Name: Influence of Step-Width Manipulation on Running Biomechanics (Video) | JoVE Journal
Uploaded: 2025-02-28T12:00:00.000+00:00
Duration: 6 min 53 s
Description: Learn how step width manipulation affects running biomechanics using motion capture technology. This method helps researchers analyze joint loading and muscle coordination to optimize performance and reduce injury risk.

ai_agent_IP

ai_agent

maintenance

instantTrialDurationMinutes

isBiopharma

enableNewMyJoveSectionDesign

educationFeatures

seoMetaApi

ai_copilot_institution_blacklist

ai_chat_institution_blacklist

freeAccessWindow

ssoRoleCapture

scheduledMaintenanceBanner

joveLabsFeatures

disable_autoplay_for_bots

extended_trial_duration

5 minutes

This study was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (12202216), Ningbo Natural Science Foundation (2023J128), and the &#34;Mechanics+&#34; Interdisciplinary Top Innovative Youth Fund Project of Ningbo University (GC2024006).

The study received approval from the Ethics Committee of the Research Institute at Ningbo University (Approval Number: ty2022001). All participants provided written informed consent after being briefed on the purpose, requirements, and procedures of the experiment. Details of the consumables, equipment, and software used are listed in the Table of Materials.
1. Experimental preparation
<ol>
	<li>Equipment preparation
	<ol>
		<li>Position eight infrared cameras in appropriate locations during equipment calibration and check for any reflections in the experimental area (e.g., reflective markers on participants&#39; clothing). Remove or cover the reflections, and ensure sufficient lighting.</li>
		<li>Insert the paired encryption dongle into the PC&#39;s parallel port. Start the motion capture cameras, tracking software, force platform amplifier, and ADC.</li>
		<li>Open the tracking software and wait for the eight cameras to initialize. Confirm the process is complete when the camera lights turn from red to green.</li>
		<li>Switch to Camera mode, and expand the System Resources panel on the left. Select all eight cameras.</li>
		<li>Adjust the settings in the left panel under Properties. Set the flash intensity to 0.95-1, gain to 1x, and grayscale mode to Auto. Under Centroid Fitting, set the threshold to 0.2-0.4, minimum circularity ratio to 0.5, and maximum blob height to 50.</li>
		<li>Position the T-frame with markers at the center of the motion capture area. Re-select all eight cameras from the toolbar on the left.</li>
		<li>Perform calibration in the Tools panel on the right. Select the 5 marker Wand &#38; T-Frame calibration object from the T-frame list.</li>
		<li>Click on the Stop button under the Mask Camera option in the System Preparation Tools panel. After the screen turns blue, click on the button again to revert it to the Stop state.</li>
		<li>Click on the Start button under the Calibrate Cameras option. Move the T-frame back and forth within the capture range, ensuring the swinging height matches the camera&#39;s focal height. Stop when the blue lights on the cameras stop flashing.</li>
		<li>Switch the view to 3D Perspective, and place the T-frame back at the center of the motion capture area. Ensure alignment with the force platform boundaries.</li>
		<li>Click on the Start button under the Set Volume Origin option in the right panel.</li>
	</ol>
	</li>
	<li>Pressure platform preparation
	<ol>
		<li>Position two embedded force plates in the center of the motion capture area and synchronize them at 1000 Hz.</li>
		<li>Mark six step widths on the force platform using different colored tapes to represent each condition, including the preferred step width and five variations (13% and 6.5% reductions, and 25%, 13%, and 6.5% increases in leg length). Connect the platform to the PC for data collection. 
		NOTE: Ensure that the system records the foot&#39;s anterior-posterior (Y-axis) coordinates upon contact, with yellow tape marking the preferred step width and other colors indicating variations.</li>
	</ol>
	</li>
	<li>Timing system preparation
	<ol>
		<li>Place a single-beam electronic timing gate on a tripod to record the participants&#39; running speed as they pass over the force plates. 
		NOTE: Ensure the distance between the electronic timing gates is 3 m (as shown in Figure 1).</li>
	</ol>
	</li>
</ol>
2. Participants preparation
<ol>
	<li>Obtain written informed consent from participants, briefly explain the study&#39;s purpose and procedures, and encourage questions. Ensure all participants are right-leg dominant to minimize variability. 
	NOTE: The present study involves 13 healthy Chinese males, with an average age of 22.7 years, weight of 70.9 kg, and height of 1.75 m. Ensure no lower limb injuries or foot deformities in the past six months. This sample selection reduces the influence of age and sex on biomechanical parameters, ensuring statistical validity and reproducibility. The sample size is sufficient for analyzing the effects of step width on biomechanics.</li>
	<li>Instruct participants to wear tight-fitting athletic pants and standardized experimental shoes to minimize gait interference. Remove excess clothing.</li>
	<li>Collect and record anthropometric data: height, weight, leg length, shoulder width, and hip width. 
	NOTE: Measure leg length from the anterior superior iliac spine to the lateral malleolus. Measure shoulder width and hip width as the direct distances between respective anatomical landmarks.</li>
	<li>Keep participants&#39; skin dry and attach reflective markers to anatomical landmarks using double-sided tape. 
	NOTE: Use 38 reflective markers with specific positions and label names detailed in Table 1. Ensure precise placement and secure attachment of the markers. For areas with high motion or uneven surfaces, reinforce the markers with muscle tape or skin-friendly adhesive. After placing the markers, take photographs from the front, back, and sides for documentation.</li>
	<li>Instruct participants to jog for 5 min as a warm-up before starting the static and dynamic recordings.</li>
</ol>
3. Static calibration
<ol>
	<li>Launch the tracking software and create a new database by selecting New Database from the toolbar. In the Data Management section, choose New Patient Classification, then New Patient, and finally, click on New Session to set up a participant information database.</li>
