$$\rightleftharpoonup{xx}$$
$$\longleftharp{xx}$$,
$$\longrightharp{xx}$$,
Laparoscopic hepatic surgery has been continuously explored and developed for more than three decades, evolving from sporadic liver resections to precise minimally invasive anatomic liver resection (MIALR). It has become a prominent area within hepatobiliary surgery, gaining considerable attention in recent years1,2,3,4,5. This technique offers several advantages, including enhanced visualization and magnification of the surgical field, enabling precise surgical operations. Accurate understanding and refinement of the Glissonean pedicles approach are fundamental skills in MIALR, ensuring safety, efficiency, and accuracy3,4,5. Atsushi Sugioka's Gate Theory, based on the anatomical structure of the Laennec capsule, provides a well-established solution that has gained wide recognition6,7(Figure 1A,B). It also describes the surgical procedure for MIALR, which includes the initial isolation and ligation of the Glissonean pedicle corresponding to the hepatic lobe, followed by the resection of the lobe.
In clinical practice, conventional hepatectomy of the right posterior liver lobe is typically performed by dissecting and ligating the right posterior Glissonean pedicle in the Rouviere's groove or by directly accessing Gate V and Gate VI through the porta7,8. However, surgery limitations, diminished tactile sensitivity, reduced global visual control ability, and anatomical variations may cause intraoperative confusion in anatomical orientation for tumors located near the bifurcation of the Glissonean pedicle in the liver (excluding hilar cholangiocarcinoma). These challenges may lead to inadvertent damage to variant blood vessels of the posterior portal vein, subsequent bleeding, and rupture of the tumor capsule5,9,10,11. Furthermore, conventional hepatectomy of the right posterior liver lobe, or occlusion of the hepatoduodenal ligament or right Glissonean pedicle, is often necessary to minimize intraoperative bleeding2,3. However, this occlusion not only induces ischemia on the tumor-bearing side of the liver but also affects the normal side, exacerbating hepatic ischemia-reperfusion injury (IRI)1,12.
Takasaki et al. previously described the extrahepatic isolation of the posterior sectional pedicle using the subtraction method7,8, while Sugioka and Kato described subtraction techniques for the extrahepatic isolation of peripheral segmental pedicles13. These applications align with liver resection in the context of peripheral subtractive dissection of the Glissonean pedicle (PSDGP), with the primary objective of mitigating pedicle injury or tumor rupture during direct pedicle isolation. Therefore, this study proposes the use of PSDGP technology for specific tumor types located near the bifurcation of the Glissonean pedicle in the liver (excluding hilar cholangiocarcinoma). The primary objective is to mitigate bleeding risk during the separation of the right posterior hepatic pedicle and prevent rupture of the tumor capsule, while concurrently reducing IRI in the residual liver.