Name: Detection of DNA Breaks in Dividing Human Cells by Neutral Comet Assay (Video) | JoVE Journal
Uploaded: 2024-08-23T14:20:00.000+00:00
Duration: 5 min 55 s
Description: Learn the neutral comet assay method for detecting DNA breaks in dividing human cells under replication stress. This protocol assesses genome stability and chromatin remodeler function.

ai_agent_IP

ai_agent

maintenance

instantTrialDurationMinutes

isBiopharma

enableNewMyJoveSectionDesign

educationFeatures

seoMetaApi

ai_copilot_institution_blacklist

ai_chat_institution_blacklist

freeAccessWindow

ssoRoleCapture

scheduledMaintenanceBanner

joveLabsFeatures

disable_autoplay_for_bots

extended_trial_duration

5 minutes

We thank the Dungrawala lab members for their input and feedback. This work was funded by NIH grant R35GM137800 to HD.

This protocol (Figure 1) primarily utilizes adherent U2OS cancer cell lines but is adaptable to a wide variety of adherent and suspension cells grown in tissue culture. The solutions and buffers used in this study are detailed in Table 1. The reagents and equipment used are listed in the Table of Materials.
1. Preparation of materials
<ol>
	<li>Prior to the day of the experiment, place the provided bottle with low melting agarose (1% low melting agarose in PBS) in a hot water bath for 5-10 min to ensure the agarose has completely melted. 
	NOTE: Do not heat the bottle in the microwave.</li>
	<li>Once melted, quickly aliquot 100 &#181;L of the agarose to 1.5 mL centrifuge tubes as required and store the tubes at 4 &#176;C. The solidified agarose can be stored at 4 &#176;C for up to 1 year.</li>
	<li>On the day of the experiment, remove the required number of centrifuge tubes from the 4 &#176;C storage. Melt the agarose by placing the tubes in a heat block or water bath at 42 &#176;C. 
	NOTE: Place the tubes at 42 &#176;C prior to harvesting the cells to ensure the agarose is completely melted for resuspension (step 3.7).</li>
	<li>Prepare fresh lysis buffer and TAE buffer on the day of the experiment and store them at room temperature and 4 &#176;C, respectively, until ready to use. In addition, aliquot 1x PBS in 15 mL conical tube and place it in the fridge to use in the resuspension step (step 3.5).</li>
	<li>Mark the sample identifications on the frosted end of the 2-well comet slides and store them at room temperature until ready to use.</li>
</ol>
2. Preparation of samples
<ol>
	<li>Prior to the day of the experiment, seed the cells in a 6-well dish and culture overnight at 37 &#176;C with 5% CO2. For U2OS cells, approximately 2-3 x 105 cells were seeded for each sample. 
	NOTE: Cell numbers might need to be adjusted depending on the cell type used for analyses.</li>
	<li>On the day of the experiment, treat cells with the conditions as per the experimental design. As a positive control to demonstrate replication-dependent break induction, treat cells with 1 &#181;M CPT for 1 h. CPT is a topoisomerase-1 inhibitor that induces double-strand breaks in a replication-dependent manner14.</li>
</ol>
3. Cell resuspension and lysis
<ol>
	<li>Aspirate cell culture media and rinse twice with 1x PBS.</li>
	<li>Add 300 &#181;L of trypsin to each well. Incubate the dish in a tissue culture incubator for 2-3 min. 
	NOTE: Prolonged incubation in trypsin can generate spurious results during comet analyses.</li>
	<li>Add 700 &#181;L of cell culture media to each well. Resuspend gently and transfer the samples to 1.5 mL centrifuge tubes. 
	NOTE: Counting cells at this step is recommended to obtain the appropriate cell density in step 3.6 to reduce the frequency of overlapping tails during analysis.</li>
	<li>Centrifuge the cell suspension at 2400 x g&#160;for 5 min at room temperature.</li>
	<li>Aspirate the media and resuspend the cells in 1 mL of cold 1x PBS.</li>
	<li>Repeat step 3.4 and step 3.5 twice and resuspend the cells in cold 1x PBS at a cell density of 2 x 105 cells per ml. 
	NOTE: Assessing cell viability at this step is recommended to ensure an adequate number of viable cells are present. At least 90% viability is recommended.</li>
	<li>Resuspend 10 &#181;L of the cell suspension in 100 &#181;L aliquot of melted agarose, and using the same pipette tip, mix gently and spread the mixture evenly into one well of the slide. Repeat this step for all samples as needed. 
	NOTE: Avoid removing all aliquots from 42 &#176;C water bath at once to prevent the agarose from solidifying. This step should preferably be performed by the water bath, and each sample is resuspended and spread in a staggered manner. Avoid introducing bubbles while spreading the agarose on the slide since the air pockets will affect the migration of the comet tails during electrophoresis (step 4.5) and introduce cracks in the drying step (step 5.3)</li>