	<li>Click on Go Live in the left toolbar, then use the Split horizontal button in the View interface. Select graphics to view trajectory counts.</li>
	<li>Click on the Subject Preparation in the toolbar. Instruct the participant to stand with feet shoulder-width apart, one foot on the force platform, arms parallel to the shoulders, and looking straight ahead. Click on Start to begin data collection, and hold the position for 10 s. Click on Stop to complete the static capture. 
	NOTE: Switch to &#34;3D Perspective&#34; mode to ensure the camera captures at least one frame showing the 38 reflective markers on the participant&#39;s body.</li>
</ol>
4. Dynamic trials
<ol>
	<li>Inform participants to prepare for the experiment and enter the experimental state.</li>
	<li>Software operations
	<ol>
		<li>Click on Go Live in the left Resources panel and Capture in the right Tools panel. Once participants are ready, start the trial by clicking on Start and end it by clicking on Stop after completion. 
		NOTE: Label different trials with varying step widths in the &#34;Trial Name&#34; section.</li>
	</ol>
	</li>
	<li>Conduct the preferred step width experiment, capturing motion at three different speeds.
	<ol>
		<li>Instruct participants to walk naturally along a straight pathway with two force platforms, placing the left foot on platform A (Kistler) and the right foot on platform B (AMTI).</li>
		<li>Consider the trial successful if the time to complete one run (passing over the force platforms) falls between 0.95-1.05 s at 3.0 m/s or between 0.76-0.86 s at 3.7 m/s. Repeat the trial if the timing does not meet these criteria to minimize the influence of speed fluctuations on running biomechanics. The primary objective is to investigate the influence of speed. 
		NOTE: These time ranges were calculated based on predefined running speeds (3.0 m/s and 3.7 m/s) and the known distance between the electronic timing gates. This ensures participants maintain a consistent running speed throughout the trial and accurately reflect the experimental conditions.</li>
		<li>Instruct participants to run at a speed of 3.7 m/s on a straight pathway with two force platforms. 
		NOTE: If the time passing over the force platform is between 0.76-0.86 s, consider the trial successful; otherwise, retry. Ensure participants consistently place their left foot on platform A and right foot on platform B. Prior studies have shown significant biomechanical differences at various speeds9,10,11,12. Instruct participants to practice multiple times before formal trials to ensure a natural gait. Monitor the trials closely, ensuring correct execution and that markers stay in place. Each condition requires at least five successful trials.</li>
	</ol>
	</li>
	<li>Measuring the preferred step width and setting different step widths
	<ol>
		<li>Based on the definition of step width and previous research, measure the participants&#39; preferred step width in three movement modes8,18,19,20. Using the motion capture system, ensure the Y-axis in the lab coordinate system represents the mediolateral (side-to-side) direction.
		<ol>
			<li>Record the Y-axis coordinates of the left and right heel markers during initial ground contact. Calculate the preferred step width as the difference in the Y-axis coordinates of the two heels, providing a direct measure of the lateral distance between the feet.</li>
		</ol>
		</li>
		<li>Mark the force platforms with different colored tapes corresponding to five step width conditions (step width reduced or increased by 13%, 6.5%, or 25% of leg length). The yellow tape indicates the preferred step width. 
		NOTE: Previous studies have demonstrated significant biomechanical differences when step width changes by 13% relative to leg length5,8,18,19. Based on this finding, introduce additional step width conditions.</li>
		<li>Instruct the participants to walk straight while focusing ahead. Ensure the left foot steps on the yellow tape on platform A and the right foot steps on a different colored tape on platform B. Randomly assign specific tape colors to alter step width. 
		NOTE: Collect at least five successful trials for each step width condition.</li>
		<li>Instruct participants to run at speeds of 3.0 m/s and 3.7 m/s with the five different step widths. 
		NOTE: Ensure participants follow instructions correctly and monitor for marker detachment. Collect at least five successful trials for each condition, and ensure adequate rest time after each test.</li>
	</ol>
	</li>
</ol>
5. Data processing
<ol>
	<li>After the experiment, manually process all collected data using compatible software. Sequentially connect the data according to the marker points set in Table 1.</li>
	<li>Check each static or dynamic trajectory for any missing or interrupted markers on the participants. Use the point connection/fill tool in the software to manually reconnect the missing markers, referencing nearby markers for accuracy.</li>
	<li>Analyze ground reaction forces (GRFs) during dynamic activities by setting a vertical threshold of 20 N to detect foot contact and toe-off, defining the stance phase of each gait cycle. 
	NOTE: GRF data from heel contact to toe-off defines one gait cycle and is saved as raw C3D files.</li>
	<li>Export the processed data in C3D, MOT, TRC, and CSV formats. Ensure each participant completes approximately 55 trials across static, walking, and running conditions with six different step widths. Use the data to compare step widths and limb characteristics. 
	NOTE: Despite strict protocol adherence, some participants may have incomplete data due to marker trajectory disappearance in the equipment system.</li>
</ol>
6. Statistical analysis
<ol>
	<li>Analyze the data using statistical software (e.g., SPSS, Python), focusing on the effects of step width and running speed on lower limb biomechanics.</li>
	<li>Use repeated measures ANOVA to analyze biomechanical parameters, applying Bonferroni correction for post-hoc tests if necessary.</li>
	<li>6.3. Use non-parametric methods like the Friedman test when normality and sphericity assumptions are not met. Set all significance levels at p&#160;&#60; 0.05.</li>
</ol>

