection process from FAERS
The adverse event data utilized in this study were sourced from the FAERS database, encompassing the timeframe from the first quarter of 2004 to the fourth quarter of 2025 (2004Q1–2025Q4; 88 quarterly releases). All 88 quarterly ASCII archives were downloaded from the official FDA FAERS quarterly-data archive on March 25, 2026. For every quarter, the DEMO, DRUG, REAC, THER, OUTC, INDI, and RPSR tables were imported. The FAERS data source, quarterly file structure, and downloadable archives were checked against the official FDA FAERS/AEMS documentation on the same date.
To mitigate the effects of duplicate reports, deduplication was conducted in accordance with the FDA-documented case version and quarterly extract conventions. Records were organized by CASEID, retaining the most recent entry based on FDA_DT; when records shared an identical FDA_DT, the record with the highest PRIMARYID was retained. The report-level VPA cohort was restricted a priori to male FAERS patients aged ≤18 years and to reports in which valproic acid or one of its formulations, standardized to the term “valproic acid,” was coded as a primary-suspect (PS) drug in ROLE_COD. After deduplication and application of these sex, age, and drug-role criteria, 7,232 unique case reports formed the report-level VPA cohort used for baseline characteristics and identification of the nested cryptorchidism subset. Cryptorchidism reports were identified by additionally requiring the MedDRA PT “Cryptorchidism” in REAC; 108 reports met this event criterion. For SOC- and PT-level disproportionality analyses, the deduplicated reports were expanded to unique PS drug–adverse-event pairs. Because one report can contain multiple PTs, the 7,232 VPA reports contributed 37,132 VPA–PT pairs. Thus, 7,232 and 37,132 represent different analytical units and are not competing cohort totals. The same pediatric male restriction and deduplication rules were applied to both units of analysis. Throughout the manuscript, “report” denotes a unique deduplicated FAERS case, whereas “drug–event pair” denotes one PS drug linked to one reported PT; SOC analyses were obtained by mapping PT-level pairs to their corresponding SOCs. “Pediatric population,” “pediatric patients,” and “pediatric male cohort” refer to male FAERS patients aged ≤18 years. “In utero exposure” refers specifically to reports coded as transplacental exposure in FAERS; “neonatal” is not used to describe the overall study population. The 108 reports constituted the broad pharmacovigilance screening set. For the exposure-focused developmental assessment, eligibility additionally required explicit FAERS coding of transplacental/in utero exposure. Of the 104 reports with exposure-route information, 93 met this criterion. Eleven reports with other/non-in utero exposure and four reports with missing route information were excluded from developmental etiologic interpretation, although retained in the screening audit trail. For descriptive summaries of the 7,232 eligible VPA-associated ADE reports, available-case denominators were defined separately for each variable. Sex, age, calendar year, and reporter type had complete information and, therefore, used N = 7,232. Reporting country was available for 4,752 reports and missing for 2,480 reports; consequently, all country percentages used N = 4,752 rather than the total analytic cohort. Route of administration was available for 7,213 reports and missing for 19 reports; route percentages used N = 7,213. Because a single report could contain more than one serious outcome, the outcome categories comprised 8,497 recorded outcome entries, and outcome percentages used the number of recorded outcome entries (N = 8,497), rather than the number of unique reports. Continuous variables were summarized using the available non-missing records and were not used as denominators for categorical percentages. For the cryptorchidism subset, serious-outcome codes were summarized on an outcome-record basis because FAERS permits multiple OUTC records for a single report. The six listed serious-outcome categories comprised 257 outcome records in total (congenital anomaly, 102; other serious outcome, 89; hospitalization, 39; disability, 20; death, 4; and life-threatening, 3). Percentages for these categories were calculated using N = 257 outcome records, not N = 108 eligible reports or N = 104 reports in the complete-case descriptive table; therefore, they describe the distribution of recorded serious-outcome codes rather than the proportion of reports or patients experiencing each outcome.
