A subscription to JoVE is required to view this content. Sign in or start your free trial.

Method Article

Optimized Yeast Surface Display Workflow for Directed Evolution of Proteases

387 views

⸱

DOI:

10.3791/72559

⸱

August 4th, 2026

In This Article

Summary

This protocol provides an optimized workflow for the directed evolution of viral proteases in Saccharomyces cerevisiae using a surface-display-based selection system. It outlines DNA insert library and substrate cassette design, electroporation optimized for high transformation efficiency, fluorescence-activated cell sorting-based selection for protease cleavage, and sequencing of enriched variants.

Abstract

Directed evolution mimics the natural evolutionary process in a fast, controlled laboratory environment to evolve proteins with desirable functions or traits. Screening a large pool of mutant protein-coding genes allows functional selection of desired variants for applications in biotechnology, medicine, and synthetic biology. Using this protocol, we perform directed evolution in Saccharomyces cerevisiae to engineer protease variants with high specificity for a non-native substrate sequence. We display these protease variants on the yeast cell surface to facilitate the selection of desired variants via fluorescence-activated cell sorting (FACS) over multiple rounds of enrichment. Four key elements of the substrate cassette are co-expressed with the protease library: a fusion protein composed of (i) the yeast adhesion receptor subunit Aga2, (ii) selection and (iii) counter-selection substrate sequences, (iv) epitope tag sequences, and an optional endoplasmic reticulum (ER) retrieval signal sequence. Yeast cells in which only the selection substrate sequence is cleaved are isolated using multicolor FACS via fluorescent (phycoerythrin/fluorescein isothiocyanate–tagged) anti-epitope antibodies. Here we provide details of the optimized, step-by-step protocol to conduct a protease evolution campaign, including DNA insert library design and substrate cassette design, yeast cell electroporation with high transformation efficiency (up to 109 transformants per microgram of DNA), FACS-based selection, enrichment, and sequencing of evolved variants. We demonstrate our directed evolution protocol by evolving the tobacco etch virus nuclear inclusion A protease (TEVp) from cleaving its natural substrate sequence, ENLYFQ↓S, to cleaving a new sequence, ENLYFE↓S.

Introduction

Cysteine proteases of the Potyviridae family, specifically the nuclear inclusion A (NIa) proteases, represent a largely untapped source of sequence-specific endopeptidases. With more than 3,800 characterized family members, NIa proteases cleave a distinct seven-amino-acid substrate sequence. The potyviral family offers a diverse set of proteases for engineering programmable protein control systems, constructing orthogonal protease-based genetic circuits, and developing sequence-specific biotechnological tools1,2. Despite this natural diversity, only two NIa proteases, TEVp and tobacco vein mottling virus protease (TVMVp), have been thoroughly characterized and engineered for broad laboratory and biotechnological use3,4. This limited protease toolkit limits the design space for multicomponent circuits that require orthogonal protease activities5, thereby motivating efforts to further expand and characterize NIa proteases through directed evolution6,7.

Yeast surface display has emerged as one of the most powerful platforms for directed evolution, enabling high-throughput protein library screening via fluorescence-activated cell sorting (FACS)6,7. For example, the yeast endoplasmic reticulum sequestration screening (YESS) system couples protease activity to surface display through the secretory pathway of S. cerevisiae6,7. The YESS system has been applied to engineer novel protease-substrate specificities and has demonstrated utility for multi-round directed evolution campaigns. In this system, protease variants are co-expressed with a fusion protein containing a cleavage substrate cassette with epitope markers, and the Aga1p surface anchor is expressed in the EBY100 yeast strain. Differential labeling with fluorescent antibodies distinguishes cleaved from non-cleaved substrate cassettes displayed on the cell surface. This activity-dependent display mechanism is directly compatible with iterative FACS-based selection for libraries of 107 or more variants6,7.

A fundamental prerequisite for directed evolution is the ability to introduce variant libraries at a sufficient scale to achieve adequate coverage of the targeted sequence space. For site-saturation mutagenesis libraries spanning multiple amino acid positions, transformation yields of 108 to 109 unique transformants are needed to ensure that the diversity introduced into the library is well represented in the sorted population. Several methods exist for introducing exogenous DNA into S. cerevisiae, each with distinct throughput ceilings. The conventional chemical transformation method uses lithium acetate/single-stranded carrier DNA/polyethylene glycol (LiAc/ssDNA/PEG) due to its simplicity and accessibility. However, it typically achieves transformation efficiencies of only 104–106 colony-forming units (CFU) per microgram of DNA, falling short of the sequence variation needed for large library campaigns8. By contrast, the electroporation method applies a high-voltage electric field to transiently permeabilize the cell membrane and facilitate DNA uptake. Electroporation consistently achieves the highest transformation efficiencies among available transformation methods, with optimized protocols reporting yields of 108–109 CFU9. It has been observed that electroporation efficiency in S. cerevisiae is critically sensitive to cell growth phase, DNA mass, and buffer composition, providing a framework that has since been widely adapted for library-scale directed evolution9.

The protocol described here uses S. cerevisiae strain EBY100, a widely adopted host strain for yeast surface display. EBY100 was engineered by Boder and Wittrup by integrating an AGA1 expression cassette under the control of the galactose-inducible GAL1 promoter into the chromosomal AGA1 locus of the protease-deficient parent strain BJ546510. The strain is commercially available from the ATCC (catalog no. MYA-4941; depositor K.D. Wittrup), carrying the genotype MATa AGA1::GAL1-AGA1::URA3 ura3-52 trp1 leu2-Δ1 his3-Δ200 pep4::HIS3 prb1Δ1.6R can1 GAL (URA+, leu−, trp−). As a result, both Aga1p and the Aga2p-substrate cassette fusion are expressed from the same galactose-inducible promoter, ensuring that the two subunits are co-induced and assemble into the disulfide-linked Aga1p–Aga2p complex that anchors the displayed fusion to the cell wall.

