Name: Trace Fear Conditioning in Mice (Video) | JoVE Journal
Uploaded: 2014-03-20T18:45:00.000+00:00
Duration: 7 min 2 s
Description: Learn trace fear conditioning to evaluate hippocampal dependent learning and memory in mice. This protocol uses auditory tone-shock pairing and freezing behavior measurement to study associative memory mechanisms.

ai_agent_IP

ai_agent

maintenance

instantTrialDurationMinutes

isBiopharma

enableNewMyJoveSectionDesign

educationFeatures

seoMetaApi

ai_copilot_institution_blacklist

ai_chat_institution_blacklist

freeAccessWindow

ssoRoleCapture

scheduledMaintenanceBanner

joveLabsFeatures

disable_autoplay_for_bots

extended_trial_duration

5 minutes

This work is supported by a Baylor University Research Council grant and from a research grant from the Epilepsy Foundation.

The mice used in the following experiment were generated and housed at Baylor University at an ambient temperature of 22 &#176;C, with a 14&#160;hr light and 10&#160;hr dark (20:00 to 6:00 hr) diurnal cycle. The mice were given ad libitum access to food and water. All procedures to the mice were in compliance with the National Institutes of Health Guidelines for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals and the animal protocol was approved by Baylor University Animal Care and Use Committee.
Overview
The trace conditioned fear task is based on procedures described by Wiltgen and colleagues9.
1. Preparation of Equipment
The fear conditioning apparatus chamber (26 cm x 22 cm x 18 cm) consists of two sides that are acrylic, two sides that are metal, and a grid floor bottom which is used to deliver a mild foot shock. The testing chamber is housed in a sound attenuated chamber. The chamber is also light tight to prevent outside light from influencing the motion detection software.
<ol>
	<li>Calibrate the shock levels, light levels, and sound intensity levels for the testing chamber. Measure the background level of the testing chamber. The background noise in this chamber is 65 dB. Use a sound meter to measure this level. The meter should be set to 70 dB, set to C, and to detection setting slow.
	<ol>
		<li>Calibrate the shock level to 0.5 mA. Use an external calibration device to correctly calibrate the shock level (see Materials Table). The internal measurement of the shock generator is not accurate. The shock generator administers a scrambled shock which cannot be accurately measured by a standard amp meter.</li>
		<li>Place one lead on one of the grid bars and place the other lead 3 or 4 bars over. Use the shock generator to administer the shock. Adjust the shock level until the correct level is achieved. Do this for each fear conditioning chamber.</li>
		<li>Close the door to the chamber when measuring the light level of the chamber. Calibrate the light level to approximately 1.0. This is a number specific to the FreezeFrame software used in this experiment. An external light meter will read this as 2 lux. The light level can be adjusted by moving the location of the house light or by adjusting the condenser of the lens. Make sure to tighten the adjusting screws for the lens after adjusting.</li>
		<li>Calibrate the sound decibel level to 85 dB. Use an external decibel meter inside the testing cage to calibrate the decibel level (see Materials Table). The sound presented will be a 2,700 Hz tone. Note: If using mice older than 6 months old it may be better to use white noise since older mice can have hearing deficits .</li>
	</ol>
	</li>
	<li>After the apparatus is ready take the subjects to a separate holding room. Note: Do not house the mouse in the same room as the testing room.</li>
	<li>Label the tail of the mice that will be tested in order of testing. It is best to reduce excessive handling before testing. Alternatively, the tails can be labeled the day before the experiment to reduce handling stress. After the mice have been labeled allow them to acclimate to the room for 30 min. Have extra clean cages for housing the mice after testing is completed.</li>
</ol>
2. Trace Conditioning&#160;Day 1
<ol>
	<li>Remove each mouse from the cage and place them in individual cages for transport to the fear conditioning chamber. Use clean bedding for each cage. Place a sticky note on the transfer cage to keep the order of mice testing correct. Note: If the mice are singly housed then they can be transported in their home cage.</li>
	<li>Place the mouse in the testing chamber and close the door. Start the software program.</li>
	<li>On the training day, allow the mice to explore the chamber for 3 min. The software then presents a 20 sec tone (85 dB, 2,700 Hz) to the animal. After a trace period of 20 sec a mild shock (2 sec, 0.5 mA) is administered to the animal.</li>
	<li>Record the reaction of the subject to confirm that they received the aversive stimuli by viewing the video. A 200 sec inter-trial interval separates the 5 conditioning trials. Each trial consists of a 20 sec tone followed by a 20 sec delay then a shock.</li>
	<li>After testing is completed allow the animal to remain in the testing chamber for 1 min before removing it from the testing cage.</li>
	<li>Place the animal back in the transfer cage and return it to its home cage. If there are additional mice in their home cage then individually house the mouse until all mice complete testing. This will reduce the stress to the other mice that have not been tested. An alternative solution would be to singly house all mice one week prior to testing to reduce the influence of continuously removing mice from one cage.</li>
	<li>Clean the testing chamber with 30% isopropanol after each animal is tested.</li>
	<li>Repeat steps 2.2-2.7 for all mice in the testing cohort.</li>
	<li>Return all mice to their colony room after the last mouse in the cohort has been tested.</li>
</ol>
3. Trace Fear Conditioning Day 2: Trace Memory Testing
<ol>
	<li>Trace memory testing will occur on day 2. In this protocol there are 3 tone presentations. Place the mice in a new context for the trace conditioning test.</li>
	<li>Prepare the software to run a program with a 2 min baseline period followed by three 20&#160;sec tone presentations. There is s a 220&#160;sec ITI between each tone presentation.</li>
	<li>For the new context condition, place clear acrylic inserts on the floor of the chamber to alter the shape, texture, and color of the conditioning chamber.</li>
	<li>Change the odor in the chamber by placing vanilla extract in a weigh boat under the floor insert.</li>
	<li>Clean the chamber with 70% ethanol instead of 30% isopropanol. Note: This will help to create a novel context.</li>
	<li>Bring the mice to the holding room and relabel their tails for testing if necessary.</li>
	<li>Prepare novel context transfer cages by replacing the bedding with shredded paper. Note: This will help in creating a novel context.</li>
	<li>Place the mice in the testing chamber then start the program. Clean the chamber with 70% ethanol after testing is completed.</li>
	<li>Return the mice to their home cage after the trace conditioning is completed. Return all mice to their colony room when all mice have been tested.</li>
</ol>
4. Trace Fear Conditioning Day 3: Contextual Memory Testing
<ol>
	<li>On the third day contextual conditioning is conducted. Prepare the software to run a program to record freezing behavior for 8 min.</li>
	<li>Clean the chamber with 30% isopropanol before testing and after testing each mouse. The context should be identical to that of day 1. The transfer cages should be the same as in day 1.</li>
	<li>Bring mice to the holding room and label their tails for testing.</li>
	<li>Place each mouse in the testing chamber then start the program. Clean the chamber with 30% isopropanol after testing is completed.</li>
	<li>Return all mice to their colony room when completed.</li>
</ol>

