Name: Examination of Host Phenotypes in Gambusia affinis Following Antibiotic Treatment (Video) | JoVE Journal
Uploaded: 2017-02-22T14:00:00.000+00:00
Duration: 9 min 25 s
Description: Learn how to examine host phenotypes in Gambusia affinis following antibiotic treatment. This method reveals how microbiome disruption affects fish health using noninvasive techniques.

ai_agent_IP

ai_agent

maintenance

instantTrialDurationMinutes

isBiopharma

enableNewMyJoveSectionDesign

educationFeatures

seoMetaApi

ai_copilot_institution_blacklist

ai_chat_institution_blacklist

freeAccessWindow

ssoRoleCapture

scheduledMaintenanceBanner

joveLabsFeatures

disable_autoplay_for_bots

extended_trial_duration

5 minutes

This project was partially funded by a FAST (Faculty and Student Team) Award to TPP and JMC from EURECA (Center for Enhancing Undergraduate Research Experiences and Creative Activities) at Sam Houston State University.

All animal experiments were conducted under approval of IACUC protocols, numbered 14-05-05-1018-3-01, 13-04-29-1018-3-01, and 14-04-17-1018-3-01.
1. Animal Collection, Handling, and Ethical Care
<ol>
	<li>Collect Gambusia affinis from the field site (identification guide at http://www.sms.si.edu/irlspec/Gambusia_affinis.htm) using a small dip net and place into 19 L buckets. Use visual inspection to identify species.</li>
	<li>Rest fish for 1 - 2 d&#160;in a bucket with pond water. Afterwards, transfer fish into 76 or 189 L aquarium tanks filled with half pond water/half tap water at 25 &#176;C, aerated with a bubbling airstone. Use a small dip net when handling fish as to minimally disturb their skin microbiome. 
	NOTE: Fish density should be no higher than 20 fish/38 L of aquarium water. Fish are acclimated to the aquarium for at least 5 d before experimentation.</li>
	<li>Feed fish on a daily regimen with 5 mg of flake food per fish. Hold fish with a 12 h light/ 12 h dark cycle.</li>
</ol>
2. Initial Antibiotic Exposure for All Experiments
<ol>
	<li>Drawing all fish from each experiment from the same aquarium, place into two separate groups (treated: exposed to antibiotic &#38; control: unexposed) in 19 L buckets. Previous data collected shows that fish in the same aquarium have homogenized skin microbiomes that have little variation in community composition.12</li>
	<li>During experiments, keep fish in 2 L of artificial pond water (APW; 0.33 g/L CaCl2, 0.33 g/L MgSO4, 0.19 g/L NaHCO3) that is sterilized by autoclaving before usage.</li>
	<li>Prepare the rifampicin antibiotic stock solution by adding 50 mg/mL into dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO). Rifampicin is a representative broad-spectrum antibiotic that is non-toxic to the fish. In humans and mice, it distributes well in the tissues.</li>
	<li>From the rifampicin stock administer a final concentration of 25 &#181;g/mL in 2 L of APW for antibiotic exposure of the treated fish group for 3 days. Note that after 3 d, culturable skin bacterial numbers return similar to that of pretreated fish skin.</li>
	<li>In parallel, keep a group of untreated fish in APW and give an equivalent amount of DMSO (0.5 mL per L of APW) into the water column to act as a control group.</li>
	<li>As experiments are intended to measure effects of an antibiotic-altered microbiome on fish phenotypes, in order to avoid effects directly from the antibiotic itself, following the three-day antibiotic exposure (or control) period, transfer fish into a bucket with 2 L of fresh APW.
	<ol>
		<li>Use a 10 h rest period so the antibiotic is removed by the bodies of the fish. Base this elimination time on experiments where fish were exposed to 25 &#956;g/mL of antibiotic for three days. Euthanize the fish by snipping the spinal cord followed by pithing, then homogenize the entire body using a tissue grinder.</li>
		<li>Determine antibiotic presence by placing 50 &#956;L of this suspension after 0.2 &#181;m filtering into the center of an agar petri dish. Make a hole for this suspension by pressing an upside down sterile 200 &#956;L pipette tip into the agar, which removes a small plug.</li>
		<li>Use agar plates with 20 mL measured volume of nutrient agar, and spread evenly using a cotton swab with an indicator organism, Bacillus subtilis, which is sensitive to rifampicin. Obtain the B. subtilis from a nutrient agar incubated at 25 &#176;C O/N and using the cotton swab to obtain a colony. Observing a zone of inhibition after overnight incubation at 25 &#176;C indicates presence of antibiotic in the fish tissues.</li>
	</ol>
	</li>
</ol>
3. Microbiome Extraction
<ol>
