Case Report

Rare Pathogen in Diabetic Foot Gangrene: A Case of Wohlfahrtiimonas chitiniclastica Infection

DOI:

10.3791/68877

September 23rd, 2025

 ,  ,  ,  ,  ,  ,  ,  ,  , 

Corresponding Authors: Jinhui Liang <pppiiiggg@163.com>

In This Article

Summary

Loading...
$$\rightleftharpoonup{xx}$$ $$\longleftharp{xx}$$, $$\longrightharp{xx}$$,

A 76-year-old diabetic male with chronic foot ulcers and gangrene, complicated by maggot infestation, was diagnosed with Wohlfahrtiimonas chitiniclastica through metagenomic sequencing. Debridement, ertapenem therapy, and wound reconstruction achieved recovery, underscoring the importance of early detection and advanced diagnostics for rare pathogens in immunocompromised patients.

Abstract

Loading...
$$\rightleftharpoonup{xx}$$ $$\longleftharp{xx}$$, $$\longrightharp{xx}$$,

Wohlfahrtiimonas chitiniclastica is a rare Gram-negative bacterium typically associated with wound infections, particularly in immunocompromised patients or individuals exposed to unsanitary conditions. Although clinical cases are infrequent, the infection can lead to severe complications such as bacteremia, septic shock, and even death if unrecognized or inadequately treated. We present the case of a 76-year-old diabetic male who developed chronic, non-healing foot ulcers complicated by gangrene and maggot infestation. Diagnostic challenges were addressed using metagenomic next-generation sequencing, which identified W. chitiniclastica alongside Proteus mirabilis and Corynebacterium striatum. Management included aggressive surgical debridement to remove necrotic tissue, local application of gentamicin-impregnated bone cement, systemic antibiotic therapy with ertapenem, and wound reconstruction using a dorsally based fascial flap. This combined approach resulted in significant clinical improvement, progressive wound healing, and marked reductions in infection markers. The case highlights the decisive role of advanced sequencing technologies in identifying rare pathogens within polymicrobial infections, where conventional methods such as MALDI-TOF mass spectrometry may fail. It also emphasizes the importance of integrating precision diagnostics with surgical intervention, targeted antimicrobial therapy, and rigorous postoperative care to achieve successful outcomes. By documenting this unusual presentation, we aim to expand clinical awareness of W. chitiniclastica infections and provide a practical framework for managing similarly complex diabetic foot infections.

Introduction

Loading...
$$\rightleftharpoonup{xx}$$ $$\longleftharp{xx}$$, $$\longrightharp{xx}$$,

Wohlfahrtiimonas chitiniclastica is a Gram-negative, non-motile rod capable of colonizing various hosts under both aerobic and anaerobic conditions, with significant chitinase activity that plays an important role in the metamorphosis of parasitic flies1,2. Female flies deposit eggs on mucosal surfaces and wounds, creating an infection nidus. The larvae feed on liquid bodily fluids, ingested food, or live and necrotic host tissues for a period of time3. Although infections are rare, the number of clinical reports is increasing, particularly in immunocompromised patients or those with exposure to unsanitary conditions. This trend is partly due to the broader use of genetic sequencing technologies, which has improved understanding of the pathogen's epidemiology4. Clinically, W. chitiniclastica can cause localized wound infections but may also progress to severe bacteremia, septic shock, and even death if left untreated5.

This case report describes a patient with a chronic, non-healing diabetic foot ulcer complicated by maggot infestation, ultimately diagnosed with W. chitiniclastica infection. The report illustrates the diagnostic challenges and the importance of early identification using metagenomic next-generation sequencing (mNGS). Furthermore, it emphasizes the integration of aggressive surgical debridement with carbapenem therapy to achieve limb salvage. By highlighting the synergy between advanced diagnostics and innovative reconstructive surgery, this case broadens the scenarios in which W. chitiniclastica should be suspected and provides a practical framework for managing similarly complex infections.

CASE PRESENTATION:

A 76-year-old man presented with ulcerations on his right foot that had persisted for three months and progressively led to blackening of the third and fifth toes. Approximately three months before admission, he developed a small ulcer on the plantar aspect of the right forefoot. Over subsequent weeks, the lesion gradually enlarged and produced purulent discharge. He initially sought care at a local hospital, where he received a 5 day course of empirical oral antibiotics (cefuroxime sodium, 1 tablet twice daily) but showed minimal improvement. Fifteen days before admission, the ulcer worsened, with progressive necrosis and maggot infestation.

