Name: Impact of Fabrication Techniques and Polishing Procedures on Surface Roughness of Denture Base Resins (Video) | JoVE Journal
Uploaded: 2025-01-17T15:00:00.000+00:00
Duration: 3 min 2 s
Description: Learn how fabrication and polishing techniques affect surface roughness in denture base resins. This method evaluates PMMA materials using profilometry to improve dental prosthetic quality.

ai_agent_IP

ai_agent

maintenance

instantTrialDurationMinutes

isBiopharma

enableNewMyJoveSectionDesign

educationFeatures

seoMetaApi

ai_copilot_institution_blacklist

ai_chat_institution_blacklist

freeAccessWindow

ssoRoleCapture

scheduledMaintenanceBanner

joveLabsFeatures

disable_autoplay_for_bots

extended_trial_duration

5 minutes

We would like to express our sincere gratitude to Ahmet Sinan Gunuc, Assist. Prof. Idil Ozden, and Dr. Mustafa Enes Ozden for their valuable assistance in data collection and analysis. The research was funded by the authors. No external financial support was obtained.

The details of the reagents, equipment, and software used are listed in the Table of Materials.
1. Sample preparation
<ol>
	<li>Production of heat-polymerized PMMA discs
	<ol>
		<li>Create a wax model with dimensions of 2 mm height and 10 mm width. Pour molten wax into a 2 mm high and 10 mm wide metal ring and allow it to cool. Once solidified, remove it from the ring to obtain a 2 mm x 10 mm wax model.</li>
		<li>Pour plaster into the lower part of a two-part flask.</li>
		<li>Place the prepared wax model into the plaster so that it is half-embedded. Before filling the upper part of the flask with plaster, apply a separating fluid (see Table of Materials). 
		NOTE: Prevent the two layers of plaster from sticking together.</li>
		<li>Close the upper part of the flask and pour plaster over it to secure the top of the wax model. Once the plaster has fully set, heat the flask to allow the wax model to melt, then remove it from the mold. 
		NOTE: A cavity will form in place of the wax, allowing the acrylic material to be poured into this space.</li>
		<li>Mix the liquid and powder of heat-polymerized acrylic in a ratio of 22.5 g of powder to 10 mL of liquid. Pack the acrylic into the cavity within the flask.</li>
		<li>After placing the acrylic material into the mold, subject the flask to polymerization in boiling water at 100 &#176;C for 45 min.</li>
		<li>After the polymerization is complete, open the flask and carefully remove the acrylic disc from the plaster. Clean the acrylic disc from any plaster residues using steam and rinse it with distilled water.</li>
	</ol>
	</li>
	<li>Production of CAD-CAM milled polymethyl methacrylate resin discs
	<ol>
		<li>Use designing software (see Table of Materials) to design a disc with a height of 2 mm and a width of 10 mm.</li>
		<li>Place the 98.5 mm/25 mm CAD/CAM milled PMMA disc into the milling unit. Position the 2 mm x 10 mm design onto the disc in the software, ensuring a 4 mm gap for the milling tool.</li>
		<li>Separate the acrylic discs from the block using a sharp carbide bur. Clean the acrylic discs from any residues using steam and rinse with distilled water.</li>
	</ol>
	</li>
	<li>Production of 3D-printed polymethyl methacrylate resin discs
	<ol>
		<li>Export the 2 mm height and 10 mm width disc design from the design software in standard tessellation language (STL) format and import it into the 3D printer&#39;s software.</li>
		<li>Place the support structures on the disc surfaces at a 45-degree angle. Select a 0.5 mm micron layer thickness that is recommended for removable dentures. Set the printing speed to 20-30 mm/s.</li>
		<li>Open the cover of the printer. Insert the full denture resin. Close the cover of the printer.</li>
		<li>Press the approve button for the build time that will appear on the screen. The screen will display the message: &#34;Confirm build area is clear. Start building now?&#34; Press the Yes button. 
		NOTE: After 3D printing is complete, the printed prosthetic or dental parts are typically semi-cured. At this stage, the material has not yet achieved its full mechanical properties and may still have soft areas.</li>
		<li>Before post-curing, clean the discs with isopropyl alcohol (IPA) for 20 min to remove excess resin and achieve a smoother finish.</li>
		<li>Place the discs into a post-curing unit that uses an ultraviolet (UV) light source. This device emits UV light at a specific wavelength, ensuring the uniform hardening of the material within 30 min. 
		NOTE: The curing unit typically emits 360-degree UV light.</li>
		<li>Separate the produced discs from the print supports using a sharp carbide bur. Clean the acrylic discs from any residues using steam and rinse with distilled water.</li>
	</ol>
	</li>
</ol>
2. Measurement of surface roughness
NOTE: Perform surface roughness measurements of the samples both before and after the polishing process.
<ol>
	<li>Calibration of the profilometer
	<ol>
		<li>Press and hold the Power button to turn on the device. Once the main screen appears, press the Start button. 
		NOTE: The scanner tip will open with the message &#34;Returning.&#34;</li>
		<li>Open the calibration panel without touching the gray area and position it under the scanner tip with the text facing the user. 
		NOTE: Place the scanner tip on the gray matte area.</li>
		<li>Press the Menu/Enter button on the control panel to initiate calibration. Select the Calib Measurement option and press the Start button. 
		NOTE: After calibration is completed, press the red button twice to return to the previous menu and press the blue button to open the main menu.</li>
		<li>Adjust the settings for surface roughness readout to cover 0.5 mm, with a cutoff value of 0.8 mm, at a speed of 0.25 mm/s and a resolution of 0.01 &#181;m.</li>
	</ol>
	</li>
	<li>Surface roughness measurement of the samples
	<ol>
		<li>Place the sample on the panel so that its surface touches the scanner tip. 
		NOTE: If contact is not established, a red warning will appear on the screen. No measurement will be taken unless the contact is made and the indicator turns blue.</li>
		<li>Once the scanner tip completes the surface scan, save the numerical data displayed on the screen to an Excel file. 
		NOTE: Measure each sample three times and record the values. After completing the measurements, power off the device by pressing and holding the Power button when the screen goes dark and then pressing the Start button once.</li>
	</ol>
	</li>
</ol>
3. Polishing procedure
<ol>
	<li>Place a 600-grit silicon carbide abrasive paper onto the Grinder/Polisher machine.</li>
	<li>Turn on the machine&#39;s water supply. Apply the samples to the rotating abrasive paper for 10 s, ensuring the entire measured surface makes contact.</li>
	<li>Repeat the process sequentially with 800- and 1000-grit silicon carbide abrasive papers, using a fresh sheet for each sample. Clean the acrylic disc from any residues using steam and rinse with distilled water.</li>
</ol>
4. Statistical analysis
<ol>
	<li>Perform statistical analyses.</li>
	<li>Apply the Kruskal-Wallis test and pairwise Mann-Whitney U test (with Bonferroni correction) to determine any significant differences between the groups.</li>
	<li>Consider a p-value below 0.05 as statistically significant.</li>
</ol>

