A subscription to JoVE is required to view this content. Sign in or start your free trial.

Case Report

Diagnosis and Treatment of Chronic Skin Infection Caused by Scedosporium apiospermum

722 views

⸱

DOI:

10.3791/68901

⸱

November 11th, 2025

 ,  ,  ,  ,  ,  , 

* These authors contributed equally

In This Article

Summary

This case report presents a rare skin infection caused by Scedosporium apiospermum in an immunosuppressed patient that was successfully diagnosed using next-generation sequencing and treated with surgical debridement and voriconazole.

Abstract

This case report presents a 77-year-old male with purplish-red, blister-like lesions on the right forearm. A background of long-term corticosteroid therapy for pemphigus led to significant immunosuppression. Initial laboratory investigations, including bacterial and fungal cultures as well as histopathological analysis, yielded inconclusive results. To identify the causative pathogen, next-generation sequencing (NGS) was performed on tissue samples, which confirmed the presence of Scedosporium apiospermum, a rare opportunistic fungus. Based on this result, a targeted treatment strategy was implemented, involving multiple surgical debridements and systemic antifungal therapy with voriconazole. The therapeutic response was favorable, with complete resolution of the infection and no signs of recurrence during an 8-month follow-up period. This case highlights the clinical value of NGS in diagnosing rare and atypical infections, particularly in immunocompromised settings where conventional methods may fail. It also underscores the importance of a multidisciplinary treatment approach that integrates timely surgical intervention with appropriate antifungal therapy to achieve optimal patient outcomes.

Introduction

Skin and soft tissue infections (SSTIs) are among the most frequently encountered conditions in clinical practice, leading to repeated outpatient visits, prolonged hospitalizations, long-term disability, and even mortality. The incidence of SSTIs continues to rise annually, with severe cases often requiring a combination of aggressive surgical intervention and broad-spectrum antimicrobial therapy1.

Although dozens of pathogens may be involved in SSTIs, bacterial infections remain the most common. However, in recent years, the increasing prevalence of geriatric comorbidities and widespread use of immunosuppressive therapies have contributed to a notable rise in opportunistic fungal infections2. These infections are frequently challenging to diagnose and manage, particularly because their clinical manifestations often overlap with those of bacterial or viral etiologies. While some fungal pathogens exhibit distinctive features, most cutaneous infections present with non-specific symptoms, underscoring the need for early and accurate pathogen identification.

Traditional diagnostic techniques, including culture and histopathology, often lack sensitivity or require prolonged turnaround times. In contrast, NGS offers an unbiased and rapid method of pathogen detection. NGS can detect low-abundance organisms with a sequencing depth typically ranging from 106-107 reads per sample and can identify rare or unexpected pathogens, even when conventional methods fail3. Nevertheless, NGS also has limitations, including high cost, potential for detecting non-pathogenic colonizers, and the need for specialized data interpretation.

Here, this report presents a rare case of cutaneous infection caused by Scedosporium apiospermum (S. apiospermum), initially manifesting as non-specific purplish-red macules and ultimately diagnosed through NGS technology. A review of the diagnostic and therapeutic process provides insights into the clinical management of similar infections.

CASE PRESENTATION:
A 77-year-old male presented to our hospital with progressively enlarging skin lesions on his right hand for more than 20 days, which broke down for 10 days. The patient unintentionally noticed two black skin lesions of rice-size on the dorsal surface of the right forearm, located at the proximal and distal ends of the forearm about 5 cm from the wrist, without local erythema, swelling, pain, or ulceration. About 2 weeks ago, before the patient visited the hospital, the lesions gradually increased to the size of a bean, and a clear fluid appeared inside. About 10 days before the visit, the lesions broke down, with yellow watery fluid flowing out, turning into blood-like exudates, without local inflammation. The patient repeatedly went to the local hospital to receive symptomatic treatment, such as antiseptic dressing, lighting, vitamin supplementation, and cephalosporin anti-infection, but obtained no improvement. Conversely, the patient developed moderate pitting edema in both lower extremities, and subsequently, the right forearm became swollen. The precise operation of the hand was affected, and the skin temperature around the lesions increased. Eventually, the patient was referred to the hospital.