	<li>Extract a skin microbiome sample from the outer mucosal epidermis by placing the fish into a sterile 15 mL conical tube filled with 2 mL sterile PBST (137 mM NaCl, 10 mM phosphate, 0.1% Tween-20, pH 7.4) solution and vortexing at a setting of 10 for 1 min with 10 s pausing increments. Detergent and salt in the buffer promotes even dispersion of bacteria in solution. Comparable results were found with 0.85% saline but lowered bacterial counts with pure water.</li>
	<li>Transfer the fish from the conical tube to a recovery bucket. Lethality of skin extraction is typically lower than 10%. Either, analyze the bacterial suspension in the tube immediately upon extraction or pellet the bacteria by a 2 min spin in a centrifuge at room temperature at 15,000 x g and store at -80 &#176;C for future analysis. 
	NOTE: All culture and biochemical analyses are immediate; DNA or protein extraction can be from frozen samples.</li>
	<li>To obtain a gut microbiome sample, first place the fish in a sterile petri dish. Euthanize the fish by severing the cervical spinal cord directly behind the head with surgical scissors, followed by pithing, and then externally sanitize the body with 70% ethanol wipes.</li>
	<li>After dissection, remove the entire gut by cutting after the esophagus and before the anus.</li>
	<li>Cut the gut into small sections 1 - 2 mm in length and place all sections into two mL PBST solution in a conical tube. After vortexing for 1 min, remove supernatant into another clean tube (take caution to not draw up the gut sections). 
	NOTE: The supernatant contains extracted gut bacteria that can either be used for direct analyses or pelleted by the previous method mentioned for skin samples.</li>
</ol>
4. Infection Model Preparation and Bath of a Specific Pathogen
<ol>
	<li>Obtain an infectious strain of Edwardsiella ictaluri (E. ictaluri) and keep the culture stored at -80 &#176;C. Strain 93 - 146 used in this study, isolated from an infected catfish, was obtained from Mark Lawrence, College of Veterinary Medicine, Mississippi State University.</li>
	<li>Streak E. ictaluri stock onto a selective &#38; differential media called E. ictaluri media (EIM) agar19 to culture the bacteria and incubate for 2 d at 27 &#176;C.</li>
	<li>Transfer a pure isolated colony from the culture and inoculate a 150 mL flask containing 40 mL of nutrient broth (NB; 5 g/L peptone, 4 g/L beef extract). Place flask in a shaker set at 150 rpm for 2 d&#160;at 27 &#176;C.</li>
	<li>After incubation, dilute a sample of the culture in PBST to a spectrometer reading of 0.2 OD at 650 nm to calibrate E. ictaluri culture for desired infectious dose volumes.</li>
	<li>Next transfer both treated (after 3 d&#160;of antibiotic exposure) and untreated fish groups into individual plastic cups containing 130 mL of fresh artificial pond water, or APW for approximately 10 h&#160;for drug clearance from fish tissues.</li>
	<li>Then from both groups, transfer again each fish into 8-ounce plastic cups containing 130 mL of clean APW.</li>
	<li>Give each fish a lethal dose containing 2.8 x 10 6 CFU/mL of E. ictaluri culture into the APW (bath infection model) and keep in a 27 &#176;C incubator for 24 h.</li>
	<li>After the E. ictaluri bath, transfer fish individually into new cups with 130 mL of APW.</li>
	<li>Following water replacement, record fish mortality over the duration of a week. Fish are not fed over this period. In contrast to catfish, Gambusia show no external signs of infection, therefore it is essential to use lethality as an experimental endpoint.</li>
</ol>
5. Polymicrobial Challenge with Feces &#38; Soil
<ol>
	<li>Feces Treatment
	<ol>
		<li>Obtain fresh human feces from a healthy volunteer subject who has not received antibiotics in the previous two weeks, using sterile gloves and a sterile 50 mL conical tube.</li>
		<li>Upon collection, gather fecal matter in a sterile plastic bag and then transfer into a sterile 15 mL conical tube. Create a stock concentration by suspending feces in PBST to give a stock solution of 500 - 800 mg/mL. This thick mixture is best to transfer using a 1 mL or larger plastic pipette tip that has been cut at the bottom with sterile scissors so that the opening is larger.</li>
		<li>After initial antibiotic exposure of treated and control untreated fish groups, separate into individual plastic cups containing fecal suspension at final concentrations of either 15 mg/mL or 10 mg/mL into APW with a total volume of 130 mL. Hold cups in an incubator at 25 &#176;C.</li>
		<li>Record fish mortality during fecal exposure by close observation over 2 d.</li>
	</ol>
	</li>
	<li>Soil Treatment
	<ol>
		<li>Collect 1 - 2 kg of rich organic topsoil (should contain the highest density and diversity of microbes) approximately 7 - 15 cm down in depth and place into a clean plastic container. Note that the soil should be used within two days following collection.</li>