The patient had a history of diabetes mellitus with poor glycemic control, reporting frequent missed doses and irregular blood glucose monitoring. His regular medications included oral metformin sustained-release tablets (one tablet, three times daily). He also had a history of pacemaker implantation. Socially, he lived in a rural environment with limited access to healthcare and suboptimal living conditions, which may have contributed to delayed wound management. He was a retired manual laborer with a history of chronic tobacco use (approximately 20 pack-years) and occasional alcohol consumption. Family history was negative for diabetes mellitus, peripheral vascular disease, or chronic infectious diseases.

Computed tomography angiography (CTA) of the lower extremities revealed arteriosclerosis in both legs. On admission, laboratory studies demonstrated leukocytosis (WBC 14.74 × 109/L) with neutrophilia (82.1%), elevated C-reactive protein (126 mg/L), and an increased erythrocyte sedimentation rate (72 mm/h), consistent with systemic infection. Glycosylated hemoglobin (HbA1c) was 9.2%. Physical examination revealed marked swelling of the right foot, blackening of the third and fifth toes, diminished dorsalis pedis and posterior tibial artery pulses compared with the contralateral side, loss of superficial sensation in the right lower limb, and absence of pain sensation.

Intraoperatively, gangrene was observed in the third to fifth toes, as well as in the dorsum and sole of the right foot, accompanied by purulent drainage and a foul odor. Active maggots were noted wriggling within the wound (Figure 1 and Figure 2). Necrotic phalanges, tendons, and bone were debrided, and osteomyelitic foci were removed. A dorsally based fascial flap was rotated to cover the exposed plantar bone defect. Irrigation and hemostasis were achieved. Antibiotic-impregnated bone cement, prepared by mixing 0.5 g of gentamicin per 40 g of cement, was applied to the residual bone ends after drilling.

Postoperatively, the patient was treated with intravenous ertapenem (1 g once daily) for 14 days, based on the pathogen profile and clinical response. Intraoperative smear revealed a small number of epithelial cells, numerous Gram-negative bacilli, and Gram-positive cocci and bacilli. Conventional culture identified Staphylococcus faecalis (Group D). Drug susceptibility testing showed sensitivity to vancomycin, penicillin G, levofloxacin, chloramphenicol, ciprofloxacin, and high-level gentamicin in combination, but resistance to high-level streptomycin, erythromycin, and tetracycline. Testing was performed using an automated microbial identification and drug susceptibility analysis system following CLSI M100-33 guidelines. Metagenomic sequencing of intraoperative specimens identified Proteus mirabilis, Wohlfahrtiimonas chitiniclastica, and Corynebacterium striatum (Figure 3). Following surgery and treatment, infection markers decreased significantly, and the wound demonstrated progressive healing.

Diagnosis, Assessment, and Plan:

The patient, a 76-year-old diabetic male with poorly controlled glycemia, presented with chronic right foot ulcers that progressed to gangrene and maggot infestation. Initial evaluation included physical examination, which revealed necrotic toes, purulent drainage, and maggot activity, along with laboratory findings of leukocytosis (WBC 14.74 × 109/L) and neutrophilia (82.1%), consistent with systemic infection. Computed tomography angiography (CTA) of the lower extremities confirmed arteriosclerosis, contributing to impaired perfusion. Intraoperative exploration demonstrated osteomyelitis and extensive necrotic tissue, prompting surgical debridement and microbiological sampling.

Wohlfahrtiimonas chitiniclastica is often isolated in the context of polymicrobial infections. In this case, metagenomic next-generation sequencing (mNGS) identified W. chitiniclastica, Proteus mirabilis, and Corynebacterium striatum. mNGS was chosen because it provides resolution in complex infections that are often undetectable by conventional methods such as MALDI-TOF MS. Differential diagnoses included common diabetic foot pathogens such as Pseudomonas and Staphylococcus species; however, maggot-associated exposure and sequencing confirmed the presence of the rare pathogen.