Despite the widespread use of EBY100 in yeast display applications, no published protocol has been systematically optimized for electroporating this strain at library-scale yields. EBY100-specific parameters, such as the optimal growth phase at harvest, the medium composition during subculture, and the quantitative relationship between initial optical density at 600 nm (OD600) and transformation efficiency, remain to be rigorously characterized and optimized. Here, we report that transformation efficiency in EBY100 increases monotonically with the culture's OD600 at harvest, with cells in late log phase yielding substantially higher transformation rates than those harvested at early log phase. We evaluated critical protocol parameters, including initial OD600 values at inoculation, the use of 2 × Yeast Extract Peptone Dextrose (YPD) medium for subcultures, electroporation buffer formulations, and post-electroporation outgrowth conditions. The protocol presented here provides an optimized, step-by-step workflow (Figure 1A–C, Figure 2, Figure 3A–D, Figure 4A–E) for preparing electrocompetent EBY100 cells and performing high-efficiency DNA library electroporation, yielding transformation rates consistently above 109 CFU. To validate this protocol, we conducted a comprehensive directed evolution campaign to engineer TEVp with altered cleavage specificity across four rounds of FACS-based selection and enrichment. Sequencing of enriched protease variants confirmed substantial diversification at targeted residues within the protease's substrate-binding pocket, demonstrating that the protocol provides sufficient library coverage of sequence space to support productive evolution campaigns. This protocol will be of broad utility to researchers using EBY100 for yeast surface display-based directed evolution and FACS-compatible, high-throughput screening of proteases, antibodies9, kinases11, and receptors12, among other proteins.

Access restricted. Please log in or start a trial to view this content.

Protocol

All experiments involving recombinant S. cerevisiae were conducted in accordance with the policies and procedures of the Institutional Biosafety and Chemical Safety Committee at The University of Texas at Dallas. Recombinant yeast strains were handled under Biosafety Level 1 (BSL-1) containment in accordance with established institutional microbiological practices. Electroporation, culture, and fluorescence-activated cell sorting (FACS) were performed in accordance with approved institutional biosafety procedures. Yeast cultures and contaminated consumables were decontaminated and disposed of as biohazardous waste in accordance with institutional guidelines.

1. Vector and insert preparation

  1. Generation of potyviral protease libraries via site-saturation mutagenesis
    1. Design using sequence-design software overlapping 30- to 50-mer, forward and reverse oligonucleotides to generate a mutant library of proteases. Replace the wild-type codon in the corresponding oligonucleotide with an NNS degenerate codon, where N represents A, T, G, or C, and S represents G or C, for positions targeted for mutagenesis.
    2. Design the 3′ overlap between each forward and reverse oligonucleotide pair with a melting temperature (Tm) of 55–60 °C. Design the first and last oligonucleotides to contain a 50-nt overlap with the yeast surface display vector beyond the restriction sites.
    3. Ensure that at least one end of the insert exactly overlaps one end of the linearized vector to facilitate homologous recombination13. Avoid gaps between adjacent oligonucleotides14.
    4. Resuspend oligos to 100 µM with deionized H2O. In a sterile 1.5 mL tube, combine 0.5 µL of each oligo to a final volume of 200 µL (final concentration of 250 nM for each oligo).
    5. Set up a PCR reaction with the components listed in Table 1 to assemble the protease library, using the thermocycling conditions in Table 2.
    6. Set up a second PCR reaction using the outermost forward and reverse oligos (Table 3) using the first assembled PCR product as a template. Amplify the product as shown in Table 4.
    7. Run the second PCR product on a 1% agarose gel with ethidium bromide (0.5 µg/mL) at 240 V for 30 min. Excise the band corresponding to the expected DNA length.
      NOTE: CAUTION: Ethidium bromide is a mutagen and should be handled using appropriate personal protective equipment (PPE), including a laboratory coat, nitrile gloves, and safety glasses. Avoid skin contact and inhalation. Dispose of ethidium bromide-containing gels, buffers, and consumables as hazardous chemical waste in accordance with institutional safety guidelines.
    8. Purify using a gel extraction kit. Elute in 50 µL of deionized H2O.
    9. Measure DNA concentration using a spectrophotometer. Store the DNA at −20 °C.
      NOTE: Each 50 µL reaction of the 2nd PCR would yield about 0.5–1.0 µg of total DNA. Since each electroporation requires 12 µg of the protease library (i.e., insert), scale up reactions accordingly.
  2. Substrate cassette assembly
    1. Prepare LB-agar plates and LB-chloramphenicol liquid media. See recipes in Table 5.
    2. Design a set of overlapping 30-mer oligonucleotides in the forward and reverse direction for substrate cassette assembly. Design the 5′ ends of each reverse oligonucleotide and forward oligonucleotide of the next fragment to match by 4 nucleotides.
    3. Resuspend lyophilized oligos to 100 µM using deionized H2O.
    4. Mix reagents as in Table 6.
    5. Use the cycling program in Table 7 to anneal and phosphorylate the oligo mix.
    6. Dilute annealed oligos 4-fold in deionized H2O to reach a final concentration of 1.25 µM.
    7. Combine the annealed oligo mix with the vector (e.g., pDD1523), following Table 8.
    8. Perform Golden Gate assembly, following the cycling program in Table 9.
      NOTE: For example, the pDD1523 plasmid has a type IIS restriction site (BsmBI) downstream of the GAL1/10 promoter. Successful assembly allows for galactose induction of the substrate cassette7.
    9. Transform the resulting plasmid into E. coli.
    10. Plate cells on LB agar with the corresponding antibiotic. Incubate for 16–18 h at 37 °C.
    11. Pick isolated colonies and inoculate them in 5 mL of LB media. Incubate overnight (16–18 h) at 37 °C with shaking (220 rpm).
    12. Extract plasmids from overnight cultures using a plasmid miniprep kit.
    13. Measure the plasmid concentration using a spectrophotometer, then send for sequencing.
  3. Linearization of yeast display vector
    1. Linearize the yeast display plasmid, e.g., digest pDD1524 with SphI and PstI restriction enzymes to prepare the yeast display vector containing the substrate cassette for electroporation. Mix the reagents listed in Table 10 and incubate at 37 °C for 1 h.
    2. Run the restriction digest product on a 1% agarose gel at 240 V for 30 min. Excise the band corresponding to the expected DNA length and purify using a gel extraction kit.
      NOTE: Each 50 µL of restriction digest would yield about 0.5–1.0 µg of total DNA. Since each electroporation requires 4 µg of linearized vector, scale up the digest reactions accordingly.

