A subscription to JoVE is required to view this content. Sign in or start your free trial.

Research Article

Identification of Aging and Mitochondria-Related Hub Genes in Dilated Cardiomyopathy

55 views

⸱

DOI:

10.3791/72286

⸱

August 25th, 2026

In This Article

Summary

This protocol integrates multidimensional transcriptomic data with machine learning to identify aging- and mitochondria-related genes in dilated cardiomyopathy for biomarker discovery and molecular subtyping.

Abstract

Dilated cardiomyopathy (DCM) is characterized by left ventricular dilation and systolic dysfunction and is associated with mitochondrial dysfunction and immune-inflammatory activation. However, aging-related molecular signatures and mitochondrial regulatory pathways in DCM remain incompletely understood. This study analyzed six bulk transcriptomic datasets and one single-cell RNA sequencing dataset from the Gene Expression Omnibus database. After data normalization, batch correction, and cell-type annotation, aging- and mitochondria-related candidate genes were identified using differential expression analysis, weighted gene co-expression network analysis, and protein-protein interaction network construction. Core genes were further screened using least absolute shrinkage and selection operator regression, random forest, and support vector machine-recursive feature elimination. Immune-cell infiltration, cell-cell communication, and molecular subtyping analyses were performed to characterize the cardiac immune microenvironment in DCM. A total of 66 aging-related genes and 16 mitochondria-related genes were associated with DCM and were mainly enriched in hypoxia-inducible factor-1 signaling, oxidative phosphorylation, and nitric oxide synthase-related pathways. Machine learning and single-cell RNA sequencing analyses identified SERPINE1, TGFB2, CYBB, and TLR2 as core genes. CYBB and TLR2 were highly expressed in monocytes and macrophages, whereas SERPINE1 and TGFB2 were predominantly expressed in stromal cells. Immune landscape analysis showed increased pro-inflammatory macrophage activation and altered cell-cell communication in DCM samples. Based on core gene expression, DCM samples were divided into two molecular subtypes associated with vascular endothelial growth factor signaling and primary bile acid biosynthesis, respectively. This protocol provides an integrated framework for identifying candidate biomarkers and molecular subtypes in DCM.

Introduction

Dilated cardiomyopathy (DCM) is a myocardial disorder characterized by left ventricular dilation and impaired systolic function. It is the third most common cause of heart failure and the leading indication for cardiac transplantation worldwide1. Population-based studies estimate a prevalence of approximately 1 in 250 adults, with a higher prevalence in males and a substantial proportion of cases attributable to monogenic variants2. These findings indicate that both genetic susceptibility and environmental factors contribute to the onset and progression of DCM.

The pathogenesis of DCM involves interconnected processes, including inflammatory activation, oxidative stress, cardiomyocyte apoptosis, and dysregulated profibrotic signaling. Inflammatory genetic polymorphisms, including tumor necrosis factor-α promoter variants, have been associated with susceptibility to viral DCM3. Increased oxidative stress has also been associated with cardiomyocyte death and left ventricular dysfunction in human DCM subtypes4. In addition, aberrant activation of Wnt/β-catenin and calcineurin/nuclear factor of activated T cells signaling promotes myocardial hypertrophy and interstitial fibrosis, thereby contributing to disease progression5,6. Mitochondrial dysfunction is another important component of DCM because cardiomyocytes have high energy demands. Disruption of mitochondrial biogenesis, calcium homeostasis, mitophagy, and mitochondrial DNA integrity can impair oxidative phosphorylation and contribute to progressive cardiac dysfunction7,8,9,10.

Despite these mechanistic findings, important knowledge gaps remain. In particular, the temporal and causal relationships between mitochondrial structural remodeling and bioenergetic dysfunction during DCM initiation and progression have not been fully defined11. Several therapeutic strategies have been investigated. Stem cell therapy has shown regenerative potential through paracrine, cytoprotective, and immunomodulatory effects, but optimization of cell sources, delivery routes, and post-transplantation survival remains necessary12. Gene therapy approaches, including adeno-associated virus-based delivery and clustered regularly interspaced short palindromic repeats-based genome editing, also offer potential precision treatment strategies. However, limitations related to cardiac tropism, vector immunogenicity, and long-term safety remain unresolved13.

Public transcriptomic datasets from repositories such as the Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO) are widely used for biomarker discovery in DCM. These resources provide access to multicenter clinical cohorts, support cost-effective and reproducible investigations, and can improve statistical power through cross-dataset integration14. Transcriptomic profiling also enables genome-wide candidate gene screening, molecular subtyping, and pathway-level analysis15. However, public datasets have inherent limitations, including technical batch effects, clinical and etiological heterogeneity, limited capacity for causal inference, and incomplete longitudinal or prognostic information16. Therefore, findings derived from public transcriptomic datasets are most suitable for hypothesis generation and candidate biomarker prioritization and require validation in independent cohorts and experimental models.

