A subscription to JoVE is required to view this content. Sign in or start your free trial.

Method Article

Modified QuEChERS for Organophosphorus Pesticide Analysis in Agricultural Soils by Gas Chromatography-Tandem Mass Spectrometry

104 views

⸱

DOI:

10.3791/72745

⸱

September 18th, 2026

 ,  ,  ,  , 

In This Article

Summary

This protocol describes a modified Quick-Easy-Cheap-Effective-Rugged-Safe (QuEChERS) method with a magnesium silicate adsorbent-based dispersive solid-phase extraction cleanup for multiresidue determination of organophosphorus pesticides in agricultural soils by gas chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry, improving co-extractive removal, minimizing matrix-related analytical interference, and supporting reliable trace-level quantification.

Abstract

Accurate determination of organophosphorus pesticide (OPP) residues in agricultural soils by gas chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (GC-MS/MS) is often hindered by matrix-induced signal effects caused by co-extracted organic matter, humic substances, and mineral-associated interferents. Conventional Quick-Easy-Cheap-Effective-Rugged-Safe (QuEChERS) cleanup strategies may not sufficiently remove matrix components from complex soil extracts, compromising analytical performance. This study presents a modified QuEChERS protocol that incorporates the adsorbent into mixed-sorbent dispersive solid-phase extraction (dSPE) cleanup for the simultaneous determination of 12 OPPs in agricultural soils by GC-MS/MS. Seven dSPE sorbent combinations were evaluated across six agricultural soils with varying soil properties. Co-extractive removal was quantified gravimetrically, and the combination of primary-secondary amine, octadecylsilane, and a magnesium silicate adsorbent (50 mg each, with 150 mg anhydrous magnesium sulfate) achieved the highest average co-extractive removal (88%). Analyte protectants consisting of ethylglycerol, L-gulonic acid γ-lactone, D-sorbitol, and shikimic acid were incorporated into final extracts to minimize matrix effects, while matrix-matched calibration compensated for soil-specific signal variation. Chlorpyrifos-methyl-d10 and triphenyl phosphate were employed as procedural and injection internal standards, respectively. Matrix-matched calibration curves (5–600 µg/kg) demonstrated excellent linearity, with coefficients of determination ≥0.9933 for most analyte-soil combinations. The limit of detection (5 µg/kg) was used for linearity assessment, whereas the method limit of quantification was established at 50 µg/kg as the lowest validated level. Accuracy and precision assessed at three recovery levels (50, 200, and 400 µg/kg, n = 5 per level) demonstrated recoveries between 70% and 120% with relative standard deviations ≤20% for most analyte-soil combinations, meeting SANTE/2020/12830 (Rev.2) performance criteria. Lower recoveries were observed only for fenamiphos, pirimiphos-ethyl, and ethion in selected soil matrices. The results demonstrate that the magnesium silicate adsorbent improves dSPE cleanup by reducing co-extractives and that its combination with analyte protectants and matrix-matched calibration provides reliable multiresidue determination of OPPs in complex soil matrices by GC-MS/MS.

Introduction

Organophosphorus pesticides (OPPs) remain among the most widely used classes of agrochemicals worldwide because of the broad-spectrum efficacy and versatility of this pesticide class in crop protection1. Although many OPPs undergo environmental degradation more rapidly than organochlorine pesticides, widespread and recurrent application of these compounds results in continued presence in agricultural soils2. Soil acts as the primary environmental compartment receiving pesticide inputs and can serve as a temporary reservoir from which residues may be transferred to crops, surface waters, groundwater, and surrounding ecosy....

Access restricted. Please log in or start a trial to view this content.

Protocol

The source data underlying the experimental optimization of the dSPE cleanup procedure, the matrix effect dataset, and the physicochemical characterization of the six agricultural soils have been deposited in Zenodo and are publicly available at DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.21644870. The details of the reagents and the equipment used are listed in the Table of Materials.

1. Soil sampling and preparation

NOTE: To ensure personal safety, wearing a lab coat, protective eyewear, and nitrile gloves is recommended throughout this protocol.

  1. Collect a bulk composite soil sample from t....

Access restricted. Please log in or start a trial to view this content.

Results

The six agricultural soils selected for method evaluation represented a broad range of soil properties (see Table 2), including pH (soil:H2O, 1:2) values ranging from 4.67 to 7.31, organic matter contents from 0.18% to 6.46%, and clay fractions from 22.9% to 48.5%. Five soils originated from agricultural regions of Colombia and one from Spain. This diversity was intentionally incorporated to evaluate the robustness of the proposed cleanup procedure across contrasting soil matrices, given that .......

Access restricted. Please log in or start a trial to view this content.

Discussion

The determination of pesticide residues in soils remains analytically challenging due to the high variability in soil physicochemical properties and the resulting differences in co-extractive composition4,5,6,14,17,18,19,20,21

Access restricted. Please log in or start a trial to view this content.

Disclosures

During the preparation of this work, the authors used the free version of Claude (Anthropic) to assist in the design of the graphical layout of Figure 3 and the free version of ChatGPT (GPT-5.5, OpenAI) to assist with grammar and spelling. After using these tools, the authors carefully reviewed and edited all content as needed. All scientific content, data, analyses, and conclusions were generated, verified, and approved by the authors, who take full responsibility for the accuracy and integrity of the published article.

