Method Article

Decompression After Posterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion without Moving Implant via Unilateral Biportal Endoscopic Technique

DOI:

10.3791/67690

June 13th, 2025

In This Article

Summary

Loading...
$$\rightleftharpoonup{xx}$$ $$\longleftharp{xx}$$, $$\longrightharp{xx}$$,

In this study, we introduce a protocol for decompression 3 years after posterior lumbar interbody fusion (PLIF) using a unilateral biportal endoscopic (UBE) technique without removing the implant. This protocol highlights how the UBE technique can enhance intraoperative visualization, improve efficiency, reduce operating time, and achieve adequate nerve root decompression.

Abstract

Loading...
$$\rightleftharpoonup{xx}$$ $$\longleftharp{xx}$$, $$\longrightharp{xx}$$,

The complexity and diversity of reasons for revising posterior lumbar interbody fusion (PLIF) are well-documented. Common triggers include weak initial surgical indications, delayed intervention, diagnostic oversights or misjudgments, insufficient decompression, internal fixation complications, postoperative disease progression or recurrence, and adjacent segment degeneration. Pathological drivers such as intervertebral disc degeneration, facet joint degeneration, spinal instability, and spondylolisthesis in operated segments frequently cause nerve compression, spinal cord injury, or vertebral fractures. These conditions manifest as low back pain, radiating nerve pain, and intermittent claudication.

Critical determinants for revision include patient age, surgical technique, number of operated PPPP segments, age at initial surgery, and prior laminectomy status. Traditional revision involves open surgery to remove fixation rods, followed by decompression and re-instrumentation. However, surgical site adhesions increase procedural complexity, risking dural tears and nerve root injuries during direct visualization. Minimally invasive unilateral biportal endoscopic (UBE) decompression has emerged to address unilateral nerve root canal stenosis post fusion without hardware removal. While UBE has demonstrated safety and efficacy, its adoption remains limited by high technical demands, restricting patient access.

This paper explores the role of UBE in revision surgery, emphasizing its ability to achieve neural decompression while preserving instrumentation. The technique's steep learning curve necessitates specialized training, contributing to geographic disparities in availability. To broaden access, the authors advocate clarifying rationale and defining dissemination strategies of UBE, including standardized training, explicit surgical indications, and outcome assessment frameworks. Addressing these challenges could improve patient outcomes and advance minimally invasive spinal care, particularly in revision contexts where traditional approaches pose higher morbidity risks. Democratizing the benefits of UBE requires structured efforts to mitigate technical barriers and foster interdisciplinary collaboration, ensuring equitable integration of this innovation.

Introduction

Loading...
$$\rightleftharpoonup{xx}$$ $$\longleftharp{xx}$$, $$\longrightharp{xx}$$,

As the application of internal fixation technology expands, there has been a consistent annual increase in the volume and quality of posterior lumbar interbody fusion (PLIF) and fusion surgeries1. Despite these advancements, the necessity for revision surgeries arises in some cases due to the recurrence of symptoms post operation, driven by factors such as the inappropriate selection of surgical strategies, intraoperative errors, and complications inherent to internal fixation procedures2.The primary objective of revision surgeries for PLIF is to alleviate nerve compression and restore the stability of the lumbar spine

Access restricted. Please log in or start a trial to view this content.

Protocol

Loading...
$$\rightleftharpoonup{xx}$$ $$\longleftharp{xx}$$, $$\longrightharp{xx}$$,

The surgical protocol was meticulously reviewed and granted approval by the Ethics Review Committee of the Affiliated Hospital of Chengdu University of Traditional Chinese Medicine. Prior to the surgery, the patient, along with her immediate family, provided signed, informed consent, demonstrating their understanding and agreement to the proposed surgical intervention, ensuring that the medical plan is in strict adherence to the Core System of Medical Quality and Safety. A detailed list of the surgical instruments and equipment utilized for this procedure is outlined in the Table of Materials.

1. Preoperative preparat....

Access restricted. Please log in or start a trial to view this content.

