$$\rightleftharpoonup{xx}$$
$$\longleftharp{xx}$$,
$$\longrightharp{xx}$$,
Liposuction and abdominoplasty are currently among the most common cosmetic surgical procedures. They achieve patients' desired aesthetic outcomes by reducing localized excess adipose tissue in specific body areas, making them highly popular1,2,13. The fact that patients receiving cosmetic surgery are typically in good health and have high expectations makes it challenging for them to accept complications. Therefore, despite the low incidence rate, potential complications of liposuction warrant significant attention3,4. The risk factors for postoperative complications are multifaceted. A prospective study indicated that age, BMI, and male gender are independent risk factors for complications. Combined surgical procedures can lead to an increased incidence of major complications14. While smoking has been well-documented to increase morbidity15, it was not found to be an independent risk factor in this study, which contrasts with previous findings.This discrepancy is attributed to the generally good health of patients undergoing cosmetic surgery and the cautious approach surgeons take when operating on smokers and diabetic patients.Furthermore, hospital medical equipment, the level of sterilization and hygiene, and the surgeon's technique also influence the complication rate.In recent years, medical tourism for cosmetic procedures has surged dramatically16. Many private clinics and companies attract patients with promises of short waiting times and low costs. This trend has contributed to a rise in associated complications. In addition to poor medical institution conditions, it may also be related to the risk of thromboembolism brought about by patients' long-distance travel, and even language barriers16.In this case, the patient underwent surgery at a private clinic prior to admission. As the patient's preoperative physical condition was relatively good, it is speculated that the cause of infection may be related to the substandard medical conditions at that clinic.
Complications resulting from liposuction and abdominoplasty are diverse, including common ones such as asymmetry, infection, hematoma, seroma, pigmentation, and lymphedema. However, beyond common complications, liposuction carries potentially life-threatening risks, including NF, toxic shock syndrome (TSS), toxicity or drug interactions, visceral organ perforation, and pulmonary embolism17,18,19,20. Among these, NF and TSS typically represent severe infections. In comparison with more prevalent complications, NF is exceedingly rare. In the preceding two decades, only a limited number of literature reports have documented NF associated with liposuction5,21,22,23,24.
NF is a severe and potentially fatal condition with a mortality rate as high as 25-35%25. Causative pathogens include various aerobic and anaerobic bacteria, Group A Streptococcus, and methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA), among others26,27,28. NF caused by fungal infections such as Candida species is exceedingly rare, with only a small number of cases reported to date29. Erythema, paresthesia, dusky discoloration, disproportionate pain, and fever present as the most prevalent early manifestations of NF. NF is characterized by infection of the superficial soft tissue with rapid dissemination along fascial planes. The infection progresses through the subcutaneous adipose tissue, reaching deeper fascial planes. This results in clinically occult tissue necrosis, initially not involving muscle, but eventually leading to systemic collapse and septic shock30,31. Any breach in the skin or mucous membranes, as well as various surgical procedures, increases patients' risk for NF. Patients suffering from comorbidities such as diabetes, alcoholism, obesity, malignancy, vascular disease, and immunosuppression exhibit an elevated risk of developing NF and progressing to severe sepsis and septic shock26.
No specific laboratory test has proven reliably diagnostic for NF32. The majority of reviewed articles employed a multifaceted approach to diagnosis, integrating clinical, radiological, microbiological, and laboratory findings. Surgical exploration remains the definitive method for confirming the diagnosis of necrotizing infection8,33,34. Differentiating NF from cellulitis is crucial, as the former requires surgical intervention while the latter can often be managed with antimicrobial therapy alone35. Similar to NF, a characteristic presentation of cellulitis is erythema, oedema, and warmth of the skin. However, patients with cellulitis generally exhibit stable hemodynamics, while those exhibiting NF might manifest significant tenderness or pain, ultimately progressing towards instability of the hemodynamics as well as tissue necrosis28. Unfortunately, the distinction is often challenging to identify, given that the initial NF clinical presentation is frequently vague. Factors such as nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug (NSAID) use can further complicate this differentiation35. Ultrasonography (US) may help distinguish between early NF and cellulitis, but in 64% of cases, clinical findings may be incorrect36. Wong et al. constructed the Laboratory Risk Indicator for Necrotizing Fasciitis (LRINEC) to assist clinicians in screening for NF by measuring serum levels of total WBC count, creatinine, glucose, hemoglobin, sodium, as well as CRP37. It is considered suggestive of NF if an LRINEC score is 6 or higher. Nevertheless, further reports have indicated that LRINEC score predictions were not accurate for NF38,39,40. This tool's sensitivity, specificity, and prognostic value remain subject to further evaluation. In this case, although surgical exploration confirmed the NF diagnosis, several LRINEC-related parameters in the patient's blood tests were within normal ranges, precluding its use for screening or assessment. Therefore, developing more accurate non-surgical diagnostic methods for NF may be a direction worthy of attention.
