Concavity Measurement
Concavity Measurement - Related Videos
11:42
A Paired Bead and Magnet Array for Molding Microwells with Variable Concave Geometries
0 Views •
Cited by 8 •
2018
This manuscript introduces a robust method of fabricating concave microwells without the need for complex high-cost facilities. Using magnetic force, steel beads, and a through-hole array, several hundred microwells were formed in a 3 cm x 3 cm polydimethylsiloxane (PDMS) substrate.
11:52
Microbubble Fabrication of Concave-porosity PDMS Beads
0 Views •
Cited by 2 •
2015
Procedures used to generate microstructured concave-porosity polydimethylsiloxane beads are presented. Effects of electrolyte concentration and identity within the aqueous phase are particularly emphasized.
08:51
Understanding Concentration and Measuring Volumes
0 Views •
2023
Solutions are utilized to some degree in almost all biological research applications. Therefore understanding how to measure and manipulate them is imperative to any experiment. In this video, concepts in preparing solutions are introduced. Solutions consist of a solute dissolved in solvent to yield a homogeneous mixture of molecular substances. Solutions are generally identified by their components and corresponding concentrations. Concentrated solutions are diluted through various...
07:22
Standardized Method for Measuring Collection Efficiency from Wipe-sampling of Trace Explosives
0 Views •
Cited by 7 •
2017
Optimized sampling protocols and the development of new wipe materials can be facilitated by standardized measurements of collection efficiency from wipe-sampling. Our approach for sampling trace explosives uses an automated device to control speed, force, and distance during wipe-sampling followed by extraction of collected explosives.
06:56
Micro/Nano-scale Strain Distribution Measurement from Sampling Moiré Fringes
0 Views •
Cited by 7 •
2017
A sampling moiré technique featuring 2-pixel and multi-pixel sampling methods for high-accuracy strain distribution measurements at the micro/nano-scale is presented here.
FAQs
Measurement results depend on how the contour and its reference are defined. A clinician first identifies the relevant anatomical boundary, then compares that contour with a reference line or curve. The resulting inward deviation can be expressed as depth, angle, or radius of curvature, so the chosen metric should match the shape feature being evaluated.
Standardized conditions are important because differences in assessment conditions can alter the apparent contour. Keeping the measurement process consistent improves reproducibility, meaning repeated assessments are more likely to produce comparable values. This consistency matters when clinicians compare anatomy between examinations or judge whether a structural change represents a meaningful difference over time.
Depth, angle, and radius of curvature describe different aspects of an inward-curving structure. Depth indicates the amount of inward deviation, while an angle describes the contour relationship at a defined location. Radius of curvature characterizes how sharply or broadly the surface bends. These measures provide complementary information and should not be treated as interchangeable.
A basic workflow begins by selecting the anatomical contour to be assessed and establishing a reference line or curve. The clinician then calculates the relevant inward deviation, using depth, angle, or radius of curvature as appropriate. Applying the same definitions and conditions at each assessment creates measurements that can support comparisons between structures or examinations.
Yes. The assessment may be based on direct examination or medical imaging, depending on how the relevant anatomical contour can be evaluated. In either setting, the clinician must define the contour and reference consistently before calculating the selected shape measure. This allows structural form to be described quantitatively rather than only through subjective visual judgment.
Clinicians can use these measurements to characterize anatomical deformities, compare normal and abnormal morphology, and support diagnosis. Quantitative contour information also contributes to treatment planning and surgical assessment, where a consistent description of shape may help evaluate structural differences. Repeating the measurement over time can further support monitoring of changes and treatment outcomes.