Name: Evaluating Dryocosmus Kuriphilus-induced Damage on Castanea Sativa (Video) | JoVE Journal
Uploaded: 2018-08-30T13:00:00.000+00:00
Duration: 7 min 14 s
Description: Learn to evaluate Dryocosmus kuriphilus damage on Castanea sativa using a composite damage index. This method assesses branch features like dormant buds and dead shoots for realistic tree health evaluation.

ai_agent_IP

ai_agent

maintenance

instantTrialDurationMinutes

isBiopharma

enableNewMyJoveSectionDesign

educationFeatures

seoMetaApi

ai_copilot_institution_blacklist

ai_chat_institution_blacklist

freeAccessWindow

ssoRoleCapture

scheduledMaintenanceBanner

joveLabsFeatures

disable_autoplay_for_bots

extended_trial_duration

5 minutes

playerTrialDesktop

The authors are grateful to the Forest Service of Canton Ticino and the Federal Office for the Environment FOEN for partially funding this study.

1. Tree Selection and Assessment Design
<ol>
	<li>If possible, identify the epidemic stage of the study area by determining the arrival years of Dryocosmus kuriphilus and Torymus sinensis and the T. sinensis parasitization rate by using reliable sources (e.g., scientific publications, forest services, chestnut grove managers&#39; knowledge).
	<ol>
		<li>If no reliable sources are available, identify the four main epidemic stages (Early, Peak, Recovery, Biocontrol) by computing the T. sinensis parasitization rate combined with the field observations described below.
		<ol>
			<li>Identify the stage as early epidemic when tree crowns show neither significant damage nor crown transparency, current year galls are rare, and T. sinensis parasitization is very low or negligible.</li>
			<li>Identify epidemic peak when tree crowns display a high degree of transparency, although dead branches are rare, and current year galls are abundant.</li>
			<li>Identify prolonged epidemic peak when current and previous years&#39; galls are abundant (up to three years previous) and T. sinensis parasitization is still very low or absent. Tree crowns still display high transparency and additional damage is represented by the first evidence of dead branches in the crown.</li>
			<li>Identify early recovery stage when T. sinensis parasitization rate becomes greater than 75%10. Damage is still high but the number of current year galls decreases and some branches produce gall-free shoots, especially from the apical bud.</li>
			<li>Identify recovery stage when T. sinensis parasitization rate is permanently greater than 75%, current year galls are rare and usually limited to single trees only and most branches produce gall-free shoots. Past years&#39; galls on older branches and dead branches due to D. kuriphilus attacks are still visible.</li>
			<li>Identify fully recovered stage when damage and galls (past and current year) are rare or absent and crowns are fully recovered. In severely damaged trees, some vestiges (e.g., dead shoots or rotten past years&#39; galls) of prior D. kuriphilus attacks can still be present inside the crown. 
			NOTE: Supplemental File 1 shows exemplary tree crown pictures for each epidemic stage.</li>
		</ol>
		</li>
	</ol>
	</li>
	<li>Observe chestnut trees in the whole area to visually estimate damage variability among and within trees. Damage variability is usually low during the early epidemic and the recovery stages (crowns are basically healthy) as well as during the epidemic peak (whole crowns are full of galls). In contrast, variability tends to be high in the intermediate epidemic stages, when dead shoots due to past D. kuriphilus attacks are still present.</li>
	<li>Based on 1.1 and 1.2, determine the number of trees to analyze. Unfortunately, it is not possible or suitable to give a specific rule regarding sample size, which may vary according to the specific epidemic situation in the field and/or the research objectives. Based on our 10 years of experience, for a 10-hectare site we advise the following (also see Table 1 for details):
	<ol>
		<li>Sample at least ten trees per site, regardless of the epidemic stage. Although during the early epidemic and recovered stage three trees would be enough, increasing the sample size to ten will give more statistical power to the results.</li>
		<li>During the early epidemic and recovered stage, sample one branch per tree.</li>
		<li>During the epidemic peak, sample one branch per tree if galls are evenly distributed within the tree crown, or two branches per tree if you notice that some crown parts have been attacked more severely.</li>