Results

Loading...
$$\rightleftharpoonup{xx}$$ $$\longleftharp{xx}$$, $$\longrightharp{xx}$$,

The surgery was performed on June 3, 2024, and lasted for 1.5 h. The patient returned to the ward safely with stable vital signs and a visual analog scale (VAS) score of 3. On postoperative day 1, the pain and numbness in the left lower limb had significantly improved and the VAS score was reduced to 2. We recommended that the patient rest in bed more and perform ankle pump exercises to prevent thrombosis. On postoperative day 2, the patient walked 200 m with a brace and a stable gait; there was a slight pain in the surg.......

Access restricted. Please log in or start a trial to view this content.

Discussion

Loading...
$$\rightleftharpoonup{xx}$$ $$\longleftharp{xx}$$, $$\longrightharp{xx}$$,

Lumbar interbody fusion (LIF) is a widely performed orthopedic procedure, demonstrating efficacy in addressing lumbar degenerative diseases, scoliosis, spinal deformities, and traumas11. However, degenerative discs, small spinal joints, and insufficient initial decompression could lead to reoperation in some patients12. Open surgery could damage soft tissue and bone because the implants should be removed using a large approach.Although traditional revision surgery offers su.......

Access restricted. Please log in or start a trial to view this content.

Disclosures

Loading...
$$\rightleftharpoonup{xx}$$ $$\longleftharp{xx}$$, $$\longrightharp{xx}$$,

The authors have no conflicts of interest to disclose.

Acknowledgements

Loading...
$$\rightleftharpoonup{xx}$$ $$\longleftharp{xx}$$, $$\longrightharp{xx}$$,

We thank the anesthesiologists and inpatient department nurses who assisted with the operation.

....

Access restricted. Please log in or start a trial to view this content.

Materials

List of materials used in this article
NameCompanyCatalog NumberComments
0°endoscopicbonssHigh-definition, wide-angle
DisplayerbonssAnti-glare screen, show realistic images
Endoscopic camerabonssIP8X waterproof rating, facilitating sterilization
Endoscopic lens sheathbonssSingle-valve design, the inlet valve can rotate 360°
Endoscopic video systembonss4K ultra-clear imaging
Estabishment of approach and neuroprotective devicesbonssHighly targeted and easy to operate
Grinding bit and handlebonssEfficient, running smoothly, with high strength.
handle of the bone rongeursbonssGood grip, easy to replace
LED luminescencebonssUltra-high brightness, with 20 levels of brightness adjustment available
Neural hook and Bone-cutting toolsbonssA wide variety of models, easy to operate
Nucleus pulposus forceps and head of bone rongeurbonssThe models are diverse and can be adapted for operation in multiple parts
PedalbonssWaterproof, pressure-resistant and convenient
PlasmabonssIntegrated design, powerful in performance, high surgical efficiency
Radio frequency plasma surgical systembonssEndoscopic cutting ablation function
Surgical dynamic systembonssLarge-sized touch screen, rich display and convenient operation.

References

Loading...
$$\rightleftharpoonup{xx}$$ $$\longleftharp{xx}$$, $$\longrightharp{xx}$$,
  1. Verma, K., Boniello, A., Rihn, J. Emerging techniques for posterior fixation of the lumbar spine. J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 24 (6), 357-364 (2016).
  2. Le Huec, J. C., et al. Revision after spinal stenosis surgery. Eur Spine J. 29 (Suppl 1), 22-38 (2020).
  3. Montenegro, ....

Access restricted. Please log in or start a trial to view this content.

Reprints and Permissions

Request permission to reuse the text or figures of this JoVE article

Request Permission

Tags

Posterior Lumbar FusionUnilateral Biportal EndoscopyLumbar DecompressionRevision Spine SurgerySpinal InstrumentationNerve Root CompressionMinimally Invasive SpineAdjacent Segment DegenerationSpinal InstabilitySpondylolisthesis
Video Coming Soon

Related Articles