<ol><li>Powell, R. A., Honey, P. L., Symbaluk, D. G. <a target="_blank" href="http://scholar.google.com/scholar?hl=en&safe=off&q=author%3aPowell%2C+RA+%22Introduction+to+learning+and+behavior%22">Introduction to learning and behavior</a>. , 4th ed, Wadsworth Cengage Learning. Forthcoming.</li>
<li>Tsaltas, E., Preston, G. C., Gray, J. A. <a target="_blank" href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed?term=((The+effects+of+dorsal+bundle+lesions+on+serial+and+trace+conditioning%5BTitle%5D)+AND+%22Behav.+Brain+Res%22%5BJournal%5D)">The effects of dorsal bundle lesions on serial and trace conditioning.</a> Behav. Brain Res. 10, 361-374 (1983).</li>
<li>McAlonan, G. M., Dawson, G. R., Wilkinson, L. O., Robbins, T. W., Everitt, B. J. <a target="_blank" href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed?term=((The+effects+of+AMPA-induced+lesions+of+the+medial+septum+and+vertical+limb+nucleus+of+the+diagonal+band+of+Broca+on+spatial+delayed+non-matching+to+sample+and+spatial+learning+in+the+water+maze%5BTitle%5D)+AND+%22Eur.+J.+Neurosci%22%5BJournal%5D)">The effects of AMPA-induced lesions of the medial septum and vertical limb nucleus of the diagonal band of Broca on spatial delayed non-matching to sample and spatial learning in the water maze.</a> Eur. J. Neurosci. 7, 1034-1049 (1995).</li>
<li>Chowdhury, N., Quinn, J. J., Fanselow, M. S. <a target="_blank" href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed?term=((Dorsal+hippocampus+involvement+in+trace+fear+conditioning+with+long%2C+but+not+short%2C+trace+intervals+in+mice%5BTitle%5D)+AND+%22Behav.+Neurosci%22%5BJournal%5D)">Dorsal hippocampus involvement in trace fear conditioning with long, but not short, trace intervals in mice.</a> Behav. Neurosci. 119, 1396-1402 (2005).</li>
<li>Quinn, J. J., Oommen, S. S., Morrison, G. E., Fanselow, M. S. <a target="_blank" href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed?term=((Post-training+excitotoxic+lesions+of+the+dorsal+hippocampus+attenuate+forward+trace%2C+backward+trace%2C+and+delay+fear+conditioning+in+a+temporally+specific+manner%5BTitle%5D)+AND+%22Hippocampus%22%5BJournal%5D)">Post-training excitotoxic lesions of the dorsal hippocampus attenuate forward trace, backward trace, and delay fear conditioning in a temporally specific manner.</a> Hippocampus. 12, 495-504 (2002).</li>
<li>Misane, I., et al. <a target="_blank" href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed?term=((Time-dependent+involvement+of+the+dorsal+hippocampus+in+trace+fear+conditioning+in+mice%5BTitle%5D)+AND+%22Hippocampus%22%5BJournal%5D)">Time-dependent involvement of the dorsal hippocampus in trace fear conditioning in mice.</a> Hippocampus. 15, 418-426 (2005).</li>
<li>Quinn, J. J., Loya, F., Ma, Q. D., Fanselow, M. S. <a target="_blank" href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed?term=((Dorsal+hippocampus+NMDA+receptors+differentially+mediate+trace+and+contextual+fear+conditioning%5BTitle%5D)+AND+%22Hippocampus%22%5BJournal%5D)">Dorsal hippocampus NMDA receptors differentially mediate trace and contextual fear conditioning.</a> Hippocampus. 15, 665-674 (2005).</li>
<li>McEchron, M. D., Bouwmeester, H., Tseng, W., Weiss, C., Disterhoft, J. F. <a target="_blank" href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed?term=((Hippocampectomy+disrupts+auditory+trace+fear+conditioning+and+contextual+fear+conditioning+in+the+rat%5BTitle%5D)+AND+%22Hippocampus%22%5BJournal%5D)">Hippocampectomy disrupts auditory trace fear conditioning and contextual fear conditioning in the rat.</a> Hippocampus. 8, 638-646 (1998).</li>