2. Electroporation

Note: Follow institutional safety procedures for handling biological materials and reagents, wear appropriate PPE, and dispose of biological and chemical waste in accordance with institutional guidelines.

  1. Preparation of buffers, plates, and media (2 days prior to electroporation)
    1. Prepare growth media (1 × YPD; 2 × YPD; Synthetic Dextrose Casamino Acids, SDCAA+; and Synthetic Galactose Casamino Acids, SGCAA+), plates (YPD and SDCAA), electroporation buffer, and sterile water following the recipes in Table 5. Store at 4 °C.
  2. Preparation of a streaked plate of EBY100.
    1. Streak out EBY100 yeast onto YPD agar from a glycerol stock. Grow at 30 °C for 2 days.
    2. Store the plate at 4 °C after growth.
      NOTE: A streaked plate remains usable for up to 1 month; mark the streak date on the plate.
  3. Preparation of EBY100 pre-culture (1 day prior to electroporation)
    1. Prepare 125 mL of 1 × YPD in a 500 mL Erlenmeyer flask.
    2. Prepare 25 mL of 1 × YPD in a 50 mL conical tube. Using a micropipette tip, collect EBY100 cells from the plate grown for 2 days. Then, transfer the yeast cells from the pipette tip into the conical tube containing 1 × YPD.
      NOTE: The streak of cells should form a smear approximately 1–2 mm in length.
    3. Remove the micropipette tip and vortex the conical tube to ensure adequate mixing.
    4. Prepare a 150 mL pre-culture by transferring 25 mL of 1 × YPD containing the yeast cells into the 500 mL flask containing 125 mL of 1 × YPD. Swirl to mix.
    5. Using a spectrophotometer, measure the OD600 by preparing two microcuvettes with a path length of 1 cm: one with 1 mL of 1 × YPD as a blank control and another with 1 mL of the pre-culture
    6. Grow 150 mL of pre-culture overnight (16–20 h) at 30 °C with orbital shaking at 270 rpm.
  4. Preparation of subculture at desired initial OD600 (on the day of electroporation)
    1. Prepare the conditioning buffer and outgrowth media, as described in Table 5.
    2. Measure the OD600 of the overnight pre-culture (expected OD₆₀₀ is 17–22). To be within the linear range of the spectrophotometer, measure a 1:20 dilution of the pre-culture.
    3. Calculate the volume of pre-culture required to inoculate a 100 mL subculture. An initial subculture OD600 of 3.0–4.0 is recommended.
    4. Dilute the culture to the desired initial OD600 in 100 mL of 2 × YPD in a 500 mL Erlenmeyer flask.
    5. Incubate the 100 mL subculture at 30 °C with orbital shaking at 270 rpm for 4 h.
  5. Preparation of media during 4 h incubation
    1. Keep ice-cold electroporation buffer and sterile water ready (from step 2.1.1).
    2. Prepare conditioning buffer (100 mL), following recipe in Table 5. Use 20 mL of conditioning buffer per transformation; scale up accordingly. Store at room temperature (20–23 °C).
      NOTE: CAUTION: Conditioning buffer contains dithiothreitol (DTT) and lithium acetate (LiAc), which are chemical irritants that may cause skin and eye irritation. Wear appropriate PPE, including a laboratory coat, nitrile gloves, and safety glasses, and handle these reagents in accordance with institutional chemical safety procedures. Dispose of unused solutions and spent buffers as chemical waste in accordance with institutional guidelines.
    3. Prepare outgrowth media (50 mL): Mix 25 mL of 2 × YPD and 25 mL of 1 M sorbitol together. Use 8 mL of outgrowth media per transformation. Store at room temperature (20–23 °C).
  6. Preparation of electrocompetent yeast cells after 4 h incubation.
    1. Split 100 mL subculture into two 50 mL conical tubes. Collect cells by centrifugation at 4 °C and 1,500 × g for 3 min, then decant the medium. Keep cells on ice until step 2.6.4 is completed.
    2. Gently resuspend each cell pellet with 25 mL of ice-cold sterile water. Centrifuge at 4 °C and 1,500 × g for 3 min, then decant the media.
    3. Repeat step 2.6.2.
    4. Gently resuspend each cell pellet with 25 mL of ice-cold electroporation buffer. Centrifuge at 4 °C and 1,500 × g for 3 min, then decant the media.
    5. Remove the cells from ice and gently resuspend each cell pellet with 10 mL of room temperature (20–23 °C) conditioning buffer. Then, pool into a single 125 mL Erlenmeyer flask and incubate at 30 °C with orbital shaking at 270 rpm for 30 min.
    6. Pour the cells into a 50 mL tube. Centrifuge at 4 °C and 1,500 × g for 3 min. Decant the media.
    7. Gently resuspend the cell pellet with 50 mL of ice-cold electroporation buffer. Centrifuge at 4 °C and 1,500 × g for 3 min, then decant the media.
    8. Resuspend the cell pellet to a final volume of 1 mL by adding approximately 100–200 µL of electroporation buffer. Keep cells on ice until electroporation.
      NOTE: Electrocompetent cells can be frozen (i.e., placed in a –80 °C freezer) and used later without significant loss of electroporation efficiency.
  7. Electroporation, outgrowth, and plating
    1. Pre-chill electroporation cuvette(s) with a gap size of 0.2 cm on ice.
    2. Transfer 380 µL of the resuspended pellet to a sterile 1.5 mL tube. Mix with 4 µg of plasmid DNA or with 4 µg of linearized plasmid vector and 12 µg of insert. Gently mix by pipetting.
      NOTE: To maximize the number of electroporated cells, vector and insert DNA concentrations should ideally be 700–800 ng/µL. If concentrations are less than that, use a vacuum concentrator.
    3. Transfer suspension into the pre-chilled electroporation cuvette(s). Keep on ice for 5 min.
    4. Wipe the sides of the cuvette after 5 min with a lint-free laboratory wipe to get rid of residual moisture, which may lead to arcing during electroporation. Avoid any bubbles or cells above the metal plates in the cuvette, as they may also lead to arcing. To maintain the cuvette's cold temperature, do not touch the plate electrodes.
    5. Prepare 8 mL of outgrowth media in a 50 mL conical tube.
    6. Electroporate the cells with the following settings: A voltage of 2.5 kV, capacitance of 25 µF, and resistance of 200 Ω9. The acceptable time constant range is 2.8–4.5 ms.
      NOTE: CAUTION: Electroporation involves high-voltage electrical pulses. Ensure cuvettes are properly seated and follow the manufacturer's operating instructions. Dispose of used electroporation cuvettes as biohazardous waste according to institutional guidelines.
    7. Flood the cuvette immediately with approximately 200 µL of outgrowth media from the conical tube and transfer electroporated cells into the 50 mL conical tube. Add another 200–350 µL of outgrowth medium until no visible liquid remains in the cuvette.
    8. Incubate the 50 mL conical tube of electroporated cells in 8 mL of outgrowth media at 30 °C without shaking for 1 h. Invert the tube every 15 min to mix.
    9. Collect cells by centrifugation at 1,500 × g, 25 °C for 3 min. Then decant the media.
    10. Resuspend cells in appropriate yeast dropout media to maintain selection for transformed cells. For plasmids containing the TRP1 selection marker, resuspend cells in 250 mL of SDCAA+ (which lacks tryptophan) to selectively recover yeast that retained the plasmid.
    11. Incubate overnight (16–20 h) at 30 °C with orbital shaking at 270 rpm.