		<li>During the other epidemic stages, increase the number of branches to two (for trees that are recovering well) or three (for more damaged trees) based on the variability of crown damage of every tree.</li>
	</ol>
	</li>
</ol>
2. Data Collection in the Field
<ol>
	<li>Prepare the appropriate equipment including a clipboard, a camping chair, secateurs, a telescopic tree pruner, a 30 m measuring tape, and tree climbing equipment if the top crown above 8 m&#160;requires analysis.</li>
	<li>Select the most representative branches trying to proportionally cover branch diversity within the tree crown (healthy trees usually have similar branches while damaged trees may have branches with different degrees of damage). For example, if you choose to collect three branches per tree, collect the most damaged branch, the healthiest and an intermediate one.</li>
	<li>Whenever possible, select architectural branches only, while avoiding reiterations (trunk suckers or reiterations sensu Hall&#233;)16.</li>
	<li>Ensure branches are at least 50 cm&#160;in length and have at least 10 shoots.</li>
	<li>Attach the beginning of the measuring tape near the blade of the telescopic tree pruner in order to measure the height above ground of the branch at the cutting point.</li>
	<li>Cut the branch with the telescopic pruner, record its cutting height, its aspect, its type (architectural or reiteration) and refine the branch selection with secateurs in order to keep only the part for analysis.</li>
	<li>Assign a unique ID to the branch and record its age, its maximum length (from the first branching point to the apex) for general information.</li>
	<li>Take a quick look at the whole branch to obtain a first impression of its history and present status (heavily attacked or not) and identify all the elements and features important for the calculation of the DCI with the help of Figure 2 and Figure 3.</li>
</ol>
3. Branch Feature Definition
The following definitions are partially or totally reproduced from Gehring et al.&#160;20185, with the permission of Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2017.
<ol>
	<li>Define a Sprout (on a shoot) as a freshly formed sprout that has grown during the current vegetative season from a developed bud on a shoot.</li>
	<li>Define a Shoot as a sprout from the previous vegetative season with respect to the sampling date (e.g., sampling season = 2017, shoot = sprout that grew in 2016). Can be dead or alive.</li>
	<li>Define a Dead shoot (Sd) as a dead shoot after D. kuriphilus attack or due to natural death.</li>
	<li>Define an Alive shoot (As) as a living shoot, not to be confused with a reactivated dormant bud.</li>
	<li>Define a Reactivated dormant bud (Bdor) as a freshly formed sprout that has grown during the current vegetative season from a dormant bud on a multiyear branch part that is older than the shoot.</li>
	<li>Define a Gall on shoot (Gons) as a gall developed at the base or along the axis of a sprout. Technically, these should be called &#34;galls on sprouts&#34; but for the purpose of consistency with existing literature, we refer to them as &#34;galls on shoots&#34;. 
	NOTE: Figure 2 and Figure 3 show examples of selected branch features. More detailed and complete descriptions (which are beyond the scope of this paper) may be found in Gehring et al.&#160;20185 and Maltoni et al.&#160;20124.</li>
</ol>
4. Branch Analysis
<ol>
	<li>Count and record all the living shoots (alive shoots).</li>
	<li>Count and record all the dead shoots.</li>
	<li>Count and record all the reactivated dormant buds.</li>
	<li>Count and record all the galls on shoots. 
	NOTE: Supplemental File 2 shows an example of a field sampling form and Supplemental File 3 shows the sampling form filled out.</li>
</ol>
5. Calculation of the Damage Composite Index
<ol>
	<li>Calculate the proportion of dead shoots (Sd) from the number of dead shoots divided by the total number of shoots (dead shoots + alive shoots).</li>
	<li>Calculate the proportion of reactivated dormant buds (BdoR) from the number of reactivated dormant buds divided by the total number of living shoots (BdoR + alive shoots).</li>
	<li>Calculate the average number of galls on shoots (Gons) from the number of galls on shoots divided by the number of living shoots (BdoR + alive shoots).</li>
	<li>Calculate the DCI using the formula DCI = (Sd * 0.479 + BdoR * 0.525 + Gons * 0.120) * 100.</li>
	<li>Use Table 2 to evaluate the damage severity. 
	Note: An R script with the DCI function is available in Supplemental Coding File 1. Its description is found in Supplemental File 4.</li>
</ol>