	<li>Store the slides at 4 &#176;C in the dark for 15-20 min to ensure the agarose has completely solidified (Figure 2A).</li>
	<li>Place the slides in Coplin jars and immerse the slides in lysis buffer for 1 h at room temperature.</li>
	<li>Rinse the slides once with cold TAE buffer and immerse the slides in cold TAE buffer for 30 min at 4 &#176;C.</li>
</ol>
4. Electrophoresis
<ol>
	<li>Setup the electrophoretic chamber on a flat surface and level the system using the four leveling knobs on the edges of the apparatus. Insert cold packs in the bottom chamber to keep the solution cold during electrophoresis.</li>
	<li>Pour approximately ~850 mL of cold 1x TAE buffer into the apparatus.</li>
	<li>Remove the slides from 4 &#176;C and place them on the electrophoresis tray in the proper orientation to allow for the migration of broken DNA. 
	NOTE: The tray holds ten 2-well slides. Place the slides in the center of the tray if working with less number of samples. If working with an odd number of slides, include a blank slide such that each well accommodates 2 slides.</li>
	<li>Gently place the provided slide tray overlay on top of the tray to cover the slides. 
	NOTE: For proper operation of the apparatus, the volume of the TAE buffer should not be lower than the bottom surface of the overlay and not exceed the top surface of the overlay.</li>
	<li>After connecting the cables, set the power at 21 V and perform electrophoresis (1 V/cm) for 40 min. 
	NOTE: The electrophoresis time may need to be adjusted depending on the cell type used for analyses. Long tails in untreated samples indicate excessive runtime. Conversely, short tails in positive control samples may reflect insufficient runtime.</li>
</ol>
5. Staining
<ol>
	<li>After completion of electrophoresis, remove the slides from the apparatus and immerse them in DNA precipitation solution for 30 min at room temperature.</li>
	<li>Discard the DNA precipitation solution and immerse the slides in 70% ethanol solution for 30 minu at room temperature.</li>
	<li>Discard the 70% ethanol solution. Remove the slides and dry them in a hybridization oven at 45 &#176;C for 30 min in the dark (Figure 2B). 
	NOTE: Slides can be left in a dark, dry place overnight for the drying step.</li>
	<li>Incubate the wells with 100 &#181;L of 1x SYBR Green solution for 30 min at room temperature in the dark.</li>
	<li>Decant the SYBR Green solution by tilting the slides and removing the excess by gently dabbing the edge of the well with a lint-free wipe.</li>
	<li>Place the slides in a drawer and allow to dry for 30 min.</li>
	<li>Proceed with imaging of the slides.</li>
</ol>
6. Imaging and analyses
<ol>
	<li>Setup the microscope for imaging purposes. 
	NOTE: All images were acquired using a epifluorescence microscope. 10x magnification with 0.45 numerical aperture was used with an exposure time of 1/40s and a gain of +6dB. The capturing mode of monochrome 8bit was utilized with 2 x 2 binning and black balance correction.</li>
	<li>Place the slides on the microscope stage and begin imaging using the FITC filter. 
	NOTE: Use the untreated sample first to test exposure time. Most cells do not exhibit comet tails since DNA is more compact. Switch to the well with CPT-treated cells and image using the same exposure time. Comet tails with increased lengths will be observed in this sample due to the migration of broken DNA ends.</li>
	<li>Acquire images for at least 100 comets per sample using the same exposure time across three technical replicates. 
	NOTE: Comet tails at the end of coverslips tend to migrate unevenly and act as outliers in the sample distribution. Most of the comets captured for analyses are present close to the center of the coverslip (Figure 3).</li>
	<li>Export images and score the comets either manually (using Image J) or by using freely available comet scoring software. Comets that are individually distinguishable and fully contained in the field of view are selected for scoring. Overlapping or partially visible comets are not considered for further analyses (Figure 4). 
	NOTE: Users can score comets on Image J using the following plugin: https://cometbio.org/index.html. Details for scoring comets using CometScore software are included in&#160;Figure 5.</li>
	<li>Plot tail moments acquired from the analyses as box and whisker plots depicting 10-90 percentile values. Perform normality tests to determine whether parametric, or non-parametric tests should be utilized for statistical analyses. 
	NOTE: In most cases, non-parametric tests are applied using the Mann-Whitney test if comparing two samples only or the Kruskal-Wallis test with Dunn&#39;s multiple comparisons if comparing three or more samples.</li>
</ol>