Disproportionality signal detection and definition of the reference background
For disproportionality analyses, the reference background was defined as all unique PS drug–PT pairs derived from deduplicated FAERS reports in males aged 18 years or younger during 2004Q1–2025Q4. Pairs involving valproic acid or its formulations coded as PS constituted the exposure group; pairs involving all other PS-coded drugs constituted the comparator group. The comparator was therefore neither a VPA-only non-event denominator nor an antiepileptic-drug-only background.
For each SOC or PT, the 2 × 2 contingency table was constructed from PS drug–event pairs as follows: a represented VPA–target-event pairs; b represented VPA–non-target-event pairs; c represented non-VPA PS drug–target-event pairs; and d represented non-VPA PS drug–non-target-event pairs. The cell definitions, populated cryptorchidism contingency table, marginal totals, and cryptorchidism-specific signal estimates are provided in Supplementary Table 1. ROR, PRR, IC, and EBGM were calculated from these four cell counts using the formulas and signal-detection thresholds provided in Supplementary Table 2. For the cryptorchidism PT, the observed pair counts were a = 108, b = 37,024, c = 743, and d = 6,565,089. Accordingly, the analysis included 37,132 VPA-associated PS drug–PT pairs and 6,565,832 non-VPA PS drug–PT pairs, for a total background of 6,602,964 pairs; 851 pairs contained the cryptorchidism PT. These pair counts should not be interpreted as numbers of unique patients or unique case reports.
This same FAERS-wide pediatric male comparator framework was applied to both SOC-level and PT-level signal detection. The resulting estimates should be interpreted as disproportionality signals based on spontaneous reporting data rather than incidence rates or class-comparative risks. Because FAERS lacks a defined exposed population denominator and systematic outcome ascertainment, neither the 108 reports nor the resulting disproportionality metrics can be used to estimate incidence, prevalence, absolute or relative risk, or to establish a causal relationship between valproic acid exposure and cryptorchidism.
Primary in utero exposure subset and geographic stratification
Following broad case screening, exposure-route information was reviewed to define the exposure-focused subset relevant to congenital cryptorchidism. Exposure route was recorded for 104 of 108 reports. Ninety-three reports (89.42% of reports with non-missing route data) were explicitly coded as transplacental exposure and were therefore classified as in utero exposure; these reports formed the primary subset for developmental interpretation. Eleven reports (10.58%) coded with other/non-in utero exposure and four reports with missing exposure-route information were excluded from prenatal etiologic interpretation and retained only for descriptive transparency and auditability. A postnatal VPA record was not considered biologically explanatory for congenital cryptorchidism. Importantly, transplacental coding indicates a reported exposure scenario but does not provide the gestational week, maternal dose, treatment duration, or a verified mother-child linkage; therefore, even the exposure-focused subset cannot establish the precise temporal sequence between VPA exposure and impaired testicular descent. The reporting country was summarized descriptively. Because country-specific exposure denominators were unavailable and stratified counts were sparse, no country-adjusted disproportionality regression was performed.
Assessment of potential confounders and unmeasured covariates
Because FAERS is a spontaneous reporting database, individual-level parental and in utero exposure-related covariates were not systematically available and could not be incorporated into a multivariable adjustment model. Potential confounders considered during interpretation included parental epilepsy or other underlying indications for VPA, epilepsy type and severity, seizure control during pregnancy, family history or genetic susceptibility to congenital reproductive anomalies, concomitant antiseizure medications or other pregnancy medications, folate use, maternal smoking, alcohol intake, diabetes, obesity, assisted reproduction, prematurity or low birth weight, and environmental or endocrine-disrupting exposures1,3. Because these variables were not consistently captured in FAERS, they were not used as exclusion criteria unless they directly affected the case definition; instead, they were treated as unmeasured confounders and addressed explicitly in the limitations.
