Name: Utilizing Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation to Study the Human Neuromuscular System (Video) | JoVE Journal
Uploaded: 2012-01-20T12:00:00.000+00:00
Duration: 12 min 19 s
Description: Learn transcranial magnetic stimulation to study cortical excitability and motor evoked potentials in human upper limb and lumbar muscles. This non-invasive method enables precise assessment of intracortical facilitation and inhibition.

ai_agent_IP

ai_agent

maintenance

instantTrialDurationMinutes

isBiopharma

enableNewMyJoveSectionDesign

educationFeatures

seoMetaApi

ai_copilot_institution_blacklist

ai_chat_institution_blacklist

freeAccessWindow

ssoRoleCapture

scheduledMaintenanceBanner

joveLabsFeatures

disable_autoplay_for_bots

extended_trial_duration

5 minutes

playerTrialDesktop

This work was funded in part by a grant from the Osteopathic Heritage Foundations to BC Clark. We would like to state a special thank you to Marissa McGinley for her assistance in creating many of the figure graphics.

1. Single and Paired-Pulse TMS of the FCR and ES Muscles
<ol>
	<li>Basic Safety Precautions: Prior to performing TMS on a human subject it is necessary to first screen them for basic safety precautions as it pertains to exposure to a magnetic field. In our laboratory we follow the screening guidelines set forth by the Institute for Magnetic Resonance Safety, Education and Research 10. In our laboratory we also routinely exclude individuals with a family history of epilepsy seizures. We also require subjects undergoing TMS of the ES muscles to wear earplugs and a mouth guard due to the less focal and stronger stimulation intensities.</li>
	<li>Electrical Recordings: To examine TMS responses in the motor system it is necessary to record electromyographic (EMG) signals from skeletal muscles. For the FCR muscle we place surface electrodes on the forearm using a bipolar electrode arrangement located longitudinally over the muscle on shaved and abraded skin as we have previously described 7,11. For the erector spinae muscles we use a similar electrode arrangement located longitudinally over the muscles at the L3-L5 vertebral level on shaved and abraded skin 8.</li>
	<li>TMS Coil Orientation: To predominantly activate corticospinal neurons transsynaptically it is necessary to position the TMS coil appropriately 12. For the FCR muscles we place a 70-mm figure-of-eight TMS coil tangential to the scalp and 45-degrees to the midline so that the induced current flows in a lateral-posterior to medial-anterior direction. For the ES muscles we use a double-cone coil that has greater penetration depth and is needed due to the representation of these muscles being deeper in the homunculus. Here, the coil is positioned such that the current flows in an anterior to posterior direction. We have custom-modified our coil with a laser attachment system to assist us in subsequent re-positioning of the double cone coil.</li>
	<li>Identifying 'Hotspot': It is necessary to determine the stimulation location that elicits the largest motor evoked potential. For the FCR muscle we do this by subtly moving the TMS coil around in very small increments and determining where we observe the largest motor evoked potential amplitude. Once located we note this area with indelible ink on either the scalp or a lycra cap. TMS of the ES muscles is considerably more uncomfortable to human subjects than TMS of upper limb muscles. Accordingly, we have streamlined our TMS protocol for the ES muscles to increase it's tolerability and feasibility. Here, instead of locating the "hotspot" we use anthropometric measurements to identify the vertex of the skull. Specifically, we identify the vertex as the intersection of the skull in the sagittal (between the nasinon and inion) and coronal (between the tragus) planes.</li>
	<li>Biomechanical Positioning: In our laboratory when we perform TMS of the FCR muscles subjects are seated with the arm resting in an extended position in a BioDex System 4 Dynamometer (Figure 2). However, we should note that this is only an example of one possible set-up for measuring exerted forces. For the ES muscles subjects are asked to sit with an upright posture while their hands rest in their lap (Figure 3). They are seated in a swivel base chair with the thigh at 90° relative to the trunk, the lower leg at ~45° relative to the thigh, and the lumbar spine in a neutral posture8.</li>
	<li>Quantifying Motor Threshold: For the FCR, we determine motor threshold (MT) by delivering single pulses at gradually increasing stimulation intensities until motor evoked potentials have peak-to-peak amplitudes greater than 50 microvolts in more than 50% of trials (Figure 4). To streamline the TMS protocol and increase tolerability and feasibility we do not determine motor threshold in the ES muscles with the same precision as when we test the upper limb musculature. Rather, we begin the TMS protocol by delivering an initial single pulse at 50% of the maximum stimulator output to determine if this stimulus intensity is above or below motor threshold. If an MEP is observed at this stimulus intensity-defined as discernable MEP relative to the level of the background EMG-the intensity is reduced to 40% of stimulator output to determine if this stimulus intensity is sub- or supra-threshold 8.</li>