		<li>Directly after initial exposure period, separate both groups of antibiotic treated and untreated fish into individual plastic cups containing 18.2 g of soil in 130 mL of APW. Mix the soil in the water well by hand before adding the fish. Most of the particulates do not suspend and stay at the bottom of the cup.</li>
		<li>Expose fish for a duration of 3 d at 25 &#176;C and record any mortality.</li>
	</ol>
	</li>
</ol>
6. Osmotic Stress Challenge
<ol>
	<li>After treatment followed by a 10 h rest period as described above, individualize fish into separate cups containing NaCl at 17.5 mg/mL (300 mM) in 150 mL of APW. This is half of the typical salinity of seawater, which is not fully lethal (&#60;50%) to control fish but is strongly stressful, requiring effective osmoregulation.</li>
	<li>Observe for fish mortality over a duration of 36 h.</li>
</ol>
7. Nitrate Toxicity Challenge
<ol>
	<li>Rest fish for a 10 h period after antibiotic exposure, and then separate fish into individual cups containing a sodium nitrate concentration of either 10 mg/mL (118 mM) or 17.5 mg/mL (206 mM) in 130 mL of APW.</li>
	<li>Record for mortality over 4 d&#160;for low dose and 1 d&#160;for high dose.</li>
</ol>
8. Growth Analysis of Individualized or Grouped Fish
<ol>
	<li>Complete 3 d antibiotic exposure or control period as groups in buckets.</li>
	<li>For Individual, fill 8-oz Styrofoam cups with 150 mL APW each, transfer an individual fish into the cup and record total body weight for initial assessment.
	<ol>
		<li>Repeat for all fish in both treated and untreated groups. Use white Styrofoam cups instead of clear plastic cups because fish will not eat when in the clear cups.</li>
	</ol>
	</li>
	<li>Feed fish daily with the standard diet of two pellets per fish. Pellets were used rather than flakes because pellets have low variance in individual mass (3.53 &#177;0.42 mg each, or 8% variation), resulting in fish receiving similar amounts of food. Monitor consumption by visually recording uneaten pellets. Consumption rates were typically above 80%.</li>
	<li>At the end of each week over 4 weeks, determine fish weight. Prepare a new cup with fresh APW, place on a balance, and then record the weight. Then, pour a fish into a dip net from the original cup and transfer into the new cup, which is then weighed again. Fish are not handled to avoid stress.</li>
	<li>For Groups, place 2 L of APW into a 19 L bucket and tare the scale. Keep fish together in both groups when transferring into new APW buckets then record total group weight. Record fish group weight each week over a month time span by transferring to a new bucket.</li>
</ol>
9. Gut Transit Time
<ol>
	<li>Use fluorescein-labeled 70 kDa anionic dextran. Dextran is not significantly digested, and is too large to be absorbed across the gut layer, thus passage will measure transit time through the gut. Labeled dextran was incorporated into fish food.</li>
	<li>Into a sterile 1.7 mL tube, add 360 &#956;L of sterile deionized water and 52 mg of gelatin (13% solution), and place the tube on a 60 &#176;C heat block until the gelatin melts and is fully dissolved.
	<ol>
		<li>Grind goldfish food flakes to a fine powder using a mortar and pestle, and add 40 mg of this powder to the tube, along with 20 &#956;L of fish oil. After mixing, add 1.6 mg of FITC-dextran.</li>
	</ol>
	</li>
	<li>Dispense the hot liquid mixture into 20 &#956;L drops onto Parafilm on the lab bench, and let them quickly cool and solidify. Drops can be stored for up to 4 d&#160;before they become too hard for fish to eat. Store drops in the refrigerator by placing the Parafilm onto half of a petri dish, which is then floated on sterile water inside a sealed plastic container, which keeps the drops humidified.</li>
	<li>Just before feeding, quarter drops into sections using a razor blade. Acclimate the fish to the Styrofoam cups individually for 2 days without feeding (Note: Only unexposed control fish were used). Place four quarters of the food into the cup with the fish, and observe the fish for 30 minutes for how many pieces of the food they each eat.</li>
	<li>To begin the monitoring period, transfer fish individually into cups with 80 mL of APW using a dip net. Every 2 h, gently swirl the APW by hand, and then take a 1 mL sample and store in a labeled 1.7 mL tube at 4 &#176;C. Take samples for 36 h.</li>
	<li>Record fluorescence, with a fluorescence spectrophotometer, of all samples at the same time after completion of the assay. Place the entire 1 mL sample into a cuvette, and record the fluorescence measured using excitation at 495 nm and emission at 520 nm.</li>
</ol>

