Name: X-ray Powder Diffraction in Conservation Science: Towards Routine Crystal Structure Determination of Corrosion Products on Heritage Art Objects (Video) | JoVE Journal
Uploaded: 2016-06-08T14:00:00.000+00:00
Duration: 9 min 16 s
Description: Learn high resolution X-ray powder diffraction for crystal structure determination of corrosion products on heritage art objects. This method enables quantitative analysis without requiring single crystals.

ai_agent_IP

ai_agent

maintenance

instantTrialDurationMinutes

isBiopharma

enableNewMyJoveSectionDesign

educationFeatures

seoMetaApi

ai_copilot_institution_blacklist

ai_chat_institution_blacklist

freeAccessWindow

ssoRoleCapture

scheduledMaintenanceBanner

joveLabsFeatures

disable_autoplay_for_bots

extended_trial_duration

5 minutes

The authors gratefully acknowledge Ms. Christine Stefani for performing the XRPD measurements. Marian Schu&#776;ch and Rebekka Kuiter (State Academy of Art and Design Stuttgart) are acknowledged for the pictures of the tile (Fig. 7).

1. Sample Preparation
<ol>
	<li>Collection of material
	<ol>
		<li>Carefully pick a small amount (less than 1 mg) of sample 1 under a digital microscope using a scalpel and tweezers from settings of opaque blue-green cabochons on a historic clasp, belonging to the collection of the Rosgartenmuseum Konstanz (RMK-1964.79) (Figure 6).</li>
		<li>Carefully scratch a few mg of sample 2 with a scalpel from the surface of a glazed ceramic tile, dating at early modern times, manufactured in Southern Germany, with size of 41 x 29 x 3.5 cm, and part of the collection of Landesmuseum W&#252;rttemberg (no. E 3004) (Figure 7). 
		Note: The tile was stored from the 1980s until 2004 in wooden cupboards. The backside heavily suffers thecotrichite efflorescence occurring as a phase-pure product (Figure 7b).</li>
	</ol>
	</li>
	<li>Preparation of the sample holders
	<ol>
		<li>Grind both samples carefully with a pestle in a small agate mortar.</li>
		<li>Distribute sample 1, which consists of few agglomerated grains (&#60;1 mg), between two thin X-ray transparent polyimide foils and mount them on a transmission sample holder with a central opening of 8 mm diameter. Fix the transmission sample holder on the &#952;-circle of the diffractometer.</li>
		<li>Fill sample 2 (approx. 5 mg) in a borosilicate glass capillary of 0.5 mm diameter.
		<ol>
			<li>To do so, place a small amount of powder into the funnel of the capillary using a spatula. Then move the powder down to the tip of the capillary with the help of an electric vibrator. Compact the powder by placing the capillary in a thick walled glass tube and tap it manually on the desk.</li>
			<li>Continue until a filling height of about 3 cm is reached. Cut the glass capillary carefully at a height of approximately 4 cm using a thin corundum blade and seal the open end using a lighter.</li>
			<li>Place a small amount of beeswax in the opening of a brass pin and melt it using a soldering iron. Then place the capillary in the molten wax and keep it upright until solidification. Mount the brass pin on a goniometer head and fix the goniometer head on the &#952;-circle of the diffractometer.</li>
			<li>Finally, center the mounted capillary by iteratively aligning the four degrees of freedom of the goniometer head (two rotations using bending slides and two translations using XY translation stages) manually with a wrench supported by a digital camera projection superimposed with a cross hair.</li>
		</ol>
		</li>
	</ol>
	</li>
</ol>
2. Data Collection
<ol>
	<li>For the laboratory XRPD patterns of samples 1 (Figure 8) and 2 (Figure 9) at room temperature use a high-resolution powder diffractometer (with primary beam Johann-type Ge(111) monochromator for Cu-K&#945;1-radiation) which is equipped with a linear position sensitive silicon strip detector with an opening of approximately 12&#176; 2&#952;.
	<ol>
		<li>Measure sample 1 for 20 hr in the range from 5-85&#176; 2&#952; with a step width of 0.015&#176; 2&#952; in transmission mode (Scan mode: Transmission; Scan type: 2ThetaOmega; Omega mode: Moving; PSD Mode: Moving). Turn rotation on in order to achieve better particle statistics.</li>
		<li>Record sample 2 for a period of 6 hr covering the range 5-60&#176; in 2&#952; with a step size of 0.015&#176; in Debye-Scherrer mode (Scan mode: Debye Scherrer; Scan type: 2Theta; Omega mode: Stationary; PSD Mode: Moving). Turn rotation on in order to achieve better particle statistics.</li>
	</ol>
	</li>
</ol>
3. Crystal Structure Determination and Refinement
Note: For the determination and refinement of the crystal structures of samples 1 and 2, a complex computer program is used11. It is either run by a graphical user interface or by text based input files. The latter make use of a sophisticated scripting language. Sample input files of the different stages of the structural analysis using sample 1 are listed in Tables S1, S2, S4-S8. The general procedure is identical for sample 2.