The patient, a farmer with long-term residence in rural areas, had a 1-year history of pemphigus and was receiving oral methylprednisolone at a dose of three tablets per day. Three months prior, disease recurrence occurred during dose tapering, leading to a 1-week hospitalization. Following discharge, oral methylprednisolone was resumed at ten tablets per day, with a tapering schedule of one tablet per week, reaching a dose of 5.5 tablets 4 days before presentation.

Physical examination revealed two large ruptured lesions on the right forearm, accompanied by localized erythema, swelling, elevated skin temperature, tissue necrosis, and clear fluid exudation, along with impaired fine motor function of the fingers (Figure 1). Pitting edema was observed in both lower extremities, while other findings were unremarkable. Laboratory tests indicated mildly elevated leukocyte levels at 10.8 × 109/L (normal: 4-10 × 109/L), with neutrophil predominance (78%), and a normal high-sensitivity C-reactive protein (hs-CRP) level of 3.5 mg/L (normal <10 mg/L). Exudate from the lesion was collected for bacterial culture, which indicated a small amount of Scedosporium apiospermum. However, due to the environmental ubiquity of this fungus4, the result was initially considered contamination, particularly as no bacteria were detected in a separate culture of exudate from the same lesion. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of the right forearm revealed diffuse high signal intensity on T2-weighted images, suggesting the presence of infection (Figure 2).

Then, empirical cephalosporin antibiotic treatment was given, and the hormone use was adjusted to methylprednisolone injection 20 mg per day, and a debridement procedure was performed. The specimen obtained during the surgery was cultured for bacteria and subjected to pathology. Out of three separate surgical tissue samples cultured, none yielded bacterial growth, and histopathology indicated granulomatous inflammation with central granulocytic microabscesses. After a dermatology consultation, further pathogen identification was recommended.

A second debridement procedure was performed, and tissue culture identified Pseudomonas aeruginosa. The antibiotic regimen was subsequently adjusted to etimicin (150 mg) in combination with cefminox (2 g twice daily) for anti-infective therapy. Following this intervention and further debridement, localized necrosis and infection of the wound gradually improved. Skin grafting was eventually performed successfully, and the patient was discharged with ongoing medication.

However, shortly after discharge, a pustular rash resembling the initial presentation reappeared on the right forearm, progressively enlarged, and ulcerated (Figure 3), necessitating a second hospitalization. Laboratory tests at readmission showed leukocytes at 11.0 × 109/L (77% neutrophils) and hs-CRP of 4.0 mg/L. MRI revealed progression of the infectious lesion compared to earlier imaging. To identify the causative pathogen, multiple diagnostic tests were conducted on surgically obtained tissue samples, including bacterial culture, tuberculosis testing, fungal culture, next-generation sequencing (NGS) (Table 1), and histopathological examination (Figure 4). The bacterial culture again identified Scedosporium apiospermum, while the fungal culture yielded negative results. Histopathology and immunohistochemistry indicated a suspected fungal infection. NGS confirmed a definitive S. apiospermum infection.

Based on these findings, consultation with the infectious disease department was undertaken, and combined therapy with voriconazole and surgical debridement was initiated. Drug levels were monitored regularly throughout the course of treatment. Following the seventh debridement, the patient was successfully discharged. At 8-month follow-up, no recurrence was observed, and the sensory and motor function of the right upper limb had fully recovered (Figure 5 and Figure 6).

Diagnosis, Assessment, and Plan:
The initial assessment included physical examination, laboratory tests, and imaging (MRI). Bacterial culture of exudate identified S. apiospermum, but the results were treated as contaminants. Repeated debridements and cultures yielded mixed or negative results. Histopathology was non-specific. Ultimately, NGS confirmed the diagnosis. The treatment plan included multiple debridements, adjusted antibiotics, and voriconazole. Regular monitoring of drug levels was conducted.

Access restricted. Please log in or start a trial to view this content.

Protocol

The surgical procedure was approved and conducted per the hospital's ethical committee guidelines.Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.