<ol><li>Panda, S., et al. <a target="_blank" href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed?term=((Short-Term+Effect+of+Antibiotics+on+Human+Gut+Microbiota%5BTitle%5D)+AND+%22PloS+ONE%22%5BJournal%5D)">Short-Term Effect of Antibiotics on Human Gut Microbiota.</a> PloS ONE. 9 (4), 95476(2014).</li>
<li>Perez-Cobas, A. E., et al. <a target="_blank" href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed?term=((Gut+microbiota+disturbance+during+antibiotic+therapy%3A+a+multi-omic+approach%5BTitle%5D)+AND+%22Gut%22%5BJournal%5D)">Gut microbiota disturbance during antibiotic therapy: a multi-omic approach.</a> Gut. 62 (11), 1591-1601 (2013).</li>
<li>Theriot, C. M., Young, V. B. <a target="_blank" href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed?term=((Microbial+and+metabolic+interactions+between+the+gastrointestinal+tract+and+Clostridium+difficile+infection%5BTitle%5D)+AND+%22Gut+Microbes%22%5BJournal%5D)">Microbial and metabolic interactions between the gastrointestinal tract and Clostridium difficile infection.</a> Gut Microbes. 5 (1), 86-95 (2014).</li>
<li>Buffie, C. G., et al. <a target="_blank" href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed?term=((Precision+microbiome+reconstitution+restores+bile+acid+mediated+resistance+to+Clostridium+difficile%5BTitle%5D)+AND+%22Nature%22%5BJournal%5D)">Precision microbiome reconstitution restores bile acid mediated resistance to Clostridium difficile.</a> Nature. 517, 205-208 (2015).</li>
<li>Sekirov, I., et al. <a target="_blank" href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed?term=((Antibiotic-Induced+Perturbations+of+the+Intestinal+Microbiota+Alter+Host+Susceptibility+to+Enteric+Infection%5BTitle%5D)+AND+%22Infect+Immun%22%5BJournal%5D)">Antibiotic-Induced Perturbations of the Intestinal Microbiota Alter Host Susceptibility to Enteric Infection.</a> Infect Immun. 76 (10), 4726-4736 (2008).</li>
<li>Looft, T., Allen, H. K. <a target="_blank" href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed?term=((Collateral+effects+of+antibiotics+on+mammalian+gut+microbiomes%5BTitle%5D)+AND+%22Gut+Microbes%22%5BJournal%5D)">Collateral effects of antibiotics on mammalian gut microbiomes.</a> Gut Microbes. 3 (5), 463-467 (2012).</li>
<li>Magnadottir, B. <a target="_blank" href="https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15950491">Innate immunity of fish.</a> Fish Shellfish Immunol. 20 (2), 137-151 (2006).</li>
<li>Gomez, D., Sunyer, J., Salinas, I. <a target="_blank" href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed?term=((The+mucosal+immune+system+of+fish%3A+the+evolution+of+tolerating+commensals+while+fighting+pathogens%5BTitle%5D)+AND+%22Fish+Shellfish+Immunol%22%5BJournal%5D)">The mucosal immune system of fish: the evolution of tolerating commensals while fighting pathogens.</a> Fish Shellfish Immunol. 35 (6), 1729-1739 (2013).</li>
<li>Nunes, B., et al. <a target="_blank" href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed?term=((Acute+Effects+of+Tetracycline+Exposure+in+the+Freshwater+Fish+Gambusia+holbrooki%3A+Antioxidant+Effects%2C+Neurotoxicity+and+Histological+Alterations%5BTitle%5D)+AND+%22Arch+Environ+Contam+Toxicol%22%5BJournal%5D)">Acute Effects of Tetracycline Exposure in the Freshwater Fish Gambusia holbrooki: Antioxidant Effects, Neurotoxicity and Histological Alterations.</a> Arch Environ Contam Toxicol. 68 (2), 331-381 (2014).</li>
<li>Fryxell, D. C., et al. <a target="_blank" href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed?term=((Sex+ratio+variation+shapes+the+ecological+effects+of+a+globally+introduced+freshwater+fish%5BTitle%5D)+AND+%22Proc+Biol+Sci%22%5BJournal%5D)">Sex ratio variation shapes the ecological effects of a globally introduced freshwater fish.</a> Proc Biol Sci. , 22(2015).</li>
<li>Nunes, B., Miranda, M. T., Correia, A. T. <a target="_blank" href="https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27074930">Absence of effects of different types of detergents on the cholinesterase activity and histological markers of mosquitofish (Gambusia holbrooki) after a sub-lethal chronic exposure.</a> Environ Sci Pollu Res Int. , 1-8 (2016).</li>
<li>Leonard, A. B., et al. <a target="_blank" href="http://file.scirp.org/pdf/AiM_2014051916164703.pdf">The Skin Microbiome of Gambusia affinis Is Defined and Selective.</a> Adv Microbiol. 4, 335-343 (2014).</li>
