22.12
The simplest case of a surface charge distribution is the uniformly charged disk. Calculating its electric field also helps us calculate the electric…
Consider a uniformly charged thin disk of radius R. The electric field at a point above its center at a perpendicular distance d is given by the surface integral over the disk.
Choose a ring of charge at a radius r, of width dr. Its area is the product of its circumference and width.
Let the electric field produced by any small charge element on the ring make an angle θ with the z-axis. Resolve this into two components: parallel and perpendicular to the z-axis.
There is a charge element whose electric field's perpendicular component is equal and opposite. So, the perpendicular components cancel. The disk's symmetry along its plane implies that it's the same for any such pair.
Since the z-components reinforce, the electric field points away from the disk. Integrating over r, the resultant field is obtained.
At large distances, the expression reduces to that of a point charge equal to the disk's total charge.
On the other hand, at small distances, the disk looks like an infinite plane whose electric field is constant.
View the full transcript and gain access to JoVE Core videos
Q1: Why does the electric field from a charged disk point perpendicular to its surface?
The disk's cylindrical symmetry causes perpendicular field components from charge elements to cancel in pairs. Only z-axis components reinforce, making the resultant field perpendicular to the plane. This symmetry holds regardless of charge sign: positive charges produce fields pointing away, negative charges point inward on both sides.
Q2: How does a charged disk behave at large distances from its center?
At large distances, the disk's internal charge distribution becomes irrelevant, and the electric field reduces to that of a point charge equal to the disk's total charge. This occurs because the detailed structure of the charge distribution is unresolvable from far away, simplifying the field calculation significantly.
Q3: What happens to the electric field very close to a charged disk?
Very close to the disk, it appears as an infinite plane, and the electric field becomes constant, independent of distance. This small-distance approximation is crucial for understanding parallel plate capacitors, where the field between plates remains uniform regardless of position.
Q4: How does the principle of superposition apply to calculating a disk's electric field?
The disk is divided into rings of charge at different radii. Each ring's field components are calculated separately, then combined using the principle of superposition. Since perpendicular components cancel by symmetry, only parallel components add, simplifying the integration over the entire disk.
Q5: What role does symmetry play in determining the disk's electric field direction?
Cylindrical symmetry ensures that for every charge element producing a field component parallel to the disk's plane, an identical element exists producing an equal but opposite component. This pairing causes all parallel components to cancel, leaving only the perpendicular component to contribute to the net field.
Q6: How is the electric field calculated for a ring element on the charged disk?
A ring at radius r with width dr has area equal to its circumference times width. The field from this ring is resolved into components parallel and perpendicular to the z-axis. By symmetry, parallel components cancel with opposite ring elements, so only perpendicular components integrate to yield the total field.
Q7: Why is the charged disk model important for understanding continuous charge distributions?
The uniformly charged disk represents the simplest continuous charge distribution case and demonstrates how symmetry simplifies field calculations. Its behavior at different distances—point charge at large distances, infinite plane at small distances—provides insight into more complex continuous charge distributions and practical applications like capacitors.