1. Initial evaluation and sample collection

  1. Perform a comprehensive inspection of the affected skin, focusing on signs of erythema, swelling, ulceration, necrosis, and purulent discharge.
    NOTE: Record baseline visual assessment (photos, dimensions) and document initial clinical signs (erythema, edema).
  2. Record a complete medical history, including the use of immunosuppressive agents (e.g., corticosteroids, chemotherapy, biologics), and document comorbidities such as diabetes, peripheral vascular disease, or recent trauma.
  3. Collect wound exudate using a sterile swab. Swab the base and margins of the ulcer by rotating the swab gently for at least 5 s. Immediately place the swab into Amies transport medium and store at 4 °C. Confirm sample quality visually (adequate exudate on swab); if inadequate, repeat sampling immediately.
    NOTE: Ensure transport to the microbiology lab within 2 h. If delayed, process within 24 h under refrigerated conditions.

2. Imaging and empirical treatment

  1. Perform MRI using T1-weighted, T2-weighted, and contrast-enhanced fat-suppressed sequences to evaluate soft tissue integrity and rule out osteomyelitis.
    NOTE: Absence of deep-tissue fluid collections, abscess formation, or osteomyelitis confirmed radiologically.
  2. Administer intravenous ceftriaxone at 2 g in 100 mL of normal saline over 30 min once daily as empirical antibiotic therapy.
    NOTE: Adjust antibiotics based on local antibiogram and culture results.
  3. Taper corticosteroids by 25-50% under the supervision of an attending physician. Monitor for signs of adrenal insufficiency and infection rebound.
    NOTE: Regular evaluation of clinical symptoms (fatigue, nausea, hypotension) and cortisol levels is required, if clinically indicated.

3. Surgical debridement procedures

  1. In the operating room under sterile conditions, excise visibly necrotic or infected tissue using a scalpel and bipolar electrocautery set at 30-40 W for soft tissue cutting. Visually confirm removal of all visibly necrotic tissue until healthy bleeding margins are achieved.
  2. Collect at least three tissue specimens from distinct regions (central ulcer base, ulcer margin, and deep tissue). Place each in sterile, labeled containers for microbiological and histopathological analysis.
    NOTE: Tissue samples must be visually confirmed to represent distinct tissue regions (healthy margin, necrotic center, deep subcutaneous).
  3. Schedule repeat debridements every 48-72 h based on the clinical appearance of the wound, presence of necrosis, granulation tissue formation, CRP levels (>10 mg/L), and leukocyte count (>10 × 109/L).
    NOTE: Observe and document progressive granulation tissue formation (>50% of wound bed), reduced edema, declining CRP (<10 mg/L), and leukocyte counts (<10 × 109/L).

4. Pathogen identification and NGS testing

  1. Stain tissue sections using Gram and Grocott's methenamine silver (GMS) stains. Incubate for 30 min at room temperature. Stain tissue sections using Gram stain (crystal violet, 0.5% w/v, followed by Gram's iodine, 1% w/v, and counterstain with safranin, 0.25% w/v) and Grocott's methenamine silver (GMS) stain according to standard protocols. Incubate the sections with the staining reagents for 30 min at room temperature.
  2. Extract total DNA using a commercial kit following the standard protocol: lyse tissue in 180 µL of tissue lysis buffer (ATL buffer) and 20 µL of Proteinase K, incubate at 56 °C for 1-3 h. Measure DNA concentration (>10 ng/µL) and purity (A260/A280 ratio between 1.7-2.0) spectrophotometrically.
  3. Perform next-generation sequencing (NGS) on an appropriate platform using validated microbial panels.
    1. Extract DNA from tissue samples using a DNA Mini Kit following the manufacturer's protocol. Quantify DNA using a dsDNA HS Assay Kit and normalize input to 1 ng/µL. Prepare sequencing libraries using a DNA Library Prep Kit.
    2. Load libraries on an Illumina MiSeq platform (2 × 150 bp paired-end mode) using a Reagent Kit. Select Generate FASTQ from the control software run setup screen, and set the cluster density target to 800-1,200 K/mm2.
    3. After sequencing, perform base calling and demultiplexing using bcl2fastq software with default parameters. Filter reads with Q30 > 85%.
    4. Import FASTQ files into a data analysis and visualization software. Use the Map Reads to Reference function with the following parameters:
      Reference: Scedosporium apiospermum genome
      Mismatch cost = 2, Insertion cost = 3, Deletion cost = 3
      Length fraction = 0.9, Similarity fraction = 0.95
      Enable Map paired reads and select Global alignment.
    5. Use Create Sequencing QC Report to check depth and uniformity of coverage. Confirm diagnosis only when >95% sequence identity is achieved with ≥10× read coverage across the mapped genome.
    6. Include a positive control (Candida albicans genomic DNA) and a negative control (blank extraction) in each sequencing run to exclude contamination or false positives.
      NOTE: Successful sequencing run with adequate coverage (>10×) and pathogen identification meeting diagnostic criteria.