Stability analysis of the signal
To describe calendar-year variation in the VPA-cryptorchidism reporting signal, separate year-specific 2 × 2 contingency tables were constructed using reports from each calendar year and the same FAERS-wide pediatric male comparator framework described above. Annual RORs were calculated only for years containing at least one report with valproic acid as the primary-suspect drug and cryptorchidism as the target PT (cell a > 0). For years in which cell a was zero, an annual ROR was considered non-estimable, and no point estimate was generated; these years are identified explicitly in Figure 1. For estimable years, the standard error of ln(ROR) was calculated as sqrt(1/a + 1/b + 1/c + 1/d), and the 95% confidence interval was calculated as ln(ROR) +/- 1.96 × SE before conversion to the log2 scale. Because each point represents a separate calendar-year estimate and several intervening years were non-estimable, the figure displays unconnected point estimates rather than a continuous line. Error bars denote 95% confidence intervals. The plot was generated in R using ggplot2. This analysis describes variation and persistence in spontaneous-reporting disproportionality and does not estimate incidence, represent a continuous biological trajectory, or establish causality.
Acquiring targets from CTD
The search term “valproic acid” was used to retrieve chemical-gene interaction records from the Comparative Toxicogenomics Database. The CTD database release available on March 25, 2026, was accessed and downloaded on March 25, 2026; this access-date-specific release is referred to throughout the manuscript as the CTD March 25, 2026 version. The CTD publication by Davis et al. was cited for the database methodology and curation framework rather than as the version identifier for the present extraction9. Species was restricted to Homo sapiens, and records supported only by non-human species were excluded. Eligible evidence comprised CTD-curated chemical-gene interactions, including direct molecular interaction/binding records and curated expression, activity, metabolic, transport, localization, stability, or post-translational regulatory records. CTD inferred disease-gene associations, pathway-only annotations, prediction-only entries, non-human-only records, and records without valid official human gene symbols were excluded. Multiple records mapping to the same official gene symbol were deduplicated. Because the primary extraction pooled heterogeneous action annotations and did not preserve a gene-level directional evidence table, increases and decreases in expression or activity, direct interactions, and non-directional “affects” records were not treated as equivalent evidence of a unidirectional VPA effect. Accordingly, the CTD-derived set was used only for broad toxicogenomic candidate screening, and VPA-to-gene regulatory direction could not be assigned reliably for the prioritized genes.
Analysis of cryptorchidism through transcriptomics
Raw CEL files and sample metadata for GSE16191 (GPL570) were obtained from GEO. The preprocessing workflow comprised robust multi-array average (RMA) background correction, quantile normalization, and log2 probe-set summarization using the affy package. Quality control included inspection of array-level intensity distributions and sample clustering before model fitting. Probe sets were annotated to official human gene symbols using hgu133plus2.db and AnnotationDbi. Affymetrix control probes, probe sets without a valid gene symbol, and probes mapping ambiguously to more than one gene symbol were removed. When several eligible probe sets mapped to the same gene, the probe set with the largest interquartile range across all 20 samples was retained; this outcome-independent variability rule was applied before differential-expression testing. A design matrix comparing the 16 cryptorchidism samples with the 4 controls was fitted using limma, empirical-Bayes moderated statistics were calculated, and p-values were adjusted using the Benjamini-Hochberg method. The primary DEG criterion was adjusted p < 0.05. Heatmap values were gene-wise z scores derived from the normalized log2 expression matrix. GSE16191 was selected because it provides human whole-testis transcriptomic data relevant to cryptorchidism rather than epididymal or animal tissue. According to the GEO series annotation, RNA was isolated from whole testicular tissue/testicular biopsies of cryptorchid boys aged 10 months to 4.5 years and age-matched controls. The dataset was generated on the GPL570 platform (Affymetrix Human Genome U133 Plus 2.0 Array) and contained 20 samples: 16 cryptorchidism samples, including 14 unilateral and 2 bilateral cryptorchidism samples, and 4 control samples labeled in GEO as controls by contralateral testicular aplasia. The differential-expression design matrix compared the cryptorchidism group with the control group. Because individual-level age and other clinical covariates were not fully available from the GEO record, no age-adjusted or covariate-adjusted differential-expression model was performed. The primary DEG criterion was adjusted p < 0.05; |log2FC|> = 1 with adjusted p < 0.05 was used as a more stringent visualization threshold for the volcano plot. For the heatmap, 10 representative, well-annotated DEGs meeting this stringent threshold were selected to provide a concise and legible illustration of between-group expression separation. The displayed genes were SRPX, COQ2, TKT, UNC5B, MAG, HIC1, ST6GALNAC4, DOK5, PCSK6, and HCP5. This 10-gene subset was used only for visualization and did not define the DEG set used in the CTD-overlap or downstream candidate-gene analyses, which used the complete set meeting the stated analytic criteria.