Many bioinformatic studies of DCM rely primarily on differential expression analysis, which may generate false-positive findings and does not fully characterize gene co-expression networks or cellular heterogeneity within cardiac tissue. To address these limitations, the present study employed an integrated analytical strategy combining complementary methods. Bulk transcriptomic analysis provides tissue-level expression profiles suitable for case-control comparisons. Weighted gene co-expression network analysis (WGCNA) identifies gene modules associated with phenotypic traits and enables prioritization of functionally related gene sets rather than individual differentially expressed genes. Protein-protein interaction (PPI) network analysis identifies highly connected genes on the basis of network topology. Three machine learning algorithms—least absolute shrinkage and selection operator regression, random forest, and support vector machine-recursive feature elimination—were used to identify candidate biomarkers across the integrated datasets¹⁷. Single-cell RNA sequencing (scRNA-seq) was then used to examine cell-type-specific expression patterns and intercellular communication networks18.

Although mitochondrial dysfunction and aging-related molecular changes have each been investigated in DCM, their combined associations with disease-related transcriptional changes remain underexplored. The present study integrated multiple bulk transcriptomic and scRNA-seq datasets to identify aging- and mitochondria-related hub genes in DCM, characterize the cardiac immune microenvironment, and examine molecular subtypes based on the identified genes. This integrated approach was used to prioritize candidate biomarkers and provide a basis for subsequent mechanistic and validation studies.

Access restricted. Please log in or start a trial to view this content.

Protocol

All animal procedures were reviewed and approved by the Laboratory Animal Ethics Committee of the Second Affiliated Hospital of Henan University of Chinese Medicine (Approval No. HNSZYYYJS2023011150). All procedures were conducted in accordance with the Guidelines for Ethical Review of Laboratory Animal Welfare (GB/T 35892-2018) and the 3R principles of Replacement, Reduction, and Refinement. The reagents, databases, software, and equipment used in this study are listed in the Table of Materials. 

1. Data resources and experimental materials
Male SPF-grade CTNTR141W transgenic mice with a spontaneous dilated cardiomyopathy (DCM) phenotype and a body weight of 25 ± 2 g were used as the model group. Age-matched male SPF-grade C57BL/6J mice with a body weight of 25 ± 2 g were used as the control group. Each group included 12 mice. All animals were obtained from institutions holding valid laboratory animal production licenses and were housed in an SPF-grade barrier environment at 22 ± 2 °C and 40%–60% relative humidity under a 12 h light/dark cycle, with free access to sterilized food and water. After 1 week of acclimatization, all mice were maintained under the same conditions for an additional 4 weeks before cardiac function assessment and sample collection. All mice were 6–8 weeks old at the start of the experiment. Mice were deeply anesthetized and euthanized by cervical dislocation.

Seven public transcriptomic datasets of left ventricular myocardial tissue from patients with DCM were retrieved from the Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO)19 database. These datasets included six bulk transcriptomic datasets and one single-cell RNA sequencing (scRNA-seq) dataset, GSE145154. Both CD45-positive and CD45-negative fractions were included in the analysis. Both CD45-positive and CD45-negative cell fractions were combined before clustering. Sample identity was used as the main batch variable for Harmony integration. Normal left ventricular and DCM left ventricular samples from GSE145154 were included, specifically GSM4307515, GSM4307516, GSM4307520, and GSM4307521. The datasets used in this study were GSE145154, GSE5406, GSE42955, GSE57338, GSE79962, GSE116250, and GSE141910. All samples other than DCM were excluded, and only control samples (Control group) and DCM samples (DCM group) were retained. No samples were removed after quality control. Sample information of included GEO datasets is summarized as follows: GSE5406 contained 102 samples (16 control and 86 DCM samples); GSE42955 contained 17 samples (5 control and 12 DCM samples); GSE57338 contained 231 samples (136 control and 95 DCM samples); GSE79962 contained 20 samples (11 control and 9 DCM samples); GSE116250 contained 51 samples (14 control and 37 DCM samples); and GSE141910 contained 322 samples (161 control and 161 DCM samples).

2. Bulk transcriptome data preprocessing
Raw expression matrices and clinical annotation files for the six bulk datasets were downloaded using the GEOquery package20. Raw CEL files were retrieved for the Affymetrix microarray datasets, and raw count matrices were retrieved for the RNA-seq datasets. Background correction, quantile normalization, and expression calculation for the microarray data were performed using the robust multi-array average algorithm implemented in the affy package21.

RNA-seq count data were normalized using the trimmed mean of M-values method in the edgeR package22 and were converted to log₂-transformed counts per million values. Probe identifiers were converted to official gene symbols using platform-specific annotation files. When multiple probes mapped to the same gene, the mean expression value was calculated.

Technical batch effects across datasets were removed using the ComBat algorithm in the sva package23. Dataset source and detection platform were specified as batch factors. Principal component analysis was performed before and after batch correction to evaluate the effectiveness of batch-effect removal.

3. Single-cell transcriptome data preprocessing and cell annotation
The gene expression matrix from GSE145154 was imported into Seurat to construct a Seurat object using Seurat version 524. Low-quality cells were excluded using the following thresholds: 200–6,000 detected genes per cell, total unique molecular identifier count greater than 500, and mitochondrial gene percentage below 25%. Cells outside these quality-control thresholds were excluded as low-quality or ruptured cells. We excluded low-quality cells solely using the quality control thresholds described above.

Log normalization was performed using the NormalizeData function with a scale factor of 10,000. The top 3,000 highly variable genes were selected using the FindVariableFeatures function with the vst method. The data were scaled using ScaleData, followed by principal component analysis for linear dimensionality reduction.