3. Induction, staining, and flow cytometric sorting of yeast cells

  1. Induction of protease library and substrate cassette (1 day before sorting)
    1. Measure OD600 as in step 2.4.2 after overnight growth of transformants in dropout media.
    2. Aliquot 12 mL of yeast transformants and centrifuge at 3,200 × g for 5 min.
    3. Remove the supernatant and resuspend the cell pellet in SGCAA+ induction medium to an OD600 of 0.5. Calculate the required resuspension volume using the dilution equation, C1V1 = C2V2.
    4. Transfer to a 125 mL Erlenmeyer flask and grow overnight for 18–24 h at 30 °C with orbital shaking at 270 rpm.
  2. Fluorescent antibody staining (on the day of sorting)
    1. Measure OD600 of cells post-induction. Use two cuvettes: one with 1 mL of SGCAA+, and the other with 950 µL of SGCAA+ mixed with 50 µL of cells. Multiply the measured OD600 value by 20 to get the true OD600 of post-induction cells.
    2. Normalize each sample to 3 × 107 cells for antibody staining and FACS sorting. Use C1V1 = C2V2 to calculate the volume of cells to transfer from the induction flask.
      NOTE: For four-site NNS saturation mutagenesis, the theoretical library size is 106 variants. To sufficiently sample the library, screen at least 10 times the library size, or 107 cells. Example: if desired C1V1 = 3 × 107 cells and C2 = post-induction OD600 of 6 (i.e., 6 × 107 cells/mL), then aliquot 500 µL of induced cells (i.e., V2 = 3 × 107 cells / 6 × 107 cells/mL = 500 µL).
    3. Transfer calculated volume of cells to a 1.5 mL tube and centrifuge at 5,000 × g for 5 min.
    4. Remove supernatant and resuspend in 500 µL of phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) + 0.5% bovine serum albumin (BSA).
    5. Centrifuge at 5,000 × g for 5 min and repeat step 3.2.4.
    6. Centrifuge at 5,000 × g for 5 min, and in the meantime, complete step 3.2.7.
    7. Prepare an antibody stain mixture in a 1.5 mL tube containing anti-HA fluorescein isothiocyanate (FITC) (0.5 µg/107 cells), anti-FLAG phycoerythrin (PE) (0.05 µg/107 cells), and PBS + 0.5% BSA (100 µL/107 cells). Keep the tube on ice. 
    8. Remove supernatant and resuspend with the stain mixture. Use 300 µL of the stain mixture per 3 × 107 cells. Do not vortex the tube; only invert or flick.
    9. Keep cells on ice in the dark for 1 h after resuspension.
  3. Post-staining wash
    1. Centrifuge stained cells at 5,000 × g for 5 min. Remove the supernatant and resuspend the pellet in PBS containing 0.5% BSA using 0.5 mL per 1 × 107 cells (e.g., 500 µL for 1 × 107 cells or 1.5 mL for 3 × 107 cells).
    2. Centrifuge at 5,000 × g, 5 min. Remove supernatant, resuspend in 750 µL of PBS + 0.5% BSA.
    3. Transfer another 750 µL of PBS + 0.5% BSA to a 10 mL collection tube.
  4. FACS
    1. Perform necessary startup and preparation of the cytometer for a new experiment.
    2. Create three dot-plots. On the first dot-plot, select the X-axis name to display the forward scatter-area (FSC-A) channel and the Y-axis name to display the side scatter-area (SSC-A) channel.
      NOTE: This will facilitate the selection of live cells.
    3. Keep the X-axis name to display FSC-A channel while changing the Y-axis channel to display forward scatter-height (FSC-H) on the second dot-plot.
      NOTE: This will facilitate selecting singlets.
    4. Select the X-axis name to display the PE channel and the Y-axis name to display the FITC channel on the third dot-plot.
    5. Run negative control on the cytometer using the 530/30 nm (FITC) and 585/42 nm (PE) channels. Perform sorting using a 70-µm nozzle at 70 psi sheath pressure. Acquire samples at a speed of 4000–5000 events/s.
    6. Draw a polygon gate around the main population of intact yeast cells to exclude debris and small particles with low FSC-A and SSC-A signals on the first dot-plot (FSC-A versus SSC-A).
    7. Gate singlets on an FSC-H versus FSC-A plot within this gate, by selecting the linear population exhibiting a proportional relationship between FSC-H and FSC-A. Exclude events that deviate from the linear distribution and correspond to doublets and cell aggregates.
      NOTE: The third dot-plot for PE versus FITC will display a diagonal cluster of dots for the negative control (i.e., yeast cells expressing the intact substrate cassette).
    8. Run samples and sort yeast cells based on desired PE/FITC values into a collection tube(s). Analyze a total number of cells corresponding to at least 10-fold the theoretical library size to ensure adequate representation of all variants (e.g., analyze ~1 × 107 cells for a library with a theoretical diversity of ~1 × 106 variants).
    9. Position the sort gate below the PE/FITC diagonal of the negative control population.
      NOTE: More stringent gates improve enrichment of desired variants but reduce cell recovery.
  5. Post-FACS
    1. Centrifuge collection tube(s) at 3,200 × g for 5 min. Carefully remove the supernatant, leaving 1 mL, and resuspend in 5 mL of PBS.
      NOTE: Leave 1 mL of supernatant, as the cell pellet at the bottom will not be visible after centrifugation.
    2. Centrifuge cells again at 3,200 × g for 5 min. Remove the supernatant, leaving 1 mL. Resuspend with 4 mL of SDCAA+.
    3. In a 250 mL Erlenmeyer flask, add 15 mL of SDCAA+. Transfer the resuspended cells from step 3.5.2 into this flask.
    4. Incubate overnight for 18–24 h at 30 °C with orbital shaking at 270 rpm.
    5. Repeat steps 3.1, 3.2, 3.3, and 3.4 for each round of directed evolution.