Investigating the Extent of DNA Breaks Occurring During DNA Replication 

<ol><li>Olive, P. L. <a target="_blank" href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed?term=((Cell+proliferation+as+a+requirement+for+development+of+the+contact+effect+in+Chinese+hamster+v79+spheroids%5BTitle%5D)+AND+%22Radiat+Res%22%5BJournal%5D)">Cell proliferation as a requirement for development of the contact effect in Chinese hamster v79 spheroids.</a> Radiat Res. 117 (1), 79-92 (1989).</li>
<li>Olive, P. L., Banath, J. P., Durand, R. E. <a target="_blank" href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed?term=((Heterogeneity+in+radiation-induced+DNA+damage+and+repair+in+tumor+and+normal+cells+measured+using+the+%26%2334%3Bcomet%26%2334%3B+assay%5BTitle%5D)+AND+%22Radiat+Res%22%5BJournal%5D)">Heterogeneity in radiation-induced DNA damage and repair in tumor and normal cells measured using the &#34;comet&#34; assay.</a> Radiat Res. 122 (1), 86-94 (1990).</li>
<li>Singh, N. P., Mccoy, M. T., Tice, R. R., Schneider, E. L. <a target="_blank" href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed?term=((A+simple+technique+for+quantitation+of+low+levels+of+DNA+damage+in+individual+cells%5BTitle%5D)+AND+%22Exp+Cell+Res%22%5BJournal%5D)">A simple technique for quantitation of low levels of DNA damage in individual cells.</a> Exp Cell Res. 175 (1), 184-191 (1988).</li>
<li>Olive, P. L., Banath, J. P. <a target="_blank" href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed?term=((The+comet+assay%3A+A+method+to+measure+DNA+damage+in+individual+cells%5BTitle%5D)+AND+%22Nat+Protoc%22%5BJournal%5D)">The comet assay: A method to measure DNA damage in individual cells.</a> Nat Protoc. 1 (1), 23-29 (2006).</li>
<li>De Lapuente, J., et al. <a target="_blank" href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed?term=((The+comet+assay+and+its+applications+in+the+field+of+ecotoxicology%3A+A+mature+tool+that+continues+to+expand+its+perspectives%5BTitle%5D)+AND+%22Front+Genet%22%5BJournal%5D)">The comet assay and its applications in the field of ecotoxicology: A mature tool that continues to expand its perspectives.</a> Front Genet. 6, 180(2015).</li>
<li>Azqueta, A., et al. <a target="_blank" href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed?term=((Application+of+the+comet+assay+in+human+biomonitoring%3A+An+hcomet+perspective%5BTitle%5D)+AND+%22Mutat+Res+Rev+Mutat+Res%22%5BJournal%5D)">Application of the comet assay in human biomonitoring: An hcomet perspective.</a> Mutat Res Rev Mutat Res. 783, 108288(2020).</li>
<li>Speit, G., Hartmann, A. <a target="_blank" href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed?term=((The+comet+assay%3A+A+sensitive+genotoxicity+test+for+the+detection+of+DNA+damage%5BTitle%5D)+AND+%22Methods+Mol+Biol%22%5BJournal%5D)">The comet assay: A sensitive genotoxicity test for the detection of DNA damage.</a> Methods Mol Biol. 291, 85-95 (2005).</li>
<li>Collins, A., et al. <a target="_blank" href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed?term=((Measuring+DNA+modifications+with+the+comet+assay%3A+A+compendium+of+protocols%5BTitle%5D)+AND+%22Nat+Protoc%22%5BJournal%5D)">Measuring DNA modifications with the comet assay: A compendium of protocols.</a> Nat Protoc. 18 (3), 929-989 (2023).</li>
<li>Rapp, A., Hausmann, M., Greulich, K. O. <a target="_blank" href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed?term=((The+comet-fish+technique%3A+A+tool+for+detection+of+specific+DNA+damage+and+repair%5BTitle%5D)+AND+%22Methods+Mol+Biol%22%5BJournal%5D)">The comet-fish technique: A tool for detection of specific DNA damage and repair.</a> Methods Mol Biol. 291, 107-119 (2005).</li>
<li>Saldivar, J. C., Cortez, D., Cimprich, K. A. <a target="_blank" href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed?term=((The+essential+kinase+atr%3A+Ensuring+faithful+duplication+of+a+challenging+genome%5BTitle%5D)+AND+%22Nat+Rev+Mol+Cell+Biol%22%5BJournal%5D)">The essential kinase atr: Ensuring faithful duplication of a challenging genome.</a> Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol. 18 (10), 622-636 (2017).</li>
<li>Cimprich, K. A., Cortez, D. <a target="_blank" href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed?term=((Atr%3A+An+essential+regulator+of+genome+integrity%5BTitle%5D)+AND+%22Nat+Rev+Mol+Cell+Biol%22%5BJournal%5D)">Atr: An essential regulator of genome integrity.</a> Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol. 9 (8), 616-627 (2008).</li>
<li>Cortez, D. <a target="_blank" href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed?term=((Replication-coupled+DNA+repair%5BTitle%5D)+AND+%22Mol+Cell%22%5BJournal%5D)">Replication-coupled DNA repair.</a> Mol Cell. 74 (5), 866-876 (2019).</li>
<li>Strumberg, D., et al. <a target="_blank" href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed?term=((Conversion+of+topoisomerase+I+cleavage+complexes+on+the+leading+strand+of+ribosomal+DNA+into+5%27-phosphorylated+DNA+double-strand+breaks+by+replication+runoff%5BTitle%5D)+AND+%22Mol+Cell+Biol%22%5BJournal%5D)">Conversion of topoisomerase I cleavage complexes on the leading strand of ribosomal DNA into 5'-phosphorylated DNA double-strand breaks by replication runoff.</a> Mol Cell Biol. 20 (11), 3977-3987 (2000).</li>
<li>Pommier, Y. <a target="_blank" href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed?term=((Topoisomerase+I+inhibitors%3A+Camptothecins+and+beyond%5BTitle%5D)+AND+%22Nat+Rev+Cancer%22%5BJournal%5D)">Topoisomerase I inhibitors: Camptothecins and beyond.</a> Nat Rev Cancer. 6 (10), 789-802 (2006).</li>
<li>Hsiang, Y. H., Hertzberg, R., Hecht, S., Liu, L. F. <a target="_blank" href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed?term=((Camptothecin+induces+protein-linked+DNA+breaks+via+mammalian+DNA+topoisomerase+i%5BTitle%5D)+AND+%22J+Biol+Chem%22%5BJournal%5D)">Camptothecin induces protein-linked DNA breaks via mammalian DNA topoisomerase i.</a> J Biol Chem. 260 (27), 14873-14878 (1985).</li>
<li>Bryant, H. E., et al. <a target="_blank" href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed?term=((Specific+killing+of+brca2-deficient+tumours+with+inhibitors+of+poly%28adp-ribose%29+polymerase%5BTitle%5D)+AND+%22Nature%22%5BJournal%5D)">Specific killing of brca2-deficient tumours with inhibitors of poly(adp-ribose) polymerase.</a> Nature. 434 (7035), 913-917 (2005).</li>
<li>Helleday, T. <a target="_blank" href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed?term=((The+underlying+mechanism+for+the+parp+and+BRCA+synthetic+lethality%3A+Clearing+up+the+misunderstandings%5BTitle%5D)+AND+%22Mol+Oncol%22%5BJournal%5D)">The underlying mechanism for the parp and BRCA synthetic lethality: Clearing up the misunderstandings.</a> Mol Oncol. 5 (4), 387-393 (2011).</li>
