Blindfold Group
Blindfold Group - Related Videos
05:25
Setup and Execution Of the Blindfolded Code Training Exercise
0 Views •
Cited by 3 •
2019
The blindfolded code training exercise, which blindfolds the team leader in a code resuscitation simulation, is an advanced teaching technique to improve closed-loop communication, organizational skills, and critical...
13:42
Clinical Examination Protocol to Detect Atypical and Classical Scrapie in Sheep
0 Views •
Cited by 23 •
2014
A short clinical examination protocol is presented to aid in the detection of classical and atypical scrapie in sheep and goats.
03:20
The Stanford Prison Experiment
0 Views •
2020
The famous and controversial Stanford Prison Experiment, conducted by social psychologist Philip Zimbardo and his colleagues at Stanford University, demonstrated the power of social roles, social norms, and scripts. Social Roles One major social determinant of human behavior is our social role—a pattern of behavior that is expected of a person in a given setting or group (Hare, 2003). Each one of us has several social roles. You may be, at the same time, a student, a parent, an aspiring...
09:29
A Standardized Obstacle Course for Assessment of Visual Function in Ultra Low Vision and Artificial Vision
0 Views •
Cited by 27 •
2014
We describe an indoor, portable, standardized course that can be used to evaluate obstacle avoidance in persons who have ultralow vision. The course is relatively inexpensive, simple to administer, and has been shown to be reliable and reproducible.
09:09
Protocol for Assessing the Relative Effects of Environment and Genetics on Antler and Body Growth for a Long-lived Cervid
0 Views •
Cited by 2 •
2017
Phenotypic differences among cervid populations may be related to population-level genetics or nutrition; discerning which is difficult in the wild. This protocol describes how we designed a controlled study where nutritional variation was eliminated. We found that phenotypic variation of male white-tailed deer was more limited by nutrition than genetics.
FAQs
The key comparison is not simply whether participants succeed, but which parts of performance change when visual cues disappear. Researchers can examine coordination, decisions, social interactions, or task performance alongside information available through touch, hearing, balance, memory, or verbal instruction. Differences between groups indicate how strongly a task depends on sight and how participants compensate.
When sight is unavailable, participants may reorganize their behavior around other information sources. Touch and hearing can support task completion, while balance, memory, or verbal information may become more important. The resulting performance reflects both the contribution of vision and the participant’s ability to adapt when sensory information is restricted during the task.
An unblindfolded control group provides a reference for interpreting performance under normal visual conditions. Comparing the two groups helps researchers distinguish changes associated with blocked visual input from the general demands of the task itself. This comparison strengthens conclusions about whether vision contributes to perception, coordination, interaction, decision-making, or overall task performance.
Researchers first select a behavioral task that can be performed with visual input restricted, then have participants complete it while their eyes are covered. Outcomes from this group are compared with results from participants who perform the task without the visual restriction. The contrast shows how removing sight changes observable behavior in that specific setting.
Interpretation should consider which nonvisual information remains available during the task. Touch, hearing, balance, memory, and verbal information may each support performance differently, so a change in behavior does not represent a single uniform effect. Researchers can relate the observed outcome to the task’s sensory demands and the participant’s adaptation to restricted vision.
This approach can support studies of how vision contributes to perception, physical coordination, social interaction, decision-making, and task performance. It is especially useful when researchers want to examine adaptation rather than visual behavior alone, because participants must rely more heavily on remaining sensory or informational cues while completing the assigned activity.