4. Plasmid recovery and sequencing of individual clones

  1. Grow individual colonies
    1. Make a glycerol stock by mixing 500 µL of the liquid culture after step 3.5.4 and 500 µL of sterile 50% glycerol, resulting in a 25% glycerol stock solution. Vortex to thoroughly mix the cells.
    2. Store in the –80 °C freezer overnight. For long-term storage, transfer into liquid nitrogen.
    3. Scrape the glycerol stock using a sterile 1000 µL tip and mix it into 100 µL of SDCAA+. Plate this mixture onto an SDCAA plate and incubate it upside down at 30 °C.
    4. Pick colonies after 3 days, and grow them overnight in 1.5 mL of SDCAA+ in 14 mL tubes.
  2. Perform yeast miniprep to extract plasmids
    1. Pellet the overnight culture by centrifuging at 16,000 × g for 1 min and resuspend in 200 µL of Solution 1 from a yeast plasmid purification kit.
    2. Add 5 µL of lytic enzyme solution (5 U/µL).
    3. Incubate in a 37 °C incubator for 4 h on an end-to-end mixer.
    4. Perform a freeze-thaw cycle by freezing at -80 °C for 20 min and thawing at 42 °C for 10 min in a water bath.
    5. Add 200 µL of Solution 2 from a yeast plasmid purification kit, mix by inverting 2–3 times, and let sit for 5 min.
    6. Add 400 µL of Solution 3 from a yeast plasmid purification kit and mix by inverting 2–3 times. Centrifuge at 16,000 × g for 5 min.
    7. Purify plasmid DNA using a purification kit with a high DNA-binding capacity column.
      NOTE: Because of the large amount of sheared genomic yeast DNA coming from the lysed cells, a silica-based column with a higher DNA-binding capacity (35 µg) needs to be used instead of a lower-capacity yeast plasmid DNA purification column (5 µg)15.
    8. Measure the DNA concentration using a spectrophotometer. DNA yields are 10–30 ng/µL.
  3. Transform purified plasmids into chemically competent E. coli cells
    1. Prepare SOC media, following the recipe in Table 5, and LB-chloramphenicol plates. Also, preheat a water bath to 42 °C.
    2. Warm up an LB-chloramphenicol plate for each plasmid at 37 °C for 20 min.
    3. Take out a tube of chemically competent cells from the –80 °C freezer and thaw on ice.
    4. Aliquot 30 µL of competent cells for each plasmid into a 1.5 mL tube on ice.
    5. Pipette 3 µL of plasmid into competent cells. Flick to mix and let it sit for 5 min on ice.
    6. Perform heat shock by briefly incubating the cells in the water bath at 42 °C for 40 s.
    7. Incubate on ice for 2 min.
    8. Add 300 µL of SOC media to the cells and incubate for 15 min at 37 °C at 220 rpm.
    9. Plate 50–100 µL of transformed competent cells onto prewarmed plates.
    10. Incubate the plates at 37 °C upside down for 18 h.
  4. Colony picking
    1. Add 5 mL of liquid LB-chloramphenicol media to 14 mL round-bottom culture tubes.
    2. Pick a colony using a sterile 1000 µL tip, and drop it into a culture tube.
    3. Place tubes in a shaker (220 rpm, 30°–45° angle to maximize aeration) at 37 °C for 18 h.
  5. Plasmid extraction from bacterial liquid culture
    1. Centrifuge the liquid cultures at 3,200 × g for 4 min. Decant the supernatant.
    2. Extract plasmids from overnight cultures using a plasmid purification kit.
    3. Measure concentration of purified plasmids using a spectrophotometer.
  6. Submit plasmids for sequencing
    NOTE: Use services such as whole-plasmid nanopore sequencing, or, alternatively, Sanger sequencing with a primer flanking the mutagenized region.

Access restricted. Please log in or start a trial to view this content.

Results

Efficient library construction is critical to ensure sufficient coverage of the mutational space. To avoid loss of rare functional variants, the number of transformants should reach at least 10× to 100× the theoretical library size. Because transformation efficiency in S. cerevisiae is influenced by cell concentration and is highest in early- to mid-log-phase cells16, we optimized the initial cell density prior to electroporation. Yeast cultures were subcultured at initial OD600

Access restricted. Please log in or start a trial to view this content.

Discussion

Directed evolution is a high-throughput method that uses iterative cycles of diversification and selection to identify proteins with enhanced or novel biochemical function17. In this protocol, we detail an optimized workflow to evolve protease-substrate recognition using a cell-surface display system in S. cerevisiae. The surface display system maps protease activity to a detectable fluorescence-based phenotype, enabling FACS-based enrichment of desired clones. We provide the detailed ste...

Access restricted. Please log in or start a trial to view this content.

Disclosures

The authors declare no competing interests. The raw data supporting this protocol, including Nanopore sequencing FASTQ files, flow cytometry (FCS) files, and source data used to generate the figures and tables, and plasmids pDD1523 and pDD1524 have been deposited in Zenodo and are publicly available at 10.5281/zenodo.20746804

Acknowledgements

We thank all members of the Dingal laboratory for their advice, expertise, and discussions. We also thank the UTD Flow Cytometry Core for infrastructure and support. M.B.L. is supported by the UTD Eugene McDermott Graduate Fellowship. This research was supported by a UTD Startup Fund and National Institutes of Health-NIGMS awards to the laboratory of P.C.D.P.D. (R35GM150967).

Access restricted. Please log in or start a trial to view this content.