Identification of common candidate genes
By overlapping the CTD-derived valproic acid-associated genes with the DEGs obtained from the cryptorchidism transcriptomic dataset, 21 common genes were retained for subsequent MR-based prioritization. These shared genes were FUCA1, ACYP2, SLC35D1, ANKRD35, GPX7, PLCL1, ST7L, KANSL1-AS1, PLOD1, CCZ1B, UBXN2A, B4GALT7, MUC20, PMS2P5, SMIM8, POU5F1, SDK1, RAP1GAP, NAPRT, CSGALNACT1, and C4BPA. Of these, 12 genes were upregulated in cryptorchidism samples (FUCA1, ACYP2, ANKRD35, GPX7, PLCL1, ST7L, KANSL1-AS1, PLOD1, B4GALT7, SDK1, NAPRT, and CSGALNACT1), whereas 9 genes were downregulated (SLC35D1, CCZ1B, UBXN2A, MUC20, PMS2P5, SMIM8, POU5F1, RAP1GAP, and C4BPA). This overlap identified candidates for follow-up but did not establish that VPA regulated these genes in the same direction or that they mediated VPA-associated cryptorchidism.
Mendelian randomization analysis
To improve transparent reporting, the MR component was structured according to STROBE-MR reporting recommendations15. The MR workflow specifies the MR design, exposure and outcome data sources, genetic instrument selection, allele harmonization, weak-instrument assessment, core instrumental-variable assumptions, primary and sensitivity estimators, MR-Egger intercept testing, MR-PRESSO global and outlier diagnostics, reverse-causality considerations, multiplicity-conscious interpretation, and data availability. The MR analysis was designed as a candidate-gene prioritization step rather than an independent proof of causality. The reporting framework additionally incorporated general MR investigation guidance and explicit documentation of the outcome GWAS source, tissue-specific eQTL source, FUSION platform, genetic instrument selection, harmonization, pleiotropy diagnostics, and interpretation limits16,17,18,19.
A two-sample MR analysis was conducted utilizing genetically regulated signals associated with shared candidate genes as exposures, and cryptorchidism Genome-Wide Association Study (GWAS) summary statistics as the outcome. The exposure data were sourced from eQTL data specific to testis tissue, as provided by the GTEx version 8 multi-tissue expression panel through the FUSION platform. Considering that cryptorchidism represents a developmental anomaly of the male reproductive system, employing testis-specific eQTLs as instrumental variables ensures adequate tissue specificity and enhances biological plausibility. GTEx v8 and FUSION methodological references were used to document the origin of the eQTL-based genetically predicted expression instruments12,19.
For each overlapping candidate gene, genetically predicted testis-specific gene expression was treated as the exposure. SNPs associated with testicular expression at p < 5 × 10-8 were eligible as instruments. Instruments were clumped using an LD threshold of r2 < 0.001 within a 10,000-kb window, with the European reference panel used for LD estimation. Outcome proxies were not substituted for missing index variants. Exposure and outcome alleles were harmonized using the TwoSampleMR action = 2 convention; incompatible alleles and palindromic variants with ambiguous intermediate allele frequencies were excluded. Instrument strength was calculated as F = beta_exposure^2/SE_exposure^2, and instruments with F ≤ 10 were excluded. The direction of each MR estimate, therefore, represented the association of genetically predicted higher testicular expression with cryptorchidism risk.