<ol><li>Stone, G. N., Schönrogge, K., Rachel, J., Bellido, D., Pujade-villar, J. <a target="_blank" href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed?term=((The+population+biology+of+oak+gall+wasps+%28Hymenoptera%3A+Cynipidae%29%5BTitle%5D)+AND+%22Annual+Review+of+Entomology%22%5BJournal%5D)">The population biology of oak gall wasps (Hymenoptera: Cynipidae).</a> Annual Review of Entomology. (47), 633-668 (2002).</li>
<li>Abe, Y., Melika, G., Stone, G. N. <a target="_blank" href="http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/00305316.2007.10417504">The diversity and phylogeography of cynipid gallwasps (Hymenoptera: Cynipidae) of the Oriental and eastern Palearctic regions, and their associated communities.</a> Oriental Insects. 41 (1), 169-212 (2007).</li>
<li>Aebi, A., Schoenenberger, N., Bigler, F. <a target="_blank" href="https://libra.unine.ch/Publications/Alexandre_Aebi/27304">Evaluating the use of Torymus sinensis against the chestnut gall wasp Dryocosmus kuriphilus in the Canton Ticino, Switzerland.</a> Agroscope Reckenholz-Tänikon Report. , (2011).</li>
<li>Maltoni, A., Mariotti, B., Tani, A. <a target="_blank" href="https://www.researchgate.net/publication/256934708_Case_study_of_a_new_method_for_the_classification_and_analysis_of_Dryocosmus_kuriphilus_Yasumatsu_damage_to_young_chestnut_sprouts">Case study of a new method for the classification and analysis of Dryocosmus kuriphilus Yasumatsu damage to young chestnut sprouts.</a> IForest. 5 (1), 50-59 (2012).</li>
<li>Gehring, E., Bellosi, B., Quacchia, A., Conedera, M. <a target="_blank" href="https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10340-017-0857-9">Assessing the impact of Dryocosmus kuriphilius on the chestnut tree branch architecture matters.</a> Journal of Pest Science. 91 (1), 189-202 (2018).</li>
<li>Kato, K., Hijii, N. <a target="_blank" href="http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/j.1439-0418.1997.tb01363.x/abstract">Effects of gall formation by Dryocosmus kuriphilus Yasumatsu (Hym ., Cynipidae ) on the growth of chestnut trees.</a> Journal of Applied Entomology. 121 (1-5), 9-15 (1997).</li>
<li>Meyer, J. B., Gallien, L., Prospero, S. <a target="_blank" href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed?term=((Interaction+between+two+invasive+organisms+on+the+European+chestnut%3A+Does+the+chestnut+blight+fungus+benefit+from+the+presence+of+the+gall+wasp%3F%5BTitle%5D)+AND+%22FEMS+Microbiology+Ecology%22%5BJournal%5D)">Interaction between two invasive organisms on the European chestnut: Does the chestnut blight fungus benefit from the presence of the gall wasp?</a> FEMS Microbiology Ecology. 91 (11), 1-10 (2015).</li>
<li>Turchetti, T., Addario, E., Maresi, G. <a target="_blank" href="https://www.researchgate.net/publication/49587666_Interactions_between_chestnut_gall_wasp_and_blight_a_new_criticality_for_chestnut">Interactions between chestnut gall wasp and blight: a new criticality for chestnut.</a> Forest@ - Rivista di Selvicoltura ed Ecologia Forestale. 7 (1), 252-258 (2010).</li>