Materials

List of materials used in this article
NameCompanyCatalog NumberComments
Reagents
10 mM dNTP MixNEBN0447SPCR reactions (Tables 1, 3)
10X PBS, pH 7.4FisherBP3994Staining buffer base (Steps 3.2–3.3)
5X Q5 Reaction BufferNEBB9027SSold separately; also included with Q5 polymerase
Agar, BactoBD Difco281230-500gSDCAA agar plates (Table 5); 15 g/L
Agarose (Low-EEO/Multi-Purpose/Molecular Biology Grade)Fisher BioReagentsBP160-500Gel Electrophoresis
Anti-FLAG PE AntibodyBioLegend637309FACS staining; PE-conjugated anti-FLAG
Anti-HA Tag Antibody [FITC]GenScriptA01621FACS staining; FITC-conjugated anti-HA
Bacto Casamino AcidsBD Difco223120SDCAA+, SGCAA+, SCAA media (Table 5); 5 g/L
Bacto Peptone / TryptoneRPIT60060-10000.0LB/SOB media preparation; 20 g/L in YPD (Table 5)
BSA, Bovine Serum Albumin, Fraction VSigma-Aldrich126575-10GM0.5% in PBS; staining buffer (Steps 3.2–3.3)
BsmBI-v2 (200 U)NEBR0739SGolden Gate assembly of substrate cassette (Table 8)
Calcium chloride solution (1M)Sigma-Aldrich21115-100mLElectroporation buffer: 1 mM final (Table 5)
ColiRollers® Plating BeadsSigma-Aldrich71013-3Sterilize by putting in reagent bottles and autoclaving at 121ºC, 15 psi, for 15 mins.
D-GalactoseThermo FisherA12813.30250 g; 20% w/v stock for SGCAA+ induction (Table 5)
D-SorbitolThermo Fisher1327300.10Electroporation buffer (1 M) and outgrowth media (Table 5)
Dextrose (D-Glucose), anhydrousSigma-AldrichG8270-1KGYPD, SDCAA+, 20% w/v dextrose stock (Table 5)
Difco Yeast Nitrogen Base w/o Amino AcidsSigmaY0626-250G6.7 g/L in SDCAA/SGCAA (Table 5)
Difco YPD Broth (pre-mixed)BD242820-500gPre-made YPD alternative; 500 g
DL-Dithiothreitol (DTT)Sigma-AldrichD0632-1GConditioning buffer: 10 mM final; aliquot 250 μL, store −20°C
E.Z.N.A. CyclePure PCR Purification KitOmega Bio-tekD6492-02PCR product cleanup
E.Z.N.A. Gel Extraction KitOmega Bio-tekD2500-01Gel purification post-PCR and restriction digest (Steps 1.1.8, 1.3.2)
E.Z.N.A. Plasmid DNA Mini Kit IOmega Bio-tekD6942-02Plasmid purification (Step 4.2)
Glycerol (≥99%)FisherBP229-450% v/v stock for glycerol stocks (Step 4.1.1)
Kanamycin Sulfate FisherBP906-5SDCAA+ and SGCAA+: 50 μg/mL final; replaces Sigma K0879-5G
KLD Enzyme MixNEBM0554SKinase-Ligase-DpnI; site-directed mutagenesis
KLD Reaction BufferNEBB0554AUsed with KLD Enzyme Mix
LB Broth (Lennox)Sigma-AldrichL3022-1KGE. coli liquid culture
Lithium Acetate Dihydrate (LiOAc·2H2O)Thermo FisherA17921.30Conditioning buffer: 0.1 M final; add before DTT (Table 5)
Luria Agar (Luria-Bertani Agar)RPIL24020-2000.0E. coli plating; replaces Sigma LB Agar Lennox L2897-1KG
OmniPur Casamino AcidsSigma2240-500GMAlternative casamino acids source
pDD1523Zenodo10.5281/zenodo. 20746804pCTCon2-TRP-CEN/ARS-Gal10-SPAga2-BsaI; Gal1-Aga2-sfGFP
pDD1524Zenodo10.5281/zenodo. 20746804pCTCon2-Aga2-6xHis-ENLYFQS-FLAG-ENLYFES-HA-ERS
Penicillin-Streptomycin Solution, 100XCorning30-002-CISDCAA+, SGCAA+: 1X final
PstI-HF (5000 U)NEBR3140SVector linearization (Table 10); use HF version