Outcome data were obtained from FinnGen Release 9 (R9/DF9) for phenocode Q17_UNDES_TESTICLE (Undescended testicle), categorized under congenital malformations of genital organs. The R9 endpoint comprised 261 cases and 374,410 controls. The endpoint and control definitions were registry-based, and the FinnGen study citation was included to document the Finnish biobank population, registry-linked phenotype construction, quality-control framework, and GWAS analysis16. The original FinnGen study publication documents the Finnish biobank population, registry-linked phenotyping, quality-control framework, and GWAS analysis underlying this endpoint.
Instrumental variables were chosen according to specific criteria: single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) demonstrating significant associations with the exposure; independent loci maintained following linkage disequilibrium pruning; and the exclusion of palindromic SNPs with ambiguous strand orientation. The robustness of the instrumental variables was assessed using the F-statistic, where an F-value greater than 10 suggests the absence of substantial weak instrument bias.
The three core MR assumptions were addressed and reported explicitly. Instrument relevance was assessed using SNP-exposure associations and F-statistics. The independence and exclusion-restriction assumptions were evaluated indirectly through linkage disequilibrium pruning, allele harmonization, sensitivity analyses using alternative MR estimators, MR-Egger intercept testing, and MR-PRESSO global testing and outlier diagnostics20. Because these assumptions cannot be fully verified using summary-level data, and because pleiotropy tests are underpowered when the number of valid instruments is small, the MR component was interpreted conservatively.
Based on the quantity of valid instrumental variables available, the inverse variance weighted (IVW) method was employed as the primary analytical approach for genes associated with multiple SNPs. This was complemented by sensitivity analyses using the weighted median, MR-Egger, weighted mode, and simple mode methods. For genes with only a single valid SNP, the Wald ratio analysis was conducted. Directional horizontal pleiotropy was assessed using the MR-Egger intercept test. MR-PRESSO global testing was used to evaluate overall horizontal pleiotropy when methodologically applicable, and MR-PRESSO outlier detection was used to determine whether outlier-corrected estimates should be generated. When the MR-PRESSO global or outlier test did not identify significant outlying instruments, no outlier-corrected estimate was generated. Allele harmonization, IVW estimation, and sensitivity analyses followed the established two-sample MR workflow described by MR-Base/TwoSampleMR17.
Analyses were conducted in R. The principal packages and versions were data.table and dplyr for data handling; affy, GEOquery, limma, AnnotationDbi, and hgu133plus2.db for GEO preprocessing, annotation, and differential-expression analysis; TwoSampleMR and ieugwasr for instrument processing, harmonization, and MR estimation; MRPRESSO for pleiotropy and outlier diagnostics; and ggplot2 for visualization. Package names and versions are now reported to define the computational environment used for reproduction. For the 21 candidate-gene primary IVW tests, multiplicity was controlled using the Benjamini–Hochberg procedure, with an FDR-adjusted q value <0.05 defining multiplicity-adjusted statistical significance. Bonferroni-adjusted p values (21 tests; family-wise α = 0.05, equivalent unadjusted threshold p < 0.00238) were additionally reported as a conservative sensitivity measure. Unadjusted p values <0.05 were labeled nominal and were used only for exploratory candidate-gene prioritization; they were not interpreted as multiplicity-adjusted evidence. Instrument strength, number of SNPs, agreement across sensitivity estimators, absence of detectable directional pleiotropy, MR-PRESSO diagnostics, and biological plausibility were considered jointly when prioritizing candidate genes. Even when mean F-statistics exceeded 10, sparse instrument sets were considered an important limitation for MR-Egger regression and MR-PRESSO-based pleiotropy assessment.