<ol><li>Mcandrew Young, P. M., Dingwell, J. B. <a target="_blank" href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed?term=((Voluntary+changes+in+step+width+and+step+length+during+human+walking+affect+dynamic+margins+of+stability%5BTitle%5D)+AND+%22Gait+Posture%22%5BJournal%5D)">Voluntary changes in step width and step length during human walking affect dynamic margins of stability.</a> Gait Posture. 36 (2), 219-224 (2012).</li>
<li>Perry, J. A., Srinivasan, M. <a target="_blank" href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed?term=((Walking+with+wider+steps+changes+foot+placement+control%2C+increases+kinematic+variability+and+does+not+improve+linear+stability%5BTitle%5D)+AND+%22R.+Soc.+Open+Sci%22%5BJournal%5D)">Walking with wider steps changes foot placement control, increases kinematic variability and does not improve linear stability.</a> R. Soc. Open Sci. 4 (9), 160627(2017).</li>
<li>Pohl, M. B., Messenger, N., Buckley, J. G. <a target="_blank" href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed?term=((Changes+in+foot+and+lower+limb+coupling+due+to+systematic+variations+in+step+width%5BTitle%5D)+AND+%22Clin+Biomech%22%5BJournal%5D)">Changes in foot and lower limb coupling due to systematic variations in step width.</a> Clin Biomech. 21 (2), 175-183 (2006).</li>
<li>Maharaj, J. N., Murry, L. E., Cresswell, A. G., Lichtwark, G. A. <a target="_blank" href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed?term=((Increasing+step+width+reduces+the+requirements+for+subtalar+joint+moments+and+powers%5BTitle%5D)+AND+%22J.+Biomech%22%5BJournal%5D)">Increasing step width reduces the requirements for subtalar joint moments and powers.</a> J. Biomech. 92, 29-34 (2019).</li>
<li>Molitor, S. L., Neptune, R. R. <a target="_blank" href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed?term=((Lower-limb+joint+quasi-stiffness+in+the+frontal+and+sagittal+planes+during+walking+at+different+step+widths%5BTitle%5D)+AND+%22J.+Biomech%22%5BJournal%5D)">Lower-limb joint quasi-stiffness in the frontal and sagittal planes during walking at different step widths.</a> J. Biomech. 162, 111897(2024).</li>
<li>Brindle, R. A., Milner, C. E., Zhang, S., Fitzhugh, E. C. <a target="_blank" href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed?term=((Changing+step+width+alters+lower+extremity+biomechanics+during+running%5BTitle%5D)+AND+%22Gait+Posture%22%5BJournal%5D)">Changing step width alters lower extremity biomechanics during running.</a> Gait Posture. 39 (1), 124-128 (2014).</li>
<li>Meardon, S. A., Campbell, S., Derrick, T. R. <a target="_blank" href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed?term=((Step+width+alters+iliotibial+band+strain+during+running%5BTitle%5D)+AND+%22Sports+Biomech%22%5BJournal%5D)">Step width alters iliotibial band strain during running.</a> Sports Biomech. 11 (4), 464-472 (2012).</li>
<li>Meardon, S. A., Derrick, T. R. <a target="_blank" href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed?term=((Effect+of+step+width+manipulation+on+tibial+stress+during+running%5BTitle%5D)+AND+%22J.+Biomech%22%5BJournal%5D)">Effect of step width manipulation on tibial stress during running.</a> J. Biomech. 47 (11), 2738-2744 (2014).</li>
<li>Schache, A. G., et al. <a target="_blank" href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed?term=((Effect+of+running+speed+on+lower+limb+joint+kinetics%5BTitle%5D)+AND+%22Med+Sci+Sports+Exerc%22%5BJournal%5D)">Effect of running speed on lower limb joint kinetics.</a> Med Sci Sports Exerc. 43 (7), 1260-1271 (2011).</li>
<li>Petersen, J., Sørensen, H., Nielsen, R. <a target="_blank" href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed?term=((Cumulative+loads+increase+at+the+knee+joint+with+slow-speed+running+compared+to+faster+running%3A+A+biomechanical+study%5BTitle%5D)+AND+%22J+Orthop+Sports+Phys+Ther%22%5BJournal%5D)">Cumulative loads increase at the knee joint with slow-speed running compared to faster running: A biomechanical study.</a> J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 45 (4), 316-322 (2015).</li>
<li>Chehab, E. F., Andriacchi, T. P., Favre, J. <a target="_blank" href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed?term=((Speed%2C+age%2C+sex%2C+and+body+mass+index+provide+a+rigorous+basis+for+comparing+the+kinematic+and+kinetic+profiles+of+the+lower+extremity+during+walking%5BTitle%5D)+AND+%22J+Biomech%22%5BJournal%5D)">Speed, age, sex, and body mass index provide a rigorous basis for comparing the kinematic and kinetic profiles of the lower extremity during walking.</a> J Biomech. 58, 11-20 (2017).</li>
<li>Yu, L., et al. <a target="_blank" href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed?term=((Principal+component+analysis+of+the+running+ground+reaction+forces+with+different+speeds%5BTitle%5D)+AND+%22Front.+Bioeng.+Biotechnol.+9%22%5BJournal%5D)">Principal component analysis of the running ground reaction forces with different speeds.</a> Front. Bioeng. Biotechnol. 9. 9, 629809(2021).</li>
<li>Fukuchi, R. K., Fukuchi, C. A., Marcos, D. <a target="_blank" href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed?term=((A+public+dataset+of+running+biomechanics+and+the+effects+of+running+speed+on+lower+extremity+kinematics+and+kinetics%5BTitle%5D)+AND+%22PeerJ%22%5BJournal%5D)">A public dataset of running biomechanics and the effects of running speed on lower extremity kinematics and kinetics.</a> PeerJ. 5, e3298(2017).</li>