Q5 HF DNA PolymeraseNEBM0492SHigh-fidelity polymerase; alternative to Q5 Hot Start
Q5 High GC EnhancerNEBB9028AFor high GC-content PCR reactions
Q5 Hot Start DNA PolymeraseNEBM0491LPCR assembly and amplification (Tables 1, 3)
rCutSmart Buffer (10X)NEBB6004SSupplied with PstI-HF and SphI-HF (Table 10)
SalI-HFNEBR3138LAdditional restriction enzyme
SOC MediumNEBB9020SPost-transformation recovery
Sodium Chloride (NaCl)FisherS271-1LB / SOB media preparation
Sodium Hydroxide (NaOH)FisherS318-500Media pH adjustment
Sodium Phosphate Dibasic (Na2HPO4)Sigma-AldrichS9763-500GSDCAA plates, SCAA media: 38 mM (Table 5)
Sodium Phosphate Monobasic, anhydrousVWR (BDH)BDH4542-1KGPSDCAA plates, SCAA media: 62 mM; replaces NaH2PO4·H2O monohydrate
SphI-HF (1000 U)NEBR3182SVector linearization in tandem with PstI-HF (Table 10)
StreptomycinLife Technologies / SigmaS6501-5gAntibiotic
T4 DNA Ligase Buffer (10X)NEBB0202STable 6
T4 Polynucleotide Kinase (500 U)NEBM0201STable 6
T7 DNA Ligase (3000 U/mL)NEBM0318STable 8
Yeast ExtractRPIY20020-5000.0YPD (10 g/L) and LB/SOB media
Zymolyase (1000 U)Zymo ResearchE1004-AYeast cell wall digestion for plasmid extraction (Step 4.2.2)
Zymoprep Yeast Plasmid Miniprep IIZymo ResearchD2004Yeast plasmid extraction; includes Solutions 1, 2, 3 (Step 4.2)
ZymoPURE II Plasmid Midi KitZymo ResearchD4201-BMid-scale plasmid prep; for larger-volume preparations
Equipment and Consumables
Disposable Cuvettes, 1.5 mLFisher14-955-127For measuring OD600 of liquid cultures
Erlenmeyer Flask, 125 mLVWR10536-912Pre-culture and conditioning incubation
Erlenmeyer Flask, 250 mLVWR10536-914Yeast subculture
Erlenmeyer Flask, 250 mLVWR75809-646Wide-mouth variant
Erlenmeyer Flask, 500 mLVWR10536-926Main pre-culture flask (Step 2.3.1, 2.4.3)
Falcon 50 mL Conical TubesFalcon352070Cell washes, centrifugation throughout protocol
Flow Cytometry Sorter: BD FusionBD BiosciencesFACSAria Fusion Flow Cytometer (catalog number not applicable)For Fluorescence-Activated Cell Sorting (FACS)
Gene Pulser/MicroPulser Electroporation Cuvettes, 0.2 cm gapBio-Rad1652086For electroporation of electrocompetent EBY100
GenePulser Xcell Electroporation SystemBio-Rad1652660INSTRUMENT; 2.5 kV, 25 μF, 200 Ω (Step 2.7.6)
New Brunswick Innova 40R - Benchtop Orbital ShakerEppendorfM12990084For yeast liquid culture incubation
Petri Dishes, 100 mmFisherFB0875712YPD and SDCAA agar plates
SpectraMax QuickDrop UV-Vis SpectrophotometerMolecular DevicesSpectraMax QuickDropFor measuring OD600 of liquid cultures and DNA concentration
Vacufuge plusEppendorf2231001204For concentrating DNA
Software
BD FACSDiva (Version: 8.0)BD Bioscienceshttps://www.bdbiosciences.com/en-us/products/software/instrument-software/bd-facsdiva-softwareCollection of tools for flow cytometer and application setup, data acquisition, and data analysis
Benchling (Version: Web-based platform, continuous release)Benchling, Inc.https://www.benchling.com/Sequence design software
SnapGene (Version: 8.0.1)SnapGene, Inc.https://www.snapgene.com/Sequence design software