<li>Moriya, S., Shiga, M., Adachi, I. Classical biological control of the chestnut gall wasp in Japan. Proceedings of the1st International Symposium on Biological Control of Arthropods, , USDA-Forestry Service. Honolulu Hawaii. 407-415 (2003).</li>
<li>Quacchia, A., Moriya, S., Bosio, G. <a target="_blank" href="https://www.researchgate.net/publication/283885568_Effectiveness_of_torymus_sinensis_in_the_biological_control_of_dryocosmus_kuriphilus_in_Italy">Effectiveness of Torymus sinensis in the Biological Control of Dryocosmus kuriphilus in Italy.</a> Acta Horticulturae. 1043, 199-204 (2014).</li>
<li>Kotobuki, K., Mori, K., Sato, Y. <a target="_blank" href="http://agris.fao.org/agris-search/search.do?recordID=JP19860062861">2 methods to estimate the tree damage by chestnut gall wasp Dryocosmus-kuriphilus.</a> Bulletin of the fruit tree research station A (Yatabe). 2 (12), 29-36 (1985).</li>
<li>Sartor, C., Dini, F., et al. <a target="_blank" href="https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0304423815302338">Impact of the Asian wasp Dryocosmus kuriphilus (Yasumatsu) on cultivated chestnut: Yield loss and cultivar susceptibility.</a> Scientia Horticulturae. 1997, 454-460 (2015).</li>
<li>Johnstone, D., Moore, G., Tausz, M., Nicolas, M. <a target="_blank" href="http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/03071375.2013.783746?journalCode=tarb20">The measurement of plant vitality in landscape trees.</a> Arboricultural Journal: The International Journal of Urban Forestry. 35 (1), 18-27 (2013).</li>
<li>Guyot, V., Castagneyrol, B., Deconchat, M., Selvi, F., Bussotti, F., Jactel, H. <a target="_blank" href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed?term=((Tree+diversity+limits+the+impact+of+an+invasive+forest+pest%5BTitle%5D)+AND+%22Plos+One%22%5BJournal%5D)">Tree diversity limits the impact of an invasive forest pest.</a> Plos One. , (2015).</li>
<li>Gehring, E., Bosio, G., Quacchia, A., Conedera, M. <a target="_blank" href="http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/09670874.2017.1364448">Adapting sampling effort to assess the population establishment of Torymus sinensis, the biocontrol agent of the chestnut gallwasp.</a> International Journal of Pest Management. , (2017).</li>
<li>Hallé, F., Oldeman, R. A. A., Tomlinson, P. B. <a target="_blank" href="http://scholar.google.com/scholar?hl=en&safe=off&q=author%3aHall%C3%A9%2C+F+%22The+Formation+of+Trees+and+Forests.+An+architectural+analysis%22">The Formation of Trees and Forests. An architectural analysis</a>. , Springer-Verlag. New York. (1978).</li>
<li>Gyoutoku, Y., Uemura, M. <a target="_blank" href="http://agris.fao.org/agris-search/search.do?recordID=JP8702225">Ecology and biological control of the chestnut gall wasp, Dryocosmus kuriphilus Yasumatsu (Hymenoptera: Cynipidae). 1. Damage and parasitization in Kumamoto Prefecture.</a> Proceedings of the Association for Plant Protection of Kyushu (Japan). 31, 213-215 (1985).</li>
<li>Müller, E., Stierlin, H. R. <a target="_blank" href="https://www.wsl.ch/eshop/product_info.php?products_id=110">Sanasilva Kronenbilder mit Nadel- und Blattverlustprozenten.</a> Eidgenössische Forschungsanstalt für Wald, Schnee und Landschaft: Birmensdorf. , (1990).</li>
</ol>

