$$\rightleftharpoonup{xx}$$
$$\longleftharp{xx}$$,
$$\longrightharp{xx}$$,
Transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) has proven to be a valuable therapy for elderly patients suffering from symptomatic severe aortic valve stenosis (AS) across all surgical risk categories1,2. The data and outcomes are most convincing for those patients in whom the TAVI procedure can be performed by transfemoral (TF) approach. TAVI by alternative access, such as transsubclavian, transaxillary, transcarotid, transcaval, and transapical access, can also be considered. However, the complication rates reported for TAVI by alternative access are higher than TF-TAVI3,4. This is also reflected in the most recent EU and US guidelines on managing patients with valvular heart disease5, in which there is a prominent role for TF-TAVI as a treatment option for patients with symptomatic severe AS.
Although there is consensus that TF-TAVI should be the default strategy for patients with proper iliofemoral access5, peripheral arterial disease (PAD) is not uncommon in patients planned for TAVI, given their advanced age and often multiple co-morbidities6. There has been a rapid technological evolution in the TAVI field over the past few years, resulting in TAVI devices with lower insertion profiles and more flexible delivery systems. Also, increased operator experience has increased the use of a fully percutaneous TF-TAVI approach. Nowadays, more than 90% of TAVI cases are performed in this way in most advanced TAVI centres7.
Still, a group of patients (5%-10%) remain good candidates for TAVI but suffer from severely calcified PAD. For many of these patients, the introduction of peripheral intravascular lithotripsy (IVL) has opened up the possibility to be treated by TF-TAVI. When using IVL, one generates sonic pressure waves using miniaturized lithotripters emitters integrated within a balloon. A steam bubble is created inside the balloon that rapidly expands and collapses by delivering electrical energy. This generates sonic pressure waves, similar in their waveform to those used during extracorporeal lithotripsy of nephrolithiasis. These waves travel through the vessel with a positive peak pressure of around 50 atm, thereby cracking and modifying both the superficial and deep vascular calcium, ultimately changing the vessel compliance and allowing for controlled luminal expansion8,9,10 (Figure 1). In this way, IVL has been shown to facilitate TF delivery of TAVI devices in patients with calcified PAD in a safe manner11,10,13. These IVL balloons are available in different diameters ranging between 3.5 mm-7 mm with a length of 60 mm.
The present article aims to provide a detailed description of performing IVL-assisted TF-TAVI safely and efficiently. Furthermore, a literature review on the outcomes obtained with this technology is included, along with a concise discussion on this new TAVI approach.
Patients (male/female) with a diseased iliofemoral anatomy corresponding to the following criteria could be suitable for IVL-assisted TF-TAVI (Figure 2): (1) Iliofemoral vascular disease with a lesion length of <20 mm and a calcium arc of ±270°, having a minimal lumen diameter of >3.0 mm, (2) iliofemoral vascular disease with a lesion length of <20 mm and calcium of arc ±360°, having a minimal lumen diameter of >4.0 mm, (3) iliofemoral vascular disease with a lesion length of >20 mm and a calcium arc of ±270°, having a minimal lumen diameter of >3.5 mm, and (4) iliofemoral vascular disease with a lesion length of >20 mm and calcium of arc ±360°, possessing a minimal lumen diameter of >4.5 mm. These recommendations are based upon expert opinion and local practice.