Here, we present a protocol to demonstrate the microsurgical feasibility of rat forelimb transplantation. This model may serve as an important translational platform for VCA research.
Method Article
* These authors contributed equally
Here, we present a protocol to demonstrate the microsurgical feasibility of rat forelimb transplantation. This model may serve as an important translational platform for VCA research.
Vascularized composite allotransplantation (VCA) involves the transplantation of multiple tissue types -- including skin, muscle, bone, and nerves -- offering a promising reconstructive option for patients with severe traumatic injuries or disfigurements. Despite its transformative potential, VCA has encountered significant challenges such as graft rejection, chronic immunosuppression complications, and neuromuscular recovery's intricacies.
We utilize a rat forelimb model as a cost-effective and anatomically relevant platform to address these challenges. The rat forelimb closely mirrors human limb anatomy, enhancing our findings' translational impact. Previous studies have validated this model for reliably and reproducibly measuring functional recovery, thereby establishing it as a key tool for assessing the rejection trajectory of forelimb grafts.
Moreover, the model offers a valuable opportunity to explore innovative therapeutic approaches and serve as a good translational platform for novel preservation techniques. Through further investigation of this model, we aim to deepen our understanding of the mechanisms behind graft rejection and neuromuscular recovery. Ultimately, this work strives to pave the way for improving clinical outcomes of VCA, addressing both current limitations and future challenges in transplant medicine.
Vascularized Composite Allotransplantation (VCA) is a life-changing procedure to reconstruct severe tissue defects. VCA refers to the transplantation of a composite tissue consisting of skin, muscle, bones, connective tissue, blood vessels, and nerves. Further refinement and exploration of VCA techniques would profoundly benefit patients suffering traumatic injuries or disfigurements1. However, its broader application is challenged by ongoing hurdles such as graft rejection, complications from long-term immunosuppression, neuromuscular recovery, and peri-transplant logistics.
The rat forelimb model has emerged as a preferred choice for VCA studies due to its cost-effectiveness and its close resemblance to human anatomical and neuromuscular characteristics2,3. Our previous work has demonstrated that this model provides a reliable and reproducible means of assessing behavioral functional recovery4. In this study, we present a detailed, step-by-step guide to the essential microsurgical techniques required for this model.
As VCA research continues to evolve, the rat forelimb model will allow mechanistic investigation of the rejection process, nerve regeneration, and neuromuscular functional recovery. Researchers could explore new preservation techniques, evaluate the effectiveness of machine perfusion methods, and test emerging immunomodulatory therapies, which may help reduce current reliance on long-term immunosuppression.
Surgical procedures were carried out under the protocols approved by the Johns Hopkins University Animal Care and Use Committee (RA18M74) according to guidelines established by the National Institutes of Health and the American Association for the Accreditation of Laboratory Animal Care.
1. Donor procedure (Figure 1)
2. Recipient procedure (Figure 2)
3. Long term post-transplant management
Graft survival can be monitored and determined through macroscopic observation. Representative pictures of both short-term (POD7) and long-term follow-up (POD120) are shown in Figure 3. The graft could recover without apparent signs of necrosis. Survival data are shown in Figure 4. Both skin and muscle samples are harvested at the designated endpoint. Representative histological images are shown in Figure 5 and Figure 6. Both the figures exhibit a normal histology feature of skin and muscle. The grip strength test was applied to evaluate the functional recovery (mainly media nerve, Figure 7 and Figure 8). The recovery would reach a plateau around 15 weeks post-transplant. The technique has been extensively described in a previous publication5.

Figure 1: Donor procedure. (A) Circumferential incision; (B) exposing brachial vessels, median and ulnar nerve; (C) lumen check before flush; (D) non-suture cuff technique. (*brachial artery, @brachial vein, #median nerve, &ulnar nerve). Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.

Figure 2: Recipient procedure. (A) Exposing brachial vessels, median, and ulnar nerve; (B) dissection of brachial vessels, median, and ulnar nerve; (C) non-suture cuff technique for vessel anastomosis; (D) Epiperineurial neurorrhaphy. (*brachial artery, @brachial vein, #median nerve, &ulnar nerve). Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.