The authors have nothing to disclose.

Dryocosmus kuriphilus lay eggs in chestnut tree buds, inducing the formation of galls in spring. Repeated and uncontrolled D. kuriphilus attacks cause, in addition to gall formation, general branch corruption, including the death of many shoots and a significant loss in green photosynthetic leaf area5. Trees usually react by attempting to produce substitutive shoots via the activation of dormant buds. For this reason, especially during the epidemic peak and the recovery stage, cl...

The chestnut gallwasp Dryocosmus kuriphilus Yasumatsu (Hymenoptera: Cynipidae) is the most significant global insect pest of the genus Castanea1,2,3. Through its repeated galling activity, it prevents and inhibits normal shoot development4,5, causing a progressive reduction of leaf area and a consequent loss of tree green biomass and vigour5,6, dormant bud reactivation5 and an increase in gallwasp post-emergence branch mortality7,8.
The European experience of the gallwasp epidemic shows that uncontrolled and repeated gallwasp attacks may induce a high level of crown corruption in Sweet chestnut (Castanea sativa Mill.). This can result in crown leaf area losses of up to 70% that are neither compensated for by substitutive foliage produced by the activation of dormant buds nor by building second flushes during the same vegetation period5.
The only successful method to reduce the pest population and allow chestnut trees to recover is biological control through its natural antagonist the parasitoid Torymus sinensis Kamijo (Hymenoptera: Torymidae)9,10. Once biological control through its natural enemy is achieved, the chestnut trees start to produce new healthy sprouts. If tree damage level is very high, this may occur starting from the terminal bud only, due to the fact that it is usually infestation-free because of its formation after gallwasp oviposition activity4. This implies a long recovery process before the whole tree crown is re-established5.
In order to check the positive reaction of chestnut trees after biological control by Torymus sinensis is reached, and to verify the need for sylvicultural (pruning, thinning) intervention, forest managers and chestnut growers need a method for quick and reliable assessment of damage level and related branch architecture and leaf area evolution throughout the gallwasp epidemic from the initial infestation phase by the pest to recovery after biological control by its antagonist. Several methods for assessing gallwasp infestation degree (MAID) have been developed and used worldwide to date, such as measuring the proportion of attacked buds11 or the average number of galls per bud12. MAID do not directly measure green biomass (e.g., leaf area), reserve structures such as dormant buds, reaction structures (e.g., reactivated dormant buds and second flushes), or previous year damage (e.g., dead shoots) as major proxies of current tree vitality and vigour6,13,14. Moreover, most MAID are only based on the number of galls found on tree branches and underestimate real branch damage, especially during the peak of the pest epidemic (Figure 1).
In this paper, we describe the damage composite index (DCI) approach proposed by Gehring et al.&#160;20185 that considers proxies of green biomass, reserves such as dormant bud, and tree reactions (dormant bud reactivation and second flushes), enabling a realistic, reliable, and reasonably rapid assessment of damage through all stages of an epidemic, especially when combined with the assessment effort optimization proposed by Gehring et al.&#160;201715.
In particular, the objectives of this paper are 1) to give a detailed description of the field protocol, including the relevant branch features to be assessed, 2) to present the damage composite index formula, and 3) to propose an improved severity scale conversion for the DCI.