	<li>Quantifying MEP Amplitude using Single-Pulse TMS: To examine the motor evoked potential amplitude of the FCR we deliver a single TMS pulse to the 'hotspot' at an intensity equal to 130% of motor threshold, and calculate the peak-to-peak amplitude. Generally, we normalize this outcome to the maximal compound muscle fiber action potential observed following supramaximal electrical stimulation of the median nerve. We should note that the MEP size is very dependent on the degree of cortical excitability. Accordingly, when the TMS pulse is delivered during a background contraction, when cortical excitability is increased, the MEP size will dramatically increase. For the ES muscles, we deliver a single TMS pulse to the vertex at an intensity 40 or 50% above the sub-motor threshold intensity 8. Unfortunately, because peripheral nerves innervating the ES muscles are not accessible to electrical stimulation we are not able to normalize these motor evoked potentials to the compound muscle fiber action potential.</li>
	<li>Quantifying Silent Period Duration using Single-Pulse TMS: When a TMS pulse to the cortex is delivered during a muscle contraction it will produce a motor evoked potential followed by electrical quiescence before activity resumes that is indicative of corticospinal inhibition and commonly referred to as the silent period 13 (Figure 5). To quantify the silent period we deliver a single TMS pulse to the 'hotspot' at an intensity equal to 130% of motor threshold while the study participant is performing a wrist flexion muscle contraction at 15% of their maximal strength. We have not previously quantified the silent period duration of the ES muscles; however, we should note that we have anecdotally observed its existence in this muscle group when the TMS pulse id delivered during a background contraction.</li>
	<li>Quantifying Intracortical Facilitation using Paired-Pulse TMS: We use paired-pulse TMS to quantify intracortical facilitation 6,7 (Figure 6 and 7 represents this measurement for the FCR and ES muscles, respectively). For the FCR muscle we first determine the stimulus intensity needed to elicit a motor evoked potential that is between 0.5-1.0 mV. Next, we deliver a subthreshold conditioning pulse-which in our laboratory is commonly set equal to 70% of motor threshold- 15-msec before the suprathreshold test pulse. This conditioning pulse delivered at this time period prior to the test pulse will increase, or facilitate, the amplitude of the motor evoked potential more than a single unconditioned pulse of the same intensity. For the ES muscle group the conditioning pulse intensity is set to the observed sub-motor threshold intensity (either 40% or 50% of stimulator output) and the test pulse intensity is set to 40% above the sub-motor threshold level (80% or 90% of stimulator output)8. We should note that the intensity of the conditioning pulses could be varied depending on the objective of the study. Similarly, the pulse intervals can vary depending on the muscle and its location relative to the cortex.</li>
	<li>Quantifying Short-Interval Intracortical Inhibition using Paired-Pulse TMS: We also use paired-pulse TMS to quantify short-interval intracortical inhibition 6,7 (Figure 6 and 7 represents this measurement for the FCR and ES muscles, respectively). Here, for both the FCR and ES muscles, the procedures are the same as described for measuring intracortical facilitation with the exception that the interstimulus interval between the two pulses is reduced to 3 msec. This conditioning pulse delivered at this time period prior to the test pulse will decrease, or inhibit, the amplitude of the motor evoked potential more than a single unconditioned pulse of the same intensity.</li>
	<li>Quantifying Long-Interval Intracortical Inhibition using Paired-Pulse TMS: Delivering two identical suprathreshold test pulses that are separated by 100 milliseconds can also be used to assess long-interval intracortical inhibition 6,7. In this case-for the FCR muscle- the motor evoked potential associated with the second pulse will be smaller, or inhibited more, than that associated with the first (Figure 8). We have not previously quantified long-interval intracortical inhibition in the ES muscles due to concerns over subject tolerability.</li>
</ol>
2. Representative Results:
Following the delivery of a suprathreshold TMS pulse, the muscles being stimulated should demonstrate an easily observable EMG response (the MEP) (illustrated in Figures 4-8). The latency between the stimulus onset and the MEP will vary between the muscle groups being examined, but for the FCR it is generally 16-19 msec (Figure 6) and for the ES it is 17-22 msec (Figure 7; although it should be noted that in some subjects definitive MEP onset in the ES muscles is more difficult to visually identify). It should be noted that when testing the ES muscle group several other muscle groups are also visibly and dramatically stimulated concomitantly (including the muscles of the lower extremity, which are represented within the same general region of the homunculus). During the measurement of intracortical facilitation the MEP amplitude is generally larger than that observed with a single unconditioned pulse (Figure 6 and 7). However, it is our experience that the degree of facilitation varies between muscles groups with some muscle groups-such as the FCR- showing only modest facilitation in many subjects. For the measurement of short-interval and long-interval intracortical inhibition a decrease in the MEP amplitude is generally observed in comparison to a single unconditioned pulse of the same intensity (Figures 6-8).