5. Antifungal therapy

  1. Reconstitute voriconazole in 100 mL of 0.9% saline. Infuse 6 mg/kg intravenously over 1-2 h every 12 h for 2 doses, then 4 mg/kg every 12 h as maintenance.
  2. Collect blood 30 min prior to the 5th maintenance dose. Measure voriconazole trough concentration using LC-MS/MS standard protocols (Figure 7).
    NOTE: Adjust dose to maintain therapeutic trough levels of 1.0-5.5 µg/mL.
  3. Continue antifungal therapy for the duration of hospitalization. Monitor treatment efficacy via CRP, procalcitonin, radiological improvement, and clinical status (e.g., fever, edema resolution).
    NOTE: Achieve radiological improvement (MRI: reduction in inflammatory edema), normalization of CRP/procalcitonin (<0.5 ng/mL), and clinical resolution of fever and local infection symptoms.

6. Recovery and follow-up

  1. Proceed with split-thickness skin grafting (0.015-0.020 inch) using an air dermatome once the wound bed is sterile and granulation tissue is visibly healthy.
    NOTE: Wound bed confirmed sterile (negative repeat culture), granulation tissue covers >90% of wound area, and no visible infection signs prior to grafting.
  2. Schedule outpatient follow-up at 1, 2, and 4 weeks post-discharge, then monthly for 6 months. Assess for recurrence, healing progression, pain (using VAS), and functional outcomes (e.g., joint mobility).
    NOTE: Document wound size reduction (weekly), complete re-epithelialization within the expected timeline (<8 weeks), improved functional status (joint mobility ≥ 80% baseline), and pain reduction (VAS ≤ 3).
  3. Record all clinical parameters, including wound size reduction, infection markers, MRI findings, and treatment duration. Store anonymized patient data in a secure case report form for analysis and publication.
    NOTE:Final outcomes recorded and reviewed monthly, confirming maintained wound closure, absence of infection recurrence at 6-month follow-up, and documented patient satisfaction and functional restoration.

Access restricted. Please log in or start a trial to view this content.

Results

A 77-year-old male with a history of pemphigus under long-term methylprednisolone therapy presented with progressive skin lesions on his right forearm. Initial evaluation, including physical examination (Figure 1) and MRI (Figure 2), revealed two ulcerated lesions with surrounding tissue edema and suspected deep soft tissue infection. Routine exudate culture detected Scedosporium apiospermum, but this was initially regarded as environmental contaminatio...

Access restricted. Please log in or start a trial to view this content.

Discussion

Skin is frequently exposed to pathogens, including bacteria, fungi, viruses, rickettsia, and parasites, with Staphylococcus aureus and β-haemolytic streptococci remaining the predominant causes of infection5. In recent decades, fungal skin infections have increased significantly, with mortality rates exceeding 50% among susceptible populations6. Scedosporium apiospermum, in particular, is recognized as a significant human fungal pathogen

Access restricted. Please log in or start a trial to view this content.

Disclosures

The authors have nothing to disclose.

Acknowledgements

The study was funded by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (grant number 81702135), Zhejiang Provincial Natural Science Foundation (grant numbers LY20H060007, LS21H060001), and the Zhejiang Traditional Chinese Medicine Research Program (grant number 2017ZB057). The funding bodies had no role in the design of the study, in the collection, analysis, and interpretation of data, or in drafting the manuscript.

Access restricted. Please log in or start a trial to view this content.