<li>Mcglynn, A. P., et al. <a target="_blank" href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed?term=((The+bromodeoxyuridine+comet+assay%3A+Detection+of+maturation+of+recently+replicated+DNA+in+individual+cells%5BTitle%5D)+AND+%22Cancer+Res%22%5BJournal%5D)">The bromodeoxyuridine comet assay: Detection of maturation of recently replicated DNA in individual cells.</a> Cancer Res. 59 (23), 5912-5916 (1999).</li>
<li>Morocz, M., Gali, H., Rasko, I., Downes, C. S., Haracska, L. <a target="_blank" href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed?term=((Single+cell+analysis+of+human+rad18-dependent+DNA+post-replication+repair+by+alkaline+bromodeoxyuridine+comet+assay%5BTitle%5D)+AND+%22PLoS+One%22%5BJournal%5D)">Single cell analysis of human rad18-dependent DNA post-replication repair by alkaline bromodeoxyuridine comet assay.</a> PLoS One. 8 (8), e70391(2013).</li>
<li>Thakar, T., et al. <a target="_blank" href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed?term=((Lagging+strand+gap+suppression+connects+BRCA-mediated+fork+protection+to+nucleosome+assembly+through+PCNA-dependent+CAF-1+recycling%5BTitle%5D)+AND+%22Nat+Commun%22%5BJournal%5D)">Lagging strand gap suppression connects BRCA-mediated fork protection to nucleosome assembly through PCNA-dependent CAF-1 recycling.</a> Nat Commun. 13 (1), 5323(2022).</li>
<li>Vaitsiankova, A., et al. <a target="_blank" href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed?term=((Parp+inhibition+impedes+the+maturation+of+nascent+DNA+strands+during+DNA+replication%5BTitle%5D)+AND+%22Nat+Struct+Mol+Biol%22%5BJournal%5D)">Parp inhibition impedes the maturation of nascent DNA strands during DNA replication.</a> Nat Struct Mol Biol. 29 (4), 329-338 (2022).</li>
<li>Dungrawala, H., et al. <a target="_blank" href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed?term=((Radx+promotes+genome+stability+and+modulates+chemosensitivity+by+regulating+rad51+at+replication+forks%5BTitle%5D)+AND+%22Mol+Cell%22%5BJournal%5D)">Radx promotes genome stability and modulates chemosensitivity by regulating rad51 at replication forks.</a> Mol Cell. 67 (3), 374-386.e5 (2017).</li>
<li>Townsend, A., Lora, G., Engel, J., Tirado-Class, N., Dungrawala, H. <a target="_blank" href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed?term=((Dcaf14+promotes+stalled+fork+stability+to+maintain+genome+integrity%5BTitle%5D)+AND+%22Cell+Rep%22%5BJournal%5D)">Dcaf14 promotes stalled fork stability to maintain genome integrity.</a> Cell Rep. 34 (4), 108669(2021).</li>
<li>Lemacon, D., et al. <a target="_blank" href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed?term=((Mre11+and+exo1+nucleases+degrade+reversed+forks+and+elicit+mus81-dependent+fork+rescue+in+brca2-deficient+cells%5BTitle%5D)+AND+%22Nat+Commun%22%5BJournal%5D)">Mre11 and exo1 nucleases degrade reversed forks and elicit mus81-dependent fork rescue in brca2-deficient cells.</a> Nat Commun. 8 (1), 860(2017).</li>
<li>Leung, W., et al. <a target="_blank" href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed?term=((Atr+protects+ongoing+and+newly+assembled+DNA+replication+forks+through+distinct+mechanisms%5BTitle%5D)+AND+%22Cell+Rep%22%5BJournal%5D)">Atr protects ongoing and newly assembled DNA replication forks through distinct mechanisms.</a> Cell Rep. 42 (7), 112792(2023).</li>
<li>Bhowmick, R., Mehta, K. P. M., Lerdrup, M., Cortez, D. <a target="_blank" href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed?term=((Integrator+facilitates+RNApii+removal+to+prevent+transcription-replication+collisions+and+genome+instability%5BTitle%5D)+AND+%22Mol+Cell%22%5BJournal%5D)">Integrator facilitates RNApii removal to prevent transcription-replication collisions and genome instability.</a> Mol Cell. 83 (13), 2357-2366.e8 (2023).</li>
<li>Mosler, T., et al. <a target="_blank" href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed?term=((R-loop+proximity+proteomics+identifies+a+role+of+ddx41+in+transcription-associated+genomic+instability%5BTitle%5D)+AND+%22Nat+Commun%22%5BJournal%5D)">R-loop proximity proteomics identifies a role of ddx41 in transcription-associated genomic instability.</a> Nat Commun. 12 (1), 7314(2021).</li>
<li>Petermann, E., Orta, M. L., Issaeva, N., Schultz, N., Helleday, T. <a target="_blank" href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed?term=((Hydroxyurea-stalled+replication+forks+become+progressively+inactivated+and+require+two+different+rad51-mediated+pathways+for+restart+and+repair%5BTitle%5D)+AND+%22Mol+Cell%22%5BJournal%5D)">Hydroxyurea-stalled replication forks become progressively inactivated and require two different rad51-mediated pathways for restart and repair.</a> Mol Cell. 37 (4), 492-502 (2010).</li>
<li>Sestili, P., Cantoni, O. <a target="_blank" href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed?term=((Osmotically+driven+radial+diffusion+of+single-stranded+DNA+fragments+on+an+agarose+bed+as+a+convenient+measure+of+DNA+strand+scission%5BTitle%5D)+AND+%22Free+Radic+Biol+Med%22%5BJournal%5D)">Osmotically driven radial diffusion of single-stranded DNA fragments on an agarose bed as a convenient measure of DNA strand scission.</a> Free Radic Biol Med. 26 (7-8), 1019-1026 (1999).</li>
<li>Sestili, P., Martinelli, C., Stocchi, V. <a target="_blank" href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed?term=((The+fast+halo+assay%3A+An+improved+method+to+quantify+genomic+DNA+strand+breakage+at+the+single-cell+level%5BTitle%5D)+AND+%22Mutat+Res%22%5BJournal%5D)">The fast halo assay: An improved method to quantify genomic DNA strand breakage at the single-cell level.</a> Mutat Res. 607 (2), 205-214 (2006).</li>
<li>Gorczyca, W., Gong, J., Darzynkiewicz, Z. <a target="_blank" href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed?term=((Detection+of+DNA+strand+breaks+in+individual+apoptotic+cells+by+the+in+situ+terminal+deoxynucleotidyl+transferase+and+nick+translation+assays%5BTitle%5D)+AND+%22Cancer+Res%22%5BJournal%5D)">Detection of DNA strand breaks in individual apoptotic cells by the in situ terminal deoxynucleotidyl transferase and nick translation assays.</a> Cancer Res. 53 (8), 1945-1951 (1993).</li>
<li>Hanada, K., et al. <a target="_blank" href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed?term=((The+structure-specific+endonuclease+mus81+contributes+to+replication+restart+by+generating+double-strand+DNA+breaks%5BTitle%5D)+AND+%22Nat+Struct+Mol+Biol%22%5BJournal%5D)">The structure-specific endonuclease mus81 contributes to replication restart by generating double-strand DNA breaks.</a> Nat Struct Mol Biol. 14 (11), 1096-1104 (2007).</li>
</ol>

