13.7
Wilcoxon Signed-Ranks Test for Matched Pairs
The Wilcoxon signed-rank test for matched pairs evaluates the null hypothesis by combining the ranks of differences with their signs. It essentially t…
Consider the dataset of fasting blood sugar levels of patients for two consecutive months. How does one test the claim that there is no difference between the May and June blood sugar levels?
For testing the null hypothesis, the Wilcoxon signed-ranks test can be performed using ranks along with signs.
To test the claim, first obtain the difference in blood sugar levels between the two months.
Then, the signs of the differences are ignored to arrange them in ascending order.
After that, rank with the appropriate sign is assigned to each number.
The absolute value of the sum of the positive and negative ranks is obtained separately. The smaller of the two values is taken as T, which in this case is five.
With an n equal to nine and a significance level of 0.05, the critical value comes out to be six.
Since T is less than the critical value, six, the null hypothesis is rejected, meaning that the May and June blood sugar levels are apparently not the same.
View the full transcript and gain access to JoVE Core videos
Q1: When should you use the Wilcoxon signed-ranks test instead of a parametric test?
Use the Wilcoxon signed-ranks test when data does not follow a normal distribution or when testing matched pairs where normality cannot be assumed. This nonparametric test incorporates more information than the sign test, yielding more trustable conclusions. It requires matched pairs and approximately symmetric distribution of differences between pairs.
Q2: What are the key steps for calculating the Wilcoxon signed-ranks test statistic?
First, calculate the difference for each matched pair. Ignore signs and rank the absolute values in ascending order. Reapply original signs to create signed ranks. Sum positive and negative signed ranks separately. The test statistic T equals the smaller of these two sums, which is then compared to the critical value.
Q3: How does sample size affect which test statistic formula you use?
When sample size n is less than or equal to 30, use T as the test statistic, which is the smallest sum of signed ranks. For n greater than 30, calculate the Z test statistic using a specific formula. The sample size n represents the number of pairs with non-zero differences.
Q4: What conditions must be met for the Wilcoxon signed-ranks test to be applicable?
Two conditions are required: the data must consist of matched pairs, and the distribution of differences between these pairs should be approximately symmetric. These conditions ensure the test produces valid and reliable results for evaluating whether the median of differences equals zero.
Q5: How do you interpret the test result when comparing T to the critical value?
If the test statistic T is less than the critical value obtained from the table, reject the null hypothesis, indicating significant differences between the paired measurements. If T is greater than or equal to the critical value, fail to reject the null hypothesis, suggesting no significant difference.
Q6: Why does the Wilcoxon signed-ranks test provide more reliable results than the sign test?
The Wilcoxon signed-ranks test incorporates more information than the sign test by using both the direction and magnitude of differences through ranking. This additional information allows the test to detect patterns and differences more effectively, resulting in more trustable conclusions about matched pair data.
Q7: What does it mean when the null hypothesis is rejected in a Wilcoxon signed-ranks test?
Rejecting the null hypothesis means the median of the differences between matched pairs is not zero, indicating statistically significant differences between the two measurements. In the blood sugar example, rejecting the null hypothesis shows May and June levels are apparently not the same.