<ol>
	<li>Peak search
	<ol>
		<li>Perform an automatic peak search using the first and second derivatives of Savitzky-Golay polynoms of low order (Figure 10) according to manufacturer&#8217;s protocol by setting the convolute range on the order of 1-1.5 times the full width at half maximum of the Bragg reflections (0.12&#176; 2 &#952; for sample 1), adjusting the noise threshold to 1.5-2 times the estimated standard deviation (1.74 for sample 1) and limiting the search for that part of the powder patterns which show clearly distinguishable peaks (5-66&#176; 2&#952; for sample 1) above the background.
		<ol>
			<li>Start the program by double clicking the icon. Click Load Scan Files. Pull down menu Select X-Y data files (*.xy). Double click on 1-GNM-4145-P4-Kapton.xy.</li>
			<li>Expand range 1-GNM-4145-P4-Kapton.xy. Click Emission profile | Load Emission profile | CuK1sharp.lam.</li>
			<li>Click button Automatically insert peaks. Unclick Remove K-Alpha 2 Peaks. Set Peak Width with slide bar to 0.12. Set Noise Threshold with slide bar to 1.74. Press button Add Peaks. Press Close.</li>
		</ol>
		</li>
		<li>Use the integrating property of the human eye and correct manually the automatically detected peaks by deleting non-Bragg peaks which obviously are due to counting statistics and adding peaks which are recognizable but hidden in the tails of other peaks. Set up indexing files with sets of 30 to 40 reflections for each sample using standard settings but allowing all crystal systems (Table S1).
		<ol>
			<li>Zoom with mouse in the pattern, use mouse wheel to scroll. Open Peak Details window by pressing F3. Set peaks by pressing left mouse button. Delete peaks by pressing F9. Close Peak Details window.</li>
			<li>Click on Peaks Phase. Mark all peaks yellow by clicking on Position. Left click in the yellow marked column. Click Copy all/selection | Create Indexing range. Deselect range 1-GNM-4145-P4-Kapton.xy. Select range Indexing. Select all Bravais lattices (click Use to highlight the list and set a tick mark). 
			&#160;</li>
		</ol>
		</li>
	</ol>
	</li>
	<li>Indexing
	<ol>
		<li>For indexing apply the &#8220;iterative use of singular value decomposition&#8221; algorithm12 (Table S2) until finding a primitive tetragonal unit cell for sample 1 and a primitive monoclinic lattice for sample 2 (see Table 1 for unit cell parameters).
		<ol>
			<li>Press Run button (F6). Press Yes to keep indexing solutions. Press Solutions button. Highlight first solution by left clicking button 1. Right click on the highlighted (yellow) solution. Click Copy all/selection. Deselect range Indexing. Select range 1-GNM-4145-P4-Kapton.xy. 
			Note: Other unit cells showing a high figure of merit all have multiple volumes but higher numbers of unobserved reflections as compared to the ones listed in Table 1. The program automatically suggests the most probable space groups based on the observed reflection extinctions which is P42/n (86) for sample 1 and P21/a for sample 2 (Figure 11).</li>
		</ol>
		</li>
		<li>Confirm these findings manually by searching for extinctions using the International Tables of Crystallography Volume A13 (Table S3). Estimate the number of formula units per unit cell from average volume increments to Z = 8 for sample 1 and Z = 4 for sample 2.</li>
	</ol>
	</li>
	<li>Whole powder pattern fitting
	<ol>
		<li>Perform whole powder pattern fitting according to Pawley14 for both powder patterns. For the description of the peak profiles, use the fundamental parameter (FP) approach15 (Figure 12). Model the background by orthogonal Chebychev polynomials of higher order (typically 8) and an additional 1/X term describing the air scattering at low diffraction angles. Set the Lorenz-Polarization factor to 27.3 which is the Bragg angle for the Ge(111) monochromator using Cu-K&#945;1 radiation. Table S4 contains all relevant input parameters.
		<ol>
			<li>Press Add hkl Phase. Expand range 1-GNM-4145-P4-Kapton.xy. Expand hkl_Phase. Click Indexing Details | Paste Indexing details. Click Background. Change Order to 8 (refine). Tick 1/X Bkg (refine).</li>
			<li>Click Instrument. Set Primary radius (mm) to 217.5. Set Secondary radius (mm) to 217.5. Tick Point detector. Tick Receiving Slit Width, value of 0.1 (fix). Tick Full Axial Model. Set Source length (mm) to 6 (fix). Set Sample length (mm) to 6 (fix). Set RS length (mm) to 6 (fix).</li>
			<li>Click Corrections. Tick Zero error, value to 0 (refine). Tick LP factor, value to 27.3 (fix). Click Miscellaneous. Set Conv. Steps to 2. Tick Start X, value 8. Tick Finish X, value 75. Click Peaks Phase | Delete Peaks Phase | Yes.</li>