Batch effects were corrected using the Harmony algorithm25 through the RunHarmony function, with sample identity specified as the grouping variable. The first 15 principal components were used to cluster cells using the FindNeighbors and FindClusters functions. Clustering was performed using the Leiden algorithm at a resolution of 0.15. Nonlinear dimensionality reduction and visualization were performed using uniform manifold approximation and projection.

Cell types were annotated using canonical marker genes together with automated annotation using the SingleR package26. The marker genes were as follows: B cells, IGKC, MS4A1, and CD79A; cardiomyocytes, TNNI3, MYL2, and ACTC1; endothelial cells, VWF, PECAM1, and EGFL7; macrophages, C1QC, C1QB, and C1QA; monocytes, S100A8, S100A9, and G0S2; natural killer cells, NKG7, GNLY, and CCL5; smooth muscle cells, MYL9, TAGLN, and ACTA2; stromal cells, FBLN1, LUM, and DCN; and T cells, CD3E, CD3G, and CD3D.

4. Differential expression analysis and gene set enrichment scoring
A linear model was constructed using the limma package27 to compare gene expression between the DCM and healthy control groups. Genes with P value < 0.05 and an absolute fold change greater than 1.5, corresponding to an absolute log₂ fold change greater than 0.58, were defined as significantly differentially expressed.

Single-sample gene set enrichment analysis was performed to calculate enrichment scores for the aging-related and mitochondria-related gene sets in each sample28. Differences in enrichment scores between the DCM and healthy control groups were evaluated using the Wilcoxon rank-sum test, with P value < 0.05 considered statistically significant.

At the single-cell level, aging-related and mitochondrial module scores were calculated using the AddModuleScore function in Seurat. Differences in module scores between groups were assessed using the Wilcoxon rank-sum test.

Aging-related gene signatures were retrieved from the CellAge database (https://genomics.senescence.info/cells/), and mitochondria-related gene sets were obtained from GeneCards (https://www.genecards.org/). The complete gene lists used for scoring are provided in Supplementary File 1.

5. Weighted gene co-expression network construction
The top 5000 protein-coding genes with the highest expression variance in bulk transcriptomic data were retained for network construction. The pickSoftThreshold function was applied to calculate the scale-free topology fit index under multiple soft-thresholding powers. The optimal threshold was determined as the minimum power yielding a scale-free network with an R2 value above 0.9. Accordingly, a soft-thresholding power of β = 5 was adopted for subsequent network analysis.

A signed weighted co-expression network was constructed using the blockwiseModules function with a minimum module size of 30. Pearson correlation coefficients were calculated between each module eigengene and the aging-related or mitochondrial enrichment score. Modules with an absolute correlation coefficient greater than 0.4 and P < 0.001 were considered significantly associated modules.

Genes within significantly associated modules were intersected with differentially expressed genes to identify DCM-associated aging candidate genes and DCM-associated mitochondria candidate genes.

6. Functional enrichment analysis
Functional enrichment analyses, including Gene Ontology (GO) and Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes (KEGG) pathway analyses, were conducted on candidate genes using the clusterProfiler package29. GO enrichment covered three standard categories: biological process, cellular component, and molecular function.

All analyses were performed with human species annotation, false discovery rate (FDR) for P‑value correction, and a q‑value threshold of 0.05. Gene sets were restricted to a size range of 10–500 genes, and terms with an FDR < 0.05 were defined as statistically significant. Finally, GO enrichment results were visualized via grouped bar charts, while KEGG enrichment outcomes were displayed using bubble plots.

7. PPI network construction and hub gene screening
Candidate genes were submitted to the STRING version 11.5 database30, with the organism set to Homo sapiens and the interaction confidence threshold set to a combined score greater than 0.7. Disconnected nodes were hidden, and the interaction data were exported in tab-separated values format.

The interaction data were imported into Cytoscape version 3.9.1 for visualization31. Node topological scores were calculated using the CytoHubba plugin32 with three algorithms: Degree, maximum neighborhood component, and maximal clique centrality.

Core functional modules within the network were identified using the MCODE plugin33 with the following default parameters: degree cutoff, 2; k-core, 2; node score cutoff, 0.2; and maximum depth, 100. Genes ranked among the top 10 by all three topological algorithms were intersected with genes in the MCODE core subnetwork to identify the final protein-protein interaction hub genes.

8. Machine learning-based core gene selection and diagnostic model building
To ensure reproducibility and balanced representation, the integrated bulk transcriptomic dataset was randomly split into training and validation sets at a 7:3 ratio using a fixed random seed (seed = 123456). This split was stratified by disease group (DCM vs. control) to maintain consistent class proportions across both sets. Prior to splitting, batch effects from different dataset sources were corrected using the sva package, and the integrated samples were treated as a unified cohort during the random allocation.

Three machine learning algorithms were applied to screen candidate genes. First, LASSO logistic regression was performed via the cv.glmnet function in the glmnet package34. A 5-fold cross-validation binary classification model was constructed, with the AUC adopted as the evaluation metric. Genes with non-zero coefficients at lambda.min were reserved as candidate genes.