<li>Wiltgen, B. J., Sanders, M. J., Ferguson, C., Homanics, G. E., Fanselow, M. S. <a target="_blank" href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed?term=((Trace+fear+conditioning+is+enhanced+in+mice+lacking+the+delta+subunit+of+the+GABAA+receptor%5BTitle%5D)+AND+%22Learn.+Mem%22%5BJournal%5D)">Trace fear conditioning is enhanced in mice lacking the delta subunit of the GABAA receptor.</a> Learn. Mem. 12, 327-333 (2005).</li>
<li>Davis, R. R., et al. <a target="_blank" href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed?term=((Genetic+basis+for+susceptibility+to+noise-induced+hearing+loss+in+mice%5BTitle%5D)+AND+%22Hear.+Res%22%5BJournal%5D)">Genetic basis for susceptibility to noise-induced hearing loss in mice.</a> Hear. Res. 155, 82-90 (2001).</li>
<li>Zheng, Q. Y., Johnson, K. R., Erway, L. C. <a target="_blank" href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed?term=((Assessment+of+hearing+in+80+inbred+strains+of+mice+by+ABR+threshold+analyses%5BTitle%5D)+AND+%22Hear.+Res%22%5BJournal%5D)">Assessment of hearing in 80 inbred strains of mice by ABR threshold analyses.</a> Hear. Res. 130, 94-107 (1999).</li>
<li>Moyer, J. R., Thompson, L. T., Disterhoft, J. F. <a target="_blank" href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed?term=((Trace+eyeblink+conditioning+increases+CA1+excitability+in+a+transient+and+learning-specific+manner%5BTitle%5D)+AND+%22%22%5BJournal%5D)">Trace eyeblink conditioning increases CA1 excitability in a transient and learning-specific manner.</a> 16, 5536-5546 (1996).</li>
<li>Leuner, B., Falduto, J., Shors, T. J. <a target="_blank" href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed?term=((Associative+memory+formation+increases+the+observation+of+dendritic+spines+in+the+hippocampus%5BTitle%5D)+AND+%22J.+Neurosci%22%5BJournal%5D)">Associative memory formation increases the observation of dendritic spines in the hippocampus.</a> J. Neurosci. 23, 659-665 (2003).</li>
<li>McEchron, M. D., Disterhoft, J. F. <a target="_blank" href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed?term=((Hippocampal+encoding+of+non-spatial+trace+conditioning%5BTitle%5D)+AND+%22Hippocampus%22%5BJournal%5D)">Hippocampal encoding of non-spatial trace conditioning.</a> Hippocampus. 9, 385-396 (1999).</li>
<li>McLaughlin, J., Skaggs, H., Churchwell, J., Powell, D. A. <a target="_blank" href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed?term=((Medial+prefrontal+cortex+and+pavlovian+conditioning%3A+trace+versus+delay+conditioning%5BTitle%5D)+AND+%22Behav.+Neurosci%22%5BJournal%5D)">Medial prefrontal cortex and pavlovian conditioning: trace versus delay conditioning.</a> Behav. Neurosci. 116, 37-47 (2002).</li>
<li>Runyan, J. D., Moore, A. N., Dash, P. K. <a target="_blank" href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed?term=((A+role+for+prefrontal+cortex+in+memory+storage+for+trace+fear+conditioning%5BTitle%5D)+AND+%22J.+Neurosci%22%5BJournal%5D)">A role for prefrontal cortex in memory storage for trace fear conditioning.</a> J. Neurosci. 24, 1288-1295 (2004).</li>
<li>Gilmartin, M. R., McEchron, M. D. <a target="_blank" href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed?term=((Single+neurons+in+the+medial+prefrontal+cortex+of+the+rat+exhibit+tonic+and+phasic+coding+during+trace+fear+conditioning%5BTitle%5D)+AND+%22Behav.+Neurosci%22%5BJournal%5D)">Single neurons in the medial prefrontal cortex of the rat exhibit tonic and phasic coding during trace fear conditioning.</a> Behav. Neurosci. 119, 1496-1510 (2005).</li>