Materials

List of materials used in this article
NameCompanyCatalog NumberComments
Bipolar electrocauteryBAISHENG20173251560
CeftriaxoneRocheH10983036
CLC Genomics Workbench Qiagenv23.0Data analysis and visualizaion software
CorticosteroidsPfizerHj20170197
DNeasy Blood & Tissue KitQiagenhttps://www.qiagen.com/us/products/discovery
-and-translational-research/dna
-rna-purification/dna-purification
/genomic-dna/dneasy-blood-and
-tissue-kit
Labeled containers3LN/A
MiSeq Illuminahttps://www.illumina.com/systems/
sequencing-platforms/miseq.html
NGS
MiSeq Control Software Illuminahttps://www.illumina.com/systems/
sequencing-platforms/miseq.html
MiSeq Reagent Kit v3Illuminahttps://www.illumina.com/products/
by-type/sequencing-kits/cluster-gen
-sequencing-reagents/miseq-
reagent-kit-v3.html
MRI SIEMENS3146466
Nextera XT DNA Library Prep KitIllumina https://www.illumina.com/products
/by-type/sequencing-kits/library-
prep-kits/nextera-xt-dna.html
DNA Library Prep Kit
QIAamp DNA Mini Kit Qiagen 51304DNA extraction kit
Qubit dsDNA HS Assay Kit Thermo Fisher Scientifichttps://www.thermofisher.com/in/en
/home/industrial/spectroscopy-
elemental-isotope-analysis/
molecular-spectroscopy/fluorometers
/qubit/qubit-assays.html?ef_id=:
G:s&s_kwcid=AL!3652!10!775157
26968096!!!!77515743318006!!3
80468453!1240249321530142&
cid=bid_pca_aqb_r01_co_cp1359_pj
t0000_bid00000_0se_bng_bt_pur_con
Scalpel JZ20140019
Sterile swabMeidike GeneMWS001
VoriconazolePfizerH20150168