<img alt="Transcranial magnetic stimulation diagram: TMS coil, magnetic field, eddy current for neural activation." src="/files/ftp_upload/3387/3387fig1.jpg" data-altupdatedat="1788235205000" data-alt="Figure 1"> 
Figure 1. The basic mechanisms of TMS. The TMS coil induces a magnetic field, which penetrates the scalp and induces an Eddy current within the motor cortex. This eddy current is then able to stimulate neurons within the brain. Figure reprinted from McGinley and Clark, In Press14.
<img alt="Transcranial magnetic stimulation setup; EMG and electric stim on arm; torque motor response." src="/files/ftp_upload/3387/3387fig2.jpg" data-altupdatedat="1788235205000" data-alt="Figure 2"> 
Figure 2. Setup for performing TMS on the FCR muscle. Note the recording of electromyogram (EMG) signals from the forearm, and the TMS paddle over the motor cortex. We generally also record muscle forces, and use electrical peripheral nerve stimulation to obtain the maximal compound muscle fiber action potential, as this is useful in interpreting amplitude values (e.g., one can express and MEP relative to the maximal muscle response as opposed to a absolute mV value which can be heavily influenced by non-physiologic factors such as subcutaneous adipose tissue). Figure reprinted from the following: Clark et al. 20089, Clark et al., 20106, and McGinley et al. 20107.
<img alt="Transcranial magnetic stimulation diagram; double cone coil, laser pointer setup for brain studies." src="/files/ftp_upload/3387/3387fig3.jpg" data-altupdatedat="1788235205000" data-alt="Figure 3"> 
Figure 3. Setup for performing TMS on the erector spinale muscles. Figure reprinted from Goss et al. 20118.
<img alt="Electrophysiology graph, multiple MEP signals at varied stimulus levels, resting threshold comparison." src="/files/ftp_upload/3387/3387fig4.jpg" data-altupdatedat="1788235205000" data-alt="Figure 4"> 
Figure 4. Example of the motor threshold determination. The EMG traces represent the motor evoked potential (MEP) response to gradually increasing stimulus intensities (represented as a percentage of stimulator output (SO)). Note that at the lower intensities (28-30% of SO) very small MEPs were elicited (sub-threshold), but that at 32% SO a MEP was elicited that reached motor threshold (typically defined as an MEP with a p-p amplitude &gt; 50 μV).
Figure reprinted from McGinley and Clark, In Press14.
<img alt="Static equilibrium diagram; stimulus onset timing, MEP, EMG signal return; electrophysiology result." src="/files/ftp_upload/3387/3387fig5.jpg" data-altupdatedat="1788235205000" data-alt="Figure 5"> 
Figure 5. TMS during a contraction: motor evoked potential &amp; silent period. The silent period is observed when a subject performs a slight contraction and a single stimulus is applied to the motor cortex. The first part of the silent period is due to spinal cord inhibition and the latter part is attributed to cortical inhibition, specifically GABAB receptors. There is no consensus way to quantify the duration of the silent period, but our findings indicate that either defining it from stimulus onset or MEP onset to the return of the voluntary interference electromyogram signal is the most reliable15. 
Figure reprinted from Clark and Quick, 201116, and McGinley and Clark, In Press14.
<img alt="Transcranial magnetic stimulation diagram, brain pathways, SICI, ICF pulse results, neural response." src="/files/ftp_upload/3387/3387fig6.jpg" data-altupdatedat="1788235205000" data-alt="Figure 6"> 
Figure 6. Change in motor evoked potential sized ith paired pulse TMS of the FCR muscle. Measurement of short-interval intracortical inhibition (SICI) and intracortical facilitation (ICF). To quantify SICI and ICF the conditioning pulse (CP) is set below motor threshold, and the test pulse (TP) is set to evoke MEP's between 0.5-1 mV. At short interstimulus intervals (e.g., 3-msec) the CP inhibits the MEP in comparison to the TP only (SICI), whereas at longer interstimulus intervals (e.g., 15-msec) it facilitates the MEP (ICF).
CP: conditioning pulse, TP: test pulse Figure reprinted from Clark et al., 20106, McGinley et al. 201014, Clark and Quick, 201116, and McGinley and Clark, In Press14.
<img alt="Cardiac cycle representation; ECG wave; electrophysiology graph; heart electrical activity analysis." src="/files/ftp_upload/3387/3387fig7.jpg" data-altupdatedat="1788235205000" data-alt="Figure 7"> 
Figure 7. Change in motor evoked potential sized with paired pulse TMS of the ES muscle. Example of EMG traces from the erector spinae muscles and the measurement of short-interval intracortical inhibition (SICI) and intracortical facilitation (ICF). 
Figure reprinted from Goss et al. 20118.
<img alt="Neuroscience diagram; brain stimulation, LICI waveform; interstimulus interval 100 ms; 0.25 mV." src="/files/ftp_upload/3387/3387fig8.jpg" data-altupdatedat="1788235205000" data-alt="Figure 8"> 
Figure 8. Change in motor evoked potential sized with paired pulse TMS. Measurement of long-interval intracortical inhibition (LICI). To quantify LICI two test pulses are delivered at an interstimulus interval of 100-msec. This results in the second MEP being inhibited in comparison to the first MEP. 
Figure reprinted from Clark et al., 20106, McGinley et al. 20107 and McGinley and Clark, In Press14.

