Three-port Surgery
Three-port Surgery - Related Videos
11:49
Single-port Non-liposuction Endoscopic Axillary Lymph Node Dissection in Breast Cancer Surgery
0 Views •
2026
This study describes a standardized surgical procedure for single-port endoscopic axillary lymph node dissection without liposuction in breast cancer. Indicated for patients with biopsy-confirmed nodal metastasis or positive sentinel lymph nodes, the technique emphasizes preservation of critical structures, particularly the intercostobrachial nerve, to reduce postoperative morbidity and optimize functional recovery.
07:17
Single Port Donor Nephrectomy
0 Views •
Cited by 5 •
2011
Single port laparoscopic surgery is changing the standard of care in surgical care like nothing since the laparoscopic technique was introduced 20 years ago. We present out technique of single port donor nephrectomy using the Gelpoint device. We have successfully performed this surgery in 100 patients.
03:07
Single-Port Robotic-assisted Transaxillary Breast-conserving Surgery: A Prospective, Single-arm, Non-randomized Phase IIa Clinical Trial
0 Views •
2025
This prospective study evaluated the implementation of a novel, single-port, robotic platform in oncoplastic breast-conserving surgery for malignant lesions. The primary endpoint focused on technical success, defined as the achievement of tumor-free resection margins confirmed by intraoperative frozen-section histopathology, with secondary assessment of aesthetic outcomes and life quality score of patients.
05:51
Computed Tomography (CT) Guided Implantation of a Totally Implantable Venous Access Port (TIVAP) through Subclavian Vein
0 Views •
2026
Implantation of a totally implantable venous access port (TIVAP) through the subclavian vein under CT guidance is a highly safe and precise method that can effectively reduce the incidence of complications and facilitate early detection of potential complications.
03:08
Single-port Robotic Transanal Total Mesorectal Excision in a Porcine Model (Sus scrofa domesticus)
0 Views •
2026
This protocol demonstrates Single-port (SP) robotic transanal total mesorectal excision (taTME) in a porcine model, highlighting procedural feasibility, technical steps, and preclinical applicability for minimally invasive rectal surgery.
FAQs
Carbon dioxide insufflation typically creates the internal working space needed for the operation. This separates the operative field from surrounding structures sufficiently to allow a laparoscope to provide visualization while instruments enter through the other access points. The resulting space supports tissue manipulation, dissection, and repair without requiring the large incision associated with open surgery.
The access points allow the camera and surgical instruments to enter the body through separate routes. The laparoscope supplies visualization of the target anatomy, while instruments provide the ability to manipulate tissue, perform dissection, and complete repairs. Using these components together gives the surgical team both visual guidance and operative access within the minimally invasive approach.
Results depend on more than the number of access points. Patient factors, the surgeon’s expertise, and whether the selected procedure is appropriate for this approach can all influence outcomes. These considerations help determine whether the technique is suitable for a particular operation and affect the likelihood of achieving its potential benefits, including reduced tissue disruption and shorter recovery.
Compared with open surgery, the three-port approach uses smaller access points rather than a large incision, which may reduce tissue disruption. It may also lessen postoperative pain and shorten recovery time. These advantages are not universal, because outcomes vary with patient characteristics, surgical expertise, and procedure selection. The comparison therefore depends on the clinical situation and operation performed.
The workflow typically begins by establishing three access points and introducing carbon dioxide to create working space. A laparoscope then provides visualization, while instruments enter through the available ports. Under visual guidance, the surgeon can manipulate tissue, dissect structures, or perform a repair. The exact operative actions depend on the target anatomy and the selected procedure.
Applications extend across several medical specialties, including general surgery, gynecology, and urology. Other specialties may also use the approach when the target anatomy and operation are suitable. Its role is therefore defined by the clinical procedure rather than by one specialty alone, with the access strategy supporting visualization and instrument-based treatment within the relevant body region.
Evaluation can include the degree of tissue disruption, postoperative pain, and the time required for recovery, because these are important comparisons with open surgery. Clinicians must interpret such outcomes in relation to patient factors, surgeon expertise, and procedure selection. The technique may offer advantages in these areas, but the overview does not imply identical results for every patient or operation.