The treatment plan prioritized surgical debridement to reduce microbial burden, followed by intravenous ertapenem (1 g daily) for broad-spectrum Gram-negative coverage, including W. chitiniclastica, which is typically sensitive to carbapenems. Therapy was planned for 14 days, tailored to the pathogen profile and clinical response. The patient was counseled regarding common adverse effects of ertapenem, including gastrointestinal upset (nausea, diarrhea) and infusion-related reactions, and monitored closely throughout hospitalization. Criteria for adjusting therapy included worsening clinical signs (increasing wound erythema, swelling, or purulent drainage) or elevated infection markers, specifically WBC >15 × 109/L or C-reactive protein >150 mg/L. In such cases, repeat imaging with vascular ultrasound or MRI would be considered, along with antibiotic modification or escalation.

Post-treatment follow-up was structured to ensure continuity of care: wound inspections every 3-5 days during the inpatient period, a comprehensive wound and vascular assessment at 2 weeks post discharge, and monthly reviews for 3 months to monitor wound healing, vascular status, and glycemic control. Wound reconstruction with a dorsally based fascial flap was performed to address tissue loss and promote healing. The choice of ertapenem was supported by its stability against extended-spectrum beta-lactamases and activity against anaerobes, which was critical in the necrotic wound environment. Potential complications included antimicrobial resistance, surgical site infection, or flap failure, necessitating vigilant monitoring. This approach highlights the necessity of advanced diagnostics and multidisciplinary management in immunocompromised patients with rare and complex infections.

Protocol

Loading...
$$\rightleftharpoonup{xx}$$ $$\longleftharp{xx}$$, $$\longrightharp{xx}$$,

Written informed consent was obtained from the patient for the publication of clinical details and clinical images, per institutional guidelines. Patient identifiers were anonymized in all documentation.

1. Patient evaluation and initial assessment

  1. A comprehensive medical history was obtained, focusing on diabetes mellitus duration, glycemic control (HbA1c levels), history of peripheral vascular disease, and prior interventions (e.g., pacemaker implantation). Chronic foot ulcer progression and maggot infestation were documented.
  2. Physical examination assessed right foot swelling, necrotic tissue (third and fifth toes), sensory deficits, and visual confirmation of maggot activity. Wound morphology was photographed (Figure 1 and Figure 2).
  3. Laboratory tests included complete blood count (CBC), C-reactive protein (CRP), and erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR).
    1. For the CBC, (WBC, neutrophils), whole blood (3 mL) was collected into an EDTA tube, which was inverted gently 8-10x and analyzed within 4 h.
    2. For CRP testing, blood (2-3 mL) was collected in a serum separator tube, allowed to clot for 20-30 min, centrifuged at 1,500-2,000 × g for 10 min, and analyzed the same day.
    3. For ESR, whole blood (2 mL) was collected in a 3.2% sodium citrate tube, mixed gently, and analyzed using the Westergren method within 4 h.
      NOTE: Store/transport blood at 2-8 °C if delayed >1 h.
  4. Computed tomography angiography (CTA) of the lower extremities was performed on a slice scanner using the following parameters: helical acquisition from diaphragm to toes, collimation 0.6-0.625 mm, rotation time 0.33-0.5 s, pitch 0.8-1.2, tube voltage 100-120 kVp, current 150-300 mA.
    1. Iohexol contrast (350 mg I/mL, 1.0-1.5 mL/kg, total 80-120 mL) was injected via an 18-20 G antecubital IV at 4-5 mL/s, followed by a 30-40 mL saline flush. Bolus tracking was triggered at 150 HU.
    2. Images were reconstructed at 0.75-1.25 mm slice thickness; Postprocessing of the CT angiography dataset included multiplanar reconstruction (MPR), maximum intensity projection (MIP), and three-dimensional volume rendering (VR).
      1. MPR was performed to reformat the helical acquisition into axial, sagittal, coronal, and oblique planes with 0.75-1.25 mm slice thickness, enabling evaluation of anatomical structures from multiple orientations.
      2. MIP images were generated using slab projections (10-20 mm) to display voxels with the highest attenuation values along each line of sight, thereby enhancing vascular and calcified structures while suppressing surrounding soft tissue.
      3. For VR, the volumetric data were processed on a dedicated workstation with threshold-based segmentation and opacity assignment, producing color-coded 3D models of bone, soft tissue, and vessels that could be rotated and magnified to improve spatial understanding and surgical planning.
  5. Handling maggot-infested tissue:
    NOTE: Procedures followed biosafety level 2 (BSL-2). Personnel wore gowns, gloves, eye protection, and N95 masks.
    1. Maggots were removed with forceps under irrigation, placed in sealed containers, and immersed in 70-95% ethanol for disposal.
    2. Contaminated instruments were disinfected with 0.1% sodium hypochlorite for ≥10 min (0.5% for heavy contamination). Infectious waste was bagged in red biohazard bags and autoclaved at 121 °C for ≥15 min or incinerated. Sharps were discarded in puncture-resistant containers.