Second, a random forest classification model with 500 decision trees was built using the randomForest package35. The number of variables sampled for each split was set to the square root of the total number of features. Gene importance was quantified based on the Gini coefficient, and the top 10 genes with the highest importance scores were retained.

Third, SVM-RFE analysis was implemented using the rfe function in the caret package36. Feature numbers were set ranging from 1–10, and 5-fold cross-validation was adopted for model training. The gene subset with the optimal cross-validation accuracy was ultimately selected.

Genes identified by all three algorithms were defined as the final core aging- and mitochondria-related genes in DCM. Diagnostic models were then constructed using 10 classification algorithms: decision tree, gradient boosting machine, boosted generalized linear model, k-nearest neighbors, logistic regression, neural network, partial least squares, random forest, support vector machine, and extreme gradient boosting.

Receiver operating characteristic curves were generated using the pROC package37. Area under the curve, accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity were calculated to evaluate diagnostic performance in the training and validation sets.

SHapley Additive exPlanations analysis was performed to calculate the contribution of each core gene to model predictions38. Summary plots and per-sample waterfall plots were generated. A final diagnostic model with an area under the curve greater than 0.8 in the validation set was considered to have good diagnostic performance.

9. Cell-cell communication inference
Cell-cell communication networks in the cardiac microenvironment were inferred using the CellChat package39. A CellChat object was constructed using the CellChatDB.human database. Differentially expressed ligands and receptors were identified using identifyOverExpressedGenes, and significant interaction pairs were filtered using identifyOverExpressedInteractions.

Communication probabilities between cell types were calculated using computeCommunProb. The global cell-type-level communication network was aggregated using aggregateNet. The number of interactions and the communication strength between each pair of cell types were quantified and visualized using heatmaps and bar charts.

10. Immune cell infiltration quantification
Enrichment scores for 28 immune cell types were calculated for each bulk sample using single-sample gene set enrichment analysis28 and an immune cell signature gene set40. The Wilcoxon rank-sum test was used to compare immune cell enrichment scores between the DCM and healthy control groups. P < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.

Pearson correlation analysis was conducted to evaluate the association between core gene expression levels and immune cell enrichment scores. All correlations with P < 0.05 were regarded as statistically significant.

11. Consensus clustering for molecular subtyping
Unsupervised consensus clustering of DCM samples was performed using core gene expression profiles via the ConsensusClusterPlus package41. The clustering parameters were set as a maximum cluster number of 6, 1000 resampling iterations, and a resampling proportion of 0.8. Partitioning around medoids with Euclidean distance was adopted for clustering, and a fixed random seed was used to ensure reproducibility.

The optimal subtype number was determined according to delta area plot and consensus cluster stability scores, with K = 2 finally identified. Principal component analysis was further performed to verify the distinct separation of the two molecular subtypes.

Gene set variation analysis42 was applied to calculate sample-specific KEGG pathway enrichment scores. The limma package27 was utilized to detect differential pathway activation between subtypes, and a P value of less than 0.05 was defined as statistically significant.

12. Echocardiographic assessment of cardiac function
Mice were anesthetized via intraperitoneal injection of 1% sodium pentobarbital (30 mg/kg) and fixed in a supine position on a thermostatic operating table. After chest hair removal, ultrasound coupling gel was evenly applied to the precordial area.

Two-dimensional-guided M-mode echocardiography was performed at the level of the left ventricular papillary muscles using a small-animal ultrasound system. Three consecutive stable cardiac cycles were captured to measure left ventricular end-diastolic diameter, end-systolic diameter, ejection fraction, and fractional shortening. All echocardiographic assessments were conducted blindly by a professional ultrasonographer.

Three mice were randomly selected from each group for echocardiographic examination, and these 6 animals in total were subsequently sacrificed for myocardial tissue collection and ELISA measurement. The remaining experimental animals underwent additional parallel laboratory assays, and their data were not included in the present study.

13. Myocardial tissue collection, protein extraction, and enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay
After echocardiographic assessment, mice were euthanized under deep anesthesia. Heart tissues were rapidly harvested via median thoracotomy, and left ventricular myocardium was dissected on ice. Isolated tissues were thoroughly rinsed with ice‑cold phosphate‑buffered saline to eliminate residual intracardiac blood. After blotting excess liquid with sterile filter paper, samples were immediately snap‑frozen in liquid nitrogen and stored at −80 °C for subsequent protein extraction, with repeated freeze–thaw cycles strictly avoided.

Frozen myocardial tissues were weighed and cut into approximately 1 mm3 fragments on ice. Tissues were lysed in ice‑cold RIPA lysis buffer containing protease and phosphatase inhibitors at a standardized ratio of 100 µL buffer per 10 mg tissue. Samples were fully homogenized mechanically on ice and incubated for 30 min to achieve complete cell lysis.

Lysates were centrifuged at 12,000 × g for 15 min at 4 °C. The resulting supernatants were collected in enzyme‑free tubes, and total protein concentration was quantified using a bicinchoninic acid protein assay kit following the manufacturer’s protocols. All samples were normalized to an identical protein concentration with lysis buffer.

