$$\rightleftharpoonup{xx}$$
$$\longleftharp{xx}$$,
$$\longrightharp{xx}$$,
Establishing a diagnosis in patients with radiological lung lesions is crucial, particularly when malignancy is suspected. Tissue sampling is essential for confirming malignancy, obtaining additional information like genotyping and staging, and diagnosing non-malignant lung lesions (e.g., infection or vasculitis)1,2.
Several invasive procedures are available for tissue sampling in patients with lung lesions, including conventional bronchoscopy, bronchoscopy supplemented with radial endobronchial ultrasound (REBUS), electromagnetic navigation bronchoscopy (ENB), endobronchial ultrasound (EBUS), endoscopic ultrasound (EUS), computed tomography guided transthoracic biopsy (CT-TTNB), and surgical biopsy3,4,5,6. The selection of the optimal procedure involves balancing factors like diagnostic yield, complication risks, patient comfort, and resource allocation3.
Most of these techniques have limitations. For instance, conventional bronchoscopy is less effective for peripheral lesions, CT-TTB carries a higher risk of complications (especially pneumothorax), and procedures like ENB and surgical biopsy can be costly4,6,7.
Ultrasound-guided transthoracic needle biopsy (US-TTNB) is an alternative method for obtaining tissue samples from lung lesions. The technique itself is not new, but its use has significantly increased in patients with peripheral lung lesions of unknown origin, particularly among pulmonologists, who now routinely use thoracic ultrasound (TUS) for point-of-care diagnostics and basic procedural guidance in various clinical scenarios8,9. In addition, ultrasound equipment is now more widely available, with TUS training increasingly formalized and made more accessible to clinicians at an earlier stage9,10,11,12,13,14,15,16.
US-TTNB carries several potential advantages. Complication rates and costs related to the procedure are low, while diagnostic yields remain comparable to other approaches, especially CT-TTB17,18,19,18,19,20,21. Its major limitation, however, is its suitability only for a limited proportion of lung lesions that can be appropriately visualized using TUS. Therefore, it cannot be used for lesions that do not contact the parietal pleura at the chest wall, such as any central tumor; lesions behind structures impenetrable to ultrasound waves, such as the scapula; or lesions with a meaningful air content, which also does not transmit ultrasound, such as 'ground glass' opacities seen on CT8,9,17,18,19,20,22,21,22,23,24,25,26. US-TTNB is also unable to definitively assess the N-stage of lung cancer, meaning in some cases, the procedure must be combined with another invasive procedure to provide a full picture1,2.
Nonetheless, US-TTNB remains an important and increasingly used front-line tool in modern invasive pulmonology practice in selected patients with suspected malignant lung lesions9,18.
Indications and contraindications
US-TTNB is indicated when all of the following criteria are met: (1) subpleural lung consolidation that can be visualized using thoracic ultrasound; (2) clinically warranted lung tissue biopsy (e.g., for establishing a diagnosis, obtaining material for supplementary diagnostic analyses). US-TTNB should not be performed when one or more of the following criteria are met: (1) manifest chronic or acute respiratory failure; (2) hemorrhagic diatheses; (3) ongoing treatment with anticoagulants or platelet aggregation inhibitors; (4) another invasive method for tissue sampling can establish a diagnosis and simultaneously provide N- or M-staging (e.g., EBUS/EUS-B in patients with suspected lung cancer and suspected involvement of mediastinal lymph nodes).
It should be noted, however, that the listed contraindications are generally relative. The physician, in agreement with the patient, should consider the clinical consequences of obtaining a biopsy by US-TTNB and balance this against the risk of complications and other potential invasive or diagnostic methods that could be performed instead of US-TTNB.