			<li>Click hkl_Phase | Microstructure. Tick Cry Size L, value to 200 (refine). Tick Cry Size G, value to 200 (refine). Tick Strain L, value to 0.1 (refine). Tick Strain G, value to 0.1 (refine). Press Run button (F6).</li>
		</ol>
		</li>
		<li>&#160;Create a list of Bragg peaks suitable for Charge Flipping6. Click hkl_Phase. Click Charge-Flipping output. Tick A file for CF, value CF.A. Tick hkl file for CF, value CF.hkl. Press Run button (F6). Pull down menu File | Export to INP file. File name, value Pawley.INP. Press Save. 
		Note: For the consecutive structure determination, keep all instrument, peak shape and lattice parameters fixed.</li>
	</ol>
	</li>
	<li>Crystal Structure determination 
	Note: A combination of three methods (used in an iterative manner) is used to determine the crystal structures of samples 1 and 2.
	<ol>
		<li>Firstly, use the method of Charge Flipping6 supported by the inclusion of the tangent formula16 (Figure 13) to find the positions of most of the heavier atoms. Delete observed reflections with a d-spacing smaller than 1.28 (for sample 1) and extend the calculated sphere to a d-spacing of 0.9. All necessary parameters are listed in Table S5. Pick atoms with recognizable electron density from the resulting list, correct falsely assigned atom types of similar scattering power like carbon, oxygen or nitrogen manually.
		<ol>
			<li>Pull down File File | Close All - Confirm by clicking Yes. Pull down Launch Launch | Launch Kernel.</li>
			<li>Pull down Launch Launch | Set INP File. Select CF.INP (prepared input text file, listed in Table S5). Confirm by clicking Open. Press Run button (F6). Press STOP button (F8) after approx. 20,000 cycles. Confirm Charge flipping finished by pressing Yes.</li>
			<li>Press Temporary output window displaying selected atoms in z-matrix format button. Press Cloud options dialog button. Set N to pick to 45. Tick With Symmetry. Press Pick button. Copy temporary output and save it to a text file called FirstGuess.str. Close the charge flipping graphics window.</li>
		</ol>
		</li>
		<li>Secondly, apply the global optimization method of simulated annealing7,17 (Figure 14) to find the positions of all missing non-hydrogen atoms (mainly the carbon atoms of the formate/acetate groups). Use the automatic annealing scheme provided by the software. Subject only the scale factor and the positional and/or occupational parameters of selected atoms to simulated annealing. For sample 1, merge sodium and oxygen atoms within a radius of 1.1 &#197; to detect special positions (Table S6).
		<ol>
			<li>Pull down Launch Launch | Set INP File. Select SA.INP (prepared input text file, listed in Table S6). Confirm by clicking Open. Press Run button (F6). Press STOP button (F8) after several thousand cycles. Confirm Update input file by pressing Yes.</li>
		</ol>
		</li>
		<li>Thirdly, turn off simulated annealing and switch to Rietveld5 refinement mode by commenting out the command Auto_T(0.1). Fix all confirmed positional parameters. Include the calculation of a difference-Fourier map (Fobs-Fcalc) (Figure 15, Table S7) to check for unaccounted electron density. Include the additionally found atoms in the atom list and refine the atomic positions and occupancies.
		<ol>
			<li>Pull down Launch Launch | Set INP File. Select Fourier_search_for_C.INP (prepared input text file, listed in Table S7). Confirm by clicking Open. Press Run button (F6). Inspect the two graphical output windows displaying the almost complete crystal structure and the difference Fourier map. 
			Note: Cycle the three structure solving methods iteratively in case of failure. If necessary, apply anti bumping constraints to light atoms (carbon and oxygen atoms) (see Table S7).</li>
		</ol>
		</li>
	</ol>
	</li>
	<li>Rietveld refinement
	<ol>
		<li>For the final crystal structure refinements of samples 1 and 2, use the Rietveld whole-pattern refinement method5 (Figure 16). In order to avoid meaningless atomic shifts of atoms in the acetic acid and nitrate groups of sample 2, employ so called soft constraints (also called restraints) based on idealized bond lengths and angles. Calculate idealized positions of the missing hydrogen atoms using standard software18 (Table S8).</li>
		<li>Refine isotropic atomic displacement parameters for the non-hydrogen atoms of each crystal structure. In case of sample two, model the apparent anisotropy of the width of the Bragg reflections caused by microstrain by including symmetry adapted spherical harmonics of second order.</li>
		<li>Finally create plots of projections of the crystal structures of sample 1 (Figure 17) and sample 2 (Figure 18) and the two crystallographic information files (CIFs) which from now on can be used for full quantitative phase analysis. An example of such a full quantitative analysis is given in Figure 19 using the crystal structure of sample 1.</li>
	</ol>
	</li>
</ol>