<table><tbody><tr><td>Name of Material/ Equipment</td><td>Company</td><td>Catalog Number</td><td>Comments</td></tr><tr><td>Clipboard</td><td>Any brand</td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Camping chair&lt;br/&gt; (Foldable and lightweight chair)</td><td>Any brand</td><td></td><td>Companies: Kelty, Campz, Half-Ton.</td></tr><tr><td>Felco 9 secateurs&lt;br/&gt; (One-hand pruning shear)</td><td>Felco</td><td></td><td>Other companies: Bahco.</td></tr><tr><td>AP-5M-Aluminium Pole&lt;br/&gt; (Telescopic tree pruner pole)</td><td>Bahco</td><td>8152079</td><td>Other companies: Spear &amp;amp; Jackson, Kingfisher, Hortex, Fiskars.</td></tr><tr><td>P34-37 top pruner&lt;br/&gt; (Telescopic tree pruner head)</td><td>Bahco</td><td>8002787</td><td></td></tr><tr><td>100 ft Fiberglass Long Tape&lt;br/&gt; (30 m measuring tape)</td><td>Stanley</td><td>34-790</td><td>Other companies: Tjima, Freemans, Astor, Lux.</td></tr><tr><td>Parallel 10.5mm&lt;br/&gt; (Low stretch kernmantel rope, flexible and lightweight for rope access)</td><td>Petzl</td><td>R077AA03</td><td>Basic equipment for tree climbing&amp;nbsp; (if necessary). Many other equipment configurations can be used for tree climbing, depending on the situation and on single operator preferences. We used Pezl equipment but many other companies offer similar products (e.g. Edelrid, Notch, Climbing technologies, DMM, ...). For a complete overview of equipment and companies we recommend a search in google&amp;nbsp; &quot;tree climbing gear&quot; as search keyword. PLEASE NOTE: tree climbing activities should be done only by professionals and are submitted to specific regulatory prescriptions according to the country.</td></tr><tr><td>Avao Sit&lt;br/&gt; (Harness for work positioning and suspension)</td><td>Petzl</td><td>C69AFA 2</td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Rig&lt;br/&gt; (Compact self-braking descender)</td><td>Petzl</td><td>D21A</td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Ascension&lt;br/&gt; (Handled rope clamp for rope ascents)</td><td>Petzl</td><td>B17ALA</td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Eclipse&lt;br/&gt; (Storage for throw-line)</td><td>Petzl</td><td>S03Y</td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Airline&lt;br/&gt; (Throw-line)</td><td>Petzl</td><td>R02Y 060</td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Jet&lt;br/&gt; (Throw-bag)</td><td>Petzl</td><td>S02Y 300</td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Vertex best&lt;br/&gt; (Comfortable helmet for work at height and rescue)</td><td>Petzl</td><td>A10BYA</td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Zillon&lt;br/&gt; (Adjustable work positioning lanyard for tree care)</td><td>Petzl</td><td>L22A 040</td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Ok&lt;br/&gt; (Lightweight oval carabiner)</td><td>Petzl</td><td>M33A SL</td><td></td></tr></tbody></table>

evaluating dryocosmus kuriphilus-induced damage on castanea sativa

Evaluating Dryocosmus Kuriphilus-induced Damage on Castanea Sativa

Dryocosmus kuriphilus Yasumatsu has become a major pest for Castaneasativa since its arrival in Europe. Its galling activity results in the formation of different gall types and prevents the development of normal shoots. Repeated and uncontrolled attacks cause, besides the production of galls and the attendant gall-related reduction in leaf area, progressive corruption of the branch architecture, including the death of branch parts, and an increase in dormant bud activation. Thus far, there have been few attempts to quantify branch architecture damage. Further, the different methods for assessing infestation degree (MAID) that have been developed focus only on the galls' presence and abundance.
Using the leaf area to sapwood area relationship as a green biomass indicator, we developed in a previous study a damage composite index (DCI) that takes into account the most important branch architectural features, allowing for realistic damage assessment during the entire epidemic process. 
The aim of this study is to present this novel method and highlight differences in the damage description with respect to other broadly used indices. Results show how the DCI depicts branch damage better, especially during the epidemic peak, compared to MAID, which tend to underestimate it. We conclude by suggesting how to properly evaluate the overall impact of the pest by means of our composite damage index, the infestation degree using classic methods, and crown transparency evaluations.

A total of 25 localities in Ticino, Switzerland were visited between 2013 and 2016 in order to create a temporal gradient covering all gall wasp epidemic stages. In total, we collected and analyzed 94 branches in 5 sites at an early epidemic stage (arrival of the pest and beginning of tree damage), 200 branches in 5 sites at the epidemic peak (medium to severe damage due to high level of D. kuriphilus attack), 200 branches in 5 sites at the recovery stage (biocontrol by T. si...

It is common practice to assess the damage caused by Dryocosmus kuriphilus by considering the abundance of galls alone rather than by also taking related branch corruption into consideration. We propose a composite damage index that takes into account the most important branch features, thus enabling more realistic damage assessment.

Dryocosmus kuriphilus Yasumatsu has become a major pest for Castaneasativa since its arrival in Europe. Its galling activity results in the formation of ...

evaluating-dryocosmus-kuriphilus-induced-damage-on-castanea-sativa

Research

JoVE Journal

Environment

This video explains mechanisms of host plant resistance to herbivory and demonstrates a no-choice test that estimates the relative contributions of antibiosis and tolerance to spittlebug resistance in Brachiaria spp.