<li>Crow, T., Xue-Bian, J. J., Siddiqi, V., Kang, Y., Neary, J. T. <a target="_blank" href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed?term=((Phosphorylation+of+mitogen-activated+protein+kinase+by+one-trial+and+multi-trial+classical+conditioning%5BTitle%5D)+AND+%22J.+Neurosci%22%5BJournal%5D)">Phosphorylation of mitogen-activated protein kinase by one-trial and multi-trial classical conditioning.</a> J. Neurosci. 18, 3480-3487 (1998).</li>
<li>Martin, K. C., et al. <a target="_blank" href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed?term=((MAP+kinase+translocates+into+the+nucleus+of+the+presynaptic+cell+and+is+required+for+long-term+facilitation+in+Aplysia%5BTitle%5D)+AND+%22Neuron%22%5BJournal%5D)">MAP kinase translocates into the nucleus of the presynaptic cell and is required for long-term facilitation in Aplysia.</a> Neuron. 18, 899-912 (1997).</li>
<li>Crestani, F., et al. <a target="_blank" href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed?term=((Trace+fear+conditioning+involves+hippocampal+alpha5+GABA%28A%29+receptors%5BTitle%5D)+AND+%22Proc.+Natl.+Acad.+Sci.+U.S.A%22%5BJournal%5D)">Trace fear conditioning involves hippocampal alpha5 GABA(A) receptors.</a> Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 99, 8980-8985 (2002).</li>
<li>Crestani, F., et al. <a target="_blank" href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed?term=((Decreased+GABAA-receptor+clustering+results+in+enhanced+anxiety+and+a+bias+for+threat+cues%5BTitle%5D)+AND+%22Nat.+Neurosci%22%5BJournal%5D)">Decreased GABAA-receptor clustering results in enhanced anxiety and a bias for threat cues.</a> Nat. Neurosci. 2, 833-839 (1999).</li>
<li>Moore, M. D., et al. <a target="_blank" href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed?term=((Trace+and+contextual+fear+conditioning+is+enhanced+in+mice+lacking+the+alpha4+subunit+of+the+GABA%28A%29+receptor%5BTitle%5D)+AND+%22Neurobiol.+Learn.+Mem%22%5BJournal%5D)">Trace and contextual fear conditioning is enhanced in mice lacking the alpha4 subunit of the GABA(A) receptor.</a> Neurobiol. Learn. Mem. 93, 383-387 (2010).</li>
<li>Cushman, J. D., Moore, M. D., Jacobs, N. S., Olsen, R. W., Fanselow, M. S. <a target="_blank" href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed?term=((Behavioral+pharmacogenetic+analysis+on+the+role+of+the+alpha4+GABA%28A%29+receptor+subunit+in+the+ethanol-mediated+impairment+of+hippocampus-dependent+contextual+learning%5BTitle%5D)+AND+%22Alcohol+Clin.+Exp.+Res%22%5BJournal%5D)">Behavioral pharmacogenetic analysis on the role of the alpha4 GABA(A) receptor subunit in the ethanol-mediated impairment of hippocampus-dependent contextual learning.</a> Alcohol Clin. Exp. Res. 35, 1948-1959 (2011).</li>
<li>Raybuck, J. D., Lattal, K. M. <a target="_blank" href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed?term=((Double+dissociation+of+amygdala+and+hippocampal+contributions+to+trace+and+delay+fear+conditioning%5BTitle%5D)+AND+%22PLoS+ONE%22%5BJournal%5D)">Double dissociation of amygdala and hippocampal contributions to trace and delay fear conditioning.</a> PLoS ONE. 6, (2011).</li>
<li>Kwapis, J. L., Jarome, T. J., Schiff, J. C., Helmstetter, F. J. <a target="_blank" href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed?term=((Memory+consolidation+in+both+trace+and+delay+fear+conditioning+is+disrupted+by+intra-amygdala+infusion+of+the+protein+synthesis+inhibitor+anisomycin%5BTitle%5D)+AND+%22Learn.+Mem%22%5BJournal%5D)">Memory consolidation in both trace and delay fear conditioning is disrupted by intra-amygdala infusion of the protein synthesis inhibitor anisomycin.</a> Learn. Mem. 18, 728-732 (2011).</li>