<ol><li><a target="_blank" href="http://scholar.google.com/scholar?hl=en&safe=off&q=%22The+interface+between+science+and+conservation%2C+Occacional+Paper+116%22">The interface between science and conservation, Occacional Paper 116</a>. Bradley, S. M. , British Museum. London. (1997).</li>
<li><a target="_blank" href="http://scholar.google.com/scholar?hl=en&safe=off&q=%22Powder+Diffraction%3ATheory+and+Practice%22">Powder Diffraction:Theory and Practice</a>. Dinnebier, R. E., Billinge, S. J. L. , 1st edition, Royal Society of Chemistry. (2008).</li>
<li>Debye, P., Scherrer, P. <a target="_blank" href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed?term=((Interferenzen+an+regellos+orientierten+Teilchen+im+Roentgenlicht%5BTitle%5D)+AND+%22Phys.+Zeit%22%5BJournal%5D)">Interferenzen an regellos orientierten Teilchen im Roentgenlicht.</a> Phys. Zeit. 17, 277-283 (1916).</li>
<li>Hull, A. W. <a target="_blank" href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed?term=((A+New+Method+of+X-Ray+Crystal+Analysis%5BTitle%5D)+AND+%22Phys.+Rev%22%5BJournal%5D)">A New Method of X-Ray Crystal Analysis.</a> Phys. Rev. 10 (6), 661-696 (1917).</li>
<li>Rietveld, H. M. <a target="_blank" href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed?term=((A+profile+refinement+method+for+nuclear+and+magnetic+structures%5BTitle%5D)+AND+%22J.+Appl.+Cryst%22%5BJournal%5D)">A profile refinement method for nuclear and magnetic structures.</a> J. Appl. Cryst. 2, 65-71 (1969).</li>
<li>Oszlanyi, G., Suto, A. <a target="_blank" href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed?term=((Ab+initio+structure+solution+by+charge+flipping%5BTitle%5D)+AND+%22Acta+Crystallogr.+Sect.+A%22%5BJournal%5D)">Ab initio structure solution by charge flipping.</a> Acta Crystallogr. Sect. A. 60 (2), 134-141 (2004).</li>
<li>Newsam, J. M., Deem, M. W., Freeman, C. M. Direct Space Methods of Structure Solution from Powder Diffraction Data. <a target="_blank" href="http://scholar.google.com/scholar?hl=en&safe=off&q=author%3aNewsam%2C+JM+%22NIST+Special+Publication+864%3A+Accuracy+in+Powder+Diffraction+II%3A+Proceedings+of+the+International+Conference+May+26-29%2C+1992%22">NIST Special Publication 864: Accuracy in Powder Diffraction II: Proceedings of the International Conference May 26-29, 1992</a>. Prince, E., Stalick, J. K. , NIST - United States Department of Commerce. Gaithersburg. 80-91 (1992).</li>
<li>Dinnebier, R. E., Runčevski, T., Fischer, A., Eggert, G. <a target="_blank" href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed?term=((Solid-State+Structure+of+a+Degradation+Product+Frequently+Observed+on+Historic+Metal+Objects%5BTitle%5D)+AND+%22Inorg.+Chem%22%5BJournal%5D)">Solid-State Structure of a Degradation Product Frequently Observed on Historic Metal Objects.</a> Inorg. Chem. 54 (6), 2638-2642 (2015).</li>
<li>Wahlberg, N., et al. <a target="_blank" href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed?term=((Crystal+Structure+of+Thecotrichite%2C+an+Efflorescent+Salt+on+Calcareous+Objects+Stored+in+Wooden+Cabinets%5BTitle%5D)+AND+%22Cryst.+Growth+Des%22%5BJournal%5D)">Crystal Structure of Thecotrichite, an Efflorescent Salt on Calcareous Objects Stored in Wooden Cabinets.</a> Cryst. Growth Des. 15 (6), 2795-2800 (2015).</li>
