A subscription to JoVE is required to view this content. Sign in or start your free trial.

Method Article

FusionNetX: A Deep Feature Fusion Model Leveraging MRI and Deep Learning for Enhanced Brain Tumor Detection

543 views

⸱

DOI:

10.3791/73365

⸱

August 21st, 2026

 ,  ,  ,  ,  ,  ,  , 

In This Article

Summary

This research work presented an approach, FusionNetX, by enriching the feature fusion capability of DenseNet121 and EfficientNetB7 for the classification of brain tumors on five publicly available datasets with data augmentation, preprocessing, and hybrid model customization (intermediate Fusion), achieving results ranging from 98.77% to 99.89%, outperforming across multiple evaluation parameters.

Abstract

Brain tumors are considered one of the deadliest diseases in the world, and misdiagnosing them puts patients’ lives in danger and lowers the survival rate. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) with deep learning-based techniques, especially convolutional neural networks, is crucial for overcoming this obstacle, as it enables a more detailed examination of the brain's internal structure and offers outstanding learning and predictive capabilities. The need for accurate diagnosis of the tumor in the brain is still significant. Therefore, an enhanced feature-fusion-based DL model (FusionNetX) is proposed that leverages the strengths of two pretrained models, DenseNet121 and EfficientNetB7, using customized fine-tuning hyperparameters, including trainable and non-trainable layers. The proposed FusionNetX model was applied to five publicly available brain tumor datasets: Br35H, Figshare, Sartaj, Masoud, and Balanced Brain Tumor. Some preprocessing steps were applied to improve image quality and address overfitting through resizing and data augmentation. Using a variety of performance evaluation metrics, such as accuracy, loss, positive predicted value, negative predictive value, true positive rate, true negative rate, F1-score, false negative rate, and false positive rate, the proposed model FusionNetX was found to have an accuracy of 99.33% for Br35H, 99.13% for Figshare, 99.89% for Masoud, 99.19% for BBT-Dataset, and 98.77% for Sartaj. Additionally, the five brain tumor datasets were evaluated using late fusion and attention-based fusion to demonstrate the significance of the proposed FusionNetX model, and the results were substantially better, with gains of 0.3% to 1.9% across all datasets. Furthermore, the receiver operating characteristic curve is computed, and results from various performance evaluation metrics indicate that the proposed FusionNetX model can accurately detect and predict brain tumors and help health practitioners make timely decisions.

Introduction

Cancer is the deadliest disease in the human body nowadays because of its severity and growing rate, while multiple cancerous diseases, like brain tumors, breast cancer, lung nodules, kidney cancer, and others, are found in the human body, causing an increase in the death rate. Cancer develops when cells or tissues in a person's body multiply abnormally.  When cancer metastasizes, it can damage other human organs and become more dangerous1. Because the brain controls every bodily function, any damage to it can have far-reaching consequences for the entire body.  That is why brain tumors or cancer are so lethal to humans

Access restricted. Please log in or start a trial to view this content.

Protocol

The most threatening disease in the world is a brain tumor. An accurate diagnosis can be beneficial to patients’ survival. Still, there is a need for an accurate diagnostic system that can detect brain tumors at an early stage. To address this problem, a more reliable technique for accurately detecting brain tumors in their early stages has been proposed by using a hybrid dual deep learning mechanism with optimized hyperparameters and fine-tuned layers based on the DenseNet121 and EfficientNetB7 models. The proposed approach takes 2D MRI images as input and outputs a prediction of either tumor exit or no tumor exit for the binary classification dataset Br35H, and tumo....

Access restricted. Please log in or start a trial to view this content.

Results

This part details the results of testing the proposed dual feature fusion model on five open-source datasets on brain cancers, including Br35H, Figshare, Sartaj, Masoud, and Balanced Brain tumor datasets, and their performance is evaluated regarding different statistical performance evaluation parameters, including accuracy42,43,44, misclassification rate (MCR)45, precision, also referred as PPV

Access restricted. Please log in or start a trial to view this content.

Discussion

As concluded, the proposed model worked as follows: First, the image size was chosen as 224 × 224, which is the moderate size for any deep learning model to extract and learn suitable features from the data samples while keeping all important information, and further performed data augmentation, which is more beneficial to make data samples in more diverse directions, which plays an important role for models to extract features from different planes or angles, and the rotational range was selected as 7% with a width.......