<li>Gilmartin, M. R., Kwapis, J. L., Helmstetter, F. J. <a target="_blank" href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed?term=((Trace+and+contextual+fear+conditioning+are+impaired+following+unilateral+microinjection+of+muscimol+in+the+ventral+hippocampus+or+amygdala%2C+but+not+the+medial+prefrontal+cortex%5BTitle%5D)+AND+%22Neurobiol.+Learn.+Mem%22%5BJournal%5D)">Trace and contextual fear conditioning are impaired following unilateral microinjection of muscimol in the ventral hippocampus or amygdala, but not the medial prefrontal cortex.</a> Neurobiol. Learn. Mem. 97, 452-464 (2012).</li>
<li>Baysinger, A. N., Kent, B. A., Brown, T. H. <a target="_blank" href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed?term=((Muscarinic+receptors+in+amygdala+control+trace+fear+conditioning%5BTitle%5D)+AND+%22PLoS+ONE%22%5BJournal%5D)">Muscarinic receptors in amygdala control trace fear conditioning.</a> PLoS ONE. 7, (2012).</li>
<li>Wanisch, K., Tang, J., Mederer, A., Wotjak, C. T. <a target="_blank" href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed?term=((Trace+fear+conditioning+depends+on+NMDA+receptor+activation+and+protein+synthesis+within+the+dorsal+hippocampus+of+mice%5BTitle%5D)+AND+%22Behav.+Brain%22%5BJournal%5D)">Trace fear conditioning depends on NMDA receptor activation and protein synthesis within the dorsal hippocampus of mice.</a> Behav. Brain. 157, 63-69 (2005).</li>
<li>Smith, D. R., Gallagher, M., Stanton, M. E. <a target="_blank" href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed?term=((Genetic+background+differences+and+nonassociative+effects+in+mouse+trace+fear+conditioning%5BTitle%5D)+AND+%22Learn.+Mem%22%5BJournal%5D)">Genetic background differences and nonassociative effects in mouse trace fear conditioning.</a> Learn. Mem. 14, 597-605 (2007).</li>
<li>Rudy, J. W., O'Reilly, R. C. <a target="_blank" href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed?term=((Contextual+fear+conditioning%2C+conjunctive+representations%2C+pattern+completion%2C+and+the+hippocampus%5BTitle%5D)+AND+%22Behav.+Neurosci%22%5BJournal%5D)">Contextual fear conditioning, conjunctive representations, pattern completion, and the hippocampus.</a> Behav. Neurosci. 113, 867-880 (1999).</li>
<li>Wiltgen, B. J., Sanders, M. J., Anagnostaras, S. G., Sage, J. R., Fanselow, M. S. <a target="_blank" href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed?term=((Context+fear+learning+in+the+absence+of+the+hippocampus%5BTitle%5D)+AND+%22J.+Neurosci%22%5BJournal%5D)">Context fear learning in the absence of the hippocampus.</a> J. Neurosci. 26, 5484-5491 (2006).</li>
<li>Reijmers, L. G., Perkins, B. L., Matsuo, N., Mayford, M. <a target="_blank" href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed?term=((Localization+of+a+stable+neural+correlate+of+associative+memory%5BTitle%5D)+AND+%22Science%22%5BJournal%5D)">Localization of a stable neural correlate of associative memory.</a> Science. 317, 1230-1233 (2007).</li>
<li>Huerta, P. T., Sun, L. D., Wilson, M. A., Tonegawa, S. <a target="_blank" href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed?term=((Formation+of+temporal+memory+requires+NMDA+receptors+within+CA1+pyramidal+neurons%5BTitle%5D)+AND+%22Neuron%22%5BJournal%5D)">Formation of temporal memory requires NMDA receptors within CA1 pyramidal neurons.</a> Neuron. 25, 473-480 (2000).</li>
<li>Jacobs, N. S., Cushman, J. D., Fanselow, M. S. <a target="_blank" href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed?term=((The+accurate+measurement+of+fear+memory+in+Pavlovian+conditioning%3A+Resolving+the+baseline+issue%5BTitle%5D)+AND+%22J.+Neurosci.+Methods%22%5BJournal%5D)">The accurate measurement of fear memory in Pavlovian conditioning: Resolving the baseline issue.</a> J. Neurosci. Methods. 190, 235-239 (2010).</li>
</ol>