The authors declare no competing interests.

This protocol outlines a NC assay for assessing DNA breaks in human cells undergoing active replication. The protocol is relatively simple to perform, and researchers can readily adapt it to high pH conditions for alkaline analyses8. It includes two critical steps, as described in steps 3.7 and 4.5. In step 3.7, it is essential to spread the melted agarose with cells uniformly across the well to prevent comets from overlapping during analysis. Ensure that cellular aggregates are dissolved before resuspending the cells in agarose. Preventing the release of the pipette tip while spreading the agarose will help minimize the introduction of bubbles. The conditions for electrophoresis are crucial for achieving appropriate comet tail migration for imaging and analysis. Researchers should consider the nature of the cell lines used for analysis, as the extent of tail migration and the percentage of cells exhibiting comet tails vary across cell types (Figure 9). Therefore, it is recommended to empirically determine the electrophoresis run time prior to experimentation.
If no comet tails are observed in positive control samples (CPT-treated cells), the drug efficacy should be corroborated in parallel using alternative approaches, such as immunostaining for the DNA damage marker &#947;H2AX. Extensive tail migration can preclude the analysis of break induction. Minimizing electrophoresis time and assessing cell morphology prior to analysis can prevent obtaining comet tails that are too long. Insufficient drying of the slides can result in blurry and hazy comet images. Ensure that the agarose on the comet slide is evenly dried and flattened before staining with 1x SYBR solution. If the range of fold induction is narrow, performing a dose-response curve with CPT can help determine an optimal working range for experimental purposes. Applying these troubleshooting tips will help maximize the results from these assays.
This assay methodology is cost-effective and highly sensitive compared to other techniques used to study DNA break induction, such as the Halo assay29,30, TUNEL assay31, and pulsed-field gel electrophoresis32. However, the current assay technique has certain limitations. It does not provide a precise number of DNA lesions but offers a relative estimation of break accumulation compared to undamaged cells. Additionally, it cannot assess break induction that occurs in a cell cycle-dependent manner. To exclude changes in break induction due to differences in cell cycle progression, cell cycle analyses by flow cytometry should be performed in parallel.

The comet assay is a gel electrophoresis method used to detect DNA breaks at the single-cell level. It relies on the principle that open-ended DNA breaks migrate under electrophoretic conditions, while intact DNA remains largely static. Broken DNA migrates because breaks result in the relaxation of supercoiled DNA, causing its gradual spatial relocation towards the anode in the electrophoretic chamber, which results in a comet-like appearance observed by immunofluorescence1,2. The extent of DNA damage is then measured by quantifying the amount of broken DNA that has migrated relative to the compact DNA.
The two most commonly used comet assay methods are the alkaline comet (AC) assay and the neutral comet (NC) assay. The AC assay is performed under denaturing conditions using a high alkaline pH solution, while the NC assay is carried out in a solution with neutral pH. Both NC and AC assays can reliably detect DNA breaks that occur in the nucleus. However, the alkaline version is also advantageous for detecting alkali-labile sites3. Both formats of the assay require the use of lysis conditions to ensure that DNA is free of proteins prior to electrophoresis.
This assay is a simple method for detecting DNA breaks and offers several unique advantages for determining cellular DNA damage. The method is relatively easy to set up and requires reagents that can either be prepared in the laboratory or purchased from commercial vendors. As a single-cell resolution technique, the assay requires very little starting material. Notably, the NC assay can measure breaks with high sensitivity, reported to detect between 50 and 10,000 breaks per cell4. The versatility of this technique is demonstrated by its wide range of applications, including ecotoxicology5, human biomonitoring6, and genotoxicity studies7. The assay can also be reliably used across various cell types and adapted for high-throughput assays8 and for assessing breaks at specific genomic regions9. Thus, this assay serves as a rapid and reliable technique for investigating break formation at the single-cell level.
The process of DNA replication is constantly challenged by several endogenous and exogenous stressors10,11. Stalling of replisomes due to such lesions can cause DNA breaks and result in heightened genome instability. DNA breaks also often arise as replication intermediates to facilitate DNA repair12. Additionally, several chemotherapeutic agents induce replication-dependent double-strand breaks (DSBs), such as camptothecin (CPT)13,14,15and PARP inhibitors16,17. Thus, this assay serves as a powerful methodology to study the nature of DNA lesions, assess the processing of replication forks, and investigate the therapeutic potential of DNA-damaging agents. Adaptations of the assay that involve labeling newly synthesized DNA with BrdU have been useful for studying replication-associated stress phenotypes18,19,20,21. Notably, the NC assay is a reliable method for studying DNA break induction in the context of replication, as demonstrated in studies involving the characterization of fork proteins22,23, analysis of replication intermediates24,25, and investigation of transcription-replication conflicts in genome maintenance26,27. Herein, we outline a NC assay protocol with the goal of quantifying DNA breaks during replication in human cells. This protocol can be readily implemented by researchers interested in assessing replication stress-associated damage in a wide variety of dividing human cells.

<table><tbody><tr><td>1x DPBS</td><td>Gibco</td><td>14190144</td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Camptothecin</td><td>Selleckchem</td><td>S1288</td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Comet LMAgarose (LMA)</td><td>R&amp;amp;D systems</td><td>4250-050-02</td><td></td></tr><tr><td>CometAssay Electrophoresis System II</td><td>R&amp;amp;D systems</td><td>4250-050-ES</td><td>Includes electrophoresis tank, safety lid, cables, 2/20 wells slide trays and slide tray overlay</td></tr><tr><td>CometScore software</td><td>TriTek</td><td></td><td>open-sourced</td></tr><tr><td>CometSlide</td><td>R&amp;amp;D systems</td><td>4250-050-03</td><td></td></tr><tr><td>DMEM, high glucose</td><td>Gibco</td><td>11965092</td><td></td></tr><tr><td>DMEM/F12</td><td>Gibco</td><td>11320033</td><td></td></tr><tr><td>DMSO&amp;nbsp;</td><td>FisherSci</td><td>D128-4</td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Epifluorescence microscope</td><td>Keyence</td><td>BZ-X810</td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Fetal Bovine Serum - Premium</td><td>Bio-Techne</td><td>S11150</td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Gibco Trypsin-EDTA (0.05%), phenol red</td><td>Gibco</td><td>25300054</td><td></td></tr><tr><td>GraphPad Prism 10.0</td><td>GraphPad</td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>HEK293T cells</td><td>ATCC</td><td>CRL-11268</td><td></td></tr><tr><td>hTERT-RPE-1 cells</td><td>ATCC</td><td>CRL-4000</td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Hydroxyurea</td><td>Millipore Sigma</td><td>H8627</td><td></td></tr><tr><td>PARP inhibitor Olaparib</td><td>Selleckchem</td><td>S8096</td><td></td></tr><tr><td>PowerPac&amp;nbsp;</td><td>FisherSci</td><td>FB300Q</td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Surface Treated Sterile Tissue Culture Plate</td><td>FisherSci</td><td>FB012927</td><td></td></tr><tr><td>SYBR Green I Nucleic Acid Gel Stain (10,000x)</td><td>FisherSci</td><td>S7567</td><td></td></tr><tr><td>U2OS cells</td><td>ATCC</td><td>HTB-96</td><td></td></tr><tr><td>UVP&amp;nbsp;HB-1000 Hybridization Incubator</td><td>FisherSci</td><td>UVP95003001</td><td></td></tr></tbody></table>

