Arterial stiffness is a key marker of vascular ageing, reflecting the cumulative impact of mechanical and biological insults associated with ageing and various cardiovascular risk factors on the arterial wall1,2. Pathobiologically, these changes involve elastin degradation, collagen deposition and cross-linking, smooth muscle stiffening, and alterations in the extracellular matrix of the arterial wall, making it stiffer and less compliant, thereby compromising the Windkessel functions of large elastic arteries1,2.
Physiological consequences of the large artery stiffening (LAS) are multi-faceted. An increase in the characteristic impedance of the aorta and the systolic afterload acting on the left ventricle disturbs normal ventricular-arterial interactions and promotes myocardial dysfunction, myocardial fibrosis, and left ventricular hypertrophy1,2. Additionally, the loss of the mechanical buffering attributed to the Winkessel function amplifies pressure and flow pulsatility in the microvasculature of various target organs, including the brain and kidney, leading to microvascular and parenchymal dysfunction in these vital organs1,2. These pathophysiological constructs of LAS and its consequences are replicated epidemiologically by large population-based studies that have irrefutably revealed the significance of arterial stiffness as an independent predictor of cardiovascular morbidity and mortality beyond conventional cardiovascular risk factors3,4,5,6. Accumulating evidence in this respect has paved the way for the inclusion of arterial stiffness assessment in clinical practice guidelines, if a risk-based BP-lowering treatment decision remains uncertain for individuals with elevated BP7. These developments underscore the importance of access to valid and reliable tools for the non-invasive measurement of arterial stiffness in humans, particularly for vascular health assessment and risk stratification.
Conventional approaches to quantifying arterial stiffness are two-pronged2,8: (1) record the pulsatile changes in arterial diameter and pressure at a specific location in the arterial tree to calculate arterial distensibility or other indices as a 'local' measure of arterial stiffness, (2) measure the velocity of propagation of the arterial pulse between two points in the arterial tree to determine the pulse wave velocity (PWV) as a regional measure of arterial stiffness. Theoretically, PWV is inversely related to the square root of distensibility, as established by the Bramwell-Hill equation, which demonstrates the physiological concurrence between the two broader measures of arterial stiffness8. Quantifying PWV of large central arteries involves the use of dedicated sensors, including tonometers, to non-invasively record the arterial pulse waveforms from two accessible locations in the arterial tree. Carotid-Femoral PWV, the gold standard measure of large artery stiffness, is calculated using sequentially or simultaneously captured arterial pulse waveforms from the common carotid and femoral arteries2,8.
Quantifying local measures of arterial stiffness often involves the use of imaging modalities, including ultrasound or MRI, and requires exhaustive post-processing of the image sequences to extract diameter and area data for the calculation of stiffness indices8,9. Measures of local arterial stiffness, when captured from the barosensitive locations of the arterial tree, can also provide vital physiological insights into the mechanical gain of the baroreceptor reflex arc, a pathway crucial for short-term cardiovascular homeostasis, which is often deranged in neurological and metabolic disorders10,11. In addition to stiffness indices, ultrasound-based Doppler and vector flow imaging techniques provide quantitative measures of blood flow velocity, flow rate, and wall shear stress, which help characterise local hemodynamic environments relevant to atherosclerosis and vascular remodelling12,13. Similarly, phase-contrast and 4D flow MRI yield volumetric blood flow, pressure gradients, wall shear stress, turbulent flow patterns, vorticity, and aortic pulse wave velocity, offering a comprehensive, non-invasive characterisation of hemodynamics that complements arterial wall stiffness measurements14,15. Recently, cuffless blood pressure (BP) technologies based on photoplethysmography (PPG) have been developed to estimate local or regional BP and pulse wave velocity from peripheral pulse waveforms16,17. These systems typically derive BP from PPG-based pulse transit time or pulse wave analysis, sometimes in combination with ECG or multi-site PPG, and can track beat-to-beat changes in local arterial stiffness and hemodynamics in a wearable or smartphone-based form factor16,17,18.
We present here a validated, image-free ultrasound-based technique for simultaneously assessing both local and regional arterial stiffness in humans9,19,20. The method employs a single-element piezoelectric ultrasound probe to insonate the common carotid artery, capturing real-time echo signals from the arterial walls to generate the carotid artery distension waveform. Local arterial stiffness is quantified using the distension data in conjunction with arterial blood pressure. To evaluate regional arterial stiffness, an oscillometric cuff is applied to the thigh to capture the femoral pulse waveform non-invasively. Carotid-femoral pulse wave velocity (cf-PWV) is then calculated by measuring the pulse arrival delay between the femoral and carotid sites, along with surface-measured arterial path lengths.