The authors have nothing to disclose.

There have been several studies that have elucidated the neural circuitry that underlies trace fear conditioning. Trace fear conditioning is believed to involve the CA1 of the hippocampus12-14. There is also evidence that the medial prefrontal cortex (mPFC) plays a large role in trace eye-blink conditioning15, and the mPFC has been found to be involved in trace fear conditioning. One study found that mPFC neurons provide sustained activity during the trace period, thus providing a structure that can...

In fear conditioning a neutral stimulus (NS) is paired with an aversive unconditioned stimulus (US). The NS is normally a tone and becomes a conditioned stimulus (CS) through repeated pairings with the US. The CS can then elicit a conditioned response (CR), such as freezing, in the absence of the aversive US. A commonly used fear conditioning protocol is delay conditioning. In this protocol the onset of the NS and the US is contiguous or with some overlap in stimulus presentation. Even though delay fear conditioning is one of the most commonly used types of temporal associative conditioning, there are several other types of associative conditioning temporal arrangements: simultaneous conditioning, backward conditioning, and trace conditioning1. In trace fear conditioning there is a stimulus-free interval between the NS and the US of several seconds resulting in a &#34;trace&#34; period.
Several studies have reported deficits in trace fear conditioning when neurotoxic lesions are produced in the structures that input into the hippocampus2-5 or when pharmacological agents are used to block receptor function in the hippocampus. Lesion to the hippocampus results in deficits in trace conditioning and contextual conditioning, but does not impair delay fear conditioning8. There are several benefits to using trace fear conditioning. The fear conditioning protocol can be achieved over a three-day testing period and allows for hippocampal-dependent memory that is not spatially dependent. Trace fear conditioning can be used as a complementary test to the Morris water maze, novel object recognition test, or other maze tests in investigating hippocampal-dependent memory.