<li>Eggert, G., Fischer, A. <a target="_blank" href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed?term=((Gef%C3%A4hrliche+Nachbarschaft%3A+Durch+Glas+induzierte+Metallkorrosion+an+Museums-Exponaten+-+Das+GIMME-Projekt%5BTitle%5D)+AND+%22Restauro%22%5BJournal%5D)">Gefährliche Nachbarschaft: Durch Glas induzierte Metallkorrosion an Museums-Exponaten - Das GIMME-Projekt.</a> Restauro. 1, 38-43 (2012).</li>
<li><a target="_blank" href="http://scholar.google.com/scholar?hl=en&safe=off&q=%22TOPAS+%28current+version+5.0%29%22">TOPAS (current version 5.0)</a>. , Bruker AXS Inc. Madison, Wisconsin, USA. 
 <a target="_blank" href="https://www.bruker.com/products/x-ray-diffraction-and-elemental-analysis/x-ray-diffraction/xrd-software/topas.html">https://www.bruker.com/products/x-ray-diffraction-and-elemental-analysis/x-ray-diffraction/xrd-software/topas.html</a> (2015).</li>
<li>Coelho, A. A. <a target="_blank" href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed?term=((Indexing+of+powder+diffraction+patterns+by+iterative+use+of+singular+value+decomposition%5BTitle%5D)+AND+%22J.+Appl.+Crystallogr%22%5BJournal%5D)">Indexing of powder diffraction patterns by iterative use of singular value decomposition.</a> J. Appl. Crystallogr. 36 (1), 86-95 (2003).</li>
<li><a target="_blank" href="http://scholar.google.com/scholar?hl=en&safe=off&q=%22International+Tables+for+Crystallography+Volume+A%3A+Space-group+symmetry%22">International Tables for Crystallography Volume A: Space-group symmetry</a>. , (2006).</li>
<li>Pawley, G. S. <a target="_blank" href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed?term=((Unit-cell+refinement+from+powder+diffraction+scans%5BTitle%5D)+AND+%22J.+Appl.+Crystallogr%22%5BJournal%5D)">Unit-cell refinement from powder diffraction scans.</a> J. Appl. Crystallogr. 14, 357-361 (1981).</li>
<li>Cheary, R. W., Coelho, A. A., Cline, J. P. <a target="_blank" href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed?term=((Fundamental+Parameters+Line+Profile+Fitting+in+Laboratory+Diffractometers%5BTitle%5D)+AND+%22J.+Res.+Natl.+Inst.+Stand.+Technol%22%5BJournal%5D)">Fundamental Parameters Line Profile Fitting in Laboratory Diffractometers.</a> J. Res. Natl. Inst. Stand. Technol. 109 (1), 1-25 (2004).</li>
<li>Karle, J., Hauptman, H. <a target="_blank" href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed?term=((A+theory+of+phase+determination+for+the+four+types+of+non-centrosymmetric+space+groups+1P222%2C+2P22%2C+3P12%2C+3P22%5BTitle%5D)+AND+%22Acta+Crystallogr%22%5BJournal%5D)">A theory of phase determination for the four types of non-centrosymmetric space groups 1P222, 2P22, 3P12, 3P22.</a> Acta Crystallogr. 9, 635-651 (1956).</li>
<li>Coelho, A. A. <a target="_blank" href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed?term=((Whole-profile+structure+solution+from+powder+diffraction+data+using+simulated+annealing%5BTitle%5D)+AND+%22J.+Appl.+Crystallogr%22%5BJournal%5D)">Whole-profile structure solution from powder diffraction data using simulated annealing.</a> J. Appl. Crystallogr. 33 (3), 899-908 (2000).</li>
<li>Macrae, C. F., et al. <a target="_blank" href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed?term=((Mercury%3A+visualization+and+analysis+of+crystal+structures%5BTitle%5D)+AND+%22J.+Appl.+Crystallogr%22%5BJournal%5D)">Mercury: visualization and analysis of crystal structures.</a> J. Appl. Crystallogr. 39 (3), 453-457 (2006).</li>
<li><a target="_blank" href="http://scholar.google.com/scholar?hl=en&safe=off&q=%22Modern+Diffraction+Methods%22">Modern Diffraction Methods</a>. Mittemeijer, E. J., Welzel, U. , Wiley-VCH Verlag GmbH. (2012).</li>
</ol>

