1.2
Inductive Reasoning
The scientific method employs two types of logic — inductive and deductive reasoning.
In inductive reasoning, broad generalizations are inferred from several specific observations.
For example, a scientist might observe that one species of butterfly is attracted to red flowers, but not to similar flowers in yellow color.
From this information, they might conclude that butterfly species prefer red flowers.
However, such conclusions may or may not be true because only a sample of instances is observed and recorded. For instance, in the current example, the scientist did not observe every butterfly or every flower.
So, such generalizations derived from inductive reasoning can be used as a basis to formulate a testable, falsifiable hypothesis.
Inductive reasoning is a form of logical thinking that uses related observations to arrive at a general conclusion. It is uncertain and operates in degrees to which the conclusions are credible. As such, inductive arguments can be weak or strong, rather than valid or invalid, and conclusions can be used to formulate testable, falsifiable hypotheses.
Inductive reasoning is common in descriptive science. A life scientist makes observations and records them. This data can be qualitative or quantitative, and one can supplement the raw data with drawings, pictures, photos, or videos. From many observations, the scientist can infer conclusions based on evidence.
For example, a scientist observes that many butterflies visit red colored flowers but not yellow flowers in the same garden. The scientist can then make an inductive conclusion from this observation that butterflies are attracted to red colored flowers. This conclusion can then be used to formulate a testable, falsifiable hypothesis — that butterflies are only attracted to red flowers. In order to test this hypothesis, the scientist might set up an experiment with flowers of different petal colors and observe how the butterflies behave. The results may lead to the conclusion that butterflies are attracted to both pink and red flowers, and not just red flowers.
Part of this text is adapted from Openstax, Biology 2e, Section 1.1: The Science of Biology
The scientific method employs two types of logic — inductive and deductive reasoning.
In inductive reasoning, broad generalizations are inferred from several specific observations.
For example, a scientist might observe that one species of butterfly is attracted to red flowers, but not to similar flowers in yellow color.
From this information, they might conclude that butterfly species prefer red flowers.
However, such conclusions may or may not be true because only a sample of instances is observed and recorded. For instance, in the current example, the scientist did not observe every butterfly or every flower.
So, such generalizations derived from inductive reasoning can be used as a basis to formulate a testable, falsifiable hypothesis.
From Chapter 1:
Now Playing
1.2 : Inductive Reasoning
Scientific Inquiry
60.4K Views
1.1 : The Scientific Method
Scientific Inquiry
226.1K Views
1.3 : Deductive Reasoning
Scientific Inquiry
60.8K Views
1.4 : Correlation and Causation
Scientific Inquiry
37.6K Views