Protein expression levels of the four hub genes in myocardial lysates were measured using the corresponding enzyme‑linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) kits. Serially diluted standards and normalized tissue lysates were added in duplicate (100 µL per well) to pre‑coated microplates. Plates were incubated for 2 h at room temperature and thoroughly washed with the kit‑supplied wash buffer.

Each well was supplemented with enzyme‑conjugated antibody and incubated for 1 h at room temperature, followed by a thorough wash. Substrate chromogen solution was then added, and the plates were incubated for 20 min at room temperature in the dark. The color reaction was terminated with the stop solution, and absorbance values were measured at 450 nm (reference wavelength: 570 nm) using a full‑wavelength microplate reader.

14. Statistical analysis
All statistical analyses and data visualizations were performed using R version 4.2.3. For ELISA concentration measurements of each target gene (TGFB2, SERPINE1, CYBB, TLR2), the Shapiro-Wilk test was first applied to assess the normality of the data in the Control and DCM groups separately. Subsequently, an F-test was used to evaluate the homogeneity of variances between the two groups. The method for intergroup comparison was determined according to the results of the variance homogeneity test: if variances were homogeneous (P ≥ 0.05), an unpaired Student’s t-test was adopted to compare mean values between groups; if variances were heterogeneous (P < 0.05), the corrected Welch’s t-test was utilized for analysis. All tests were two-tailed, and the threshold for statistical significance was set at P < 0.05. Data were visualized as boxplots overlaid with jittered individual data points. The P values of all tests and the type of t-test implemented were annotated in detail on each plot.

Access restricted. Please log in or start a trial to view this content.

Results

Data preprocessing and differential expression analysis
All six bulk transcriptomic datasets underwent standardized preprocessing and batch-effect correction before downstream analysis. Microarray data were normalized using the robust multi-array average algorithm, whereas RNA-seq count data were normalized using the trimmed mean of M-values method. The ComBat algorithm was applied to remove technical batch effects associated with the dataset source and detection platform. Principal component analysi...

Access restricted. Please log in or start a trial to view this content.

Discussion

The integrated multilayered workflow combined bulk transcriptomic meta-analysis, weighted gene co-expression network construction, ensemble machine learning, single-cell transcriptomic validation, and in vivo animal-model verification. Four aging- and mitochondria-related hub genes CYBB, SERPINE1, TGFB2, and TLR2 were identified as candidate diagnostic biomarkers for dilated cardiomyopathy (DCM). Integration of six independent left ventricular transcriptomic datasets from the Gene Expression Omnibus repository, ...

Access restricted. Please log in or start a trial to view this content.

Disclosures

The author declares no competing interests.

Acknowledgements

The publicly available data provided through the Gene Expression Omnibus database are gratefully acknowledged. The reviewers and editors are also acknowledged for their constructive comments on the manuscript. This work was supported by the Provincial Department-Level Scientific Research Project (Grant No. 2021JDZX2026), “Mechanism of Yiqi Huoxue Formula in Attenuating Atherosclerotic Vascular Remodeling via KLF2-Nrf2-Mediated Inflammatory Regulation.”

Access restricted. Please log in or start a trial to view this content.