<table><tbody><tr><td>FreezeFrame</td><td>Coulbourn</td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>30% Isopropanol</td><td></td><td></td><td>Purchase 90% isopropanol and dilute it down to 30%</td></tr><tr><td>70% Ethanol</td><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Amp-meter</td><td>Med-Associates</td><td>ENV-420</td><td>Windows XP, Vista, and 7 Compatible (32-bit only)</td></tr><tr><td>Digital Sound Level Meter</td><td></td><td>33-2055</td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Vanilla Extract</td><td>McCormick Pure Vanilla Extract</td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Sticky Notes</td><td>Post-it</td><td></td><td>3 in x 3 in</td></tr></tbody></table>

trace fear conditioning in mice

Trace Fear Conditioning in Mice

In this experiment we present a technique to measure learning and memory. In the trace fear conditioning protocol presented here there are five pairings between a neutral stimulus and an unconditioned stimulus. There is a 20 sec trace period that separates each conditioning trial. On the following day freezing is measured during presentation of the conditioned stimulus (CS) and trace period. On the third day there is an 8 min test to measure contextual memory. The representative results are from mice that were presented with the aversive unconditioned stimulus (shock) compared to mice that received the tone presentations without the unconditioned stimulus. Trace fear conditioning has been successfully used to detect subtle learning and memory deficits and enhancements in mice that are not found with other fear conditioning methods. This type of fear conditioning is believed to be dependent upon connections between the medial prefrontal cortex and the hippocampus. One current controversy is whether this method is believed to be amygdala-independent. Therefore, other fear conditioning testing is needed to examine amygdala-dependent learning and memory effects, such as through the delay fear conditioning.

For the representative results we present data from control C57BL/6J adult mice that received the neutral stimulus pairings with the unconditioned stimulus (shock condition) compared to mice that received the neutral stimulus but did not receive the unconditioned stimulus (no shock condition). It is important to run this condition when first setting up this behavioral test to determine whether the protocol has been performed correctly.
The data in Figure 1 represent the traini...

In the following experiment we describe a protocol for trace fear conditioning in mice. This type of associative memory includes a trace period that separates the neutral stimulus and the unconditioned stimulus.

In this experiment we present a technique to measure learning and memory. In the trace fear conditioning protocol presented here there are five pairings ...

The overall goal of the following experiment is to evaluate hippocampal dependent learning and memory in mice through the use of trace sphere conditioning. This is achieved by first training the animal to associate an auditory tone with an aversive stimulus. The next day, the animal is placed in a novel context and freezing behavior is recorded in reaction to the tone.On the third day, the animal is returned to the original context and freezing behavior is recorded. Results show that mice trained with the shock tone pairing display more freezing behavior than those not receiving the shock. This method can be used to provide insights into hippocampal dependent learning and memory and mice, and is especially useful when used in the study of transgenic and knockout animals.The following procedure is performed in a fear conditioning chamber housed inside a larger sound attenuating chamber. With the door to the chamber closed position the lights to reach the desired level of illumination if correctly placed the light level indicator light should be off. Use a sound meter to confirm a consistent level of background noise inside each chamber.Next, calibrate the tone used during training. Use an external calibration device to calibrate the shock level. Place one lead on a bar and another three or four bars over.Use the shock generator to administer the shock and calibrate until the correct level is achieved. Repeat this step for each fear conditioning chamber. Once the apparatus is prepared, transfer the subjects to a holding room separate from the testing room to reduce excessive handling.Before testing, label the tails at least 30 minutes before testing or on the day before. When ready to begin, transfer the test mouse into a clean labeled cage for transport to the fear conditioning chamber. Place the mouse in the chamber, close the door and start the software program.On the first day of training, mice are allowed to explore the chamber for three minutes. The software then presents a 22nd tone, followed by a 22nd trace interval that terminates in a mild foot shock. Observe the subject to confirm that they received the aversive stimuli.A 202nd inter trial interval separates five conditioning trials. After the trials, allow the animal to remain in the testing chamber for one minute before removing, place the animal back in the transfer cage and return to the holding room. If there are additional mice to be tested in their home cage individually, house the mouse until all mice have completed testing.Clean the test chamber with 30%isopropanol in preparation for the next animal. Repeat these steps until all mice have been trained. Return all mice to their colony room.After the last mouse in the cohort has been tested the following day, animals are tested. For trace fear memory. On this day, replace the bedding of the transfer cages with shredded paper to change their context.The context of the chamber is also changed. Place a foam sheet under a clear acrylic insert on the floor to alter its texture and appearance. Place an acrylic divider inside the testing area.Change the odor by placing vanilla extract in a whey boat under the floor. Insert on this day, clean the chamber with 70%ethanol instead of 30%isopropanol between each mouse. When ready, place the mouse in the test chamber and start the program.The session begins with a two minute baseline period followed by three 22nd tone presentations. There is a 222nd inter trial interval between each tone presentation. After the session is over, return the mice to their home cage and continue until all animals have been tested in preparation for testing on the next day.Restore the same context as used in day one. Clean the chamber with 30%isopropanol. Contextual conditioning is conducted on day three.Using the same transfer cages as day one, retrieve the test mouse from the holding room. Place the mouse in the testing chamber and then start the program for testing contextual memory. Run a program to record freezing behavior for eight minutes.After this time, return the mouse to their home cage and continue testing as shown earlier, representative results show an increase in freezing behavior in animals receiving the shock tone pairing over the course of the training session. In a new context, mice that received the aversive shock stimulus had more freezing compared to the mice that did not receive the shock during the baseline tone trace and inter trial interval. When returned to the original context, animals receiving the aversive shock stimulus showed consistently higher freezing behavior over the eight minute period.After watching this video, you should have a good understanding of how to use trace fear conditioning in order to understand hippocampal dependent learning and memory and mice.

