With advances in surgical techniques, immunosuppressive drugs, and intensive care medicine, organ transplantation has been established as a standard therapy for end-stage organ diseases. Liver transplantation (LT) is currently the only curative treatment for end-stage liver disease and certain hepatic malignancies. Translational research using animal models is essential to address clinical issues in LT. As various genetically modified animals are available in mouse models, mouse orthotopic LT is an important tool to explore mechanistic insights into liver regeneration, ischemia-reperfusion injury, and immune responses following LT1. However, as the technical challenges in this procedure restrict its feasibility, research groups working on this model are limited2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10.
Mouse orthotopic LT was first described by Qian et al. in 19912. The surgical procedure, developed by applying orthotopic LT techniques in the rats, comprises three steps: donor surgery, back-table preparation of the liver graft, and recipient operation6. The technically challenging parts of mouse LT are biliary and vascular reconstruction in recipients, including the suprahepatic inferior vena cava (SHIVC), portal vein (PV), and infrahepatic inferior vena cava (IHIVC). In addition to the surgical techniques, the anhepatic phase from clamping to releasing the PV flow should be within 20 min for successful mouse orthotopic LT 2,6,11. Furthermore, in our experience, the total reperfusion time from PV clamping to IHIVC release should be within 30 min to achieve long-term survival in mouse LT. This is consistent with the previous report for rat LT describing the preferable time of unstable systemic hemodynamic state as within approximately 30 min12. Thus, technical difficulties and time limitations in mouse LT make this procedure more challenging.
Although the cuff technique can be used for PV reconstruction, a suture technique is required to reconstruct the SHIVC during the anhepatic phase. Therefore, a safe and rapid suture technique is essential for SHIVC anastomosis. While both cuff and suture techniques are applicable for IHIVC reconstruction, most previous studies have employed a cuff technique5,6,7,11,13. However, the use of a cuff technique in IHIVC reconstruction leads to a longer operation time in donor and back-table operations. In addition, inserting a cuff may be harder than suturing for beginners because of the short margin of recipient inferior vena cava (IVC)13.
We herein provide guidelines for successful SHIVC and IHIVC reconstruction using a suture technique in mouse orthotopic LT.