Characterizing Herbivore Resistance Mechanisms: Spittlebugs on Brachiaria spp. as an Example

A method to rapidly screen host plant volatiles by measurement of the electrophysiological response of adult navel orangeworm (Amyelois transitella) antennae to single components and blends via electroantennographic analysis is demonstrated.

Electroantennographic Bioassay as a Screening Tool for Host Plant Volatiles

Beech bark disease is initiated by feeding activities of the beech scale insect that create fungal entry points in the bark. Trees that are resistant to the scale insect are also disease resistant. Here we present the protocol we have developed to screen individual beech trees for beech scale resistance.

A Technique to Screen American Beech for Resistance to the Beech Scale Insect (Cryptococcus fagisuga Lind.)

This manuscript describes a multispectral optical sensor that effectively detected damage to early season cotton artificially infested with varying densities of the two-spotted spider mite populations.

Remote Sensing Evaluation of Two-spotted Spider Mite Damage on Greenhouse Cotton

Fungicide sprays on flowering plants may expose solitary bees to high concentrations of pollen-borne fungicide residues. Using laboratory-based experiments involving in vitro-reared bee larvae, this study investigates the interactive effects of consuming fungicide-treated pollen derived from host and non-host plants.

In Vitro Rearing of Solitary Bees: A Tool for Assessing Larval Risk Factors

This protocol presents a method for assessing the feeding rate of the wood-boring crustacean, Limnoria, by measuring faecal pellet production. This method is designed for use in non-specialist labs and has potential for incorporation into standard testing protocols, to evaluate enhanced wood durability under marine conditions.

Rapid Testing of Resistance of Timber to Biodegradation by Marine Wood-Boring Crustaceans

The present protocol explains a method to feed pesticide-contaminated provisions to the larvae of the solitary bees, Osmia excavata. The procedure examines the ecotoxicity of the pesticide to the larvae of the solitary bees.

Evaluating the Effect of Pesticides on the Larvae of the Solitary Bees

A method using green coffee fruits (GFs) was developed to test the toxicity of insecticides against the coffee berry borer (CBB). Insecticides or toxic substances were applied to disinfected GFs before or after CBB infestation. Insect mortality, repellency, and reproductive capacity, in addition to other parameters, were evaluated.

Methodology to Test Control Agents and Insecticides Against the Coffee Berry Borer Hypothenemus hampei

In this paper, standardized ecotoxicological methods for the evaluation of biomarkers in neotropical anuran species are presented. Specifically, this paper details several methodologies at different scales of ecotoxicological evaluation, such as the genetic, cellular-histological, biochemical, morphological, and individual levels.

Ecotoxicological Methodologies to Evaluate Biomarkers at Different Scales in Neotropical Anurans

We provide a step-by-step protocol for assessing poplar resistance to stem canker pathogens using an in vivo leaf inoculation method. This method is especially suitable for large-scale assessment of Cytospora chrysosperma and Botryosphaeria dothidea canker disease resistance in poplar breeding progeny in China.

In Vivo Leaf Inoculation: An Alternative Method to Assess the Disease Resistance of Hybrid Clones in Poplar Breeding of Stem Canker Disease

This study aimed to investigate the relationship between the timing of pesticide application and bee activity, measured using bioacoustics, in soybeans. Analysis showed that pesticide application, regardless of timing, had no effect on bee activity, defoliation, or yield. However, bee activity was higher later in the day and during peak soybean bloom.

Assessing the Repellency of an Insecticide-Fungicide Combination to Bees Using Bioacoustics

Learn to evaluate Dryocosmus kuriphilus damage on Castanea sativa using a composite damage index. This method assesses branch features like dormant buds and dead shoots for realistic tree health evaluation.

Evaluating Dryocosmus Kuriphilus-induced Damage on Castanea Sativa

Explore More Videos