Acknowledgements

The authors gratefully acknowledge EAN University and its Research and Transfer Management Office for supporting this research. The authors also thank the EAN University Laboratories for providing the analytical facilities and technical resources necessary to conduct this work, including access to the GC-MS/MS instrumentation employed throughout the study. This work was supported by the Research and Transfer Management, Universidad EAN, Bogotá D.C., Colombia.

....

Access restricted. Please log in or start a trial to view this content.

Materials

List of materials used in this article
NameCompanyCatalog NumberComments
3-Ethoxy-1,2-propanediol (ethylglycerol)Sigma Aldrich260428-1G
Acetic acidSigma Aldrich695092
AcetonitrileMerck1006652500
AOAC 20i/s autosamplerShimadzu221-723115-58
BalanceOHAUSPA224
C18Sigma Aldrich52600-U
Centrifuge tubes, 2 mLEppendorf4610-1815
Centrifuge tubes, 50 mLNest602002
Centrifuge Z206AMERMLE6019500118
Column SH-Rxi-5sil MS, 30 m x 0.25 mm, 0.25 µmShimadzu221-75954-30
Container, with cap, amber glass, 1000 mLSigma AldrichZ674176
DesiccatorSimax415262302
Dispensette 5-50 mLBRAND4600361
D-SorbitolSigma Aldrich240850-5G
Ethyl acetateMerk1313181212
Florisil <200 mesh, fine powderSigma Aldrich288705-50G
Formic acidMerck1002641000
GCMS-TQ8040Shimadzu211552
Injection syringeShimadzuLC2213461800
L-Gulonic acid γ-lactoneSigma Aldrich310301-5G
Linner splitlessShimadzu221-4887-02
Magnesium sulfate (anhydrous)Sigma AldrichM7506-2KG
MethanolPanreac131091.12.12
Milli-Q ultrapure (type 1) waterMilliporeF4H4783518
Pipette tips 10 - 100 µLBiologix200010
Pipette tips 100 - 1000 µLBrand541287
Pipette tips 20 - 200 µLBrand732028
Pipettes PasteurNORMAX5426023
Pippette Transferpette S variabel 10 - 100 µLBRAND704774
Pippette Transferpette S variabel 100 - 1000 µLBRAND704780
Pippette Transferpette S variabel 20 - 200 µLSCILOGEX712111099999
Primary-secondary amine (PSA)Sigma Aldrich52738-U
Refrigerator/freezerHacebNEV ALC 404
Shikimic acidSigma AldrichS5375-1G
Sodium acetateSigma Aldrich241245-1KG
Software GCMSsolutionShimadzu223-18472-92
Stainless steel 2 mm meshPinzuarPS33N10
Test tube, glass, 10 mLSigma AldrichBR114508
TolueneMerck1083252500
Triphenyl phosphate (I-IS)Sigma Aldrich241288-50G
Vials with fused-in insert, 0.3 mLSigma Aldrich29398-U
Vials, screw top, amber glass, 15 mLSigma Aldrich27088-U
Volumetric flask, 10 mLSigma AldrichDWK28017-10
VortexScilogex82120004
Pesticides
ChlorpyrifosSigma Aldrich45395-100MG2921-88-2
Chlorpyrifos-methylSigma Aldrich45396-250MG5598-13-0
Chlorpyrifos-methyl-d10 (P-IS)Sigma Aldrich90047-5MG285138-81-0
EthionSigma Aldrich45477-250MG563-12-2
FenamiphosSigma Aldrich45483-250MG22224-92-6
FenitrothionSigma Aldrich45487-250MG122-14-5
FenthionSigma Aldrich36552-250MG55-38-9
MalathionSigma Aldrich36143-100MG121-75-5
MethidathionSigma Aldrich36158-100MG950-37-8
Parathion-methylSigma Aldrich36187-100MG298-00-0
Pirimiphos-ethylSigma Aldrich45628-250MG23505-41-1
Pirimiphos-methylSigma Aldrich32058-250MG29232-93-7
Tolclofos-methylSigma Aldrich31209-250MG5701804-9

References

  1. Saad H, Elfeky SA, El-Gamel NE, Dena ASA. Organophosphate pesticides: a review on classification, synthesis, toxicity, remediation and analysis. RSC Adv. 2025;15(48):40802-40822.
  2. Mali H, et al. Organophosphate pesticides an emerging environmental contaminant: Pollution, toxicity, bioremediation progress, and remaining challenges. J Environ Sci. 2023;127:234-250.
  3. Dhuldhaj UP, Singh R, Singh VK. Pesticide contamination in agro-ecosystems: toxicity, impacts, and bio-based management strategies. Environ Sci Pollut Res. 2023;30:9243-9270.
  4. González-Curbelo MÁ, Varela-Martínez DA, Riaño-Herrera DA. Pesticide-residue analysis in soils by th....

Access restricted. Please log in or start a trial to view this content.

Reprints and Permissions

Explore More Articles

Organophosphorus PesticidesQuEChERS ExtractionDispersive Solid-Phase ExtractionMatrix EffectsCo-Extractive RemovalAnalyte ProtectantsMatrix-Matched Calibration