No conflicts of interest declared.

The overall goal of this article is to provide scientists and clinicians a visual account of our laboratories use of transcranial magnetic stimulation. However, in addition to providing a visualization of these experiments, below we discuss basic issues to consider when performing TMS in this manner, provide a brief overview of the physiology of TMS responses, and also discuss our use of TMS with regards to the usage of others.
General Issues To Be Aware of When Performing TMS As Described in th...

<table><tbody><tr><td>Transcranial Magnetic Stimulator 2002 Transcranial Magnetic Stimulator Bi-Stim2 Figure-Eight 70-mm coil Double Cone Coil</td><td>Magstim</td><td>NA</td><td>TMS equipment (including coils)</td></tr><tr><td>Biodex System 4 </td><td>Biodex</td><td>NA</td><td>Dynamometer</td></tr><tr><td>Biopac MP150 Data Acquisition System</td><td>Biopac Systems, Inc.</td><td>MP150WSW</td><td>A-D converter for EMG and force</td></tr><tr><td>AcqKnowledge 4.0 Data acquisition software</td><td>Biopac Systems, Inc.</td><td>ACK100W</td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Nikomed Trace 1 ECG electrodes</td><td>Nikomed</td><td>2015</td><td>EMG electrodes</td></tr><tr><td>&lt;a href="http://digitimer.com/products/clinical-neurophysiology/ds7aah-psarp-peripheral-stimulators/ds7a-ds7ah-hv-constant-current-stimulator-clinical-product/" target="_blank"&gt;Constant Current Stimulator&lt;/a&gt;</td><td><a href="http://www.digitimer.com" target="_blank"><img src="/img/new_window.png"> Digitimer Ltd.</a></td><td>&lt;a href="http://digitimer.com/products/clinical-neurophysiology/ds7aah-psarp-peripheral-stimulators/ds7a-ds7ah-hv-constant-current-stimulator-clinical-product/" target="_blank"&gt;DS7A&lt;/a&gt;</td><td>&lt;a href="http://digitimer.com/products/clinical-neurophysiology/ds7aah-psarp-peripheral-stimulators/" target="_blank"&gt;Peripheral nerve stimulator&lt;/a&gt;</td></tr></tbody></table>