2. Diagnostic procedures

  1. Intraoperative necrotic tissue and purulent drainage were collected as specimens during surgical debridement.
  2. Samples were stained by Gram staining and cultured under both aerobic and anaerobic conditions.
  3. Metagenomic next-generation sequencing (mNGS) was performed on intraoperative tissue samples.
    1. Tissue biopsies (~0.5 × 0.5 × 0.5 mm) were homogenized in 100 µL of 1× PBS for 5-8 min and adjusted to 200 µL.
    2. DNA and RNA were extracted separately from the homogenized specimens.
      1. For DNA processing, host DNA was depleted by treatment with 1 U Benzonase and 0.5% Tween-20 at 37 °C for 5 min, followed by extraction using the referenced DNA Kit. DNA concentration was quantified using a dsDNA HS assay.
      2. All DNA and RNA libraries were checked using the DNA Kit and quantified with a fluorometer before sequencing.
    3. Libraries were checked and sequenced on a sequencing platform (e.g., SE-75, ~2 × 107 reads/sample). Reads < 50 bp, low-quality, or host DNA were removed.
    4. Microbial reads were aligned to an in-house database. Detection thresholds were as follows: SMRN-r ≥10 (if also in negative control), SMRN ≥3 (if absent in negative control), SMRN >1 for intracellular/hard-to-lyse bacteria; viruses required ≥3 non-overlapping genomic regions; turnaround ~16-19 h.
  4. Differential diagnoses included common diabetic foot pathogens such as Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Staphylococcus aureus. These organisms were excluded by mNGS and clinical correlation.

3. Surgical intervention

  1. Radical debridement was performed to excise necrotic soft tissue, osteomyelitic bone, and infected tendons. Maggots were manually removed from the wound.
  2. Wound reconstruction was achieved by rotating a dorsally based fascial flap to cover the exposed plantar bone defect. Hemostasis was achieved, and the wound was irrigated thoroughly with saline.
  3. Antibiotic-impregnated bone cement was prepared by incorporating 0.5 g of gentamicin into 40 g of cement and applied to the residual bone ends after drilling.

4. Antibiotic therapy

  1. Intravenous ertapenem (1 g once daily) was administered empirically for Gram-negative coverage, including Wohlfahrtiimonas chitiniclastica, which is typically sensitive to carbapenems.
  2. Antibiotic therapy was continued for 14 days and adjusted according to clinical response and infection markers such as WBC count and CRP levels.

5. Postoperative care

  1. Blood glucose levels were monitored regularly, and insulin doses were adjusted to maintain HbA1c below 7.5%.
  2. The wound was inspected daily for signs of infection, and CBC and inflammatory markers were monitored weekly.

Results

Loading...
$$\rightleftharpoonup{xx}$$ $$\longleftharp{xx}$$, $$\longrightharp{xx}$$,

The 76-year-old diabetic male with chronic right foot gangrene and maggot infestation (Figure 1 and Figure 2) underwent comprehensive management, including radical debridement of necrotic tissue, removal of osteomyelitic foci, and wound reconstruction using a dorsally based fascial flap. Metagenomic next-generation sequencing (mNGS) of intraoperative specimens identified Wohlfahrtiimonas chitiniclastica as the primary pathogen, with 97.96% genome coverage (Figure 3). Additional organisms detected included Proteus mirabilis and Corynebacterium striatum.

Postoperatively, the patient received intravenous ertapenem (1 g daily), which resulted in a significant decline in infection markers. The surgical site demonstrated progressive healing, with no evidence of flap failure or recurrent infection. Glycemic control was optimized, further contributing to recovery.

This case highlights the critical role of mNGS in detecting rare pathogens within polymicrobial infections and underscores the efficacy of combining surgical debridement, targeted antibiotic therapy, and reconstructive techniques in the management of complex diabetic foot infections.