<li>Reznick, E., et al. <a target="_blank" href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed?term=((Lower-limb+kinematics+and+kinetics+during+continuously+varying+human+locomotion%5BTitle%5D)+AND+%22Sci.+Data%22%5BJournal%5D)">Lower-limb kinematics and kinetics during continuously varying human locomotion.</a> Sci. Data. 8 (1), 282(2021).</li>
<li>Fukuchi, C. A., Fukuchi, R. K., Duarte, M. <a target="_blank" href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed?term=((A+public+dataset+of+overground+and+treadmill+walking+kinematics+and+kinetics+in+healthy+individuals%5BTitle%5D)+AND+%22PeerJ%22%5BJournal%5D)">A public dataset of overground and treadmill walking kinematics and kinetics in healthy individuals.</a> PeerJ. 6, e4640(2018).</li>
<li>Lencioni, T., Carpinella, I., Rabuffetti, M., Marzegan, A., Ferrarin, M. <a target="_blank" href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed?term=((Human+kinematic%2C+kinetic+and+EMG+data+during+different+walking+and+stair+ascending+and+descending+tasks%5BTitle%5D)+AND+%22Sci.+Data%22%5BJournal%5D)">Human kinematic, kinetic and EMG data during different walking and stair ascending and descending tasks.</a> Sci. Data. 6, 309(2019).</li>
<li>Scherpereel, K., Molinaro, D., Inan, O., Shepherd, M., Young, A. <a target="_blank" href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed?term=((A+human+lower-limb+biomechanics+and+wearable+sensors+dataset+during+cyclic+and+non-cyclic+activities%5BTitle%5D)+AND+%22Sci.+Data%22%5BJournal%5D)">A human lower-limb biomechanics and wearable sensors dataset during cyclic and non-cyclic activities.</a> Sci. Data. 10 (1), 924(2023).</li>
<li>Sample, D. W., Thorsen, T. A., Weinhandl, J. T., Strohacker, K. A., Zhang, S. <a target="_blank" href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed?term=((Effects+of+increased+step-width+on+knee+biomechanics+during+inclined+and+declined+walking%5BTitle%5D)+AND+%22J+Appl+Biomech%22%5BJournal%5D)">Effects of increased step-width on knee biomechanics during inclined and declined walking.</a> J Appl Biomech. 36 (5), 292-297 (2020).</li>
<li>Bennett, H. J., Shen, G., Cates, H. E., Zhang, S. <a target="_blank" href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed?term=((Effects+of+toe-in+and+toe-in+with+wider+step+width+on+level+walking+knee+biomechanics+in+varus%2C+valgus%2C+and+neutral+knee+alignments%5BTitle%5D)+AND+%22Knee%22%5BJournal%5D)">Effects of toe-in and toe-in with wider step width on level walking knee biomechanics in varus, valgus, and neutral knee alignments.</a> Knee. 24 (6), 1326-1334 (2017).</li>
<li>Shih, H. -J. S., Gordon, J., Kulig, K. <a target="_blank" href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed?term=((Trunk+control+during+gait%3A+Walking+with+wide+and+narrow+step+widths+present+distinct+challenges%5BTitle%5D)+AND+%22J.+Biomech%22%5BJournal%5D)">Trunk control during gait: Walking with wide and narrow step widths present distinct challenges.</a> J. Biomech. 114, 110135(2021).</li>
<li>Mcandrew Young, P. M., Dingwell, J. B. <a target="_blank" href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed?term=((Voluntarily+changing+step+length+or+step+width+affects+dynamic+stability+of+human+walking%5BTitle%5D)+AND+%22Gait+Posture%22%5BJournal%5D)">Voluntarily changing step length or step width affects dynamic stability of human walking.</a> Gait Posture. 35 (3), 472-477 (2012).</li>
<li>Effects of wide step walking on swing phase hip muscle forces and spatio-temporal gait parameters. Bajelan, S., Nagano, H., Sparow, T., Begg, R. K. 2017 39th Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society (EMBC), 2017, Jeju, Korea (South), , 954 (2017).</li>
<li>Arvin, M., et al. <a target="_blank" href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed?term=((Effects+of+narrow+base+gait+on+mediolateral+balance+control+in+young+and+older+adults%5BTitle%5D)+AND+%22J+Biomech%22%5BJournal%5D)">Effects of narrow base gait on mediolateral balance control in young and older adults.</a> J Biomech. 49 (7), 1264-1267 (2016).</li>
<li>Schreiber, C., Moissenet, F. <a target="_blank" href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed?term=((A+multimodal+dataset+of+human+gait+at+different+walking+speeds+established+on+injury-free+adult+participants%5BTitle%5D)+AND+%22Sci+Data%22%5BJournal%5D)">A multimodal dataset of human gait at different walking speeds established on injury-free adult participants.</a> Sci Data. 6 (1), 111(2019).</li>
<li>Moreira, L., Figueiredo, J., Fonseca, P., Vilas-Boas, J. P., Santos, C. P. <a target="_blank" href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed?term=((Lower+limb+kinematic%2C+kinetic%2C+and+EMG+data+from+young+healthy+humans+during+walking+at+controlled+speeds%5BTitle%5D)+AND+%22Sci+Data%22%5BJournal%5D)">Lower limb kinematic, kinetic, and EMG data from young healthy humans during walking at controlled speeds.</a> Sci Data. 8 (1), 103(2021).</li>
<li>Zee, T. J. V. D., Mundinger, E. M., Kuo, A. D. <a target="_blank" href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed?term=((A+biomechanics+dataset+of+healthy+human+walking+at+various+speeds%2C+step+lengths+and+step+widths%5BTitle%5D)+AND+%22Sci+Data%22%5BJournal%5D)">A biomechanics dataset of healthy human walking at various speeds, step lengths and step widths.</a> Sci Data. 9, 704(2022).</li>
</ol>