<li>Carlson, J. M., Hyde, E. R., Petrosino, J. F., Manage, A. B. W., Primm, T. P. <a target="_blank" href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed?term=((The+host+effects+of+Gambusia+affinis+with+an+antibiotic-disrupted+microbiome%5BTitle%5D)+AND+%22Comp+Biochem+Physiol+C+Toxicol+Pharmacol%22%5BJournal%5D)">The host effects of Gambusia affinis with an antibiotic-disrupted microbiome.</a> Comp Biochem Physiol C Toxicol Pharmacol. 178, 163-168 (2015).</li>
<li>Karsi, A., Gulsoy, N., Corb, E., Dumpala, P. R., Lawrence, M. L. <a target="_blank" href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed?term=((High-throughput+bioluminescence-based+mutant+screening+strategy+for+identification+of+bacterial+virulence+genes%5BTitle%5D)+AND+%22Appl+Environ+Microbiol%22%5BJournal%5D)">High-throughput bioluminescence-based mutant screening strategy for identification of bacterial virulence genes.</a> Appl Environ Microbiol. 75 (7), 2166-2175 (2009).</li>
<li>Hawke, J. P., et al. <a target="_blank" href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed?term=((Edwardsiellosis+caused+by+Edwardsiella+ictaluri+in+Laboratory+Populations+of+Zebrafish+Danio+rerio%5BTitle%5D)+AND+%22J+Aquat+Anim+Health%22%5BJournal%5D)">Edwardsiellosis caused by Edwardsiella ictaluri in Laboratory Populations of Zebrafish Danio rerio.</a> J Aquat Anim Health. 25 (3), 171-183 (2013).</li>
<li>Petrie-Hanson, L., et al. <a target="_blank" href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed?term=((Evaluation+of+Zebrafish+Danio+rerio+as+a+Model+for+Enteric+Septicemia+of+Catfish+%28ESC%29%5BTitle%5D)+AND+%22J+Aquat+Anim+Health%22%5BJournal%5D)">Evaluation of Zebrafish Danio rerio as a Model for Enteric Septicemia of Catfish (ESC).</a> J Aquat Anim Health. 19 (3), 151-158 (2007).</li>
<li>Fultz, R. S., Primm, T. P. A Laboratory Module for Host-Pathogen Interactions: America's Next Top Model. J. Microbiol. Biol. Educ. 11, abstract 20-B (2010).</li>
<li>Uliano, E., Cataldi, M., Carella, F., Migliaccio, O., Iaccarino, C. <a target="_blank" href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed?term=((Effects+of+acute+changes+in+salinity+and+temperature+on+routine+metabolism+and+nitrogen+excretion+in+gambusia+%28Gambusia+affinis%29+and+zebrafish+%28Danio+rerio%29%5BTitle%5D)+AND+%22Comp+Biochem+Physiol+A%22%5BJournal%5D)">Effects of acute changes in salinity and temperature on routine metabolism and nitrogen excretion in gambusia (Gambusia affinis) and zebrafish (Danio rerio).</a> Comp Biochem Physiol A. 157, 283-290 (2010).</li>
<li>Shotts, E. B., Waltman, W. D. <a target="_blank" href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed?term=((A+medium+for+the+selective+isolation+of+Edwardsiella+ictaluri%5BTitle%5D)+AND+%22J+Wildl+Dis%22%5BJournal%5D)">A medium for the selective isolation of Edwardsiella ictaluri.</a> J Wildl Dis. 26, 214-218 (1990).</li>
<li>Under animal toxicity studies, sodium chloride entry. TOXNET - Hazardous Substances Data Bank. , National Library of Medicine. Available from:
 <a target="_blank" href="https://toxnet.nlm.nih.gov/">https://toxnet.nlm.nih.gov/</a> (2016).</li>
<li>Under animal toxicity studies, sodium nitrate entry. TOXNET - Hazardous Substances Data Bank. , National Library of Medicine. Available from:
 <a target="_blank" href="https://toxnet.nlm.nih.gov/">https://toxnet.nlm.nih.gov/</a> (2016).</li>
<li>Under animal toxicity studies, sodium nitrite entry. TOXNET - Hazardous Substances Data Bank. , National Library of Medicine. Available from:
 <a target="_blank" href="https://toxnet.nlm.nih.gov/">https://toxnet.nlm.nih.gov/</a> (2016).</li>
<li>Vilz, T. O., et al. <a target="_blank" href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed?term=((Functional+Assessment+of+Intestinal+Motility+and+Gut+Wall+Inflammation+in+Rodents%3A+Analyses+in+a+Standardized+Model+of+Intestinal+Manipulation%5BTitle%5D)+AND+%22J+Vis+Exp%22%5BJournal%5D)">Functional Assessment of Intestinal Motility and Gut Wall Inflammation in Rodents: Analyses in a Standardized Model of Intestinal Manipulation.</a> J Vis Exp. (67), e4086(2012).</li>
<li>Katoh, H. International Harmonization of Laboratory Animals. National Research Council (US) International Committee of the Institute for Laboratory Animal Research. Microbial Status and Genetic Evaluation of Mice and Rats: Proceedings of the 1999 US/Japan Conference. , National Academies Press. (2000).</li>
</ol>