References

  1. Duane, T. M., et al. Surgical infection society 2020 updated guidelines on the management of complicated skin and soft tissue infections. Surg Infect. 22 (4), 383-399 (2021).
  2. Ma, Y., Wang, X., Li, R. Cutaneous and subcutaneous fungal infections: recent developments on host-fungus interactions. Curr Opin Microbiol. 62 (1), 93-102 (2021).
  3. Stevens, D. L., et al. Practice guidelines for the diagnosis and management of skin and soft-tissue infections. Clin Infect Dis. 41 (10), 1373-1406 (2005).
  4. Tóth, E. J., et al. Recurrent Scedosporium apiospermum mycetoma successfully treated by surgical excision and terbinafine treatment: a case report and review of the literature. Ann Clin Microbiol Antimicrob. 16 (1), 31(2017).
  5. Dryden, M. S. Skin and soft tissue infection: microbiology and epidemiology. Int J Antimicrob Agents. 34 (Suppl 1), S2-S7 (2009).
  6. Brown, G. D., et al. Hidden killers: human fungal infections. Sci Transl Med. 4, (2012).
  7. Seidel, D., et al. Prognostic factors in 264 adults with invasive Scedosporium spp. and Lomentospora prolificans infection reported in the literature and FungiScope®. Crit Rev Microbiol. 45 (1), 1-21 (2019).
  8. Guarro, J., et al. Scedosporium apiospermum: changing clinical spectrum of a therapy-refractory opportunist. Med Mycol. 44 (4), 295-327 (2006).
  9. Cortez, K. J., et al. Infections caused by Scedosporium spp. Clin Microbiol Rev. 21 (1), 157-197 (2008).
  10. Lackner, M., et al. Species-specific antifungal susceptibility patterns of Scedosporium and Pseudallescheria species. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 56 (5), 2635-2642 (2012).
  11. Kaltseis, J., Rainer, J., de Hoog, G. S. Ecology of Pseudallescheria and Scedosporium species in human-dominated and natural environments and their distribution in clinical samples. Med Mycol. 47 (4), 398-405 (2009).
  12. Ramirez-Garcia, A., et al. Scedosporium and Lomentospora: an updated overview of underrated opportunists. Med Mycol. 56 (suppl_1), S102-S125 (2018).
  13. Romão, D., et al. Children and sand play: screening of potential harmful microorganisms in sandboxes, parks, and beaches. Curr Fungal Infect Rep. 9 (3), 155-163 (2015).
  14. Heath, C. H., et al. Population-based surveillance for scedosporiosis in Australia: epidemiology, disease manifestations and emergence of Scedosporium aurantiacum infection. Clin Microbiol Infect. 15 (7), 689-693 (2009).
  15. Husain, S., et al. Infections due to Scedosporium apiospermum and Scedosporium prolificans in transplant recipients: clinical characteristics and impact of antifungal agent therapy on outcome. Clin Infect Dis. 40 (1), 89-99 (2005).
  16. Delhaes, L., et al. Molecular typing of Australian Scedosporium isolates showing genetic variability and numerous S. aurantiacum. Emerg Infect Dis. 14 (2), 282-290 (2008).
  17. Tammer, I., et al. Infections due to Pseudallescheria/Scedosporium species in patients with advanced HIV disease: a diagnostic and therapeutic challenge. Int J Infect Dis. 15 (6), 422-429 (2011).
  18. Jabado, N., et al. Invasive pulmonary infection due to Scedosporium apiospermum in two children with chronic granulomatous disease. Clin Infect Dis. 27 (6), 1437-1441 (1998).
  19. Castiglioni, B., et al. Pseudallescheria boydii (Anamorph Scedosporium apiospermum) infection in solid organ transplant recipients in a tertiary medical center and review of the literature. Medicine (Baltimore). 81 (5), 333-348 (2002).
  20. Morio, F., et al. Disseminated Scedosporium/Pseudallescheria infection after double-lung transplantation in patients with cystic fibrosis. J Clin Microbiol. 48 (5), 1978-1982 (2010).
  21. Ong, A., et al. Fatal mycotic aneurysms due to Scedosporium and Pseudallescheria infection. J Clin Microbiol. 49 (5), 2067-2071 (2011).
  22. Moffarah, A. S., Al Mohajer, M., Hurwitz, B. L., Armstrong, D. G. Skin and soft tissue infections. Microbiol Spectr. 4, (2016).
  23. Raza, A. Microbial infections of skin and nails. Medical Microbiology. 98, (1996).
  24. Canet, J. J., et al. Lymphocutaneous syndrome due to Scedosporium apiospermum. Clin Microbiol Infect. 7 (11), 648-650 (2001).
  25. Schaenman, J. M., et al. Scedosporium apiospermum soft tissue infection successfully treated with voriconazole: potential pitfalls in the transition from intravenous to oral therapy. J Clin Microbiol. 43 (2), 973-977 (2005).
  26. Thornton, C. R. Tracking the emerging human pathogen Pseudallescheria boydii by using highly specific monoclonal antibodies. Clin Vaccine Immunol. 16 (5), 756-764 (2009).
  27. Kimura, M., et al. Unique histological characteristics of Scedosporium that could aid in its identification: case report. Pathol Int. 60 (2), 131-136 (2010).
  28. Rainer, J., et al. Efficacy of a selective isolation procedure for members of the Pseudallescheria boydii complex. Antonie Van Leeuwenhoek. 93 (3), 315-322 (2008).
  29. Horré, R., et al. Selective isolation of Pseudallescheria and Scedosporium species from respiratory tract specimens of cystic fibrosis patients. Respiration. 77 (3), 320-324 (2009).
