Central Route Processing
Central Route Processing - Related Videos
02:20
Routes of Persuasion
0 Views •
2020
Persuasion is the process of changing our attitude toward something based on some kind of communication. Much of the persuasion we experience comes from outside forces. How do people convince others to change their attitudes, beliefs, and behaviors? What communications do you receive that attempt to persuade you to change your attitudes, beliefs, and behaviors? Yale Attitude Change Approach The topic of persuasion has been one of the most extensively researched areas in social psychology...
09:16
Dynamic Quantitative Sensory Testing to Characterize Central Pain Processing
0 Views •
Cited by 46 •
2017
By assessing pain in response to repetitive or different types of standardized stimuli, dynamic quantitative sensory testing (QST) can reveal changes in the central processing of pain. We present methods to optimize and individualize two dynamic QST measures: temporal summation (TS) and conditioned pain modulation (CPM).
01:25
The Central Dogma
0 Views •
2019
Overview The central dogma of biology states that information encoded in the DNA is transferred to messenger RNA (mRNA), which then directs the synthesis of protein. The set of instructions that enable the mRNA nucleotide sequence to be decoded into amino acids is called the genetic code. The universal nature of this genetic code has spurred advances in scientific research, agriculture, and medicine. RNA Is the Missing Link between DNA and Proteins In the early 1900s, scientists discovered...
02:16
Measures of Central Tendency
0 Views •
2020
The "center" of a data set is also a way of describing location. The two most widely used measures of the "center" of the data are the mean (average) and the median. The words "mean" and "average" are often used interchangeably. The substitution of one word for the other is common practice. The technical term is "arithmetic mean" and "average" is technically a center location. However, in practice among non-statisticians, "average" is commonly accepted for "arithmetic mean." Another measure of...
11:39
Central Venous Catheter Insertion: Internal Jugular
0 Views •
2023
Source: James W Bonz, MD, Emergency Medicine, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut, USA Central venous access is necessary in a multitude of clinical situations, including vascular access, vasopressor and caustic medication delivery, central venous pressure monitoring, intravascular device delivery (pacing wires, Swann-Ganz catheters), volume resuscitation, total parental nutrition, hemodialysis, and frequent phlebotomy. Safe reliable placement of a central venous catheter (CVC) in...
FAQs
Two conditions are especially important: people must be motivated to examine the message, and they must have the ability to think about it. If either condition is insufficient, careful evaluation becomes less likely. This means that the same argument may influence beliefs differently depending on the audience’s readiness and capacity for detailed consideration.
These features give recipients material to evaluate rather than merely notice. Cognitive responses arise as individuals assess whether the reasoning is convincing and whether the information applies to the issue at hand. Persuasion therefore depends on the substance of the message and the recipient’s assessment of that substance, not simply on its presentation.
Central processing requires evaluation of message content, whereas peripheral-cue influence relies mainly on surface features. The distinction matters because the resulting attitudes are not equally stable. Attitudes formed after careful consideration are generally more enduring, more resistant to counterpersuasion, and better predictors of later behavior than attitudes formed through peripheral influence.
Detailed evidence is most likely to matter when the audience is both motivated and able to think through the message. Under those conditions, communicators can focus on the quality, logic, and relevance of arguments. This principle helps distinguish situations in which substantive information may change beliefs from situations in which surface cues are more influential.
In health communication and education, the framework helps identify when people may respond to carefully supported information. In advertising, it helps clarify when message arguments deserve attention rather than relying mainly on presentation. Across these settings, the central question is whether the audience has sufficient motivation and ability to evaluate the content.
Researchers can examine whether an attitude change persists, withstands counterpersuasion, and predicts behavior. These outcomes are important because immediate agreement alone does not show how deeply a message affected judgment. When change follows careful evaluation, the framework predicts greater durability and stronger behavioral relevance than when change depends primarily on peripheral cues.