The impact of step width on human running is a multifaceted and significant issue. Step width refers to the lateral distance between the center of the heel and the ground upon initial contact of each foot3. Changing step width may affect stability, balance, biomechanics, and energy expenditure during running. Earlier research suggests that an increase in step width may reduce the hip adduction angle, knee abduction moment, and peak impulse. Conversely, narrowing the step width could potentially in...

Environmental factors, including spatial and temporal elements, directly influence human daily movement. Individuals may adopt different postures and movement patterns while running and walking in various environmental conditions. It is well-established that altering running techniques can impact body biomechanics, with step width being closely associated with stability and balance during human running1,2. Step width is defined as the mediolateral distance between the midfoot and the initial ground contact of each foot, representing a variable in the frontal plane3. During walking and running, short-term variations in step width can influence lower extremity biomechanics across three planes3,4,5.
Numerous studies have demonstrated that step width significantly affects the biomechanics of lower limb joints, kinematics, and kinetics during running. A wider step width reduces hip adduction angles, knee abduction moments, and rearfoot eversion angles, contributing to enhanced stability and potentially lowering injury risk6,7. Conversely, a narrower step width increases knee internal rotation and hip adduction angles, potentially elevating joint loads. Specifically, a narrow step width has been associated with increased variations in knee internal rotation and peak knee abduction torque compared to a normal step width6,7. Additionally, wider step widths have been shown to reduce tibial loading, thereby decreasing stress on the tibia during running8. These findings underscore the critical role of step width in influencing running biomechanics, highlighting its importance in optimizing performance and minimizing injury risk.
Studies have further demonstrated that walking and running speeds influence the biomechanical parameters of the lower limbs9,10,11,12. However, the effects of step width change on biomechanics at varying exercise speeds remain unclear, and limited scientific data regarding human movement under different speed and step width conditions are available. Therefore, this study aims to investigate the impact of step width changes on lower limb biomechanics at different speeds, focusing on key parameters such as hip adduction angle and knee abduction moment.
To address this, a dataset was established comprising 13 healthy male participants aged 20-24 years, including C3D files and ready-to-use kinematic data. Participants were instructed to run at speeds of 3.0 m/s and 3.7 m/s using six distinct step widths. The selection of these step widths and speeds was informed by existing research findings and the current state of open-source datasets on gait biomechanics in the literature13,14,15,16,17. This study aims to examine the acute effects of step width changes on the lower limb kinetic chain while expanding the dataset to provide valuable insights into the relationship between step width and lower limb biomechanics.