<ol><li>Budtz-Jörgensen, E. <a target="_blank" href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed?term=((Restoration+of+the+partially+edentulous+mouth--a+comparison+of+overdentures%2C+removable+partial+dentures%2C+fixed+partial+dentures+and+implant+treatment%5BTitle%5D)+AND+%22J+Dent%22%5BJournal%5D)">Restoration of the partially edentulous mouth--a comparison of overdentures, removable partial dentures, fixed partial dentures and implant treatment.</a> J Dent. 24 (4), 237-244 (1996).</li>
<li>Alqutaibi, A. Y., et al. <a target="_blank" href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed?term=((Polymeric+denture+base+materials%3A+A+review%5BTitle%5D)+AND+%22Polymers+%28Basel%29%22%5BJournal%5D)">Polymeric denture base materials: A review.</a> Polymers (Basel). 15 (15), 3258(2023).</li>
<li>Zafar, M. S. <a target="_blank" href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed?term=((Prosthodontic+applications+of+polymethyl+methacrylate+%28PMMA%29%3A+An+update%5BTitle%5D)+AND+%22Polymers+%28Basel%29%22%5BJournal%5D)">Prosthodontic applications of polymethyl methacrylate (PMMA): An update.</a> Polymers (Basel). 12 (10), 2299(2020).</li>
<li>Çakmak, G., et al. <a target="_blank" href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed?term=((Surface+roughness+and+stainability+of+CAD-CAM+denture+base+materials+after+simulated+brushing+and+coffee+thermocycling%29%5BTitle%5D)+AND+%22J+Prosthet+Dent%22%5BJournal%5D)">Surface roughness and stainability of CAD-CAM denture base materials after simulated brushing and coffee thermocycling).</a> J Prosthet Dent. 132 (1), 260-266 (2024).</li>
<li>Arslan, M., Murat, S., Alp, G., Zaimoglu, A. <a target="_blank" href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed?term=((Evaluation+of+flexural+strength+and+surface+properties+of+prepolymerized+CAD%2FCAM+PMMA-based+polymers+used+for+digital+3D+complete+dentures%5BTitle%5D)+AND+%22Int+J+Comput+Dent%22%5BJournal%5D)">Evaluation of flexural strength and surface properties of prepolymerized CAD/CAM PMMA-based polymers used for digital 3D complete dentures.</a> Int J Comput Dent. 21 (1), 31-40 (2018).</li>
<li>Abualsaud, R., Gad, M. M. <a target="_blank" href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed?term=((Flexural+strength+of+CAD%2FCAM+denture+base+materials%3A+Systematic+review+and+meta-analysis+of+in-vitro+studies%5BTitle%5D)+AND+%22J+Int+Soc+Prev+Community+Dent%22%5BJournal%5D)">Flexural strength of CAD/CAM denture base materials: Systematic review and meta-analysis of in-vitro studies.</a> J Int Soc Prev Community Dent. 12 (2), 160-170 (2022).</li>
<li>Aguirre, B. C., Chen, J. H., Kontogiorgos, E. D., Murchison, D. F., Nagy, W. W. <a target="_blank" href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed?term=((Flexural+strength+of+denture+base+acrylic+resins+processed+by+conventional+and+CAD-CAM+methods%5BTitle%5D)+AND+%22J+Prosthet+Dent%22%5BJournal%5D)">Flexural strength of denture base acrylic resins processed by conventional and CAD-CAM methods.</a> J Prosthet Dent. 123 (4), 641-646 (2020).</li>
<li>Goodacre, B. J., Goodacre, C. J. <a target="_blank" href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed?term=((Additive+manufacturing+for+complete+denture+fabrication%3A+A+narrative+review%5BTitle%5D)+AND+%22J+Prosthodont%22%5BJournal%5D)">Additive manufacturing for complete denture fabrication: A narrative review.</a> J Prosthodont. 31 (S1), 47-51 (2022).</li>
<li>Oğuz, E., et al. <a target="_blank" href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed?term=((Evaluation+of+denture+base+adaptation+fabricated+using+conventional%2C+subtractive%2C+and+additive+technologies%3A+A+volumetric+micro-computed+tomography+analysis%5BTitle%5D)+AND+%22J+Prosthodont%22%5BJournal%5D)">Evaluation of denture base adaptation fabricated using conventional, subtractive, and additive technologies: A volumetric micro-computed tomography analysis.</a> J Prosthodont. 30 (3), 257-263 (2021).</li>
<li>Pacquet, W., Benoit, A., Hatège-Kimana, C., Wulfman, C. <a target="_blank" href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed?term=((Mechanical+properties+of+CAD%2FCAM+denture+base+resins%5BTitle%5D)+AND+%22Int+J+Prosthodont%22%5BJournal%5D)">Mechanical properties of CAD/CAM denture base resins.</a> Int J Prosthodont. 32 (1), 104-106 (2019).</li>
<li>Al-Dwairi, Z. N., Tahboub, K. Y., Baba, N. Z., Goodacre, C. J. <a target="_blank" href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed?term=((A+comparison+of+the+flexural+and+impact+strengths+and+flexural+modulus+of+CAD%2FCAM+and+conventional+heat-cured+polymethyl+methacrylate+%28PMMA%29%5BTitle%5D)+AND+%22J+Prosthodont%22%5BJournal%5D)">A comparison of the flexural and impact strengths and flexural modulus of CAD/CAM and conventional heat-cured polymethyl methacrylate (PMMA).</a> J Prosthodont. 29 (4), 341-349 (2020).</li>
<li>de Oliveira Limírio, J. P. J., et al. <a target="_blank" href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed?term=((Mechanical+properties+of+polymethyl+methacrylate+as+a+denture+base%3A+conventional+versus+CAD-CAM+resin-A+systematic+review+and+meta-analysis+of+in+vitro+studies%5BTitle%5D)+AND+%22J+Prosthet+Dent%22%5BJournal%5D)">Mechanical properties of polymethyl methacrylate as a denture base: conventional versus CAD-CAM resin-A systematic review and meta-analysis of in vitro studies.</a> J Prosthet Dent. 128 (6), 1221-1229 (2022).</li>