detection of dna breaks in dividing human cells by neutral comet assay

Detection of DNA Breaks in Dividing Human Cells by Neutral Comet Assay

DNA replication is constantly challenged by a wide variety of endogenous and exogenous stressors that can damage DNA. Such lesions encountered during genome duplication can stall replisomes and convert replication forks into double-strand breaks. If left unrepaired, these toxic DNA breaks can trigger chromosomal rearrangements, leading to heightened genome instability and an increased likelihood of cellular transformation. Additionally, cancer cells exhibit persistent replication stress, making the targeting of replication fork vulnerabilities in tumor cells an attractive strategy for chemotherapy. A highly versatile and powerful technique to study DNA breaks during replication is the comet assay. This gel electrophoresis technique reliably detects the induction and repair of DNA breaks at the single-cell level. Herein, a protocol is outlined that allows investigators to measure the extent of DNA damage in mitotically dividing human cells using fork-stalling agents across multiple cell types. Coupling this with automated comet scoring facilitates rapid analysis and enhances the reliability in studying induction of DNA breaks.

Analysis of break induction by replication stress reagents 
U2OS cells were treated with DMSO, 4 of mM hydroxyurea (HU), or 100 nM of CPT for 4 h and analyzed for break accumulation by the NC assay (Figure 6A). While CPT induces breaks during S-phase by blocking topoisomerase-113, HU-induced depletion of nucleotide pools stalls replication forks that are progressively converted into DSBs28. The data indicates that exposure to either HU or CPT triggers break induction in S-phase, which is detectable by NC assay.
Analysis of break induction comparing lysis at different temperatures 
Untreated U2OS cells were incubated in lysis buffer either at room temperature (RT) or 4 °C prior to analyses of break induction (Figure 6B). The results indicate that the temperature at which lysis is performed has minimal impact on the migration of tails in the assay.
Temporal analysis of breaks by hydroxyurea (HU) 
U2OS cells were left either untreated or treated with 4 mM of HU for 4 h and 8 h prior to analyses of break induction by the NC assay (Figure 7). The results indicate that prolonged stalling of replication forks with HU causes replication fork collapse into DSBs.
Dose-dependent analysis of breaks by camptothecin 
U2OS cells were treated with increased doses of CPT for 1 h and harvested for break analyses using the NC assay (Figure 8). Whereas break accumulation is minimal in cells not treated with CPT, the degree of break induction gradually increases with increased dosage of CPT, thus demonstrating the utility of the assay in studying dose-dependent effects on break accumulation during DNA replication.
Comparative analysis of breaks across multiple cell types 
Basal levels of DNA breaks were assessed across three divergent mitotic cell types- hTERT immortalized retinal pigment epithelial cells (hTERT-RPE-1), simian virus 40 (SV40) large T-antigen expressing human embryonic kidney cells (HEK293T) and bone osteosarcoma cells (U2OS) (Figure 9). Each cell line demonstrated differential migration of tail moments in the absence of added replication stress, which may be due to differences in cell cycle distribution, chromatin organization, or number of active replication forks. Each cell type was also exposed to 1 µM of CPT for 1 h to validate an increase in replication-dependent DNA breaks.
Analyses of break induction by AC assay 
U2OS cells were treated with DMSO, 4 mM of HU, 1 µM of CPT, or 10 µM of PARP inhibitor (PARPi) Olaparib and analyzed for break induction (Figure 10). Cells were treated with DMSO, HU, and PARPi for 2 h while CPT treatment was for 1 h. The results indicate that exposure to replication stress causes break accumulation, which is observable by the AC assay.
<img alt="Comet assay process diagram; cell culture to electrophoresis; DNA damage assessment steps." class="xfigimg" src="/files/ftp_upload/67110/67110fig01.jpg" data-altupdatedat="1788304762000" data-alt="Figure 1"> 
Figure 1: Schematic representation of the NC assay. (A) The required number of cells is seeded the day before in a 6-well dish. (B) After drug treatments, the cells are trypsinized and harvested in cold PBS. (C) The cells are gently resuspended in melted agarose at a ratio of 10:1 (10 µL of agarose for 1 µL of cell suspension) using a pipette tip. (D) The cell suspension is transferred onto a slide well using a pipette tip and spread uniformly to cover the well surface completely with agarose. (E) Following incubation at 4 °C, the slides are immersed in lysis buffer, followed by cold 1x TAE buffer. (F) The samples are subjected to electrophoresis using the appropriate apparatus. (G) The slides are then immersed in the DNA precipitation solution, followed by a 70% ethanol solution. (H) After drying, the wells are stained with 1x SYBR Green solution. (I) The slides are imaged using an epifluorescence microscope. <a href="https://www.jove.com/files/ftp_upload/67110/67110fig01large.jpg" target="_blank">Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.</a>
<img alt="Agarose gel electrophoresis diagram: side view solidification to drying process, experimental setup." class="xfigimg" src="/files/ftp_upload/67110/67110fig02.jpg" data-altupdatedat="1788304762000" data-alt="Figure 2"> 
Figure 2: Side view of agarose on comet slide wells. (A) After incubation at 4 °C (step 3.8), the solidified agarose appears as a 'bubble' with a convex shape. (B) After drying at 45 °C (step 5.3), the agarose appears flattened on the well. <a href="https://www.jove.com/files/ftp_upload/67110/67110fig02large.jpg" target="_blank">Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.</a>
<img alt="Electrophoresis diagram of comet assay highlighting DNA migration and random sampling technique." class="xfigimg" src="/files/ftp_upload/67110/67110fig03.jpg" data-altupdatedat="1788304762000" data-alt="Figure 3"> 
Figure 3: Imaging and analysis of comets. (A) Comets within the inner circle of the well (highlighted in blue) are selected for analysis. Comets toward the outer edge of the well are excluded due to atypically longer tail moments, marking them as outliers. (B) At least 100 representative comets are randomly selected from the blue-colored region. <a href="https://www.jove.com/files/ftp_upload/67110/67110fig03large.jpg" target="_blank">Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.</a>
<img alt="Comet assay diagram; DNA damage analysis, fluorescence microscopy." class="xfigimg" src="/files/ftp_upload/67110/67110fig04.jpg" data-altupdatedat="1788304762000" data-alt="Figure 4"> 
Figure 4: Representative image of comets obtained from the NC assay. The right panel displays a representative field of view for SYBR Green-stained nuclei, while the left panel highlights the region (green outline) used for scoring comets. Nuclei that are partially visible or stacked close to each other (red outline, right panel) are not included in the analysis. Comets selected for scoring should be individually distinguishable, fully contained within the field of view, and exhibit uniform staining intensity. <a href="https://www.jove.com/files/ftp_upload/67110/67110fig04large.jpg" target="_blank">Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.</a>