The authors have nothing to disclose.

Some challenges require a rest period in clean APW after antibiotic treatment for the drug to be depleted in fish tissues. If the rest period is skipped then antibiotic presence can confound the results, especially when the assay involves exposure to bacteria. In order to examine effects from an altered microbiome composition without large changes in the total number of microbes on the host, preliminary experiments monitoring microbiome composition (16S profiling or whole genome sequencing) and population density (16S qu...

It has been established that antibiotics can disrupt the human microbiome leading to dysbiosis, meaning a microbial community imbalance. The microbiota&#39;s compositional alteration after antibiotic treatments has been shown to lower the community&#39;s diversity, reduce key members, and alter community metabolism, especially in the gut1,2. Antibiotic disturbance of the gut microbiome can reduce colonization resistance to Clostridium difficile3,4 and Salmonella5.
Additionally, the disruption of the microbiota has been linked to the development of many syndromes and diseases in humans (e.g., antibiotic-associated enterocolitis, inflammatory bowel disease, metabolic disorders, etc.). Antibiotics are also widely implemented in agriculture as growth promoters in livestock and poultry production6. The usage of these powerful tools is not without collateral effects, which is evident in the rapid rise of antibiotic resistance, as well as the effects of a disrupted microbiome has with its inhabited host. Many studies have shown that broad-spectrum antibiotic usage has long lasting consequences to the structure and function of the microbiota, yet the side effects from an antibiotic-disrupted microbiome impacting host physiology are only speculations which have yet to be supported.
The interplay between host, microbiota, and antibiotics is far from being understood in a concise manner. Therefore, a simple and more tractable model is advantageous to shedding light on the highly complex mammalian system. Mucosal surfaces in humans, including the gut, harbor the highest density and diversity of microbes, and also the most intimate microbe-host interactions. The mucosal skin microbiome of fish offers several advantages as a model system. The Teleostei (bony fish) is one of the earliest lineages to diverge within the Vertebrata meaning that teleosts have both innate and acquired immune systems that have co-evolved a relationship with commensal bacterial communities7. Fish skin shares many characteristics with type 1 mucosal surfaces of mammals, such as physiological functions, immunity components, and arrangement of mucus-producing cells8. The external location of the fish skin mucosal surface offers a microbiome easy to experimentally manipulate and sample.
The Western mosquitofish, Gambusia affinis (G. affinis), is a model fish that has been used in the past for studying mating and toxicology9,10,11. Given the small size, population abundance in the wild as an invasive species, minimal care cost, and hardy nature, we have developed G. affinis as a mucosal microbiome model. Further, Gambusia share the physiology of giving birth to live young with viviparous mammals, which is uncommon in fish species. We completed the most extensive study at the time of fish skin normal microbiota using 16S profiling with Gambusia12. Further work demonstrated three negative effects on the host following disruption of the skin and gut microbiota using a broad-spectrum antibiotic13.
Five different effects were examined in the fish following antibiotic exposure. The most well established host benefit of the microbiome is competitive exclusion of pathogens. The fish pathogen Edwardsiella ictaluri is known to cause outbreaks of enteric septicemia in commercial catfish farms14. E. ictaluri has also been shown to lethally infect zebrafish15,16 and Gambusia17. A challenge with this pathogen from the water column can serve as a measure of exclusion. As a comparison to susceptibility to an individual pathogen, survival during exposure to a high density of mixed organisms was also carried out. Feces and organic-rich soil were used as commonly-encountered sources of microbial communities.
Another established role the bacterial gut community performs is nutrient processing and energy harvest, thus affecting the overall nutritional uptake for the host. As a gross measurement of nutrition, fish body weight was compared before and after one month of being fed a standard diet. Antibiotic-treated fish as an average lost weight while control fish on average gained weight over the month. The mechanism for this lack of weight gain is unclear. One possible contributing factor is transit time of food in the gut. A GI motility method was adapted from zebrafish (Adam Rich, SUNY Brockport, personal communication) to determine transit time. It has not yet been determined if antibiotic-treated fish have an altered transit time.
A common challenge experienced in the natural environment by all organisms, especially fish, is osmotic stress. Gambusia have been shown to quickly adapt when acutely stressed in high concentrations of salinity18. Surprisingly, fish with an antibiotic-altered microbiome exhibited lowered survival to a high salt stress. The mechanism for this novel phenotype is under investigation. Another common stress on aquatic animals, especially in aquaria, is toxic forms of nitrogen (ammonia, nitrate, and nitrite). Survival against nitrate was not significantly different between antibiotic-treated and control fish. The methods presented in this manuscript can be used with Gambusia or similar fish model organisms, such as zebrafish and medaka, to measure phenotypes in the fish following experimental manipulation.

<table><tbody><tr><td>Rifampicin</td><td>Calbiochem</td><td>557303-1GM</td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Sodium Nitrate</td><td>Sigma Aldrich</td><td>S5506</td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Fluorescein-labeled 70 kDa anionic dextran</td><td>ThermoFisher Scientific</td><td>D1823</td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Phosphate-buffered Saline (PBS) tablets</td><td>Calbiochem</td><td>6500-OP</td><td>tablets dissolve in water to make PBS</td></tr></tbody></table>

examination of host phenotypes in gambusia affinis following antibiotic treatment

Examination of Host Phenotypes in Gambusia affinis Following Antibiotic Treatment

The commonality of antibiotic usage in medicine means that understanding the resulting consequences to the host is vital. Antibiotics often decrease host microbiome community diversity and alter the microbial community composition. Many diseases such as antibiotic-associated enterocolitis, inflammatory bowel disease, and metabolic disorders have been linked to a disrupted microbiota. The complex interplay between host, microbiome, and antibiotics needs a tractable model for studying host-microbiome interactions. Our freshwater vertebrate fish serves as a useful model for investigating the universal aspects of mucosal microbiome structure and function as well as analyzing consequential host effects from altering the microbial community. Methods include host challenges such as infection by a known fish pathogen, exposure to fecal or soil microbes, osmotic stress, nitrate toxicity, growth analysis, and measurement of gut motility. These techniques demonstrate a flexible and useful model system for rapid determination of host phenotypes.

An overall schematic diagram of the experimental system used to study fish host effects from antibiotic exposure13 is represented in Figure 1A and includes the technique for extracting the skin (Figure 1B) and gut (Figure 1C) microbiomes from the fish. Three days was selected as the antibiotic period of exposure because previous data reveals that while the total skin culturable number drops early in treatment, it h...

This study involves methods to reveal effects on a model fish host following alteration of the skin and gut microbiome communities&#160;composition by an antibiotic.

The commonality of antibiotic usage in medicine means that understanding the resulting consequences to the host is vital. Antibiotics often decrease host ...