<li>Galante, R., Figueiredo-Pina, C. G., Serro, A. P. <a target="_blank" href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed?term=((Additive+manufacturing+of+ceramics+for+dental+applications%3A+A+review%5BTitle%5D)+AND+%22Dent+Mater%22%5BJournal%5D)">Additive manufacturing of ceramics for dental applications: A review.</a> Dent Mater. 35 (6), 825-846 (2019).</li>
<li>Alhallak, K. R., Nankali, A. <a target="_blank" href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed?term=((3D+printing+technologies+for+removable+dentures+manufacturing%3A+A+review+of+potentials+and+challenges%5BTitle%5D)+AND+%22Eur+J+Prosthodont+Restor+Dent%22%5BJournal%5D)">3D printing technologies for removable dentures manufacturing: A review of potentials and challenges.</a> Eur J Prosthodont Restor Dent. 30 (1), 14-19 (2022).</li>
<li>Dimitrova, M., et al. <a target="_blank" href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed?term=((Comparison+between+conventional+PMMA+and+3D+printed+resins+for+denture+bases%3A+A+narrative+review%5BTitle%5D)+AND+%22J+Compos+Sci%22%5BJournal%5D)">Comparison between conventional PMMA and 3D printed resins for denture bases: A narrative review.</a> J Compos Sci. 6 (3), 87(2022).</li>
<li>Arora, O., et al. <a target="_blank" href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed?term=((A+comparative+evaluation+of+physical+properties+of+CAD%2FCAM+complete+denture+resins-an+in+vitro+study%5BTitle%5D)+AND+%22BMC+Oral+Health%22%5BJournal%5D)">A comparative evaluation of physical properties of CAD/CAM complete denture resins-an in vitro study.</a> BMC Oral Health. 24 (1), 65(2024).</li>
<li>Kraemer Fernandez, P., Unkovskiy, A., Benkendorff, V., Klink, A., Spintzyk, S. <a target="_blank" href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed?term=((Surface+characteristics+of+milled+and+3D+printed+denture+base+materials+following+polishing+and+coating%3A+An+in-vitro.+study%5BTitle%5D)+AND+%22Materials+%28Basel%29%22%5BJournal%5D)">Surface characteristics of milled and 3D printed denture base materials following polishing and coating: An in-vitro. study.</a> Materials (Basel). 13 (15), 3305(2020).</li>
<li>Echhpal, U. R., Shah, K. K., Ahmed, N. <a target="_blank" href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed?term=((Effectiveness+of+denture+cleansers+on+Candida+albicans+biofilm+on+conventionally+fabricated%2C+computer-aided+design%2Fcomputer-aided+manufacturing-milled%2C+and+rapid-prototyped+denture+base+resins%3A+an+in+vitro+study%5BTitle%5D)+AND+%22Cureus%22%5BJournal%5D)">Effectiveness of denture cleansers on Candida albicans biofilm on conventionally fabricated, computer-aided design/computer-aided manufacturing-milled, and rapid-prototyped denture base resins: an in vitro study.</a> Cureus. 16 (6), e63290(2024).</li>
<li>Bilhan, H., et al. <a target="_blank" href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed?term=((The+role+of+Candida+albicans+hyphae+and+Lactobacillus+in+denture-related+stomatitis%5BTitle%5D)+AND+%22Clin+Oral+Investig%22%5BJournal%5D)">The role of Candida albicans hyphae and Lactobacillus in denture-related stomatitis.</a> Clin Oral Investig. 13 (4), 363-368 (2009).</li>
<li>Dayan, C., Guven, M. C., Gencel, B., Bural, C. <a target="_blank" href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed?term=((A+comparison+of+the+color+stability+of+conventional+and+CAD%2FCAM+polymethyl+methacrylate+denture+base+materials%5BTitle%5D)+AND+%22Acta+Stomatol+Croat%22%5BJournal%5D)">A comparison of the color stability of conventional and CAD/CAM polymethyl methacrylate denture base materials.</a> Acta Stomatol Croat. 53 (2), 158-167 (2019).</li>
<li>Alharbi, N., Alharbi, A., Osman, R. <a target="_blank" href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed?term=((Stain+susceptibility+of+3D-printed+nanohybrid+composite+restorative+material+and+the+efficacy+of+different+stain+removal+techniques%3A+An+in+vitro.+study%5BTitle%5D)+AND+%22Materials+%28Basel%29%22%5BJournal%5D)">Stain susceptibility of 3D-printed nanohybrid composite restorative material and the efficacy of different stain removal techniques: An in vitro. study.</a> Materials (Basel). 14 (19), 5621(2021).</li>
<li>akmak, G., et al. <a target="_blank" href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed?term=((Effect+of+polishing+and+denture+cleansers+on+the+surface+roughness+of+new-generation+denture+base+materials+and+their+color+change+after+cleansing%5BTitle%5D)+AND+%22J+Prosthodont%22%5BJournal%5D)">Effect of polishing and denture cleansers on the surface roughness of new-generation denture base materials and their color change after cleansing.</a> J Prosthodont. 33 (8), 783-790 (2024).</li>
<li>Kuhar, M., Funduk, N. <a target="_blank" href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed?term=((Effects+of+polishing+techniques+on+the+surface+roughness+of+acrylic+denture+base+resins%5BTitle%5D)+AND+%22J+Prosthet+Dent%22%5BJournal%5D)">Effects of polishing techniques on the surface roughness of acrylic denture base resins.</a> J Prosthet Dent. 93 (1), 76-85 (2005).</li>
<li>Gungor, H., Gundogdu, M., Yesil Duymus, Z. <a target="_blank" href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed?term=((Investigation+of+the+effect+of+different+polishing+techniques+on+the+surface+roughness+of+denture+base+and+repair+materials%5BTitle%5D)+AND+%22J+Prosthet+Dent%22%5BJournal%5D)">Investigation of the effect of different polishing techniques on the surface roughness of denture base and repair materials.</a> J Prosthet Dent. 112 (5), 1271-1277 (2014).</li>