<table><tbody><tr><td>AMTI Force Plate</td><td>AMTI</td><td>OR6-7</td><td>Watertown, MA, USA</td></tr><tr><td>Colored Tape for Floor Marking</td><td>Generic</td><td>-</td><td>Used to mark different step widths on force plates, purchased online</td></tr><tr><td>Kistler Force Plate</td><td>Kistler</td><td>9260AA</td><td>Winterthur, Switzerland</td></tr><tr><td>MATLAB</td><td>MathWorks</td><td>Version R2021b</td><td>Data processing and modeling</td></tr><tr><td>Reflective Markers</td><td>Vicon Metrics Ltd.</td><td>-</td><td>Used for marking participant body points</td></tr><tr><td>Single-Beam Electronic Timing Gate</td><td>Brower Timing System</td><td>-</td><td>Draper, UT, USA, Used to record running speed</td></tr><tr><td>Standard Experimental Shoes</td><td>Designated Brand</td><td>-</td><td>Standardized shoes to minimize gait interference</td></tr><tr><td>Vicon Motion Capture System</td><td>Vicon Metrics Ltd.</td><td>Vicon T-Series</td><td>Oxford, UK, Used for motion capture</td></tr><tr><td>Vicon Nexus Software</td><td>Vicon Metrics Ltd.</td><td>Version 1.8.5A</td><td>Data collection and analysis</td></tr></tbody></table>