Figure 3: Forelimb graft. Representative macroscopic images of forelimb graft on post-transplantation day 7 (left) and day 120 (right). Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.

Figure 4: Graft survival. Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.

Figure 5: Hematoxylin and eosin staining of graft skin. The section shows normal histology features of the skin. Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.

Figure 6: Hematoxylin and eosin staining of graft muscle. The section shows normal histology features of the muscle. Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.

Figure 7: Demonstration of grip strength test. Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.

Figure 8: Recovery of grip strength post-transplantation. Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.
Orthotopic forelimb transplantation in rats is a commonly used model in experimental reconstructive transplantation as it not only contains vascularized composite tissues but also allows for the assessment of functional recovery. A conventional suture technique for vascular anastomosis is highly complex and demands advanced microsurgical skills that require years of microsurgical training. To greatly reduce the time and costs, a vascular non-suture cuff anastomosis technique was applied in this modified rat forelimb model. It significantly expedites the microsurgical training process and shortens the training curve, as we have demonstrated in the mouse heart transplantation model6 and mouse hindlimb model7. The non-suture cuff technique has achieved over 90% success in all the forelimb transplant-related projects. From a technical perspective, the inner membranes of the vessel walls are free from surgical manipulation, which would help reduce the confounding factor in static cold storage-related experiments.
With the establishment of this model4, we have furthermore effectively tailored grip strength tests and the Irvine, Beatties, and Bresnahan scale (IBB scale) to measure functional recovery in the postoperative course. In addition, the model facilitates consistent histological assessments of peripheral nerve regeneration and muscle atrophy and is therefore ideally suited for a wide range of innovative studies like novel preservation techniques such as machine perfusion8, among others9,10. The availability of a robust, highly reproducible model sets the stage for significant advancements in the field of VCA, benefiting both research endeavors and future clinical applications.
We would also like to acknowledge the limitations of this protocol. The procedure only involves reconnecting the median nerve, while the other 2 nerves are left unrepair. Therefore, the recovery could only yield a portion of the full recovery of the forelimb. The functional recovery of the wrist and individual digits would require modification of the current protocol.
Gerald Brandacher is a medical advisor to X-Therma and Ossium Health.
This work was supported by Grant 1R43HL158398 (NIH), 5R44AI145782 (NIH), and Maryland stem cell 2020-MSCRFL-5414. We want to acknowledge our lab manager, Angela Estevez, for her support with this study.
| Name | Company | Catalog Number | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10-0 Non-Sterile Micro Suture | AROSurgical | TK-107038 | |
| 4-0 Sharpoint Nylon Black | esutures | A1667N | |
| 4-0 Sharpoint Polysyn Taper | esutures | G214N | |
| 5 mL syringes | MDC | 2045 | |
| 6-0 silk | Fisher Scientific | NC9742105 | |
| ABB-22 V Double Micro Vessel | S&T | 00480 | |
| B-1 V Single Micro Vessel Clamp | S&T | 00462 | |
| BD Quincke Spinal needle | esutures | 405073 | |
| Castroviejo Micro Needle Holders | F.S.T | 12061-02 | |
| Chatilon DFE II force meter | Ametek | DFE II series | |
| Cotton tiped | JH Supply store | 100252 | |
| Fine Scissors - Tungsten Carbide | F.S.T | 14569-09 | |
| Forceps | S&T | FRS-15 RM-8 | |
| Gauze Sponges | Fisher Scientific | 22-362178 | |
| Halsted-Mosquito Hemostats | F.S.T | 13009-12 | |
| Heparin | JHH Pharmacy | NDC 63323-540-05 | |
| I.V. Catheter Radiopaque 24 G | esutures | SMTH5053 | |
| Jewelers Bipolar Coagulating Forceps, Stainless Steel | ASSI | 103000BPS03 | |
| Round Handled Vannas Spring Scissors | F.S.T | 15400-12 | |
| Special-Forceps | S&T | FRAS-15 RM-8 | |
| Vessel Dilators - Balanced Instruments | F.S.T | 18602-15 |
Request permission to reuse the text or figures of this JoVE article
Request Permission