<li>Alp, G., Johnston, W. M., Yilmaz, B. <a target="_blank" href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed?term=((Optical+properties+and+surface+roughness+of+prepolymerized+poly%28methyl+methacrylate%29+denture+base+materials%5BTitle%5D)+AND+%22J+Prosthet+Dent%22%5BJournal%5D)">Optical properties and surface roughness of prepolymerized poly(methyl methacrylate) denture base materials.</a> J Prosthet Dent. 121 (2), 347-352 (2019).</li>
<li>Quirynen, M., Bollen, C. M. <a target="_blank" href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed?term=((The+influence+of+surface+roughness+and+surface-free+energy+on+supra-+and+subgingival+plaque+formation+in+man%3A+A+review+of+the+literature%5BTitle%5D)+AND+%22J+Clin+Periodontol%22%5BJournal%5D)">The influence of surface roughness and surface-free energy on supra- and subgingival plaque formation in man: A review of the literature.</a> J Clin Periodontol. 22 (1), 1-14 (1995).</li>
<li>Alfouzan, A. F., et al. <a target="_blank" href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed?term=((Effect+of+aging+and+mechanical+brushing+on+surface+roughness+of+3D+printed+denture+resins%3A+A+profilometer+and+scanning+electron+microscopy+analysis%5BTitle%5D)+AND+%22Technol+Health+Care%22%5BJournal%5D)">Effect of aging and mechanical brushing on surface roughness of 3D printed denture resins: A profilometer and scanning electron microscopy analysis.</a> Technol Health Care. 30 (1), 161-173 (2022).</li>
<li>Quezada, M. M., Salgado, H., Correia, A., Fernandes, C., Fonseca, P. <a target="_blank" href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed?term=((Investigation+of+the+effect+of+the+same+polishing+protocol+on+the+surface+roughness+of+denture+base+acrylic+resins%5BTitle%5D)+AND+%22Biomedicines%22%5BJournal%5D)">Investigation of the effect of the same polishing protocol on the surface roughness of denture base acrylic resins.</a> Biomedicines. 10 (8), 1971(2022).</li>
<li>Onwubu, S. C., Mdluli, P. S. <a target="_blank" href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed?term=((Comparative+analysis+of+abrasive+materials+and+polishing+system+on+the+surface+roughness+of+heat-polymerized+acrylic+resins%5BTitle%5D)+AND+%22Eur+J+Dent%22%5BJournal%5D)">Comparative analysis of abrasive materials and polishing system on the surface roughness of heat-polymerized acrylic resins.</a> Eur J Dent. 16 (3), 573-579 (2022).</li>
<li>Koppaka, R., Shah, K. K., Ahmed, N., Echhpal, U. R. <a target="_blank" href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed?term=((Evaluation+of+surface+roughness+of+acrylic+denture+bases+polished+using+Algishine%2C+a+novel+polishing+material%3A+An+in+vitro+study%5BTitle%5D)+AND+%22Cureus%22%5BJournal%5D)">Evaluation of surface roughness of acrylic denture bases polished using Algishine, a novel polishing material: An in vitro study.</a> Cureus. 16 (7), e63955(2024).</li>
<li>Demirkol, D., Tuğut, F. <a target="_blank" href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed?term=((Comparison+of+the+effect+of+the+same+polishing+method+on+the+surface+roughness+of+conventional%2C+CAD%2FCAM+milling+and+3D+printing+denture+base+materials%5BTitle%5D)+AND+%22Cumhuriyet+Dent+J%22%5BJournal%5D)">Comparison of the effect of the same polishing method on the surface roughness of conventional, CAD/CAM milling and 3D printing denture base materials.</a> Cumhuriyet Dent J. 26 (3), 281-286 (2023).</li>
<li>Freitas, R., et al. <a target="_blank" href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed?term=((mechanical%2C+and+anti-biofilm+formation+properties+of+CAD-CAM+milled+or+3D+printed+denture+base+resins%3A+in+vitro+analysis%5BTitle%5D)+AND+%22J+Prosthodont%22%5BJournal%5D)">mechanical, and anti-biofilm formation properties of CAD-CAM milled or 3D printed denture base resins: in vitro analysis.</a> J Prosthodont. 32 (S1), 38-44 (2023).</li>
<li>Sasany, R., Jamjoon, F. Z., Kendirci, M. Y., Yilmaz, B. <a target="_blank" href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed?term=((Effect+of+printing+layer+thickness+on+optical+properties+and+surface+roughness+of+3D-printed+resins%3A+An+in+vitro+study%5BTitle%5D)+AND+%22Int+J+Prosthodont%22%5BJournal%5D)">Effect of printing layer thickness on optical properties and surface roughness of 3D-printed resins: An in vitro study.</a> Int J Prosthodont. 37 (7), 165-173 (2024).</li>
<li>Li, P., Lambart, A. L., Stawarczyk, B., Reymus, M., Spintzyk, S. <a target="_blank" href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed?term=((Postpolymerization+of+a+3D-printed+denture+base+polymer%3A+Impact+of+post-curing+methods+on+surface+characteristics%2C+flexural%5BTitle%5D)+AND+%22J+Dent%22%5BJournal%5D)">Postpolymerization of a 3D-printed denture base polymer: Impact of post-curing methods on surface characteristics, flexural.</a> J Dent. 115, 103856(2021).</li>
<li>Xu, Y., Xepapadeas, A. B., Koos, B., Geis-Gerstorfer, J., Li, P., Spintzyk, S. <a target="_blank" href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed?term=((Effect+of+post-rinsing+time+on+the+mechanical+strength+and+cytotoxicity+of+a+3D-printed+orthodontic+splint+material%5BTitle%5D)+AND+%22Dent+Mater%22%5BJournal%5D)">Effect of post-rinsing time on the mechanical strength and cytotoxicity of a 3D-printed orthodontic splint material.</a> Dent Mater. 37 (5), e314-e327 (2021).</li>
</ol>