References

  1. Adams MJ, Antoniw JF, Beaudoin F. Overview and analysis of the polyprotein cleavage sites in the family Potyviridae. Mol Plant Pathol. 2005;6:471–487.
  2. Lim Suan MB et al. Identification and engineering of highly functional potyviral proteases in cells using co-evolutionary models. Nat Commun. 2026;17:3257. doi: 10.1038/s41467-026-69961-5.
  3. Kapust RB, Waugh DS. Controlled intracellular processing of fusion proteins by TEV protease. Protein Expr Purif. 2000;19:312–318.
  4. Nallamsetty S et al. Efficient site-specific processing of fusion proteins by tobacco vein mottling virus protease in vivo and in vitro. Protein Expr Purif. 2004;38:108–115.
  5. Chen Z, Elowitz MB. Programmable protein circuit design. Cell. 2021;184:2284–2301.
  6. Sanchez MI, Ting AY. Directed evolution improves the catalytic efficiency of TEV protease. Nat Methods. 2020;17:167–174.
  7. Denard CA et al. YESS 2.0, a tunable platform for enzyme evolution, yields highly active TEV protease variants. ACS Synth Biol. 2021;10:63–71.
  8. Gietz RD, Schiestl RH. High-efficiency yeast transformation using the LiAc/SS carrier DNA/PEG method. Nat Protoc. 2007;2:31–34.
  9. Benatuil L, Perez JM, Belk J, Hsieh CM. An improved yeast transformation method for the generation of very large human antibody libraries. Protein Eng Des Sel. 2010;23:155–159.
  10. Boder ET, Wittrup KD. Yeast surface display for screening combinatorial polypeptide libraries. Nat Biotechnol. 1997;15:553–557.
  11. Lau WL et al. Using yeast surface display to engineer a soluble and crystallizable construct of hematopoietic progenitor kinase 1 (HPK1). Acta Crystallogr Sect F Struct Biol Commun. 2021;77:22–28.
  12. Kieke MC et al. Selection of functional T cell receptor mutants from a yeast surface-display library. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1999;96:5651–5656.
  13. Ma H, Kunes S, Schatz PJ, Botstein D. Plasmid construction by homologous recombination in yeast. Gene. 1987;58:201–216.
  14. Varadarajan N, Cantor JR, Georgiou G, Iverson BL. Construction and flow cytometric screening of targeted enzyme libraries. Nat Protoc. 2009;4:893–901.
  15. Haas CM, Francino-Urdaniz IM, Steiner PJ, Whitehead TA. Identification of SARS-CoV-2 S RBD escape mutants using yeast screening and deep mutational scanning. STAR Protoc. 2021;2:100869. doi: 10.1016/j.xpro.2021.100869.
  16. Ito H, Fukuda Y, Murata K, Kimura A. Transformation of intact yeast cells treated with alkali cations. J Bacteriol. 1983;153:163–168.
  17. Bloom JD, Arnold FH. In the light of directed evolution: pathways of adaptive protein evolution. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2009;106:9995–10000.
  18. Yi L et al. Engineering of TEV protease variants by yeast ER sequestration screening (YESS) of combinatorial libraries. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2013;110:7229–7234.
  19. Martinusen SG et al. Modular and integrative activity reporters enhance biochemical studies in the yeast ER. Protein Eng Des Sel. 2024;37. doi: 10.1093/protein/gzae008.
  20. Li Q et al. Profiling protease specificity: combining yeast ER sequestration screening (YESS) with next generation sequencing. ACS Chem Biol. 2017;12:510–518.
  21. Packer MS, Rees HA, Liu DR. Phage-assisted continuous evolution of proteases with altered substrate specificity. Nat Commun. 2017;8:956. doi: 10.1038/s41467-017-01055-9.
  22. Yaghi RM, Andrews CL, Wylie DC, Iverson BL. High-resolution substrate specificity profiling of SARS-CoV-2 Mpro; comparison to SARS-CoV Mpro. ACS Chem Biol. 2024;19:1474–1483.

Access restricted. Please log in or start a trial to view this content.

Reprints and Permissions

Tags

Protease EngineeringSaccharomyces CerevisiaeFluorescence Activated Cell SortingProtease VariantsSubstrate CassetteDNA Library DesignYeast ElectroporationProtein Screening

This article has been published

Video Coming Soon