Surgical site showing sutured wound and tissue analysis, potentially for medical study or procedure.
Figure 1: Maggot in the wound. Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.

Tissue dissection with tweezers on gauze for medical or biological research analysis.
Figure 2: Maggots in the severed toes. Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.

Genomic coverage chart for Wohlfahrtiimonas chitiniclastica; average depth vs. position data.
Figure 3: Sequence coverage plot of Wohlfahrtiimonas chitiniclastica. Genome coverage of Wohlfahrtiimonas chitiniclastica in diabetic foot gangrene infection. The figure shows the average sequencing depth (X-axis: genomic position in megabases, Y-axis: average depth) across the genome of Wohlfahrtiimonas chitiniclastica6. The sequencing coverage across the genome was 97.96%, with an average depth of approximately 10-20x across most regions. The variability in coverage suggests uneven sequencing depth, though most of the genome is well-covered. This data supports the presence of W. chitiniclastica in the clinical sample from a diabetic foot gangrene case, confirming the pathogen's significant involvement in the infection7. Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.

Discussion

Loading...
$$\rightleftharpoonup{xx}$$ $$\longleftharp{xx}$$, $$\longrightharp{xx}$$,

Wohlfahrtiimonas chitiniclastica is a rod-shaped, Gram-negative, nonfermenting bacterium that is oxidase- and catalase-positive. It was first discovered in the larvae of the parasitic fly Wohlfahrtia magnifica6. Female flies lay eggs on wounds and mucosal surfaces, generating an infection nidus. The larvae feed for a period of time on necrotic or viable host tissues, bodily fluids, or ingested food3. Several factors, including low socioeconomic status, advanced age, peripheral vascular disease, alcohol use, and chronic open wounds, increase susceptibility to infection7.

Conventional laboratory methods such as MALDI-TOF MS mass spectrometry and 16S rRNA sequencing can identify W. chitiniclastica from tissue or blood cultures8. In this case, however, the organism was identified by metagenomic next-generation sequencing (mNGS). Unlike 16S rDNA sequencing, which is limited to bacterial identification and cannot detect fungi, viruses, or parasites, mNGS allows the broad detection of a wide range of pathogens from clinical samples. MALDI-TOF MS is similarly constrained, as it cannot effectively distinguish mixed microbial cultures containing multiple bacterial species or fungi9. By contrast, mNGS directly analyzes DNA and RNA from tissue without the need for culture, enabling detection of rare, fastidious, or uncultivable pathogens. This was especially relevant here, since W. chitiniclastica is uncommon and often absent from MALDI-TOF MS reference databases, while in culture it may be overgrown by faster-growing species such as Proteus mirabilis. Thus, mNGS provided an unbiased survey of the wound microbiome and guided timely, species-level identification and targeted antimicrobial therapy10,11,12.

Several refinements during diagnosis and treatment improved outcomes. Host DNA depletion was extended by two minutes when initial mNGS runs yielded low microbial counts, increasing diagnostic yield. During debridement, continuous irrigation was used to prevent rupture of maggots and loss of identifiable material. In addition, drilling through biofilm-covered bone improved cement interdigitation and enhanced local antibiotic delivery. In similar cases, repeating mNGS on additional tissue samples and maintaining parallel conventional cultures are recommended to ensure accurate identification and preservation of phenotypic susceptibility data.

W. chitiniclastica infection is frequently polymicrobial, and patient outcomes vary. Although the organism is usually sensitive to β-lactam antibiotics, including carbapenems, penicillins, and cephalosporins4, mortality has been reported despite antimicrobial therapy. In chronic wounds, foreign bodies, surgical implants, or stomas often contribute to persistent infection, and their removal is essential for recovery13,14. Debridement remains a cornerstone of management, reducing the microbial burden and promoting wound healing15.

The combined use of mNGS, radical debridement, carbapenem therapy, and flap reconstruction in this case illustrates an approach defined by efficiency, automation, and usability. The automated bioinformatics pipeline of mNGS enabled rapid species-level identification without culture, facilitating early decision-making. The dorsally based fascial flap minimized donor site morbidity while achieving durable wound coverage. Local antibiotic delivery through gentamicin-loaded bone cement improved penetration into avascular bone and reduced systemic toxicity. These features collectively contributed to shorter hospitalization, faster wound healing, and ultimately limb salvage in a high-risk patient.