The authors have no conflicts of interest to disclose.

In this study, the impact of different fabrication techniques and polishing procedures on the surface roughness (Ra) of resin-based materials used in the fabrication of complete dentures was thoroughly assessed. The statistical analysis revealed significant differences in surface roughness values across all groups, with the samples produced via 3D printing exhibiting the highest roughness values, both before and after polishing. Mechanical polishing resulted in an effective reduction in surface roughness values....

The restoration of edentulous areas is most commonly achieved through the use of partial or complete removable dentures, which serve as an important alternative in cases where implant-supported fixed prostheses are not feasible due to anatomical factors or patient-related conditions such as economic constraints or systemic illnesses1. The base materials employed in these prostheses are typically resins containing polymethyl methacrylate (PMMA). PMMA is a cost-effective material valued for its ease of processing, repairability, and polishability2. It also demonstrates favorable physicochemical properties and satisfactory esthetic outcomes3. Various fabrication methods, such as fluid resin pouring and mold-filling techniques like compression and injection molding, have been employed to produce removable dentures from PMMA resin.
Among traditional methods, the most commonly used fabrication technique is compression molding, also known as the flask press method. It involves placing the resin material into a mold within a flask, followed by pressing it under pressure to fill the mold and achieve the desired shape. The flask pack press method, which has been in use for many years, offers advantages such as ease of application and low cost. However, it also has certain disadvantages, including the requirement for manual labor and time-consuming steps in laboratory procedures, susceptibility to human error, the risk of failing to achieve a homogeneous structure during the mixing and processing of the resin, and polymerization shrinkage. However, with the advent of computer-aided design manufacturing (CAD/CAM) technologies, subtractive manufacturing techniques such as milling have also been employed for their production4. Studies have demonstrated that denture base materials produced using the milling technique possess greater flexural strength and base adaptation than those fabricated using conventional methods5,6. These improvements can be attributed to the elevated pressure and temperature levels applied during the fabrication of milled PMMA disks, which ultimately yields a more compact material with a reduced number of voids7,8,9.
The research into the physical properties of materials produced via subtractive manufacturing in dentistry has revealed a number of advantages, including an improved fit, greater durability, and enhanced dimensional stability5,10,11,12. Nevertheless, considerable disadvantages have been identified, including the generation of substantial quantities of waste during milling and the high costs associated with this process13. In order to address these challenges, as well as the polymerization shrinkage observed in conventionally fabricated denture bases, additive manufacturing methods, in particular three-dimensional (3D) printing, have emerged as a viable alternative. 3D-printed denture base materials offer a number of advantages, including streamlined production processes, enhanced dimensional stability, and minimal material waste, which positions them as a promising alternative manufacturing method8,14,15. Nevertheless, it is hypothesized that denture bases produced via 3D printing may display a higher propensity for discoloration in comparison to those manufactured through conventional or milling techniques16. Such discoloration could have implications for the long-term aesthetic appeal and patient satisfaction, warranting further investigation into the material composition and surface treatments employed in 3D-printed denture bases. One of the primary causes of discoloration of 3D printed materials is their inherently rough surface. Denture bases with rough surfaces are more susceptible to staining and discoloration. Furthermore, surface roughness provides an environment conducive to biofilm accumulation, increasing the adherence of microorganisms such as Candida albicans. This microbial accumulation is dangerous for both oral hygiene and overall health, highlighting the importance of optimizing the surface smoothness of denture base materials17,18,19.
The increased surface roughness observed in denture bases produced via 3D printing, as compared to those fabricated using conventional heat-cured or milled methods, can be attributed to the inherent characteristics of the manufacturing process. 3D printing relies on a layer-by-layer fabrication technique, where each layer leaves microscopic traces on the surface, contributing to surface irregularities14,17. This effect becomes more pronounced with lower-resolution printers, further exacerbating the surface roughness4. Additionally, the photopolymer resins utilized in 3D printing undergo light-induced polymerization, which may not achieve complete polymerization in some areas, leading to surface imperfections2,15. Inadequate polymerization or insufficient post-processing can further compound this issue3. Furthermore, the nature of photopolymer resins and the rapid polymerization reactions involved can impact material homogeneity, thereby compromising surface smoothness5,13. In contrast, the subtractive milling technique removes material from a pre-fabricated block, resulting in a more uniform and smoother surface due to the high precision of milling burs and the continuous cutting process16,11. Lastly, the post-processing steps required in 3D printing, such as sanding and polishing, may not always be performed with adequate rigor, leaving residual surface irregularities8,10. Collectively, these factors explain the increased surface roughness associated with 3D-printed denture bases. However, advancements in printer resolution, material optimization, and more effective post-processing protocols hold promise for mitigating these surface deficiencies9.
3D printing technology may also present challenges, such as the &#34;stair-stepping phenomenon,&#34; particularly evident on curved surfaces. This issue arises when the printed surface lacks smoothness and instead exhibits a layered, step-like structure rather than a smooth finish, which can negatively impact the color stability of the materials used in aesthetically critical regions20,21. A variety of techniques have been proposed for the reduction of surface roughness in denture bases. These include mechanical polishing with water sandpaper, the application of specialized chemical agents, and a combination of both approaches17,22,23,24.
Despite the existence of numerous studies that have compared the properties of removable denture bases, there has been a paucity of detailed investigation into surface roughness, a key factor contributing to discoloration, across different fabrication methods. The objective of this study is to assess the influence of contemporary denture-based fabrication techniques and mechanical polishing procedures on surface roughness. The initial null hypothesis to be tested is that there is no discernible difference in the surface roughness of denture base materials produced by 3D printing, milling, or conventional methods. The second null hypothesis is that mechanical polishing has no effect on the surface roughness of denture base materials.

