The dissection process outlined in this study emphasizes several critical steps necessary to achieve optimal visualization of Cooper’s ligaments and the superficial fascial system. Proper sagittal sectioning of the breast tissue into 2-cm-thick slices under the guidance of a pathologist is fundamental to preserving the anatomical orientation and integrity of the structures of interest. Additionally, the use of a surgical microscope with 5×–10× magnification ensures precise dissection and observation of delicate structures. The irrigation of tissue slices with saline and the use of a suction system are indispensable for maintaining tissue hydration and ensuring visual clarity during dissection.
Several procedural refinements were introduced to address the technical challenges encountered during dissection and to enhance the consistency and clarity of anatomical visualization. Increased optical magnification using an operative microscope and fine-tipped microsurgical instruments to improve tissue handling and facilitate identification of fascial and ligamentous structures. A smartphone adapter connected to the surgical microscope was used to facilitate live monitoring and high-resolution recording. A microscope with an integrated video output may also be used as an alternative. Periodic saline flushing of the suction tip and intermittent saline irrigation were used throughout the procedure to prevent clogging and maintain adequate suction. Keep tissues adequately hydrated. Hydration preserves the native appearance of fascial and ligamentous structures for more accurate identification. Remove only enough adipose tissue on either side of the target ligament by gentle suction to improve visualization of the edge of the ligamentous and fascial structures while preserving the target ligament or fascial structure. Collectively, these refinements improve procedural consistency, enhance visualization of fascial and ligamentous structures, and increase the protocol's educational value.
Despite the methodological advancements listed above, certain limitations persist. The anatomical identity of the SLSF, DLSF, Cooper's ligaments, and pectoral fascia was determined during microsurgical dissection based on the gross anatomical characteristics and tissue relationships. The identification of fascial and ligamentous structures was not independently confirmed by a breast pathologist or an anatomist, and histological or microscopic correlation was not performed because it was not the aim of this study. However, identification of these structures was based on the senior author’s 40-year experience performing breast reconstruction and other types of breast surgery. Therefore, the absence of independent anatomical and histological validation represents a small but definite limitation of this study.
Electrocautery is routinely used during mastectomy as part of the standard surgical practice at our institution. Although all specimens underwent the same tissue procurement process, thermal injury from electrocautery may have altered the gross appearance of the pectoral fascial structure. Because thermal artifacts were not formally evaluated, their influence on the anatomical identification of the pectoral fascia was not fully evaluated in this study. However, the pectoral fascia was identified based on its location relative to the mastectomy specimen, itself i.e., it is the last structural layer included with the mastectomy specimen as the breast surgeon cuts the specimen from the pectoral muscles. The identification of the DLSF remains challenging due to its variable proximity to the pectoral fascia and its variable presentation across specimens. Additionally, the reliance on tissue from patients undergoing a prophylactic mastectomy may introduce sampling bias, as these specimens may not fully represent the anatomical variations found in the general population. Furthermore, the use of 5×–10× magnification, while sufficient for this protocol, may not capture ultra-fine details that higher magnifications provide. Another potential limitation of this study is the age range of the patients. All samples were obtained from women approximately 33 to 86 years old and thus may not fully represent the anatomical characteristics of women outside this range. Finally, this study was designed to present a microsurgical dissection protocol rather than to prospectively validate the study’s performance and quantitative metrics, such as identification rates, dissection time, technical failure rates, and operator-related variability. Thus, quantitative metrics were not systematically recorded.
This protocol enables microsurgical visualization of Cooper's ligaments and the superficial fascial system in fresh human breast tissue, providing a suggested approach for observing their anatomical relationships. The observations here support the general concept that the breast parenchyma is situated between superficial and deep layers of the superficial fascial system and is traversed by Cooper’s ligaments. However, differences in scope and nomenclature exist among previous anatomical descriptions. Rehnke et al. proposed a broader three-dimensional model in which the anterior and posterior lamellae surround the corpus mammae and fuse peripherally with the deep fascia of the chest wall to form the circummammary ligament4. Instead, the present protocol focused on reproducible identification of SLSF, DLSF, Cooper's ligaments, and pectoral fascia. By comparison, the terminology summarized by Duncan et al., particularly the superficial and deep layers of the superficial fascial system and Cooper’s ligaments, more closely aligns with the structures identified in our dissections13. Building on these previous approaches, this protocol provides a complementary microsurgical dissection technique for direct visualization of these structures and their three-dimensional relationships in fresh human breast tissue. By providing a clearer understanding of these relationships, the technique expands the anatomical knowledge base and provides a foundation for future anatomical and surgical investigations. Compared to cadaveric studies, the protocol's use of fresh non-fixed tissue specimens may better preserve the native ligamentous architecture of the breast than cadaveric specimens14.
The findings from this study may have implications for future anatomical research and surgical education. For breast and plastic surgeons, detailed visualization of Cooper's ligaments, the superficial fascial system, and their continuity with the pectoral fascia provides valuable anatomical guidance for identifying tissue structures visualized and used during breast reconstruction, implant pocket preparation, mastopexy, and mastectomy. Preservation of the superficial fascial layer and its ligamentous attachments may help maintain the native supporting framework in selected breast procedures where the superficial fascial system is preserved, such as reconstruction following segmental mastectomy. However, these potential applications require further clinical validation. This dissection protocol has potential applications in biomechanical studies, where a detailed anatomical understanding is crucial for modeling the mechanical behavior of breast tissues. Beyond anatomical characterization, this protocol may facilitate future studies correlating imaging findings with gross anatomy, support finite-element modeling and surgical simulation, and contribute to the development of anatomical training resources. The protocol may serve as a useful resource for further investigations of breast anatomy and changes under pathological conditions, such as cancer or trauma15.
In conclusion, this study provides a standardized microsurgical dissection protocol for visualization of Cooper's ligaments and the superficial fascial system in fresh human breast tissue. The protocol provides a useful resource for future anatomical, translational, and surgical investigations.