influence of step-width manipulation on running biomechanics

Influence of Step-Width Manipulation on Running Biomechanics

Step width is a critical factor influencing lower limb biomechanics during running, significantly affecting stability, performance, and injury risk. Understanding these effects is essential for optimizing running performance and minimizing injury risk. This study evaluated the effects of varying step widths on lower limb biomechanics at different running speeds. Thirteen healthy Chinese males (aged 20-24) participated in the study, running at speeds of 3.0 m/s and 3.7 m/s using six distinct step widths: the preferred step width and five variations (reductions of 13% and 6.5%, and increases of 6.5%, 13%, and 25%, based on leg length). Data were collected using a motion capture system and force plates and analyzed through repeated measures ANOVA and correlation tests. The results indicated that wider step widths significantly reduced peak knee abduction moments and hip adduction angles, whereas narrower step widths increased knee joint loading. These findings have important implications for clinicians and runners, suggesting that careful step width selection can help reduce injury risk and enhance running efficiency. This study contributes a new dataset that lays the foundation for future research into the relationship between step width and running biomechanics and serves as a reference for training and rehabilitation practices.

After the experiment and data processing, the processed marker trajectory and simulated ground reaction force (GRF) data were saved in C3D files, as outlined in Table 1. The C3D.zip folder contains the raw dataset obtained from the motion capture experiment. All data records are listed in Table 2. The dataset is organized into folders, each representing one of the 13 participants. Within these subfolders, the experimental files are named NNN_CV_TT.XXX, where NNN denotes the part...

The present protocol outlines an experimental setup designed to investigate the influence of step width manipulation on running biomechanics using a motion capture system. The objective is to expand relevant datasets and examine the effects of varying step widths on the kinematic chain of the human lower limb.