The authors have nothing to disclose.

XRPD is a suitable technique for conservation research as it is non-destructive, fast and easy-to-use. XRPD data can be used in routine qualitative analysis, owing to the fact that the powder pattern is a fingerprint signature to the corresponding crystal structure. The biggest advantage of XRPD over other analytic techniques is the ability of performing simultaneous qualitative and quantitative analysis of crystalline constituents in mixtures by using the Rietveld refinement method5. Moreover, the presence of...

Conservation science applies scientific (often chemical) methods in the conservation of artifacts. This includes investigations of the production of artifacts (&#39;technical art history&#39;: How was it made at that time?) and their decay pathways as a prerequisite to develop proper conservation treatments. Oftentimes these studies deal with metal organic salts like carbonates, formates and acetates. Some of them have been deliberately manufactured using suitable compounds (e.g., vinegar), others derive from deterioration reactions with the atmosphere (carbon dioxide or carbonyl compounds from indoor air pollution)1. As a matter of fact, the crystal structures of many of these corrosion materials are still unknown. This is an unfortunate fact, since the knowledge of the geometrical structure helps conservation science to better understand production and decay reactions and to allow for full quantitative analysis in the case of mixtures.
Under the condition that the material of interest forms single crystals of sufficient size and quality, single crystal diffraction is the method of choice for the determination of the crystal structure. If these boundary conditions are not fulfilled, powder diffraction is the closest alternative. The biggest drawback of powder diffraction as compared to single crystal diffraction lies in the loss of the orientational information of the reciprocal d-vector d* (scattering vector). In other words, the intensity of a single diffraction spot is smeared over the surface of a sphere. This can be considered a projection of the three-dimensional diffraction (= reciprocal) space onto the one dimensional 2&#952;-axis of the powder pattern. As a consequence, scattering vectors of different direction but equal or similar length, overlap systematically or accidentally making it difficult or even impossible to separate these reflections2 (Figure 1). This is also the main reason why powder diffraction, despite its early invention just four years after the first single crystal experiment3,4, was mainly used for phase identification and quantification for more than half a century. Nevertheless, the information content of a powder pattern is huge as can be easily deduced from Figure 2. The real challenge, however, is to reveal as much information as possible in a routine way.
A crucial step towards this goal, without any doubt, was the idea from Hugo Rietveld in 19695 who invented a local optimization technique for crystal structure refinement from powder diffraction data. The method does not refine single intensities but the entire powder pattern against a model of increasing complexity, thus taking the peak overlap intrinsically into account. From that time on, scientists using powder diffraction techniques were no longer limited to data analysis by methods developed for single crystal investigation. Several years after the invention of the Rietveld method, the power of the powder diffraction method for ab-initio structure determinations was recognized. Nowadays, almost all branches of natural sciences and engineering use powder diffraction to determine more and more complex crystal structures, although the method can still not be regarded as routine. Within the last decade, a new generation of powder diffractometers in the laboratory was designed providing high resolution, high energy and high intensity. Better resolution immediately leads to better peak separation while higher energies fight absorption. The benefit of a better peak profile description based on fundamental physical parameters (Figure 3) are more accurate intensities of Bragg reflection allowing for more detailed structural investigations. With modern equipment and software even microstructural parameters like domain sizes and microstrain are routinely deduced from powder diffraction data.
All algorithms for crystal structure determination from powder diffraction data use single peak intensities, the entire powder pattern or a combination of both. The conventional single crystal reciprocal space techniques often fail due to an unfavorable ratio between available observations and structural parameters. This situation changed dramatically with the introduction of the &#34;charge flipping&#34; technique6 (Figure 4) and the development of global optimization methods in direct space, of which the simulated annealing technique7 (Figure 5) is the most prominent representative. In particular, the introduction of chemical knowledge into the structure determination process using rigid bodies or the known connectivity of molecular compounds concerning bond lengths and angles strongly reduces the number of necessary parameters. In other words, instead of three positional parameters for every single atom, only the external (and few internal) degrees of freedom of groups of atoms need to be determined. It is this reduction of structural complexity which makes the powder method a real alternative to single crystal analysis.
Two pioneering case studies of the authors8,9 proved that it is possible to solve complicated crystal structures of complex corrosion products using powder diffraction data. The superiority of the crystallographic studies compared to other approaches was demonstrated among others by the fact that in both cases the reported formulas had to be corrected after considering the solved crystal structures.
The occurrence of both materials under investigation in museums is related to their storage in wooden cabinets or exposed to other sources of carbonyl pollutants. The first material under investigation was sodium copper formate hydroxide oxide hydrate, Cu4Na4O(HCOO)8(OH)2&#8729;4H2O (sample 1), which forms on soda glass/copper alloy composite historic objects (e.g., enamels) in museum collections, exposed to formaldehyde and formic acid from wooden storage cabinets, adhesives, etc. This degradation phenomenon has recently been characterized as &#34;glass induced metal corrosion&#34;10. For the second case study, thecotrichite, Ca3(CH3COO)3Cl(NO3)2&#8729;6H2O (sample 2), was chosen. Thecotrichite is a frequently observed efflorescent salt forming needlelike crystallites on tiles and limestone museum objects, which are stored in oak cabinets and display cases. In this case, the wood acts as source for acetic acid which reacts with soluble chloride and nitrate salts from the artifact.
In the following part of the text, the individual steps of the structure determination process using powder diffraction data applied to corrosion products from conservation science are presented in detail.

<table><tbody><tr><td>Stadi-P&amp;nbsp;</td><td>Stoe &amp;amp; Cie GmbH</td><td></td><td>Powder Diffractometer</td></tr><tr><td>Mythen 1-K (450 &amp;mu;m)</td><td>Dectris Ltd.</td><td></td><td>Position Sensitive Detector</td></tr><tr><td>Mark tube borosilicate glass No. 50, 0.5 mm diameter</td><td>Hilgenberg GmbH</td><td>4007605</td><td>Low absorbing capillaries</td></tr><tr><td>Topas 5.0</td><td>Bruker AXS Advanced X-ray Solutions GmbH</td><td></td><td>Powder Diffraction Evaluation Software</td></tr></tbody></table>

x-ray powder diffraction in conservation science: towards routine crystal structure determination of corrosion products on heritage art objects

X-ray Powder Diffraction in Conservation Science: Towards Routine Crystal Structure Determination of Corrosion Products on Heritage Art Objects

The crystal structure determination and refinement process of corrosion products on historic art objects using laboratory high-resolution X-ray powder diffraction (XRPD) is presented in detail via two case studies.
The first material under investigation was sodium copper formate hydroxide oxide hydrate, Cu4Na4O(HCOO)8(OH)2&#8729;4H2O (sample 1) which forms on soda glass/copper alloy composite historic objects (e.g., enamels) in museum collections, exposed to formaldehyde and formic acid emitted from wooden storage cabinets, adhesives, etc. This degradation phenomenon has recently been characterized as &#34;glass induced metal corrosion&#34;.
For the second case study, thecotrichite, Ca3(CH3COO)3Cl(NO3)2&#8729;6H2O (sample 2), was chosen, which is an efflorescent salt forming needlelike crystallites on tiles and limestone objects which are stored in wooden cabinets and display cases. In this case, the wood acts as source for acetic acid which reacts with soluble chloride and nitrate salts from the artifact or its environment.
The knowledge of the geometrical structure helps conservation science to better understand production and decay reactions and to allow for full quantitative analysis in the frequent case of mixtures.