<table><tbody><tr><td>3-dimensionally printed resin</td><td>Dentabase, Asiga, Australia</td><td>https://www.asiga.com/materials-dental/</td><td>complete denture material&amp;nbsp;</td></tr><tr><td>Asiga Composer Software</td><td>Asiga, Australia</td><td>https://www.asiga.com/software-composer/</td><td>&amp;nbsp;3D Printer software</td></tr><tr><td>CAD-CAM milled polymethyl methacrylate resin&amp;nbsp;</td><td>M-PM Disc, Merz Dental, Germany</td><td>A2: SKU 1019085</td><td>complete denture material&amp;nbsp;</td></tr><tr><td>Curing unit</td><td>Lilivis, Huvitz, South Korea</td><td>https://www.medicalexpo.com/prod/huvitz/product-80194-1066733.html</td><td>3D light curing</td></tr><tr><td>Exocad software</td><td>Align Technology, Germany</td><td>https://exocad.com/company/about-us/</td><td>desing software</td></tr><tr><td>Grinder/Polisher machine&amp;nbsp;</td><td>Buehler Inc, Phoenix Beta, Germany</td><td></td><td>polishing</td></tr><tr><td>Milled Unit</td><td>Dentifa PRO2,IFA Machinery Design Engineering Services Industry and Trade Ltd. Co., Turkey</td><td>http://www.dentifa.com/</td><td>Milling of the CAD-CAM milled polymethyl methacrylate resin discs</td></tr><tr><td>Polimerized polymethyl methacrylate resin</td><td>Probase, Ivoclar, Liechtenstein</td><td>https://www.ivoclar.com/en_us/products/removable-prosthetics/probase-hot-cold</td><td>complete denture material&amp;nbsp;</td></tr><tr><td>Profilometer&amp;nbsp;</td><td>Surftest SJ-210, Mitutoyo, Japan</td><td>178-561-12A</td><td>surface roughness measurement</td></tr><tr><td>Separating agent&amp;nbsp;</td><td>Ivoclar Vivadent Separating Fluid</td><td>https://www.ivoclar.com/en_li/products/removable-prosthetics/probase-hot-cold</td><td>separating agent</td></tr><tr><td>SPSS28 software&amp;nbsp;</td><td>IBM Corp., Armork, NY,USA</td><td>https://www.ibm.com/spss</td><td>statistical analyses</td></tr></tbody></table>