Materials

List of materials used in this article
NameCompanyCatalog NumberComments
Aquasonic Clear Ultrasound GelParker Laboratories, Inc.Mar-34Used for small-animal echocardiographic imaging.
BCA Protein Assay KitThermo Fisher Scientific23227Detection at 562 nm; range, 20–2,000 µg/mL; used for total protein quantification of mouse heart lysates.
CellAge databaseHuman Ageing Genomic Resourceshttps://genomics.senescence.info/cells/Source of aging-related gene signatures.
CytoHubba, Cytoscape pluginCytoscape App StoreVersion 0.1Used for node-topology scoring in protein-protein interaction networks.
CytoscapeCytoscape ConsortiumVersion 3.9.1Used for visualization of protein-protein interaction networks.
Full-wavelength microplate readerThermo Fisher ScientificMultiskan FCUsed to measure absorbance in ELISA assays.
Gene Expression OmnibusNational Center for Biotechnology Informationhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/geo/Public repository used to obtain transcriptomic datasets.
GeneCardsWeizmann Institute of Sciencehttps://www.genecards.org/Source of mitochondria-related gene sets.
Halt Protease and Phosphatase Inhibitor Cocktail, 100×, EDTA-freeThermo Fisher Scientific78441Stored at 4 °C; added to RIPA buffer at 10 µL/mL immediately before use.
Liquid nitrogenLocal laboratory gas supplierNot applicableUsed for snap-freezing myocardial tissue.
Male SPF-grade C57BL/6J mice, 6–8 weeks old, 25 ± 2 gBeijing Vital River Laboratory Animal Technology Co., Ltd.Not applicableAnimal Production License No. SCXK (Jing) 2021-0006; used as normal controls.
Male SPF-grade CTNTR141W transgenic DCM mice, 6–8 weeks old, 25 ± 2 gInstitute of Laboratory Animal Science, Chinese Academy of Medical SciencesNot applicableAnimal Production License No. SCXK (Jing) 2021-0065; used as the spontaneous DCM model.
MCODE, Cytoscape pluginCytoscape App StoreVersion 2.0.2Used to identify core functional subnetworks in protein-protein interaction networks.
Mouse CYBB ELISA KitBiogradetechA-QEK09250-96wellsUsed in this study to measure CYBB in mouse myocardial tissue lysates.
Mouse PAI-1 ELISA KitEK-BIOML30970Used in this study to measure PAI-1, the SERPINE1-encoded protein, in mouse myocardial tissue lysates.
Mouse TGF-β2 ELISA KitElaBoXSEKM-0036Used in this study to measure TGF-β2 in mouse myocardial tissue lysates.
Mouse TLR-2 ELISA KitSolarbioSEKM-0163Used in this study to measure TLR-2 in mouse myocardial tissue lysates.
Phosphate-buffered saline, pH 7.4, calcium- and magnesium-freeBiological Industries02-024-1ACSSterile 1× solution; stored at 4 °C; used for tissue washing and dilution.
R package: caretCRANVersion 6.0-94Used for support vector machine-recursive feature elimination.
R package: CellChatCellChat developersVersion 1.6.1Used for cell-cell communication inference from single-cell RNA sequencing data.
R package: clusterProfilerBioconductorVersion 4.8.3Used for functional enrichment analysis.
R package: ConsensusClusterPlusBioconductorVersion 1.64.0Used for unsupervised consensus clustering.
R package: edgeRBioconductorVersion 3.42.4Used for RNA sequencing data normalization with the trimmed mean of M-values method.
R package: GEOqueryBioconductorVersion 2.68.0Used to download data from the Gene Expression Omnibus.
R package: glmnetCRANVersion 4.1-8Used for least absolute shrinkage and selection operator logistic regression.
R package: limmaBioconductorVersion 3.56.2Used for differential expression analysis and statistical modeling.
R package: pROCCRANVersion 1.18.5Used for receiver operating characteristic curve analysis.
R package: randomForestCRANVersion 4.7-1.2Used for random forest machine learning.
R package: SeuratCRANVersion 5.0.1Used for single-cell RNA sequencing data analysis.
R package: SingleRBioconductorVersion 2.2.0Used for automated cell-type annotation.
R package: svaBioconductorVersion 3.48.0Used for ComBat batch-effect correction.
Refrigerated centrifugeSigma-AldrichSIGMA 3-KUsed for centrifugation of myocardial tissue lysates.
RIPA Lysis and Extraction BufferThermo Fisher Scientific89900Ready-to-use 1× solution; stored at 4 °C; supplemented with protease and phosphatase inhibitors before use.
Small-animal ultrasound imaging systemVINNO Technology Co., Ltd.VINN06LABUsed for echocardiographic assessment of cardiac function.
Sodium pentobarbitalSinopharm Chemical Reagent Co.20040428Prepared as a 1% solution, 10 mg/mL, in sterile saline; used for intraperitoneal anesthesia at 30 mg/kg.
STRING databaseSTRING ConsortiumVersion 11.5Used for protein-protein interaction network construction.
TGrinder H24 Tissue HomogenizerTIANGENOSE-TH-01Used to homogenize mouse myocardial tissue in RIPA buffer at 6.0 m/s for 30–60 s over 2–3 cycles.
Thermostatic animal platform/heated operating table for small animalsShanghai Yuyan Scientific Instrument Co., Ltd.T-30350Used to maintain mice at 37 °C during echocardiography; operating range, room temperature to 50 °C.