Initial drug treatment for NF ought to comprise empirical, broad-spectrum antibiotics until the availability of Gram staining, culture, and sensitivity results of the tissue, in conjunction with corresponding sensitive drugs28. In suspected or diagnosed cases of NF, surgical intervention is regarded as the gold standard treatment. An urgent surgical exploration and vigorous removal of necrotic tissue are critical to reducing morbidity and mortality41,42,43. During surgical exploration, specimens should be obtained for Gram staining and culture to facilitate the diagnosis of pathogenic bacteria. Based on traditional detection methods, this case adopted the pathogen mNGS technology, and six pathogenic bacteria were successfully detected, providing a basis for the precise selection of sensitive antibiotics. This technology has been proven to be an important tool for the diagnosis of infectious disease pathogens, especially suitable for difficult, rare, mixed infection, or culture-negative cases44,45. Based on its high efficiency and comprehensiveness, mNGS may also be used as an auxiliary diagnostic method for necrotizing fasciitis. However, mNGS results are susceptible to variables such as specimen collection (e.g., sampling depth, contamination), library preparation protocols, and bioinformatics analysis parameters. Different laboratories or platforms may report divergent pathogen profiles46. Patient-specific factors significantly impact detection reliability: immunocompromised individuals may yield false-positive results due to the identification of low-abundance commensal bacteria or environmental microorganisms, while early-stage infections or antibiotic pretreatment can reduce pathogen load, increasing false-negative risks47,48. Additionally, high costs and the need for specialized data analysis expertise limit its adoption in primary care facilities12. Thus, in resource-limited settings, traditional culture methods should remain the initial screening approach, with mNGS reserved for critically ill or diagnostically challenging cases. For NF patients, multiple debridements should be performed until no necrotic tissue is identified and only healthy tissue remains49. Once the patient is stable, secondary wound closure may be necessary using techniques like VAC, skin grafting, or local and free flaps. In most cases, the aesthetic outcome of NF involves disfigurement of the affected area.In cases requiring graft or flap reconstruction, significant scarring may also occur at the donor site level8. In this case, due to skin necrosis and increased tension in the defect following liposuction and abdominoplasty, direct suture was rendered impossible. Consequently, the full-thickness skin on the right inguinal region was chosen as the donor site for skin grafting.
Antibiotic bone cement is commonly used in orthopedic surgery for infection prevention and treatment9. In this case, after debridement of necrotic tissue, we opted to fill the defect with antibiotic bone cement. Compared with traditional treatment methods, this provided local sustained high concentrations of antibiotics, aiding infection control. Meanwhile, its space-occupying effect prevented wound collapse while simultaneously stimulating granulation tissue formation, creating favorable conditions for subsequent skin grafting. It may serve as an adjunctive treatment for necrotizing fasciitis. However, bone cement is primarily used for bone infections in areas with poor blood supply9. Whether its use in well-vascularized soft tissues like the abdominal wall offers superior outcomes compared to traditional debridement combined with VSD (vacuum sealing drainage) negative pressure therapy requires validation through studies with larger sample sizes.Furthermore, should infection persist, prompt debridement and cement replacement become necessary. However, bone cement embedded within soft tissues may become encased by granulation tissue, complicating complete removal and thereby impeding therapeutic efficacy.
To reduce complications from liposuction and abdominoplasty and enhance the management of severe infections such as NF, a multi-layered prevention and control system needs to be established, encompassing strict preoperative assessment to screen high-risk patients and control risk factors (such as smoking cessation and weight management),standardized medical facility credentials and surgical procedures to minimize complication risks, and enhanced postoperative monitoring for early identification of signs of serious complications. Once suspicious signs appear, prompt diagnosis and treatment should be achieved by integrating clinical evaluation, imaging, and laboratory testing, aided by rapid detection technologies like mNGS. Except for liposuction and abdominoplasty, this comprehensive treatment plan may also be of reference value for managing infections caused by general surgery or other cosmetic interventions. To address current limitations such as the high cost of mNGS and the difficulty of removing bone cement, future efforts should focus on optimizing mNGS by establishing regional testing centers and utilizing artificial intelligence-assisted analysis to reduce costs and improve accessibility, alongside developing point-of-care rapid sequencing devices. Exploring the replacement of bone cement with degradable carriers (such as thermosensitive hydrogels-antibiotic composites) to achieve injection filling and controlled sustained release, thus avoiding secondary removal surgery.
Conclusion
Although NF following routine cosmetic procedures such as liposuction is rare, this case, which progressed from skin flap necrosis to abdominal wall abscess, sinus tract formation, and ultimately NF, serves as a critical warning that surgical risks cannot be overlooked. Local tissue damage or inadequate postoperative care may trigger catastrophic outcomes. Given NF's high mortality, vigilance for early symptoms, such as erythema, disproportionate pain, diminished skin sensation, and rapidly progressive edema, is essential, emphasizing the urgency of early debridement and intervention. This case provides management insights for rare complications and further underscores that clinicians must fully understand postoperative complications and strictly adhere to intraoperative aseptic principles.