impact of fabrication techniques and polishing procedures on surface roughness of denture base resins

Impact of Fabrication Techniques and Polishing Procedures on Surface Roughness of Denture Base Resins

This study aimed to assess the impact of various fabrication techniques and polishing procedures on the surface roughness (Ra) of resin-based materials used in the fabrication of complete dentures. A total of 90 specimens were produced from three different resin materials: heat-polymerized polymethyl methacrylate (PMMA) resin, CAD-CAM milled PMMA resin, and 3D-printed resin (n = 30). Each specimen measured 10 mm in diameter and 2 mm in height. The surface roughness (Ra) values of the specimens were initially determined using a contact profilometer following fabrication. Subsequently, each group of specimens was polished with 600-, 800-, and 1000-grit silicon carbide abrasive papers under running water. A second measurement of the surface roughness (Ra) values was then performed. The data were analyzed statistically using the Kruskal-Wallis test, Mann-Whitney U test, Wilcoxon signed-rank test, and paired samples t-test (p = 0.05). A statistically significant difference was identified between the groups in terms of surface roughness (Ra) prior to the polishing process (p &#60; 0.001). However, no statistically significant difference was observed between the milled and heat-polymerized PMMA base materials following the polishing process. The 3D-printed specimens showed the most notable improvement in surface roughness due to the polishing process. Nevertheless, their surface roughness remained statistically significantly higher compared to the other samples, both before and after polishing (p &#60; 0.001). The fabrication method of complete denture base materials was observed to influence surface roughness. The surface roughness values of the base materials fabricated using the 3D printing method were higher compared to those fabricated with milled and heat-polymerized PMMA resin, both before and after polishing.