High resolution XRPD was used to determine the previously unknown crystal structures of two long-known corrosion products on historic objects. The samples were taken from two museum objects and carefully grinded before they were sealed in transmission and capillary sample holders (Figures 6, 7). Standard measurements using a state of the art laboratory high resolution powder diffractometer in transmission and Debye-Scherrer geometry using monochromatic X-rays were perform...

Modern high resolution X-ray powder diffraction (XRPD) in the laboratory is used as an efficient tool to determine crystal structures of long-known corrosion products on historic objects.

The crystal structure determination and refinement process of corrosion products on historic art objects using laboratory high-resolution X-ray powder ...

The overall goal of this method is to gain knowledge of the crystal structure of micro and nano crystal and corrosion products to better understand production and decay reactions of heritage art objects and to allow for full quantitative analysis of mixtures. This method can help answer key questions in the field of conservation science such as how the art object has been produced and why is it corroded. The main advantage of this technique is that it does not require single crystals but only small amounts of micro crystal and powder.Though this method can provide insight into conservation science it can also be applied to other fields such as material science, inorganic chemistry or metallogy. We found that the idea for this method when we investigated at a gradation phenomenon which recently has been characterized as glass induced metal corrosion. Demonstrating sample preparation and data collection will be Ms.Stefani, a chemical technical assistant from our laboratory.Under a digital microscope carefully pick less than one milligram of sample one from opaque blue green cabochons on a historic clasp using a fine needle. Following this, grind the sample carefully with a pestle in a small agate mortar. Distribute the sample between two thin x-ray transparent polyamide foils and mount them on a transmission sample holder with an eight millimeter diameter central opening.Fix the transmission sample holder on the theta circle of a diffractometer. Measure the sample for 20 hours from five to 85 degrees two theta, with a step width of 0.015 degrees two theta in transmission mode. Turn rotation on in order to achieve better particle statistics.The next step is to perform an automatic peak search using the first and second derivatives of Sovietske Golle polynomials of low order. First start the software program by double clicking the icon and then click Load Scan Files. Using the pull down menu select xy data files and then double click on the appropriate file.Now expand the range of the file. Click on the Emission Profile tab, select Load Emission Profile and choose the desired profile. Next click the Automatically Insert Peaks button and unclick Remove K Alpha 2 Peaks, after setting the Peak Width to 0.12 set the Noise Threshold to 1.74 and press the Add Peaks button.Zoom in on the pattern, move to the desired section of peaks and then open the peak details window. Set the peaks by pressing the left mouse button. Next click on Peaks Phase.Mark all peaks yellow by clicking on Position and then left click in the yellow marked column, copy the selection and select Create Indexing Range. Deselect the range and select Range Indexing. Then select all bravais lattices.Following this press the Run button. And Yes to keep indexing solutions. Press the Solutions button and then highlight the first solution by left clicking button one.Now right click on the highlighted solution and copy the selection. Deselect Range Indexing and then select the range. At this point press Add hkl Phase, expand the range and then expand hkl Phase.Under Indexing Details, choose Paste Indexing Details. Under Background, change Order to eight and then select 1/X Bkg term. Next click Instrument.After setting the primary and secondary radii to 217.5 mm, select Receiving Slit Width under Point detector. Under Full Axial Model, set the source, sample, and RS length to six mm. Now click Corrections and choose 0 error.Choose LP factor and set the value to 27.3. Then click Miscellaneous and set Convolution Steps to 2. Select Start X and set the value to eight, then choose Finish X and set the value to 75.Under Click Peaks Phase choose Delete Peaks Phase and click Yes. At this point click hkl Phase and choose Microstructure. After selecting Cry size L choose Cry size G, select Strain L, choose Strain G and then press the Run button.Finally create a list of brag peaks suitable for charge flipping. For crystal structure determination use the method of charge flipping supported by the inclusion of the tangent formula to find the positions of most of the heavier atoms. First under File select Close All and click Yes.Under Launch, select Launch Kernel. From the Launch pull down menu, select Set INP file and then select the prepared input file. Now press the Run button and after approximately 20, 000 cycles press the Stop button and click OK.Following this press the temporary output window displaying selected atoms button and then press the Cloud options dialog button.Set N to pick to 45. Choose width symmetry and press the Pick button. Copy the temporary output, save it to a text file and close the charge flipping graphics window.The next step is to apply the global optimization method of simulated annealing to find the positions of all missing non hydrogen atoms. From the launch pull down menu select Set INP file and then choose the prepared input file. Press the Run button and after several thousand cycles press the Stop button and click Yes.The final step is to turn off simulated annealing and switch to the Reitfeld refinement mode by commenting out the appropriate command. Under Launch choose Set INP file and select the prepared input text file. Finally press the Run button and click Yes.High resolution X-ray powder diffraction was used to determine the crystal structures of two long known corrosion products on historic objects. Standard measurements using a state of the art laboratory high resolution powder diffractometer in transmission and Debye Scherrer geometry using monochromatic x-rays were performed. Crystal structure determination of sample one was performed by iteratively combining reciprocal and direct space methods with Difference Fourier analysis.The determination of the crystal structures of these compounds confirms the exact composition, improves our understanding of the decay mechanisms and allows full quantitative phase analysis of corrosion products. Once mastered this technique can be done within one day if it is performed properly. Following this procedure other methods like DTA, Raman Spectroscopy and EDX can be performed in order to get complimentary and additional information concerning composition, bonding, possible phase transitions and stability.After watching this video you should have a good understanding of how to prepare samples, record appropriate powder diffraction data, perform data reduction and determine the crystal structure of micro crystalline material. After its development this technique will pave the way for researchers in the field of conservation science and it is non destructive, fast and easy to use.