References

  1. Pinto YM et al. Proposal for a revised definition of dilated cardiomyopathy, hypokinetic non-dilated cardiomyopathy, and its implications for clinical practice: a position statement of the ESC working group on myocardial and pericardial diseases. Eur Heart J. 2016;37(23):1850-1858. https://doi.org/10.1093/eurheartj/ehv727
  2. Newman NA, Burke MA. Dilated Cardiomyopathy: A Genetic Journey from Past to Future. Int J Mol Sci. 2024;25(21):11460. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms252111460
  3. Mishra B et al. Tumour necrosis factor-alpha promoter polymorphism and its association with viral dilated cardiomyopathy in Indian population: a pilot study. Indian J Med Microbiol. 2015;33(1):16–20. https://doi.org/10.4103/0255-0857.148368
  4. Frustaci A et al. Oxidative myocardial damage in human cocaine-related cardiomyopathy. Eur J Heart Fail. 2015;17(3):283-290. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejhf.219
  5. Ni B et al. The role of β-catenin in cardiac diseases. Front Pharmacol. 2023;14:1157043. https://doi.org/10.3389/fphar.2023.1157043
  6. Kuwahara K et al. TRPC6 fulfills a calcineurin signaling circuit during pathologic cardiac remodeling. J Clin Invest. 2006;116(12):3114-3126. https://doi.org/10.1172/JCI27702
  7. He SL et al. Mitochondrial-related gene expression profiles suggest an important role of PGC-1alpha in the compensatory mechanism of endemic dilated cardiomyopathy. Exp Cell Res. 2013;319(17):2604–2616. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.yexcr.2013.07.017
  8. Luczak ED et al. Mitochondrial CaMKII causes adverse metabolic reprogramming and dilated cardiomyopathy. Nat Commun. 2020;11(1):4416. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-020-18165-6
  9. Li E et al. BMAL1 regulates mitochondrial fission and mitophagy through mitochondrial protein BNIP3 and is critical in the development of dilated cardiomyopathy. Protein Cell. 2020;11(9):661–679. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13238-020-00713-1
  10. Alila-Fersi O et al. First description of a novel mitochondrial mutation in the MT-TI gene associated with multiple mitochondrial DNA deletion and depletion in family with severe dilated mitochondrial cardiomyopathy. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2018;497(4):1049-1054. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bbrc.2018.02.162
  11. Ramaccini D et al. Mitochondrial Function and Dysfunction in Dilated Cardiomyopathy. Front Cell Dev Biol. 2020;8:624216. https://doi.org/10.3389/fcell.2020.624216
  12. Yang J et al. Stem cells in the treatment of myocardial injury-induced cardiomyopathy: mechanisms and efficient utilization strategies. Front Pharmacol. 2025;16:1600604. https://doi.org/10.3389/fphar.2025.1600604
  13. Van Linthout S et al. State of the art and perspectives of gene therapy in heart failure. A scientific statement of the Heart Failure Association of the ESC, the ESC Council on Cardiovascular Genomics and the ESC Working Group on Myocardial & Pericardial Diseases. Eur J Heart Fail. 2025;27(1):5–25. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejhf.3516
  14. Alimadadi A, Munroe PB, Joe B, Cheng X. Meta-Analysis of Dilated Cardiomyopathy Using Cardiac RNA-Seq Transcriptomic Datasets. Genes (Basel). 2020;11(1):60. https://doi.org/10.3390/genes11010060
  15. Verdonschot J et al. Clustering of Cardiac Transcriptome Profiles Reveals Unique Subgroups of Dilated Cardiomyopathy Patients. JACC Basic Transl Sci. 2023;8(4):406–418. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacbts.2022.10.007
  16. Zhu T et al. Identification and Verification of Feature Biomarkers Associated With Immune Cells in Dilated Cardiomyopathy by Bioinformatics Analysis. Front Genet. 2022;13:874544. https://doi.org/10.3389/fgene.2022.874544
  17. Li H et al. Identification of Centrosome Duplication-Related Biomarkers in Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy Through Integrative Multi-Omics, Single-Cell Transcriptomics, and Experimental Validation. J Am Heart Assoc. 2026;15(12):e047416. https://doi.org/10.1161/JAHA.125.047416
  18. Ni L et al. Dissecting and validation the biomarker of heart failure progression in patients with atherosclerosis by single-cell sequencing, bioinformatics, and machine learning. Front Genet. 2025;16:1587274. https://doi.org/10.3389/fgene.2025.1587274
  19. Barrett T et al. NCBI GEO: archive for functional genomics data sets--update. Nucleic Acids Res. 2013;41(Database issue):D991–D995. https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gks1193
  20. Davis S, Meltzer PS. GEOquery: a bridge between the Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO) and BioConductor. Bioinformatics. 2007;23(14):1846-1847. https://doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/btm254
  21. Irizarry RA et al. Exploration, normalization, and summaries of high density oligonucleotide array probe level data. Biostatistics. 2003;4(2):249-264. https://doi.org/10.1093/biostatistics/4.2.249
  22. Robinson MD, McCarthy DJ, Smyth GK. edgeR: a Bioconductor package for differential expression analysis of digital gene expression data. Bioinformatics. 2010;26(1):139–140. https://doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/btp616
  23. Leek JT et al. The sva package for removing batch effects and other unwanted variation in high-throughput experiments. Bioinformatics. 2012;28(6):882–883. https://doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/bts034
  24. Butler A et al. Integrating single-cell transcriptomic data across different conditions, technologies, and species. Nat Biotechnol. 2018;36(5):411-420. https://doi.org/10.1038/nbt.4096
  25. Korsunsky I et al. Fast, sensitive and accurate integration of single-cell data with Harmony. Nat Methods. 2019;16(12):1289-1296. https://doi.org/10.1038/s51592-019-0619-0
  26. Aran D et al. Reference-based analysis of lung single-cell sequencing reveals a transitional profibrotic macrophage. Nat Immunol. 2019;20(2):163-172. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41590-018-0276-y
  27. Ritchie ME et al. limma powers differential expression analyses for RNA-sequencing and microarray studies. Nucleic Acids Res. 2015;43(7):e47. https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkv007
