$$\rightleftharpoonup{xx}$$
$$\longleftharp{xx}$$,
$$\longrightharp{xx}$$,
Many wood-boring insects complete most of their life cycle inside trees, where they feed and often act as vectors of plant pathogens, posing serious risks to agriculture and forest ecosystems1,2. Among the most damaging groups are invasive beetles in the families Buprestidae, Cerambycidae, Bostrichidae, and Curculionidae, which have been linked to extensive tree mortality and economic losses worldwide3. Florida hosts over 35 ambrosia beetle species (Coleoptera: Curculionidae), with at least 15 known to infest avocado trees4,5. Common species in orchards include Xyleborinus saxesenii Ratzeburg, Xyleborus affinis (Eichhoff), X. bispinatus Eichhoff, X. ferrugineus (Fabricius), X. volvulus (Fabricius), X. gracilis (Eichhoff), and Xylosandrus crassiusculus (Motschulsky), often co-occurring in the same tree4,6. These beetles are damaging primarily because they vector symbiotic fungi, some of which are pathogenic to plants7. The most serious pathogen is Harringtonia lauricola, the causal agent of laurel wilt, introduced to the U.S. with its primary vector, Xyleborus glabratus Eichhoff, around 20028,9. Laurel wilt has devastated Florida's avocado industry and native Lauraceae, killing over half a billion trees10,11. Moreover, H. lauricola now occurs in association with multiple ambrosia beetle species, which function as alternative vectors in avocado systems where X. glabratus is rare4,12.
Mites (Acari) are highly diverse arthropods occupying a wide range of ecological niches. Among them, several groups are increasingly recognized for their potential as biological control agents due to their predatory behavior, high reproductive rates, and ability to thrive in various environments, including soil, plant surfaces, and stored products. Their ability to suppress pest outbreaks in greenhouses, nurseries, and agricultural fields underscores their importance in integrated pest management (IPM) programs13,14. For example, the family Phytoseiidae includes several species of considerable importance in biological control, notably Neoseiulus californicus Berlese and Phytoseiulus persimilis Athias-Henriot, which are extensively utilized for the suppression of spider mites (Acari: Tetranychidae) and thrips in greenhouse and field crops15. Likewise, the laelapid mite Stratiolaelaps scimitus is a biological control agent targeting soil-dwelling pests such as fungus gnat larvae and thrips pupae and is broadly incorporated into integrated pest management programs16. Phoretic mites represent a promising group in this context. These mites rely on temporary associations with their hosts for dispersal and are frequently found within the galleries or brood chambers of wood-boring insects such as bark and ambrosia beetles17,18,19.
The diversity of phoretic mites extends to both morphology and ecology. Some exhibit fungivorous and detritivorous feeding behavior, while others are predatory. Considering their closeness to their hosts, phoretic mites have the potential to suppress insect populations directly by predating on eggs and larvae, by physically impairing them, or indirectly, by disrupting symbiotic associations of wood-boring insects20,21,22,23.
Despite the growing interest in mites and their potential biological control agents, the development of rearing protocols for them remains limited. Some studies have reported methods for culturing free-living predatory mites (Acari: Mesostigmata)24,25; however, the descriptions often lack instructions for the initial establishment of mite colonies, posing a challenge for new acarologists. Currently, no established protocols are available for maintaining long-term laboratory colonies or rearing phoretic mites for experimental use. The protocol presented in this study addresses this gap by offering a practical, scalable, and reproducible method for rearing both predatory (i.e., Mesostigmata) and fungivore/detritivore (i.e., Astigmata) mites. Although the protocol is described in the context of phoretic mites, it is broadly applicable to other mites and can be readily adapted to suit diverse research objectives. For instance, Astigmata mites reared using this method can serve as factitious prey for predatory mites26,27.
This study aimed to develop and evaluate a standardized rearing protocol for phoretic mites, under the hypothesis that a broadly applicable substrate and diet combination can support sustained survival and reproduction across diverse mite taxa (Mesostigmata and Astigmata).