Minimally invasive surgery has become mainstream. Many techniques have been developed, such as the da Vinci robot system and the endoscope. However, the equipment and cost of da Vinci robotic surgery are bulky and very high, respectively. Compared to the conventional craniotomy surgery, the endoscopic transcanal transpromontorial approach for resection of vestibular schwannoma has been developed to decrease the risks of vestibular dysfunction and cerebrospinal fluid leak1. However, lack of stereoscopic vision is still the main limitation of endoscopic surgery, especially for complicated ear surgeries2. Hence, the 3D endoscope was developed to imitate the binocular disparity to generate stereopsis of operative vision3,4. However, the caliber of the currently available 3D binocular endoscope is equal to or greater than 4 mm, making its application in transcanal endoscopic ear surgeries difficult. In addition, when the 3D binocular endoscope is used at close range, its large binocular parallax may lead to double vision.
A monocular 3D endoscope was first introduced in sinus surgeries in 20135. This monocular 3D endoscope system incorporates a microscopic array of lenses in front of a single video chip in the endoscope, acting as separate visual receptors. This method mimics “insect eye” technology, which in turn generates 3D vision. A novel computer-based 3D imaging system was first applied in transurethral endoscopic surgery in 20156. The processor simulates a 3D image by converting the conventional 2D endoscopic image into a pair of images, as received from two viewpoints. The major advantage of this computer processing system is that it can be adapted to conventional monocular endoscopes of any diameter. Both abovementioned 3D imaging systems have not been previously used in otologic surgery. We applied the computer-based imaging processor to endoscopic ear surgeries, including tympanoplasty, mastoidectomy, ossiculoplasty and cochlear implant2. This image system has some advantages for transcanal endoscopic ear surgeries. First, we can use all the equipment from the 2D endoscope system and do not need to change the whole system. Second, the caliber of the scope is no longer a concern. The average diameter of the external ear canal is 7 mm in width7; the caliber of the instruments (e.g., hook, dissector, and forceps) is approximately 1–2 mm. Thus, the proper caliber of the endoscope is restricted for transcanal ear surgeries. The common calibers of the 2D endoscope for otologic surgery are 3, 2.7 and 1.9 mm, and all of them could be used with this computer-based processor. Therefore, a smaller diameter 2D endoscope equipped with a novel 3D imaging system can be easily and conveniently applied in otologic surgery and enable ear surgeons to operate with 3D vision. In our previous work, we also found that there is no time delay and no visual fatigue when performing ear surgeries using this computer-based 3D endoscopic system2.
In this study, to evaluate the feasibility of the computed-based 3D imaging system for endoscopic lateral skull base surgery, we applied this 3D imaging system to the transcanal endoscopic transpromontorial approach for two patients with vestibular schwannomas with nonserviceable preoperative hearing.