Research

JoVE Journal

Behavior

This article presents a protocol for a contextual and cued fear conditioning test using a video analyzing system to assess fear learning and memory in mice.

Contextual and Cued Fear Conditioning Test Using a Video Analyzing System in Mice

This protocol describes a method of chemical kindling with pentylenetetrazole and provides a mouse model of epilepsy. This protocol can also be used to investigate vulnerability to seizure induction and pathogenesis after epileptic seizures in mice.

Pentylenetetrazole-Induced Kindling Mouse Model

Here we describe the detailed methodology required to conduct stress-enhanced fear learning (SEFL) experiments, a preclinical model of post-traumatic stress disorder, in both rats and mice. The model utilizes aspects of Pavlovian fear conditioning and freezing as an index of enhanced fear in rodents.

Stress-Enhanced Fear Learning, a Robust Rodent Model of Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder

We describe an extended fear-conditioning protocol that produces overtraining and fear incubation in rats. This protocol entails a single training session with 25 tone-shock pairings (i.e., overtraining) and a comparison of conditioned freezing responses during context and cue tests 48 h (short-term) and 6 weeks (long-term) after training.

Fear Incubation Using an Extended Fear-Conditioning Protocol for Rats

Defensive behavioral responses are contingent upon threat intensity, proximity, and context of exposure. Based on these factors, we developed a classical conditioning paradigm that elicits clear transitions between conditioned freezing and flight behavior within individual subjects. This model is crucial for the understanding the pathologies involved in anxiety, panic, and post-traumatic stress disorders.

A Novel Pavlovian Fear Conditioning Paradigm to Study Freezing and Flight Behavior

To study flight behaviors in a fearful context, we introduce a modified fear conditioning protocol. This protocol ensures that mice consistently exhibit flight behaviors during cue presentation in the fear conditioning.

Modified Fear Conditioning for Inducing Flight Behaviors in Mice

The observational fear paradigm assesses vicarious freezing in rodents as a model for affective empathy. This procedure entails exposing observer rodents to conspecific demonstrators receiving aversive foot shocks to elicit empathic freezing responses. By employing observational fear assays, researchers can investigate the neural mechanisms underlying affective empathy.

Observational Fear as a Model of Affective Empathy in Mice

Disrupting reconsolidation is a promising approach to dampen the behavioral expression of fear memory in patients with anxiety disorders or posttraumatic stress disorder. In a series of human fear conditioning studies we showed that disrupting reconsolidation by the noradrenergic β-blocker propranolol is very effective in erasing conditioned fear responding.

Disrupting Reconsolidation of Fear Memory in Humans by a Noradrenergic &#946;-Blocker

Gonadal hormones such as estrogen modulate memory formation in a number of experimental paradigms including fear extinction memory. This protocol describes a set of methods for investigating the influence of gonadal hormones specifically during extinction in naturally cycling females, including estrous cycle monitoring and exogenous estrogen administration.

Protocol for Studying Extinction of Conditioned Fear in Naturally Cycling Female Rats

This article describes a new protocol for the quantitative measurement of social motivation in mice using operant conditioning for a social reward. The protocol is useful for the measurement of social motivation in mouse models of autism and other disorders of social behavior.

Quantifying Social Motivation in Mice Using Operant Conditioning

Learn trace fear conditioning to evaluate hippocampal dependent learning and memory in mice. This protocol uses auditory tone-shock pairing and freezing behavior measurement to study associative memory mechanisms.

Trace Fear Conditioning in Mice

Explore More Videos