The measurement of surface roughness values in the study groups before the polishing procedure yielded the following values: 2.13 (IQR 0.84) for the HP group, 4.21 (2.73) for the 3D-printed group, and 0.99 (0.54) for the ML group. After the mechanical polishing procedure, a decrease in surface roughness values was observed in all groups, with measurement of SR values post-polishing yielding the following outcomes: 0.29 (0.06) for the HP group, 0.41 (0.05) for the 3D-printed group, and 0.31 (0.06) for the ML group. Althou...

This article presents a protocol to evaluate the effects of different manufacturing methods (heat-polymerized PMMA, CAD-CAM milled PMMA, and 3D-printed resin) and polishing techniques (600, 800, and 1000 grit silicon carbide abrasive papers) on the surface roughness (Ra) of resin base materials used for complete dentures.

This study aimed to assess the impact of various fabrication techniques and polishing procedures on the surface roughness (Ra) of resin-based materials ...

impact-fabrication-techniques-polishing-procedures-on-surface

Research

JoVE Journal

Medicine

PDMS Device Fabrication and Surface Modification

A novel optical polishing process, called “Convergent Polishing”, which enables faster, lower cost polishing, is described. Unlike conventional polishing processes, Convergent Polishing allows a glass workpiece to be polished in a single iteration and with high surface quality to its final surface figure without requiring changes to polishing parameters.

Convergent Polishing: A Simple, Rapid, Full Aperture Polishing Process of High Quality Optical Flats &amp; Spheres

Plasma polishing is a promising surface processing technology, especially suitable for 3D printing of porous titanium alloy workpieces. It can remove semi-molten powders and ablative oxide layers, thereby effectively reducing surface roughness and improving surface quality.

Plasma Polishing as a New Polishing Option to Reduce the Surface Roughness of Porous Titanium Alloy for 3D Printing

Microhardness is a mechanical property and an informative parameter for evaluating hard tissue pathophysiology. Here, we demonstrate a standardized protocol (sample preparation, polishing, flat surface, and indentation sites) for microhardness analysis in tooth and alveolar bone in rodent oral disease models, namely, dental fluorosis, and ligature-induced periodontal bone resorption.

Microhardness Measurements on Tooth and Alveolar Bone in Rodent Oral Disease Models

This methodology allows applying a dental appliance on any specimen at any angle with standardized force and stability. This approach might be extensively used in health sciences to standardize the impacts of dental equipment with hand-holding elements such as micromotors, turbines, and ultrasonic scalers on varied surfaces.

Roughness Impact of Piezoelectric Dental Scaler on Two Distinct Flowable Composite Filling Materials

A quasistatic load-to-fracture test with a non-fixed stainless steel ball was developed to determine the fracture strength of minimally invasive posterior computer-aided design and manufacturing restorations cemented to dentin analog materials. This test models the typical loading regime responsible for the fracture of dental restorations.

Quasistatic Mechanical Testing for Computer-Aided Design and Manufacturing Occlusal Veneers Cemented to Milled Dentin Analog Material

Here, we evaluated the impact of various polishing methods on the color stability of compomer and composite resin restorations used in anterior restorations within pediatric dentistry. This study highlights the significance of selecting appropriate polishing methods to enhance the color stability of compomer and composite resin restorations in pediatric dentistry.

Evaluating the Effects of Different Polishing Methods on Color Stability of Dental Restorations in Pediatric Dentistry

The present protocol describes an experimental model based on ink-staining which can be used for in vitro implant surface decontamination and roughness research to contribute to clinical decision-making.

Effects of Mechanical Methods Used in Peri-implantitis Treatment on Implant Surface Decontamination and Roughness

This protocol aims to evaluate the effects of surface treatment protocols, luting cement selection, and thermocycling on the shear bond strength between PEEK and an indirect composite resin.

Standardized Protocol to Evaluate the Effect of Surface Treatments, Luting Cements, and Thermocycling on PEEK&#8211;Composite Bond Strength

Bronchial thermoplasty is a non-drug procedure for severe persistent asthma that delivers thermal energy to the airway wall in a precisely controlled manner to reduce excessive airway smooth muscle.  Reducing airway smooth muscle decreases the ability of the airways to constrict, thereby reducing the frequency of asthma attacks.

Bronchial Thermoplasty:  A Novel Therapeutic Approach to Severe Asthma

Learn how fabrication and polishing techniques affect surface roughness in denture base resins. This method evaluates PMMA materials using profilometry to improve dental prosthetic quality.

Impact of Fabrication Techniques and Polishing Procedures on Surface Roughness of Denture Base Resins

Explore More Videos