Nonetheless, limitations exist. mNGS is significantly more expensive than conventional culture or 16S rRNA sequencing, limiting accessibility in resource-constrained settings. Although the turnaround time of 16-19 h is faster than culture, it may not provide same-day results in acute septic presentations. Sensitivity and specificity can also be affected by sample quality, prior antibiotic exposure, and environmental DNA contamination. Interpreting mNGS results in polymicrobial infections remains challenging, as thresholds for pathogenic relevance are not standardized.

This case highlights the potential of incorporating mNGS into early diagnostic workflows for complex diabetic foot infections, particularly those involving atypical clinical features or environmental exposures. Future research should assess cost-effectiveness models for routine mNGS screening in high-risk populations, explore machine-learning algorithms for prioritizing pathogens in polymicrobial datasets, and investigate portable nanopore sequencing platforms to further reduce turnaround times. On the surgical front, innovations such as bioactive bone cements with pathogen-specific antimicrobials may enhance infection eradication in osteomyelitic wounds.

Disclosures

Loading...
$$\rightleftharpoonup{xx}$$ $$\longleftharp{xx}$$, $$\longrightharp{xx}$$,

The authors declare that there is no conflict of interest.

Materials

List of materials used in this article
NameCompanyCatalog NumberComments
Agilent 2100 HS DNA KitAgilent Technologies, Santa Clara, CA, USA5067-4626 (DNA 1000) / 5067-4627 (DNA HS)*Used for library quality control and fragment analysis
Agilent 2100 HS DNA, Qubit 3.0Agilent Technologies, Santa Clara, CA, USAG2939BAInstrument for library QC, paired with HS DNA Kit
bioMérieux VITEK 2 systembioMérieux, Marcy-l'Étoile, France414532Automated microbial identification and antimicrobial susceptibility testing
Illumina NextSeq 500  Illumina Inc., San Diego, CA, USAIllumina Inc.,SY-415-1001High-throughput sequencing platform
QIAamp UCP Pathogen DNA KitHigh-throughput sequencing platform50214Pathogen DNA extraction with host DNA depletion
Qubit 3.0 fluorometerThermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USAQ33216DNA and RNA quantification
Siemens SOMATOM Definition AS 64-slice Siemens Healthineers, Erlangen, GermanyN/AUsed for computed tomography angiography (CTA) imaging