utilizing transcranial magnetic stimulation to study the human neuromuscular system

Utilizing Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation to Study the Human Neuromuscular System

Transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) has been in use for more than 20 years 1, and has grown exponentially in popularity over the past decade. While the use of TMS has expanded to the study of many systems and processes during this time, the original application and perhaps one of the most common uses of TMS involves studying the physiology, plasticity and function of the human neuromuscular system. Single pulse TMS applied to the motor cortex excites pyramidal neurons transsynaptically 2 (Figure 1) and results in a measurable electromyographic response that can be used to study and evaluate the integrity and excitability of the corticospinal tract in humans 3. Additionally, recent advances in magnetic stimulation now allows for partitioning of cortical versus spinal excitability 4,5. For example, paired-pulse TMS can be used to assess intracortical facilitatory and inhibitory properties by combining a conditioning stimulus and a test stimulus at different interstimulus intervals 3,4,6-8. In this video article we will demonstrate the methodological and technical aspects of these techniques. Specifically, we will demonstrate single-pulse and paired-pulse TMS techniques as applied to the flexor carpi radialis (FCR) muscle as well as the erector spinae (ES) musculature. Our laboratory studies the FCR muscle as it is of interest to our research on the effects of wrist-hand cast immobilization on reduced muscle performance6,9, and we study the ES muscles due to these muscles clinical relevance as it relates to low back pain8. With this stated, we should note that TMS has been used to study many muscles of the hand, arm and legs, and should iterate that our demonstrations in the FCR and ES muscle groups are only selected examples of TMS being used to study the human neuromuscular system.

Transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) is a non-invasive tool to gain insight on the physiology and function of the human nervous system. Here, we present our TMS techniques to study cortical excitability of the upper limb and lumbar musculature.

Transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) has been in use for more than 20 years 1, and has grown exponentially in popularity over the past decade.  While ...

The overall goal of this procedure is to perform transcranial magnetic stimulation to elicit motor evoked potentials. First in the flexor carpi radialis muscle, and then in the erector spine, a muscles. This is accomplished by first preparing the skin overlying the respective muscles for electromyographic recordings and biomechanically positioning the subject for transcranial magnetic stimulation.The hotspot is identified as the portion of the stimulation location over the motor cortex that elicits the largest motor revoked potentials. The next step is to determine the motor threshold. At this point, single pulse transcranial magnetic stimulation is performed to quantify motor evoked potential amplitude and silent period duration.Paired pulse transcranial magnetic stimulation is also performed to quantify intracortical facilitation and short and long interval intracortical inhibition. Ultimately in vivo indices of corticospinal and cortico cortical excitability in humans can be assessed via combined use of transcranial magnetic stimulation and electromyography. Generally individuals new to this method may struggle because it can be difficult to derive and understand the subtle tech

utilizing-transcranial-magnetic-stimulation-to-study-human

Research

JoVE Journal

Medicine

Source: Kuhn, Y. et al. Intracortical Inhibition Within the Primary Motor Cortex Can Be Modulated by Changing the Focus of Attention. J. Vis. Exp. (2017)This video demonstrates the use of transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) to modulate motor neuron activity and measure muscle responses via electromyography (EMG). It outlines the steps for locating the motor hotspot, determining stimulation thresholds, and assessing the effects of subthreshold TMS (subTMS) on cortical inhibition.

Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation for Modulating Muscle Response in Humans

Source: Taube, W., et.al., Non-invasive Assessment of Changes in Corticomotoneuronal Transmission in Humans. J. Vis. Exp. (2017)This video demonstrates a non-invasive method to assess changes in corticomotoneuronal transmission in humans following repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS). The study introduces an electrophysiological technique that differentiates fast, direct corticospinal pathways from polysynaptic connections.

Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation-Induced Changes in Human Corticomotoneuronal Synapses

Source: Stefanou, M., et.al. Brain State-dependent Brain Stimulation with Real-time Electroencephalography-Triggered Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation. J. Vis. Exp. (2019)This video demonstrates the process of real-time EEG-triggered transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) to study cortical excitability. The procedure involves positioning the TMS coil over the motor cortex, synchronizing stimulation with specific phases of the EEG signal, and recording motor-evoked potentials (MEPs) to explore...

Real-Time Electroencephalography-Triggered Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation for Cortical Excitation

Source: Curado, M. et. al., Non-Invasive Electrical Brain Stimulation Montages for Modulation of Human Motor Function. J. Vis. Exp. (2016)This video demonstrates the setup and mechanism of transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) for modulating human motor function. By placing the anode over the primary motor cortex and the cathode over the contralateral supraorbital area, the targeted electrical stimulation increases cortical excitability, enhancing motor neuron activity and improving...

Non-Invasive Electrical Brain Stimulation for Modulating Human Motor Neuron Activity

Source: Charalambos, C. C., et al. Bilateral Assessment of the Corticospinal Pathways of the Ankle Muscles Using Navigated Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation. J. Vis. Exp. (2019)This video demonstrates the method to assess corticospinal pathways of the leg muscles using transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS). Rest and active muscle responses are recorded from one brain hemisphere to evaluate the contralateral corticomotor function of leg muscles.

Assessing Corticospinal Pathways Using Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation

Source: Shafi, M. M., et al. A Multimodal Imaging- and Stimulation-based Method of Evaluating Connectivity-related Brain Excitability in Patients with Epilepsy. J. Vis. Exp. (2016)The video demonstrates the procedure for using transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) and electroencephalography (EEG) to assess neuronal excitability in patients with epilepsy. It details the steps for aligning the patient’s head with a pre-recorded brain scan, positioning the TMS coil over a functionally connected...

Assessing Brain Hyperexcitability with Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation and Electroencephalography

This article aims to describe a basic protocol for combining transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) with proton magnetic resonance spectroscopy (1H-MRS) measurements to investigate the effects of bilateral stimulation on primary motor cortex metabolism.

The Use of Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopy as a Tool for the Measurement of Bi-hemispheric Transcranial Electric Stimulation Effects on Primary Motor Cortex Metabolism

Transcranial magnetic stimulation, electromyography, and 3D motion capture are commonly used non-invasive techniques for investigating neuromuscular function in humans. In this paper, we describe a protocol that synchronously samples data generated by all three of these tools along with the unique addition of virtual reality stimulus presentation and feedback.

Multifunctional Setup for Studying Human Motor Control Using Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation, Electromyography, Motion Capture, and Virtual Reality

This article describes new approaches to measure and strengthen functionally specific neural pathways with transcranial magnetic stimulation. These advanced noninvasive brain stimulation methodologies can provide new opportunities for the understanding of brain-behavior relations and development of new therapies to treat brain disorders.

Measuring and Manipulating Functionally Specific Neural Pathways in the Human Motor System with Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation

Here, we present a protocol outlining the methodology to assess primary motor cortex excitability and excitability modulation using transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) paired with electromyography (EMG).

Assessing Primary Motor Cortex Excitability and Excitability Modulation by Pairing Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation with Electromyography

This paper describes the standardized induction of Long-term Potentiation-like cortical plasticity using repetitive stimulation protocols, followed by applying single-pulse transcranial magnetic stimulation guided by a neuronavigation system to evaluate synaptic plasticity.

Standardized Induction and Assessment of Long-term Potentiation-like Cortical Plasticity Using Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation

Learn transcranial magnetic stimulation to study cortical excitability and motor evoked potentials in human upper limb and lumbar muscles. This non-invasive method enables precise assessment of intracortical facilitation and inhibition.

Utilizing Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation to Study the Human Neuromuscular System

Explore More Videos