x-ray-powder-diffraction-conservation-science-towards-routine-crystal

Research

JoVE Journal

Chemistry

The laser heated diamond anvil cell combined with synchrotron micro-diffraction techniques allows researchers to explore the nature and properties of new phases of matter at extreme pressure and temperature (PT) conditions. Heterogeneous samples can be characterized in situ under high pressure by 2D mapping and combined powder, single-crystal and multigrain diffraction approaches.

Synthesis and Microdiffraction at Extreme Pressures and Temperatures

In this report, we describe detailed procedures for carrying out single crystal X-ray diffraction experiments with a diamond anvil cell at the GSECARS 13-BM-C beamline at the Advanced Photon Source. ATREX and RSV programs are used to analyze the data.

High Pressure Single Crystal Diffraction at PX^2

This protocol describes in detail how to fabricate and operate microfluidic devices for X-ray diffraction data collection at room temperature. Additionally, it describes how to monitor protein crystallization by dynamic light scattering and how to process and analyze obtained diffraction data.

Microfluidic Chips for In Situ Crystal X-ray Diffraction and In Situ Dynamic Light Scattering for Serial Crystallography

We describe a beamline setup meant to carry out rapid two-dimensional x-ray fluorescence and x-ray microdiffraction mapping of single crystal or powder samples using either Laue (polychromatic radiation) or powder (monochromatic radiation) diffraction. The resulting maps give information about strain, orientation, phase distribution, and plastic deformation.

Synchrotron X-ray Microdiffraction and Fluorescence Imaging of Mineral and Rock Samples

The targeted synthesis of new metal-organic frameworks (MOFs) is difficult, and their discovery depends on the knowledge and creativity of the chemist. High-throughput methods allow complex synthetic parameter fields to be explored quickly and efficiently, accelerating the process of finding crystalline compounds and identifying synthetic and structural trends.

Discovery and Synthesis Optimization of Isoreticular Al(III) Phosphonate-Based Metal-Organic Framework Compounds Using High-Throughput Methods

Here, we present a protocol on how to determine the quantity and distribution of metals in a sample using synchrotron X-ray fluorescence. We focus on adherent cells, and describe the chemical fixation method to prepare this sample. We then describe how to mount and image the sample using synchrotron X-rays.

Preparing Adherent Cells for X-ray Fluorescence Imaging by Chemical Fixation

β-barrel outer membrane proteins (OMPs) serve many functions within the outer membranes of Gram-negative bacteria, mitochondria, and chloroplasts. Here, we hope to alleviate a known bottleneck in structural studies by presenting protocols for the production of β-barrel OMPs in sufficient quantities for structure determination by X-ray crystallography or NMR spectroscopy.

From Constructs to Crystals &#8211; Towards Structure Determination of &#946;-barrel Outer Membrane Proteins

This work details a step-by-step method to prepare polyphenol-rich extracts from freeze-dried berry powder. In addition, it provides a thorough description of how to use these polyphenol-rich extracts in cell culture in the presence of the peptide hormone angiotensin II (Ang II) using Vascular Smooth Muscle Cells (VSMCs).

Extraction and Purification of Polyphenols from Freeze-dried Berry Powder for the Treatment of Vascular Smooth Muscle Cells In Vitro

Here, we demonstrate the use of the X-ray fluorescence fitting software, MAPS, created by Argonne National Laboratory for the quantification of fluorescence microscopy data. The quantified data that results is useful for understanding the elemental distribution and stoichiometric ratios within a sample of interest.

Quantifying X-Ray Fluorescence Data Using MAPS

We describe an experiment designed to probe the electronic damage induced in nanocrystals of Buckminsterfullerene (C60) by intense, femtosecond pulses of X-rays. The experiment found that, surprisingly, rather than being stochastic, the X-ray induced electron dynamics in C60 are highly correlated, extending over hundreds of unit cells within the crystals1.

Measurements of Long-range Electronic Correlations During Femtosecond Diffraction Experiments Performed on Nanocrystals of Buckminsterfullerene

Learn high resolution X-ray powder diffraction for crystal structure determination of corrosion products on heritage art objects. This method enables quantitative analysis without requiring single crystals.

X-ray Powder Diffraction in Conservation Science: Towards Routine Crystal Structure Determination of Corrosion Products on Heritage Art Objects (Video) | JoVE Journal

X-ray Powder Diffraction in Conservation Science: Towards Routine Crystal Structure Determination of Corrosion Products on Heritage Art Objects

Explore More Videos