References

Loading...
$$\rightleftharpoonup{xx}$$ $$\longleftharp{xx}$$, $$\longrightharp{xx}$$,
  1. Wohlfahrtiimonas chitiniclastica: A rare infection reported in an adult with liver cirrhosis. Clin Case Rep. 11 (2), e6972(2023).">Kozyk, M., Strubchevska, K., Fisher, J. Wohlfahrtiimonas chitiniclastica: A rare infection reported in an adult with liver cirrhosis. Clin Case Rep. 11 (2), e6972(2023).
  2. Comparative genomic analysis of the human pathogen Wohlfahrtiimonas chitiniclastica provides insight into the identification of antimicrobial resistance genotypes and potential virulence traits. Front Cell Infect Microbiol. 12, 912427(2022).">Kopf, A., et al. Comparative genomic analysis of the human pathogen Wohlfahrtiimonas chitiniclastica provides insight into the identification of antimicrobial resistance genotypes and potential virulence traits. Front Cell Infect Microbiol. 12, 912427(2022).
  3. Cutaneous myiasis: A review of the common types of myiasis. Int J Dermatol. 49 (10), 1092-1098 (2010).">Robbins, K., Khachemoune, A. Cutaneous myiasis: A review of the common types of myiasis. Int J Dermatol. 49 (10), 1092-1098 (2010).
  4. The zoonotic pathogen Wohlfahrtiimonas chitiniclastica- current findings from a clinical and genomic perspective. BMC Microbiol. 24 (1), 3(2024).">Kopf, A., Bunk, B., Riedel, T., Schrottner, P. The zoonotic pathogen Wohlfahrtiimonas chitiniclastica- current findings from a clinical and genomic perspective. BMC Microbiol. 24 (1), 3(2024).
  5. A rare case of Wohlfahrtiimonas chitiniclastica infection in California. JAAD Case Rep. 17, 55-57 (2021).">Leeolou, M. C., et al. A rare case of Wohlfahrtiimonas chitiniclastica infection in California. JAAD Case Rep. 17, 55-57 (2021).
  6. Wohlfahrtiimonas chitiniclastica gen. nov., sp. nov., a new gammaproteobacterium isolated from Wohlfahrtia magnifica (Diptera: Sarcophagidae). Int J Syst Evol Microbiol. 58 (Pt 4), 976-981 (2008).">Tóth, E. M., et al. Wohlfahrtiimonas chitiniclastica gen. nov., sp. nov., a new gammaproteobacterium isolated from Wohlfahrtia magnifica (Diptera: Sarcophagidae). Int J Syst Evol Microbiol. 58 (Pt 4), 976-981 (2008).
  7. First case of Wohlfahrtiimonas chitiniclastica isolation from a patient with a foot ulcer infection in Belgium. Acta Clin Belg. 78 (3), 245-247 (2023).">De Smet, D., Goegebuer, T., Ho, E., Vandenbroucke, M., Lemmens, A. First case of Wohlfahrtiimonas chitiniclastica isolation from a patient with a foot ulcer infection in Belgium. Acta Clin Belg. 78 (3), 245-247 (2023).
  8. Wohlfahrtiimonas chitiniclastica monomicrobial bacteremia in a homeless man. Emerg Infect Dis. 27 (12), 3195-3197 (2021).">Harfouch, O., Luethy, P. M., Noval, M., Baghdadi, J. D. Wohlfahrtiimonas chitiniclastica monomicrobial bacteremia in a homeless man. Emerg Infect Dis. 27 (12), 3195-3197 (2021).
  9. Maldi-tof MS: A reliable tool in the real life of the clinical microbiology laboratory. Microorganisms. 12 (2), 322(2024).">Calderaro, A., Chezzi, C. Maldi-tof MS: A reliable tool in the real life of the clinical microbiology laboratory. Microorganisms. 12 (2), 322(2024).
  10. Clinical metagenomics. Nat Rev Genet. 20 (6), 341-355 (2019).">Chiu, C. Y., Miller, S. A. Clinical metagenomics. Nat Rev Genet. 20 (6), 341-355 (2019).
  11. Sepsis and hepatapostema secondary to Chromobacterium violaceum infection on lower limb skin: A case report. Infect Drug Resist. 17, 1003-1010 (2024).">Li, K., et al. Sepsis and hepatapostema secondary to Chromobacterium violaceum infection on lower limb skin: A case report. Infect Drug Resist. 17, 1003-1010 (2024).
  12. Post-COVID reactivation of latent Bartonella henselae infection: A case report and literature review. BMC Infect Dis. 24 (1), 422(2024).">Dong, Y., et al. Post-COVID reactivation of latent Bartonella henselae infection: A case report and literature review. BMC Infect Dis. 24 (1), 422(2024).
  13. Granuloma cells in chronic inflammation express CD205 (DEC205) antigen and harbor proliferating T lymphocytes: Similarity to antigen-presenting cells. Pathol Int. 63 (2), 85-93 (2013).">Ohtani, H. Granuloma cells in chronic inflammation express CD205 (DEC205) antigen and harbor proliferating T lymphocytes: Similarity to antigen-presenting cells. Pathol Int. 63 (2), 85-93 (2013).
  14. An exceptional case of suture granuloma 30 years following an open repair of Achilles tendon rupture: A case report. J Orthop Case Rep. 7 (3), 50-53 (2017).">Ergin, N. Ö, Demirel, M., Özmen, E. An exceptional case of suture granuloma 30 years following an open repair of Achilles tendon rupture: A case report. J Orthop Case Rep. 7 (3), 50-53 (2017).
  15. Therapeutic strategies for chronic wound infection. Chin J Traumatol. 25 (1), 11-16 (2022).">Liu, Y. F., Ni, P. W., Huang, Y., Xie, T. Therapeutic strategies for chronic wound infection. Chin J Traumatol. 25 (1), 11-16 (2022).

Reprints and Permissions

Request permission to reuse the text or figures of this JoVE article

Request Permission

Tags

Wound InfectionMetagenomic SequencingSurgical DebridementAntibiotic TherapyPolymicrobial InfectionGentamicin Bone CementFascial Flap Reconstruction

Related Articles