Access restricted. Please log in or start a trial to view this content.

Disclosures

The authors have nothing to disclose and have no conflict of interest. Further, no AI tools have been used to generate the manuscript as well as figures.

Acknowledgements

The authors are grateful for the support provided by the Princess Nourah bint Abdulrahman University Researchers Supporting Project (PNURSP2026R192), Princess Nourah bint Abdulrahman University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia. The authors also thank the research participants and institutions that contributed to this research.

Funding:

This work was supported by the National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) grant funded by the Korea government (MSIT) (No. RS-2023-00218176) and the Soonchunhyang University Research Fund. Princess Nourah bint Abdulrahman University Researchers Supporting Project number (PNURSP2026R192), Pri....

Access restricted. Please log in or start a trial to view this content.

Materials

List of materials used in this article
NameCompanyCatalog NumberComments
Br35H Brain Tumor DatasetKaggle (dataset contributor)https://www.kaggle.com/datasets/ahmedhamada0/brain-tumor-detectionPublic dataset; binary classification (tumor / no tumor)300 MRI images 
Figshare Brain Tumor DatasetKaggle / Figsharehttps://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.1512427Public dataset; multiclass (glioma, meningioma, pituitary tumor) 3064 MRI images
Sartaj Brain Tumor Classification MRI DatasetKaggle (dataset by Sartaj Bhuvaji)https://doi.org/10.34740/kaggle/dsv/12745533Public dataset; multiclass (glioma, meningioma, no tumor, pituitary tumor) 3264 MRI images
Masoud Brain Tumor MRI DatasetKaggle (dataset by Masoud Nickparvar)https://doi.org/10.34740/kaggle/dsv/14832123Public dataset; multiclass (glioma, meningioma, no tumor, pituitary tumor) 7023 MRI images
BBT-Dataset (Brain Tumor Dataset)Kaggle (dataset contributor)https://doi.org/10.34740/kaggle/dsv/6758053Public dataset; balanced multiclass brain tumor 5248 MRI images
PythonPython Software Foundationhttps://www.python.orgProgramming language, version 3.10.13
TensorFlow / KerasGoogle / TensorFlow developershttps://www.tensorflow.orgDeep learning framework; model construction, training, and evaluation, version 2.15.0
EfficientNetB7 (pretrained)Google / Keras Applicationshttps://keras.io/api/applications/efficientnet/ImageNet-pretrained backbone; feature extraction
DenseNet121 (pretrained)Keras Applicationshttps://keras.io/api/applications/densenet/ImageNet-pretrained backbone; feature extraction
scikit-learnscikit-learn developers (NumFOCUS)https://scikit-learn.orgLabel encoding, train-test split, evaluation metrics (classification report, confusion matrix, ROC/AUC)
OpenCV (cv2)OpenCV teamhttps://opencv.orgImage loading and resizing
NumPyNumPy developers (NumFOCUS)https://numpy.orgNumerical computing and array operations
pandaspandas development team (NumFOCUS)https://pandas.pydata.orgData organization and metrics tabulation

References

  1. He Z, et al. A review on methods for diagnosis of breast cancer cells and tissues. Cell Prolif. 2020;53(7):e12822. doi:10.1111/cpr.12822.
  2. Siegel RL, Giaquinto AN, Jemal A. Cancer statistics, 2024. CA Cancer J Clin. 2024;74(1):12–49.
  3. Varuna Shree N, Kumar TNR. Identification and classification of brain tumor MRI images with feature extraction using DWT and probabilistic neural network. Brain Inform. 2018;5(1):23–30.
  4. Ghoreishi Mokri SM, Valadbeygi N, Grigoryeva V. Diagnosis of glioma, menigioma and pituitary brain tumor using MRI images recognition by deep learning in Python. EAI Endorsed Trans Intell Syst Mach Learn Appl. 2024;1:1–9.

Access restricted. Please log in or start a trial to view this content.

Reprints and Permissions

Explore More Articles

MRI AnalysisConvolutional Neural NetworksDenseNet121EfficientNetB7Data AugmentationPerformance MetricsAttention-Based Fusion