The protocol presented here outlines a robust method for the microinjection and live-cell imaging of mouse oocytes, enabling the visualization of chromosome dynamics during meiosis with high temporal and spatial resolution. Critical to the success of this approach is the meticulous handling of oocytes throughout each stage of the procedure, from collection and microinjection to imaging. Oocytes are highly sensitive to environmental fluctuations, and deviations in temperature, pH, or osmolarity can compromise their physiological integrity and developmental potential3,4,5,16,17. Therefore, maintaining optimal conditions-such as continuous incubation at 37 °C and the use of pre-warmed media and temperature-controlled microscope stages-is essential for preserving oocyte viability during extended manipulations and imaging sessions3,4.
A key strength of this protocol is its integration of fluorescent markers (H2B-RFP for chromosomes and SiR-tubulin for spindles) with time-lapse confocal microscopy, allowing simultaneous visualization of chromatin and microtubule structures in living oocytes. This dual-labeling approach facilitates detailed tracking of key meiotic events, including germinal vesicle breakdown, spindle assembly, chromosome alignment, and polar body extrusion. Highresolution imaging studies in mouse oocytes by Schuh and Ellenberg7 and Kitajima et al.18 have demonstrated similar strategies for minimizing phototoxicity while capturing spindle selforganization and kinetochore dynamics. Our imaging parameters -- such as low laser power and minimal exposure times -- were optimized to balance signal detection with phototoxicity reduction, ensuring that oocytes could proceed through meiosis without artificial arrest or damage.
While the data strongly support that this protocol maintains oocyte viability and meiotic integrity, we also note that it is important for individual users to validate oocyte survival and developmental competence according to their specific imaging systems, fluorescent constructs, and experimental goals. Variations in equipment configuration, imaging duration, or cRNA constructs may influence outcomes and should be assessed empirically.
The procedure also highlights the technical challenges inherent in microinjection of large mammalian oocytes. Successful delivery of cRNA into the cytoplasm without compromising the plasma membrane or meiotic competence requires precise micromanipulation and injection pressure control17. In our hands, post-injection survival rates ranged from 60%-80%, consistent with prior reports using similar techniques19,20. Variability in survival and expression efficiency underscores the need for operator experience and ongoing optimization, particularly when adapting the protocol to different mouse strains or molecular constructs20,21.
While the protocol is robust, several aspects can be modified to accommodate specific experimental goals or to resolve technical challenges. These modifications, however, may affect experimental outcomes and should be implemented with caution. For instance, the concentration of cRNA can be adjusted within a typical range of 0.1-1 µg/µL to balance expression efficiency with minimal cytotoxicity. In our hands, and with the given imaging system, 0.1-0.25 µg/µL typically yields strong fluorescence with minimal toxicity, whereas higher concentrations (up to 1 µg/µL9) may enhance signal intensity but increase the risk of overexpression artifacts or meiotic arrest. Labeling strategies may also be adapted. Alternatives such as transgenic reporter mice or fluorophore-conjugated antibodies can provide more physiological expression levels and reduce concerns of ectopic protein load, though they may offer less flexibility in experimental design and temporal resolution. Additionally, the choice of culture medium can be tailored to optimize oocyte health. Depending on the mouse strain and laboratory environment, supplementing media with antioxidants or culturing under lowoxygen conditions -- as demonstrated by Yamagata et al. in preimplantation embryos -- may improve oocyte viability during prolonged imaging sessions22.
Troubleshooting strategies for common problems
Low oocyte survival post-injection: This may result from excessive injection pressure, suboptimal needle shape/size, or cold media. Ensuring that needles are properly sculpted and polished, using minimal injection pressure, and pre-warming all media and tools are recommended practices.
Weak or inconsistent fluorescent signal: This can occur due to low-quality or degraded cRNA. Preparation of capped, polyadenylated cRNA, followed by gel verification, and storage at −80 °C in aliquots, helps maintain consistency.
Injection failure or cytoplasmic leakage: A visible cytoplasmic dispersal should be observed upon successful injection. Absence of such dispersal may suggest incorrect needle position (external to the oolemma) or a blocked needle. These issues may be resolved by adjusting micromanipulator positioning, flushing the needle, or checking the air pressure system.
Pellet not visible during DNA precipitation: This may indicate low DNA yield or inefficient precipitation. Repeat plasmid preparation using a high-quality E. coli culture system. To enhance DNA recovery, include glycogen as a co-precipitant and extend centrifugation time at high speed.
Potential loss of inhibitor efficacy due to oil overlay: This is an important consideration when using drug inhibitors under an oil overlay. As reported by Rémillard-Labrosse et al.23, drugs may leach into the oil, reducing their effective concentration within the culture media. We recommend users test the actual effective concentration of inhibitors under oil before conducting their formal experiments. Additionally, planning shorter-term experiments can help minimize potential loss of drug efficacy. After experiments performed under oil, it is also advisable to check the inhibitor's effect again to confirm that it remains active.
Overall, this protocol provides a valuable platform for studying the dynamic processes governing chromosome behavior and spindle assembly during mammalian oocyte meiosis. By enabling high-resolution, live-cell imaging in a physiologically supportive environment, it offers insights into the mechanisms of meiotic error and reproductive failure and lays the groundwork for future investigations into factors affecting oocyte quality and developmental competence.