$$\rightleftharpoonup{xx}$$
$$\longleftharp{xx}$$,
$$\longrightharp{xx}$$,
Respiratory-related concerns, such as apnea and respiratory distress, for many preterm infants require life-saving modes of respiratory support, which, unfortunately, contribute to infant morbidity and prolonged hospital stays. Supplemental O2 and positive pressure respiratory support, including mechanical ventilation (MV) and less-invasive CPAP, are common respiratory support modalities. However, the major short- and long-term problem for survivors of the critical period in prematurity remains chronic bronchial airway disease1,2,3,4, manifested as life-long wheezing/asthma, poor pulmonary function, and decreased exercise capacity. Although the injurious effects of supplemental O2 and MV have been widely implicated in the pathogenesis of bronchopulmonary dysplasia (BPD) and longer-term respiratory morbidities for decades5,6,7,8, some evidence suggests that noninvasive forms of respiratory support, such as CPAP, could also have unintended effects on the developing lung6,9,10,11,12. However, very little is known about the adverse effects of CPAP, largely because of the technical challenges associated with administering it non-invasively to neonatal animals.
Given the overall rising rate of pediatric asthma13, and increased survival rates of preterm infants beyond the NICU stay, understanding the mechanisms initiating adverse structural and functional changes of the immature tracheobronchial airways and how they contribute to life-long pulmonary disorders independently of supplemental O2 is an important unmet clinical and research need. Emerging evidence suggests neonatal CPAP may have long-term adverse effects on airway function and contribute to wheezing disorders, which is significant since CPAP has become the preferred respiratory support modality in efforts to avoid O2 toxicity from supplemental O2. The technical challenges associated with administering CPAP to small and age-appropriate neonatal animals have hindered progress in our understanding of CPAP effects (whether beneficial or detrimental) on lung development. We resolved this problem by developing the first neonatal mouse model of CPAP10,11,12,14,15 delivered daily (with varying levels of CPAP for 3 h/day) to awake, un-anesthetized mice from birth onwards, thus permitting study of clinically relevant levels of CPAP at a lung development stage comparable to very preterm (~24-28 week fetus) infants who are likely to receive CPAP16,17. We have performed MRI scans in the neonatal mouse model and have confirmed that CPAP results in lung inflation11 and that CPAP for the first postnatal week causes a long-term (3 weeks of age) increase in airway reactivity (i.e., 2 weeks post-CPAP)10,11,12,14, which aligns with wheezing in toddlers (3-4 years of age). Here, we provide a detailed demonstration of our custom-designed CPAP system for newborn mice and describe a convenient method of assessing airway contractility using the ex vivo precision lung slice method (PCLS).
The PCLS provides an excellent and convenient opportunity to investigate airway hyperreactivity mechanisms and their respective pathways. Using the PCLS method, individual airways are imaged in real-time to measure airway narrowing in response to a bronchoconstrictor such as methacholine after pretreating airways with specific receptor/channel inhibitors. These studies are important for understanding the pathophysiological consequences of CPAP in prematurity to provide targetable and actionable interventions that permit optimization of necessary clinical care while mitigating potential life-long consequences.