The overall goal of this experimental system is to examine the negative side effects to a host organism after antibiotic treatment. So this method can help answer key questions in the microbiome field, such as enbac associated side effects on the host's health that is mediated by a disrupted microbiome. So the main advantages of this technique are that this system is straightforward, inexpensive in examining vertebrate hosts'physiological phenotypes, and allows for noninvasive disruption to the mucosal microbiome.This technique's implications characterize how a disruption in the microbiome of an animal can lead to major side effects. To begin, streak a previously obtained and frozen infectious strain of Edwardsiella ictaluri onto E.Ictaluri selective and differential medium agar. Incubate the culture at 27 degrees Celsius for two days.Transfer a pure isolated colony from the culture and innoculate a 150 milliliter flask containing 40 milliliters of nutrient broth. Place the flask in a shaking incubator at 27 degrees Celsius and 150 RPM for two days. Following the incubation, to calibrate the E.Ictaluri culture for desired infectious dose volumes, use PBST to dilute a sample of the culture to an OD 650 of 0.2.After collecting Gambusia affinis, and treating the fish with rifampicin in the water column for three days, transfer both antibiotic treated and untreated control fish groups into individual plastic cups containing 130 milliliters of fresh artificial pond water, or APW, for approximately 10 hours for drug clearance from fish tissues. Then, separate the fish again into individual eight ounce plastic cups containing 130 milliliters of clean APW. Administer a lethal dose of E.Ictaluri culture to each fish and incubate the fish at 27 degrees Celsius for 24 hours.Following the E.Ictaluri bath, transfer each fish into a new cup with 130 milliliters of APW. Without feeding the fish, record fish mortality over the duration of a week. Gather collected fecal matter into a sterile plastic bag before transferring it into a sterile 15 milliliter conical tube, then use PBST to create a stock concentration of the fecal matter at 500 to 800 milligrams per milliliter, using a one milliliter or larger plastic pipette with the tip cut off, prepare 130 milliliters per cup of 15 milligram per milliliter or 10 milligram per milliliter of fecal matter in APW.Transfer antibiotic treated or untreated fish into individual cups of the solution, and then incubate the fish at 25 degrees Celsius for two days, closely observing and recording mortality during this time. To treat fish with soil, collect one to kilograms of rich organic topsoil, approximately seven for 15 centimeters deep, and transfer it into a clean plastic container. Prepare individual plastic cups containing 18.2 grams of soil and 130 milliliters of APW, mixing the soil well by hand, then transfer the antibiotic treated or untreated fish into the cups and leave at 25 degrees Celsius for three days while recording any mortality.After a 10 hour rest period in APW following antibiotic treatment, transfer fish into individual cups containing 17.5 milligram per milliliter of sodium chloride and APW, observe the fish over 36 hours for mortality, to carry out a nitrate toxicity challenge, after a 10 hour rest period as before, separate fish into individual cups containing either 10 or 17.5 milligram per milliliter of sodium nitrate and 130 milliliters of APW. Observe fish over the course of one day for mortality at the high dose of sodium nitrate, and four days for the fish at the low dose. After completing three day antibiotic or control exposure in groups, for individual fish, fill eight ounce styrofoam cups with 150 milliliters of APW, and after weighing the filled cups, transfer the fish into the cups, then record the total body weight for initial assessment.Feed the fish daily with two pellets of food per fish, monitor the consumption by visually recording uneaten pellets. At the end of each week over the course of four weeks, determine the fish weight by first weighing a cup of fresh APW and record the weight, then pour the fish into a dip net, and transfer it into the new cup, before weighing the cup again. For groups of fish, place 150 milliliters of APW into a cup and tare the scale.Keep the fish together in both groups when transferring them into new containers of APW, then record the total group weight. Repeat the weighing at the end of each week over the course of a month. To analyze gut transit time, add 360 microliters of sterile deionized water and 52 milligrams of gelatin into a sterile 1.7 milliliter tube, and place it on a 60 degrees Celsius heat block until the gelatin melts and is fully dissolved.Using a mortal and pestle, grind the goldfish food flakes into a fine powder, and add 40 milligrams of the powder to the tube along with 20 microliters of fish oil. After mixing, add 1.6 milligrams of FitC dextran. Dispense 20 microliter drops of the hot liquid onto parafilm on the lab bench, and let them quickly cool and solidify.Place the parafilm onto half of a Petri dish and float it on sterile water inside a sealed plastic container. Store the solidified drops in the refrigerator for up to four days before they become too hard for the fish to eat. Just before feeding, use a razor blade to cut drops into quarter sections.Acclimate the fish to individual styrofoam cups for two days without feeding, place four quarters of the food into the fish cup, and observe the fish for 30 minutes for how many pieces of the food they each eat. To begin monitoring, transfer individual fish into cups with 80 milliliters of APW, and every two hours, take a 1 milliliter sample. Store it in a labeled 1.7 milliliter tube at four degrees Celsius.After completion of the assay, place an entire one milliliter sample into a cuvette, and use a fluorescence spectrophotometer to record fluorescence at an excitation of 495 nanometers, and an emission of 520 nanometers for all the samples at the same time. as shown here, fish with an antibiotic-altered microbiome were more susceptible to an E.Ictaluri infection than control fish. The difference in mean time to death for the treated versus control fish was not significant.This is likely due to the small group size. This graph illustrates that fish exposed to rifampicin were more susceptible to osmotic stress than control fish, with this assay, salinity levels above 18 milligrams per milliliter resulted in rapid fish death. As demonstrated in this table, when exposed to the toxin nitrate in the water column, pre-exposure to antibiotic treatment did not affect survival.At 10 milligrams per milliliter, 50%lethality was observed for both the antibiotic treated and control groups at 90 hours. In this experiment using control fish in an aquarium, either two sections of FitC dextran labeled food, or one section were fed to fish to examine food transit time by measuring fluorescence in the surrounding water over time. Following this procedure, other methods like measuring total body fat stores and quantifying skin mucous production can be performed in order to understand mechanisms, and narrow down confounding factors that might contribute to negative host effects.