  28. Barbie DA et al. Systematic RNA interference reveals that oncogenic KRAS-driven cancers require TBK1. Nature. 2009;462(7269):108-112. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature08460
  29. Yu G et al. clusterProfiler: an R package for comparing biological themes among gene clusters. OMICS. 2012;16(5):284-287. https://doi.org/10.1089/omi.2011.0118
  30. Szklarczyk D et al. STRING v11: protein-protein association networks with increased coverage, supporting functional discovery in genome-wide experimental datasets. Nucleic Acids Res. 2019;47(D1):D607–D613. https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gky1131
  31. Shannon P et al. Cytoscape: a software environment for integrated models of biomolecular interaction networks. Genome Res. 2003;13(11):2498-2504. https://doi.org/10.1101/gr.1239303
  32. Chin CH et al. cytoHubba: identifying hub objects and sub-networks from complex interactome. BMC Syst Biol. 2014;8(Suppl 4):S11. https://doi.org/10.1186/1752-0509-8-S4-S11
  33. Bader GD, Hogue CW. An automated method for finding molecular complexes in large protein interaction networks. BMC Bioinformatics. 2003;4:2. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2105-4-2
  34. Friedman J, Hastie T, Tibshirani R. Regularization Paths for Generalized Linear Models via Coordinate Descent. J Stat Softw. 2010;33(1):1-22. https://doi.org/10.18637/jss.v033.i01
  35. Touw WG et al. Data mining in the Life Sciences with Random Forest: a walk in the park or lost in the jungle. Brief Bioinform. 2013;14(3):315-326. https://doi.org/10.1093/bib/bbs034
  36. Chicco D. Ten quick tips for machine learning in computational biology. BioData Min. 2017;10:35. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13040-017-0155-3
  37. Robin X et al. pROC: an open-source package for R and S+ to analyze and compare ROC curves. BMC Bioinformatics. 2011;12:77. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2105-12-77
  38. Lundberg SM et al. From Local Explanations to Global Understanding with Explainable AI for Trees. Nat Mach Intell. 2020;2(1):56-67. https://doi.org/10.1038/s42256-019-0138-9
  39. Jin S et al. Inference and analysis of cell-cell communication using CellChat. Nat Commun. 2021;12(1):1088. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-021-21246-9
  40. Charoentong P et al. Pan-cancer Immunogenomic Analyses Reveal Genotype-Immunophenotype Relationships and Predictors of Response to Checkpoint Blockade. Cell Rep. 2017;18(1):248–262. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.celrep.2016.12.019
  41. Wilkerson MD, Hayes DN. ConsensusClusterPlus: a class discovery tool with confidence assessments and item tracking. Bioinformatics. 2010;26(12):1572–1573. https://doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/btq170
  42. Hänzelmann S, Castelo R, Guinney J. GSVA: gene set variation analysis for microarray and RNA-seq data. BMC Bioinformatics. 2013;14:7. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2105-14-7
  43. Zheng Y et al. Exploring Key Genes to Construct a Diagnosis Model of Dilated Cardiomyopathy. Front Cardiovasc Med. 2022;9:865096. https://doi.org/10.3389/fcvm.2022.865096
  44. Johnson WE, Li C, Rabinovic A. Adjusting batch effects in microarray expression data using empirical Bayes methods. Biostatistics. 2007;8(1):118-127. https://doi.org/10.1093/biostatistics/kxj037
  45. Koslow M, Mondaca-Ruff D, Xu X. Transcriptome studies of inherited dilated cardiomyopathies. Mamm Genome. 2023;34(2):312-322. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00335-023-09978-z
  46. Zhang B, Horvath S. A general framework for weighted gene co-expression network analysis. Stat Appl Genet Mol Biol. 2005;4:Article17. https://doi.org/10.2202/1544-6115.1128
  47. Lin M et al. Machine learning and multi-omics integration: advancing cardiovascular translational research and clinical practice. J Transl Med. 2025;23(1):388. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12967-025-06425-2
  48. Climente-González H et al. Interpretable machine learning leverages proteomics to improve cardiovascular disease risk prediction and biomarker identification. Commun Med (Lond). 2025;5(1):170. https://doi.org/10.1038/s43856-025-00872-0
  49. Shah P et al. Predicting cardiovascular risk with hybrid ensemble learning and explainable AI. Sci Rep. 2025;15(1):17927. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-01650-7
  50. Chaffin M et al. Single-nucleus profiling of human dilated and hypertrophic cardiomyopathy. Nature. 2022;608(7921):174-180. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-022-04817-8
  51. Juan F et al. The changes of the cardiac structure and function in cTnTR141W transgenic mice. Int J Cardiol. 2008;128(1):83-90. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijcard.2008.03.006
  52. Russell-Hallinan A et al. Single-Cell RNA Sequencing Reveals Cardiac Fibroblast-Specific Transcriptomic Changes in Dilated Cardiomyopathy. Cells. 2024;13(9):752. https://doi.org/10.3390/cells13090752
  53. Knowlton KU. Dilated Cardiomyopathy. Circulation. 2019;139(20):2339-2341. https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.119.040037
  54. Smith GD, Ebrahim S. Mendelian randomization: prospects, potentials, and limitations. Int J Epidemiol. 2004;33(1):30-42. https://doi.org/10.1093/ije/dyh132
  55. Chen R et al. Macrophages in cardiovascular diseases: molecular mechanisms and therapeutic targets. Signal Transduct Target Ther. 2024;9(1):130. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41392-024-01840-1
  56. Liu R et al. Tead1 is essential for mitochondrial function in cardiomyocytes. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol. 2020;319(1):H89-H99. https://doi.org/10.1152/ajpheart.00732.2019
  57. Sharma S et al. SOD2 deficiency in cardiomyocytes defines defective mitochondrial bioenergetics as a cause of lethal dilated cardiomyopathy. Redox Biol. 2020;37:101740. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.redox.2020.101740

Access restricted. Please log in or start a trial to view this content.

Reprints and Permissions

Explore More Articles

Mitochondrial DysfunctionAging-Related GenesBulk TranscriptomicsSingle Cell RNAGene Co-ExpressionProtein Interaction NetworkImmune Cell InfiltrationMachine Learning BiomarkersMolecular Subtyping