<img alt="Comet assay process diagram with software analysis for DNA damage scoring." class="xfigimg" src="/files/ftp_upload/67110/67110fig05.jpg" data-altupdatedat="1788304762000" data-alt="Figure 5"> 
Figure 5: Representative scoring of comets obtained from the NC assay. (A) Individual nuclei are outlined using CometScore software. (B) The full spectrum view (left panel) is enabled, and the threshold (cutoff bar) is adjusted to achieve optimal signal intensity with minimal background. The 'full spectrum' signal should correspond to the 'single hue' image (top image, right panel) and not exceed the outline (bottom image, right panel). (C) The vertical yellow line in the box is aligned with the center of the comet head, using the widest part of the comet head as a reference for consistency. (D) The score for each analyzed comet is reported in the upper right corner. <a href="https://www.jove.com/files/ftp_upload/67110/67110fig05large.jpg" target="_blank">Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.</a>
<img alt="U2OS tail moment box plot, DNA damage assay, p-values comparing DMSO, CPT, HU, RT, 4°C conditions." class="xfigimg" src="/files/ftp_upload/67110/67110fig06.jpg" data-altupdatedat="1788304762000" data-alt="Figure 6"> 
Figure 6: Analysis of break induction by replication stress reagents. (A) U2OS cells were treated with DMSO, 100 nM camptothecin (CPT), or 4 mM hydroxyurea (HU) before break induction analysis. The representative graph shows increased break accumulation in cells treated with CPT or HU. (B) Untreated U2OS cells were seeded on comet slides and incubated for lysis (step 3.9) either at room temperature (RT) or 4 °C to compare the effect of lysis temperature. Tail moments from the analyses are plotted as box-and-whisker plots depicting 10-90 percentile values, with median values represented by horizontal lines within the boxes. P-values were calculated using the Kruskal-Wallis test with Dunn's multiple comparisons (cutoff p-value of 0.05). <a href="https://www.jove.com/files/ftp_upload/67110/67110fig06large.jpg" target="_blank">Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.</a>
<img alt="Box plot illustrating DNA damage in U2OS cells; tail moment vs HU hours, statistical analysis." class="xfigimg" src="/files/ftp_upload/67110/67110fig07.jpg" data-altupdatedat="1788304762000" data-alt="Figure 7"> 
Figure 7: Temporal analysis of breaks induced by hydroxyurea. U2OS cells were either untreated or treated with 4 mM HU for 4 h or 8 h before break induction analysis. The representative graph depicts a gradual increase in break accumulation in cells treated with HU. Tail moments from the analyses are plotted as box-and-whisker plots depicting 10-90 percentile values, with median values represented by horizontal lines within the boxes. P-values were calculated using the Kruskal-Wallis test with Dunn's multiple comparisons (cutoff p-value of 0.05). <a href="https://www.jove.com/files/ftp_upload/67110/67110fig07large.jpg" target="_blank">Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.</a>
<img alt="Box plot of tail moment analysis, U2OS cells treated with CPT; dose-dependent DNA damage." class="xfigimg" src="/files/ftp_upload/67110/67110fig08.jpg" data-altupdatedat="1788304762000" data-alt="Figure 8"> 
Figure 8: Dose-dependent analysis of breaks induced by camptothecin. U2OS cells were treated with either DMSO or increasing concentrations of CPT (25 nM, 100 nM, 500 nM, and 1 µM) for 1 h before break analysis. Tail moments from the analyses are plotted as box-and-whisker plots depicting 10-90 percentile values, with median values represented by horizontal lines within the boxes. The representative graph shows a dose-dependent increase in breaks induced by CPT. P-values were calculated using the Kruskal-Wallis test with Dunn's multiple comparisons (cutoff p-value of 0.05). <a href="https://www.jove.com/files/ftp_upload/67110/67110fig08large.jpg" target="_blank">Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.</a>
<img alt="Box plot of comet assay results, DNA damage analysis, comparing DMSO and CPT treatments." class="xfigimg" src="/files/ftp_upload/67110/67110fig09.jpg" data-altupdatedat="1788304762000" data-alt="Figure 9"> 
Figure 9: Comparative analysis of breaks across multiple cell types. hTERT-RPE-1, HEK293T, and U2OS cells were treated with either DMSO or 1 µM CPT for 1 h. The representative graph shows the relative extent of DNA damage across the three cell types in the presence or absence of CPT. Tail moments from the analyses are plotted as box-and-whisker plots depicting 10-90 percentile values, with median values represented by horizontal lines within the boxes. P-values were calculated using the Kruskal-Wallis test with Dunn's multiple comparisons (cutoff p-value of 0.05). <a href="https://www.jove.com/files/ftp_upload/67110/67110fig09large.jpg" target="_blank">Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.</a>
<img alt="Box plot showing DNA damage in U2OS cells under various treatments; statistical analysis included." class="xfigimg" src="/files/ftp_upload/67110/67110fig10.jpg" data-altupdatedat="1788304762000" data-alt="Figure 10"> 
Figure 10: Analysis of break induction by the AC assay. U2OS cells were treated with DMSO, 4 mM HU, 1 µM CPT, or 10 µM PARP inhibitor Olaparib prior to break induction analysis. Cells were treated with DMSO, HU, and PARP inhibitor for 2 h, while CPT treatment was for 1 h. The representative graph demonstrates increased break accumulation in cells treated with CPT, HU, or PARP inhibitors. Tail moments from the analyses are plotted as box-and-whisker plots depicting 10-90 percentile values, with median values represented by horizontal lines within the boxes. P-values were calculated using the Kruskal-Wallis test with Dunn's multiple comparisons (cutoff p-value of 0.05). <a href="https://www.jove.com/files/ftp_upload/67110/67110fig10large.jpg" target="_blank">Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.</a>
<table border="1" fo:keep-together.within-page="1" fo:keep-with-next.within-page="always">
	<tbody>
		<tr>
			<td>Reagent</td>
			<td>Working solution</td>
		</tr>
		<tr>
			<td>Lysis Buffer</td>
			<td>0.5% SDS, 200 mM Tris-Cl (pH 7.4), 50 mM EDTA</td>
		</tr>
		<tr>
			<td>1x TAE Buffer</td>
			<td>40 mM Tris Base, 20 mM Acetic Acid, 1 mM EDTA in pH 8.45</td>
		</tr>
		<tr>
			<td>DNA Precipitation solution</td>
			<td>1 M Ammonium Acetate, 87% Ethanol</td>
		</tr>
		<tr>
			<td>70% Ethanol solution</td>
			<td>70% Ethanol in distilled water</td>
		</tr>
		<tr>
			<td>1x SYBR Green solution</td>
			<td>1x SYBR Green in 1x TAE buffer</td>
		</tr>
		<tr>
			<td>DMEM culture media</td>
			<td>DMEM with 7.5% FBS</td>
		</tr>
		<tr>
			<td>DMEM/F12 culture media</td>
			<td>DMEM/F12 with 7.5% FBS</td>
		</tr>
		<tr>
			<td>Alkaline unwinding solution (for use in Alkaline Comet Assay)</td>
			<td>200 mM NaOH, 1 mM EDTA in pH&gt;13</td>
		</tr>
	</tbody>
</table>
Table 1: List of buffers and solutions.