examination-host-phenotypes-gambusia-affinis-following-antibiotic

Research

JoVE Journal

Immunology and Infection

Source: Bernut, A., et al., Deciphering and Imaging Pathogenesis and Cording of Mycobacterium abscessus in Zebrafish Embryos. J. Vis. Exp. (2015).This video demonstrates a protocol for isolating and quantifying Mycobacterium abscessus from an infected zebrafish embryo. The procedure involves embryo euthanasia, tissue lysis, and homogenization to release the bacteria, followed by centrifugation and resuspension in a surfactant buffer. Finally, the bacterial suspension is serially diluted, plated...

Isolation and Cultivation of Bacteria from Zebrafish Embryos to Assess Infection Load

Source: Le, T. A. N., et al., Measuring the Effects of Bacteria and Chemicals on the Intestinal Permeability of Caenorhabditis elegans. J. Vis. Exp. (2019)This video demonstrates a fluorescence-based assay to quantify intestinal permeability in C. elegans exposed to Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Compared to controls fed Escherichia coli, pathogen-treated worms show increased fluorophore leakage into the body cavity, indicating epithelial barrier damage.

Assessment of Intestinal Permeability in C. elegans Following Bacterial Exposure

An egg-in-worm (EIW) assay is a useful method to quantify egg-laying behavior. Alterations in egg laying can be a behavioral response of the model organism Caenorhabditis elegans to potentially harmful environmental substances such as those produced by pathogenic bacteria.

Measuring the Effects of Bacteria on C. Elegans Behavior Using an Egg Retention Assay

Optically transparent zebrafish embryos are widely used to study and visualize in real time the interactions between pathogenic microorganisms and the innate immune cells. Micro-injection of Mycobacterium abscessus, combined with fluorescence imaging, is used to scrutinize essential pathogenic features such as cord formation in zebrafish embryos.

Deciphering and Imaging Pathogenesis and Cording of Mycobacterium abscessus in Zebrafish Embryos

This protocol describes the use of sump swabs and sludge analysis of zebrafish systems, which leads to increased detection compared to the sole use of sentinels to detect pathogens such as Aeromonas hydrophila, Mycobacterium spp., and Pseudocapillaria tomentosa. A system to monitor P. tomentosa eggs in quarantine is also proposed.

Environmental Screening of Aeromonas hydrophila, Mycobacterium spp., and Pseudocapillaria tomentosa in Zebrafish Systems

Due to the striking similarities of the life cycle and biology of rodent malaria parasites to human malaria parasites, rodent malaria models have become indispensable for malaria research. Herein, we standardized some of the most important techniques used in the phenotypic analysis of wild-type and transgenic rodent malaria species.

Phenotypic Analysis of Rodent Malaria Parasite Asexual and Sexual Blood Stages and Mosquito Stages

Here, we present the nematode Caenorhabditis elegans as a versatile host model to study microbial interaction.

The Nematode Caenorhabditis Elegans - A Versatile In Vivo Model to Study Host-microbe Interactions

Zebrafish (Danio rerio) are becoming a widely-used vertebrate animal model for microbial colonization and pathogenesis. This protocol describes the use of the protozoan Paramecium caudatum as a vehicle for food-borne infection in zebrafish larvae. P. caudatum readily internalizes bacteria and get taken up by larval zebrafish through natural preying behavior.

Using the Protozoan Paramecium caudatum as a Vehicle for Food-borne Infections in Zebrafish Larvae

This protocol describes an Aspergillus infection model in zebrafish larvae. Aspergillus spores are microinjected into the hindbrain of larvae, and chemical treatment is used to induce immunosuppression. Infection progression is monitored via a daily imaging setup to monitor fungal growth and immune responses as well as enumeration of live spores by colony forming unit plating.

Infection of Zebrafish Larvae with Aspergillus Spores for Analysis of Host-Pathogen Interactions

This article presents a protocol to investigate the effect of individual mosquito gut bacteria, including isolation and identification of mosquito midgut cultivable microbes, antibiotic depletion of mosquito gut bacteria, and reintroduce one specific bacteria species.

A Bacterial Oral Feeding Assay with Antibiotic-Treated Mosquitoes

There is currently a lack of in vivo models amenable to drug screening against chronic bacterial infections. Here, we describe a protocol for wound infection by a Pseudomonas aeruginosa clinical isolate to generate a persistent infection in zebrafish larvae.

Modeling Persistent Pseudomonas aeruginosa Infection in Wounded Zebrafish Larvae

Learn how to examine host phenotypes in Gambusia affinis following antibiotic treatment. This method reveals how microbiome disruption affects fish health using noninvasive techniques.

Examination of Host Phenotypes in Gambusia affinis Following Antibiotic Treatment

Explore More Videos