  30. Sedlacek, L., et al. Prevalence of Scedosporium species and Lomentospora prolificans in patients with cystic fibrosis in a multicenter trial by use of a selective medium. J Cyst Fibros. 14 (2), 237-241 (2015).
  31. Lagier, J. C., et al. The rebirth of culture in microbiology through the example of culturomics to study human gut microbiota. Clin Microbiol Rev. 28 (1), 237-264 (2015).
  32. Brook, I. Clinical review: bacteremia caused by anaerobic bacteria in children. Crit Care. 6 (3), 205-211 (2002).
  33. Yang, S., Rothman, R. E. PCR-based diagnostics for infectious diseases: uses, limitations, and future applications in acute-care settings. Lancet Infect Dis. 4 (6), 337-348 (2020).
  34. Goodwin, S., McPherson, J. D., McCombie, W. R. Coming of age: ten years of next-generation sequencing technologies. Nat Rev Genet. 17 (6), 333-351 (2016).
  35. West, C. E., et al. Gut microbiome and innate immune response patterns in IgE-associated eczema. Clin Exp Allergy. 45 (9), 1419-1429 (2015).
  36. Foster, J. A., McVey Neufeld, K. A. Gut-brain axis: how the microbiome influences anxiety and depression. Trends Neurosci. 36 (5), 305-312 (2013).
  37. Fujimoto, T., et al. Decreased abundance of Faecalibacterium prausnitzii in the gut microbiota of Crohn's disease. J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 28 (4), 613-619 (2013).
  38. Komaroff, A. L. The microbiome and risk for obesity and diabetes. JAMA. 317 (4), 355-356 (2017).
  39. Salipante, S. J., et al. Rapid 16S rRNA next-generation sequencing of polymicrobial clinical samples for diagnosis of complex bacterial infections. PLoS One. 8 (5), (2013).
  40. Cummings, L. A., et al. Clinical next generation sequencing outperforms standard microbiological culture for characterizing polymicrobial samples. Clin Chem. 62 (11), 1465-1473 (2016).
  41. Boers, S. A., Jansen, R., Hays, J. P. Understanding and overcoming the pitfalls and biases of next-generation sequencing (NGS) methods for use in the routine clinical microbiological diagnostic laboratory. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis. 38 (6), 1059-1070 (2019).
  42. Boers, S. A., et al. Development and evaluation of a culture-free microbiota profiling platform (MYcrobiota) for clinical diagnostics. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis. 37 (6), 1081-1089 (2018).
  43. Pasquaroli, S., et al. Antibiotic pressure can induce the viable but non-culturable state in Staphylococcus aureus growing in biofilms. J Antimicrob Chemother. 68 (8), 1812-1817 (2013).
  44. Wylie, K. M., et al. Sequence analysis of the human virome in febrile and afebrile children. PLoS One. 7 (6), (2012).
  45. Lecuit, M., Eloit, M. The diagnosis of infectious diseases by whole genome next generation sequencing: a new era is opening. Front Cell Infect Microbiol. 5, 1-3 (2014).
  46. Tortorano, A. M., et al. ESCMID and ECMM joint guidelines on diagnosis and management of hyalohyphomycosis: Fusarium spp., Scedosporium spp. and others for Integrated Oncology CIO KölnBonn, Cologne Excellence Cluster on Cellular Stress Responses in Aging-Associated Diseases (CECA). Clin Microbiol Infect. 20, 27-46 (2014).
  47. Osherov, N., Kontoyiannis, D. P. The anti-Aspergillus drug pipeline: Is the glass half full or empty. Med Mycol. 55 (1), 118-124 (2017).
  48. Perfect, J. R. The antifungal pipeline: A reality check. Nat Rev Drug Discov. 16 (9), 603-616 (2017).
  49. Howden, B. P., Slavin, M. A., Schwarer, A. P., Mijch, A. M. Successful control of disseminated Scedosporium prolificans infection with a combination of voriconazole and terbinafine. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect. Dis. 22 (2), 111-113 (2003).
  50. Troke, P., et al. Treatment of scedosporiosis with voriconazole: Clinical experience with 107 patients. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 52 (5), 1743-1750 (2008).
  51. Buzina, W., et al. Lethal brain abscess due to the fungus Scedosporium apiospermum (teleomorph Pseudallescheria boydii) after a near-drowning incident: Case report and review of the literature. Med Mycol. 44 (5), 473-477 (2006).
  52. Yustes, C., Guarro, J. In vitro synergistic interaction between amphotericin B and micafungin against Scedosporium spp. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 49 (8), 3498-3500 (2005).
  53. Steinbach, W. J., Schell, W. A., Miller, J. L., Perfect, J. R. Scedosporium prolificans osteomyelitis in an immunocompetent child treated with voriconazole and caspofungin, as well as locally applied polyhexamethylene biguanide. J Clin Microbiol. 41 (8), 3981-3985 (2003).

Access restricted. Please log in or start a trial to view this content.

Reprints and Permissions

Explore More Articles

Opportunistic Fungal InfectionNext-Generation SequencingImmunosuppressed PatientAntifungal TherapySurgical DebridementVoriconazole TreatmentMultidisciplinary ApproachHistopathological Analysis

This article has been published

Video Coming Soon