This protocol is designed to investigate the extent of DNA damage occurring during DNA replication. Under neutral conditions, the induction of DNA breaks can be readily assessed within a short time frame. Additionally, the protocol is adaptable to other cell types and various replication stress reagents.

DNA replication is constantly challenged by a wide variety of endogenous and exogenous stressors that can damage DNA. Such lesions encountered during ...

detection-of-dna-breaks-in-dividing-human-cells-by-neutral-comet-assay

Research

JoVE Journal

Bioengineering

The video demonstrates the comet assay for detecting DNA damage following exposure to harmful agents. Under alkaline conditions, the DNA unwinds and denatures, and upon electrophoresis, the undamaged and damaged DNA migrate differently in the agarose gel, forming a comet-shaped structure. The slowly migrating undamaged DNA forms the circular comet head, while the rapidly migrating damaged DNA fragments form the elongated comet tail.

Comet Assay for DNA Damage Detection in Cells

The comet assay is an efficient way of detecting single- and double-strand breaks, including alkali-labile sites and DNA-DNA/DNA-protein cross-links on the DNA in all cells including hippocampal neurons. The method takes advantage of the differential migration of DNA in an electric field due to differences in amount of DNA damage.

Assaying DNA Damage in Hippocampal Neurons Using the Comet Assay

We describe here a platform that allows comet assay detection of DNA damage with unprecedented throughput. The device patterns mammalian cells into a microarray and enables parallel processing of 96 samples. The approach facilitates analysis of base level DNA damage, exposure-induced DNA damage and DNA repair kinetics.

CometChip: A High-throughput 96-Well Platform for Measuring DNA Damage in Microarrayed Human Cells

The comet assay is an efficient method to detect DNA damage including single and double-stranded DNA breaks. We describe alkaline and neutral comet assays to measure DNA damage in cancer cells to evaluate the therapeutic effect of chemotherapy.

Evaluating In Vitro DNA Damage Using Comet Assay

This protocol describes several procedures for preparing high quality frozen tissue samples at the time of necropsy for use in the comet assay to assess DNA damage: 1) minced tissue, 2) scraped epithelial cells from the gastrointestinal tract, and 3) cubed tissue samples, requiring homogenization using a tissue mincing device.

Use of Frozen Tissue in the Comet Assay for the Evaluation of DNA Damage

Here we describe two modifications of the DNA fiber assay to investigate single-stranded DNA gaps in replicating DNA after lesion induction. The S1 fiber assay enables the detection of post-replicative gaps using the ssDNA-specific S1 endonuclease, while the gap-filling assay allows visualization and quantification of gap repair.

Detection of Post-Replicative Gaps Accumulation and Repair in Human Cells Using the DNA Fiber Assay

The comet assay is a popular means of detecting DNA damage. This study describes an approach to running slides in representative variants of the comet assay. This approach significantly increased the number of samples while decreasing assay run-time, the number of slide manipulations, and the risk of damage to gels.

A High-Throughput Comet Assay Approach for Assessing Cellular DNA Damage

This protocol describes an effective method for quantifying the difference in DNA damage induced by type I and type II inhibitors in FLT3 mutant cells through the application of the comet assay.

Comet Assay to Quantify DNA Damage in FLT3 Mutant-expressing 32D Cells after Exposure to Type I and Type II FLT3 Inhibitors

"E-DNA" sensors, reagentless, electrochemical biosensors that perform well even when challenged directly in blood and other complex matrices, have been adapted to the detection of a wide range of nucleic acid, protein and small molecule analytes.  Here we present a general procedure for the fabrication and use of such sensors.

Fabrication of Electrochemical-DNA Biosensors for the Reagentless Detection of Nucleic Acids, Proteins and Small Molecules

We demonstrate the assembly and application of a molecular-scale device powered by a topoisomerase protein. The construct is a bio-molecular sensor which labels two major types of DNA breaks in tissue sections by attaching two different fluorophores to their ends.

In vitro Assembly of Semi-artificial Molecular Machine and its Use for Detection of DNA Damage

Learn the neutral comet assay method for detecting DNA breaks in dividing human cells under replication stress. This protocol assesses genome stability and chromatin remodeler function.

Detection of DNA Breaks in Dividing Human Cells by Neutral Comet Assay

Explore More Videos