Step width is a critical factor influencing lower limb biomechanics during running, significantly affecting stability, performance, and injury risk. ...

influence-of-step-width-manipulation-on-running-biomechanics

Research

JoVE Journal

Bioengineering

Body segmental inertial properties are required for inverse dynamics modeling. Using an oscillation and reaction board technique, inertial properties of below-knee prostheses were measured. Using direct measures of prosthesis inertia in the inverse dynamics model of the prosthetic leg resulted in lower magnitudes of resultant joint forces and moments.

Oscillation and Reaction Board Techniques for Estimating Inertial Properties of a Below-knee Prosthesis

Here, we present a novel protocol to measure positional stability at key events during the sit-to-stand-to-walk using the center-of-pressure to the whole-body-center-of-mass distance. This was derived from the force platform and three-dimensional motion-capture technology. The paradigm is reliable and can be utilized for the assessment of neurologically compromised individuals.

Sit-to-stand-and-walk from 120% Knee Height: A Novel Approach to Assess Dynamic Postural Control Independent of Lead-limb

We describe a protocol for investigating human locomotor adaptation using the split-belt treadmill, which has two belts that can drive each leg at a different speed. We specifically focus on a paradigm designed to test the generalization of adapted locomotor patterns to different walking contexts (e.g., gait speeds, walking environments).

Using a Split-belt Treadmill to Evaluate Generalization of Human Locomotor Adaptation

This study investigated lower-limb kinematics and ground reaction force (GRF) during moderate high-heeled jogging and running. Subjects were divided into groups of experienced wearers and inexperienced wearers. A three-dimensional motion analysis system with a configured force platform captured lower-limb joint movements and GRF.

Using Gold-standard Gait Analysis Methods to Assess Experience Effects on Lower-limb Mechanics During Moderate High-heeled Jogging and Running

Here, we present a protocol to evaluate the differences in injury mechanisms between professional and amateur players when performing a badminton maximal right lunge movement by analyzing lower limb kinematics.

Biomechanical Analysis Methods to Assess Professional Badminton Players' Lunge Performance

This article introduces a comprehensive experimental methodology on two of the latest technologies available to measure the lower limb biomechanics of individuals.

Lower Limb Biomechanical Analysis of Healthy Participants

This study investigated the biomechanical characteristics of the lower extremity kinematic variables between the initial and terminal phase of 5 km treadmill running. The lower-limb kinematic data of 10 runners were collected using a three-dimensional motion capture system on a treadmill at the initial phase (0.5 km) and the terminal phase (5 km), respectively.

Comparative Analysis of Lower Limb Kinematics between the Initial and Terminal  Phase  of 5km Treadmill Running

This study compared the biomechanical characteristics of the lower extremity during unplanned gait termination under different walking speeds. The lower-limb kinematic and kinetic data from fifteen subjects with normal and fast walking speeds were collected using a motion analysis system and plantar pressure platform.

Lower-Limb Biomechanical Characteristics Associated with Unplanned Gait Termination Under Different Walking Speeds

This study presents a protocol to investigate the ground reaction force characteristics between cross-step and chasse step during stroke in table tennis.

Comparison of Kinetic Characteristics of Footwork during Stroke in Table Tennis: Cross-Step and Chasse Step

This paper describes the material and method developed to investigate the postural organization of gait initiation. The method is based on force platform recordings and on the direct principle of mechanics to compute center of gravity and center of pressure kinematics.

Postural Organization of Gait Initiation for Biomechanical Analysis Using Force Platform Recordings

This protocol details a standardized approach to quantify plantar pressure distribution, foot balance, and foot axis angle during 45° change-of-direction tasks using a Footscan pressure plate, enabling reproducible assessment of bilateral limb loading patterns at a controlled approach speed.

Effect of Change of Direction (COD) Movement on Plantar Pressure and Foot Balance in Bilateral Limbs

Learn how step width manipulation affects running biomechanics using motion capture technology. This method helps researchers analyze joint loading and muscle coordination to optimize performance and reduce injury risk.

Influence of Step-Width Manipulation on Running Biomechanics

Explore More Videos